writing tip: put words on page. hope this helps. i will not be taking questions because i have not done this

Origami Around
Color Me Curious
YOU ARE THE REASON

tannertan36
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
Phantogram Three

No title available
Not today Justin
cherry valley forever
No title available
ojovivo

pixel skylines
Doug Jones
đ
macklin celebrini has autism

Kiana Khansmith
tumblr dot com

izzy's playlists!
art blog(derogatory)
One Nice Bug Per Day

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Nepal

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany

seen from Chile
seen from Colombia

seen from Ukraine
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from United States

seen from Russia
seen from Ukraine

seen from United States
seen from Austria
seen from Chile
@idontlikeseagulls
writing tip: put words on page. hope this helps. i will not be taking questions because i have not done this
I was talking about Sherlock Holmes with my cool weird 42 year old coworker the other day and he said that he had read other works by ACD but not any Sherlock Holmes. ACD is smiling down from heaven on his one and only true fan.
In light of the Odyssey movie coming out this is my formal PSA that Helen of Troy is actually Helen of Sparta, Troy is the city she was stolen and brought to. The entire Trojan war is the Greeks trying to get her back from Troy, because she is from Sparta. I feel like we all collectively forget this.
every once in a while I remember that there are people who came to AO3 from video game fandoms, where they were set up to think "rated E for everyone" - except on AO3 it's
Tbf, the E is red and not green, and you would think gamers of all people would be able to intuit that.
I get annoyed when people downplay Helen's beauty, actually. I've seen people saying the double casting for Helen and Clytemnestra in that movie makes it so much more interesting, when it... really doesn't feel like it. You cannot strip Helen's divine beauty when it is the sole catalyst for everything that has happened to her. You cannot say "oh Helen wasn't actually beautiful, she was just â" because it simply isn't that. Helen was the most beautiful. Helen suffered for being the most beautiful. Trying to basically erase that is erasing a major part of Helen's character. And no you cannot replace her either, you cannot say "oh x person was actually just as beautiful as her, but she â" because Helen. Was. The. Most. Beautiful. It is integral to her character that she was the most beautiful. However, her being the most beautiful does not mean other women were not beautiful either, which is what some of you cannot seem to understand, and that too is also incredibly odd. Penelope does not need to be as beautiful as Helen to be beautiful. Clytemenstra does not need to be as beautiful as Helen to be beautiful. The way you all seem to subconsciously think other women are immediately unattractive simply because they are not as attractive as an outlier is odd.
"You can't ship those characters because they have a problematic height gap" well, strictly speaking we can't ship one of them. The other is well within the size and weight limits of most domestic parcel couriers.
So youâre telling me Christopher Nolan read the magical, mythical story that is the Odyssey and decided that actually the gods and magic are superfluous and not actually unnecessary?
everybody leaving tags on my letterboxd roundup like "they didn't do the nobody scene??" we're so fucking past that i need you to catch up. i went into the movie knowing they wouldn't do the nobody scene and frankly i had made peace with it like okay if you don't want odysseus calling himself outis because you don't feel like the joke translates well enough WHATEVER you dont need to film every line of the poem. what i was NOT prepared for is that THEY DON'T SPEAK TO POLYPHEMUS AT ALL. they don't steal a giant wheel of cheese, they don't get him drunk, odysseus doesn't taunt him after their escape, AND he doesn't cry out to poseidon or the other cyclopes on the shore. it's "revealed" that he can speak in the cave before their escape as he prays to poseidon. someone asks odysseus "should we try to reason with him?" and ODYSSEUS says "we're past that." resulting in an adaptation where odysseus does not use wit or trickery to escape polyphemus at all-- which is the case with every single obstacle he meets. this guy does not lie and he does not play tricks. his intelligence is restricted to battlefield tactics, the administration and direction of his men as units. You have to poke polyphemus so he opens his eye before you can stab it! I am very smart. the only point at which he could be described as "tricking" polyphemus