Truly, why do so many people care about these inaccuracies? It's like, in this modern age, we have this profound obsession with fidelity to the author/source text. And this simply does not reflect how artists have engaged with Homer throughout history in the European literary tradition.
Historically, when poets, playwright and painters engaged with the Homeric epics they *always* reworked them, and yes, this meant introducing all kinds of changes that would be considered inaccuracies by modern "fidelity-to-the-text" standards. The classical Attic tragedians presented the characters of the Homeric epics in ways quite different to their characterisation in the epics themselves. Here, too, they sometimes changed the plotlines of the Epic Cycle (e.g. In Euripides' Helen, she never reaches Troy but instead stays in Egypt, where a remarkaby un-Homeric Menelaus eventually reunites with her.)
Then, there's a visual retelling of the Circe episode painted on a drinking cup (c. 400BCE) that shows us a very unflattering Odysseus, pot-bellied with a puffy face and dangling dong. Certainly not the slick Odysseus i remember from Homer's work, where he coolly defies Circe's spells and beds her like he's bloody James Bond.
Then, of course, Vergil's Aeneid which insists on retelling the Trojan Horse episode by inventing a whole new character, Sinon. Shocking disloyalty to the text... I'd boycott Vergil if I were alive then. Definitely not going to see him perform 😠
Oh, then the Ilias Latina, which compresses 15,693 lines of Homer's Iliad into 1070 lines of Latin poetry. Oh boy, imagine how much of the Iliad this retelling ignores. I'm def not reading that.
And then, in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, you have gorgeous (but, oh, utterly inaccurate!) illustrations of the Trojan War that show knights in shining armour and the city of Troy looking like a full-blown Frankish castle. Hmm, seemingly changing the Homeric characters' culture and armoury, and, dare i say, maybe their race... Where have I seen that before? 🤔🤔🤔
Folks, the Homeric tradition is beautiful precisely because it reworks, reinterprets and, yes!, reinvents the epics instead of obsessing about some fidelity that was never part of this tradition historically. I don't know if this Hollywood film is gonna be any good, but criticising Nolan for being unfaithful is such a historically illiterate take, because he is literally doing what the Homeric tradition has been doing 2500+ years.
And, honestly, may we reinvent Homer a thousand times more.