is when-- because the movie is allergic to making odysseus look stupid or silly in any way-- they tie straw to their backs to be mistaken for sheep instead of riding the undersides of the sheep, and we are presented with an action sequence of trousered and armored soldiers somersaulting and army crawling under polyphemus' gently dangling hand. which i hate because it is a less clever solution that only works if polyphemus is extremely stupid (shepherd who doesn't know how many sheep he has) -- and more importantly because it removes IMO the most emotionally efficient moment in the odyssey, which is polyphemus talking to the one sheep that's walking slow because it has odysseus on its belly like "oh no are you feeling okay today? you're moving so slow, maybe you're upset because i'm in pain? you're the best sheep in the world and i love all of you my sheeps" like that scene is supposed to instantly retroactively humanize polyphemus and make you realize odysseus has been torturing a person with feelings who basically just wants to be left alone with his pet sheep and it's extremely good at that in every translation i've ever read. but not one of odysseus' enemies are allowed an inch of humanity in this entire adaptation which seems to be a veiled metaphor for the vietnam war so what can you expect. and yes because odysseus never does anything wrong or stupid or silly, OF COURSE he would never reveal his name and allow polyphemus to curse him, and his crew only "believes" that he's been cursed by poseidon thereafter, which removes the ENTIRE MAIN ANTAGONIST of the story and changes the central conflict from man vs. god to man vs. ????
Forgotten, But Not Gone
BONUS:
Something approaching
I still really can't wrap my head around the concept that it'd be physically possible to sleep too much. Like??? your body won't let you do that???? Isn't there like a hard limit on that somewhere?? Like the way your hair won't grow beyond a certain limit just because you let it, there's a cut-off range where it's just Done Growing and falls off. There's no option of your hair becoming 4 km long rapunzel-ass rope just because you neglected to cut it.
No natural part of the human body regularly needs cutting and trimming, it gets worn down in natural use. Sure your nails would grow absurdly long if you never cut them if you never use your hands or feet for anything, but if you're out there doing hunter-gatherer shit 24/7 year round then as far as I've understood they get worn down to reasonable length from just natural use??
I thought that sleep is like piss? You can't just choose to piss more than you need to piss as a conscious choice and bad habit. Nobody's walking around looking like a human raisin like "oh yeah I'm getting mummified on my feet because I just fucking love pissing so much", you get dehydrated from not drinking enough, not from pissing too much.
I can't see how you could overdo something that your body can't store for later. Sure, you can fuck up your salt ratio or whatever if you drink too much water all at once, but if you have like 3 more cups of water per day than you need, your body just pisses them out?? Fat stores are a thing because your body likes saving up the energy because there's no knowing beforehand if it might need it for later. Water isn't stored like that and neither is sleep.
The most essential defining trait of the very nature of life is that it wants to continue to live. All things that feel good are rewarded due to some mechanism that rewards behaviour that secures survival often enough to be worth the gamble. I don't see what kind of function is there in wanting to sleep more than the body requires. Like what situation is there where it's beneficial to have a mechanic that goes "hey let's shut down for prolonged times for no benefit and damage the cells and the entire organism for literally no reason."
Like why do we even have that lever?
Reblogs were turned off but I wanted to be able to find this again
Friend Inside Me(at). I've been holding onto the one-liner "Sorry I Minecrapped all over your ribcage" for so long. Leave me be. I also wanted to write the line "You shouldn't leave your 2 door sedan open like that" referring to the 2 doors they look into their own ribcage with. Maybe some other time.
LotR take of the night: Sam Gamgee and Denethor are seriously underanalyzed as thematic parallels/foils.
(And yes I know they never meet. Thatâs not relevant.)
They are the two characters with the most straitened or at least focused loyalties in LotR; almost everyone here develops loyalty of some kind to someone outside their original allegiances, but Sam cares about Frodo and Denethor cares about Gondor and that does not change.
More specifically, they are both servants; Denethor is the Steward of Gondor, and Sam is Frodoâs gardener, but in effect they are both stewards of their mastersâ households.
They each face a moment of despair, when that which they loved and bound themselves to appears to be dead. Each of them, in that moment, contemplates suicide.
HOWEVER. Their choices diverge. And I would say this illustrates (among other things) the differences in their loyalties, and in their attitudes toward them.
Both are servants in name, and bound to their services; but Sam is truly a servant who loves his master as a follower, and Denethor has become a servant who considers himself master, and thus he loves Gondor (and his sons) partly as his possessions. He loves with pride, where Sam loves with humility.
When Denethor loses everything (his city and his sons), he spirals into a proud despair because he refuses to let go of them, because he sees his losses as âdiminishingâ himself; he would rather die with themâeven hastening their deathsâthan live a life where they are not his. He is unable to look beyond that separation for either himself or them.
When Sam loses everything (his master), he wants to die, rather than live without Frodo; he wants to give himself over to vengeance or suicide rather than live outside of Frodoâs service. However, he sees that these things would only separate him further from his master and so rejects them. He chooses the love of his master, even after having lost him, over the hatred of a world without him.
And THEN: both characters are also given calls to renewed service, in the moments of their deepest despair! Gandalf tells Denethor that his place is on the battlefield, to let go of Faramir and to face death with his people even if he has no hope. Sam hears a call, from grace or his own heart, telling him quite clearly that he has to pick up his masterâs errand, even if that also means leaving his master.
Denethor wavers; but he falls back on his despair, and his hatred of a world which he thinks is lost to him. He chooses pride and possessiveness over the love and loyalty that were first mixed with them, and so ultimately chooses ânaught.âÂ
Sam wavers, too, also clinging to his loss; but in the end he looks up from his master and sees the duty that Frodo followed, and accepts it in his turn. He chooses that duty and service over his attachment to Frodo, when said attachment can do Frodo no good; and by this choice he not only proves his love and loyalty to be stronger than his own desires, but ultimately is able to save Frodo and the Quest.
TL;DR, they both suffered the same total loss, to a degree that would be difficult for any other character to feel at a single blow, due to their concentrated loyalties. However, Samâs loyalty and love were those of a true and humble servant, while Denethorâs loyalty and love were corrupted by pride and possessiveness. Because of this, Denethorâs loss led to his final fall, while Samâs proved a new degree of virtue in him.
If u could bring dead ppl back 2 life with magic like in video games the hollywood stunt scene would be out of control. There'd be professional snuff actors winning awards for dying the best. Producers would be like "If u need somebody to get killed in a film call up Resurrection Eddie, nobody gets killed as good as Eddie"
I imagine with dangerous jobs, there being a legal limit on the number of times you can die a year.
Imagine studies to REALLY see how deadly new chemicals are.
Murder trials are WAY easier.
If u could bring dead ppl back 2 life with magic like in video games the hollywood stunt scene would be out of control. There'd be professional snuff actors winning awards for dying the best. Producers would be like "If u need somebody to get killed in a film call up Resurrection Eddie, nobody gets killed as good as Eddie"
"Came back weird" this, "came back normal" that. Came back pervert about it! Girl that died in a car crash now has a folder of videos with the most horrific car crashes. Guy that died in a shooting accident have a suspicious gun stash and talks about right to bear arms too much. And Eddie... Oh boy, Eddie died 5 different ways and his fetish list is getting long.
If u could bring dead ppl back 2 life with magic like in video games the hollywood stunt scene would be out of control. There'd be professional snuff actors winning awards for dying the best. Producers would be like "If u need somebody to get killed in a film call up Resurrection Eddie, nobody gets killed as good as Eddie"
On the flipside, the hitman business would be 100% dead
Unless there's a way to make someone un-revivable, in which case it may even thrive because if you want someone dead you need professionals to do it right