“Somewhere, someone is falling in love with a person who loves them back after a whole winter of being alone and broken. It is the earth’s magic to make people trust in the warmth of love again.”
— Juansen Dizon
Fai_Ryy
noise dept.
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
The Bright Sessions

tannertan36
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Color Me Curious
Cosmic Funnies

bliss lane

Discoholic 🪩

Jimmy Eat World
🪼

pixel skylines

@theartofmadeline

#extradirty
tumblr dot com
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Today's Document

if i look back, i am lost
Mike Driver

seen from China
seen from Philippines
seen from Russia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany

seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from Pakistan
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Spain
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
@in-the-bushes97
“Somewhere, someone is falling in love with a person who loves them back after a whole winter of being alone and broken. It is the earth’s magic to make people trust in the warmth of love again.”
— Juansen Dizon
great job everyone lets hit the showers
Bestie English - best friend Bestie Czech - beast, brute, monster
synonyms
Transcript:
“Most of what you think you know about Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is wrong.
This is the model that we all learned in psych 101 is wrong [image of Maslow’s pyramid is shown] where our basic physiological needs are at the bottom of the pyramid and achieving one’s full individual potential is at the apex.
What you may not have known is that Maslow spent 6 weeks with the Blackfoot First Nation in the summer of 1938. He learned about their worldview and the Blackfoot Tipi, appropriated and misrepresented their perspective to establish his own Maslow’s hierarchy, and then didn’t give them credit.
[Image of Maslow’s pyramid and Blackfoot tipi shown, described below]
According to the Blackfoot Tipi, self-actualization is at the bottom of the pyramid. In the middle we have belonging and community actualization, where people take care of each other and help each other with their basic needs. And at the top, we have cultural perpetuity, which is teaching each other how to live in harmony with the land and achieve community actualization through generations.
It makes so much sense, right? Taking care of oneself is not enough. We need to take care of each other and our community.
This is why we need to decolonize psychology.”
I really hope the Amazon show picks a side in the Gil-Gadad debate. Just for the drama. I think it will be funny to watch.
It will set a thousand invented fans screaming and re-launch the Infamous Debates.
#gil galad#rings of power#lotr#silmarillion#wait someone break it down for those of us who haven’t read silm
Keeping in mind that I am a semi-casual Tolkien fan and will almost certainly get a few things wrong, here is my summary of The Gil-Galad Debate.
...please forgive me for the long post, this is my soapbox and I really feel like exposition at the moment.
Gil-Galad is referenced in JRR Tolkien’s *The Lord of the Rings* series as “the last of the great Elf-kings of Middle Earth”, who was in charge of the elvish forces during the Last Alliances of Elves and Men and was killed by Sauron. This is accurate, but not the entirety of his background as described in The Silmarillion.
Gil-Galad was the last High King of the Noldor in Exile in Middle Earth, the Noldor being essentially a subethnicity of elves, many of whom left Valinor (aka the Blessed Realm) and headed to Middle Earth for various reasons it would take a much longer post to explore in full. (It is interesting to note that this group does not include the Wood-Elves, who were never in Valinor to begin with - their own High King was historically someone else entirely. No, it wasn’t Thranduil, and yes, said someone else was long dead by the events of LOTR.)
Historically, the first High King of All The Noldor Everywhere was an elf called Finwe. The Kingship, descending as it apparently did via agnatic primogeniture (meaning, according to wiki, ‘determined by tracing shared descent from the nearest common ancestor through male ancestors’) means that all of the High Kings of the Noldor, in Exile or not, presumably back their claim to the throne via relationship to Finwe.
Meaning that Gil-Galad has to be related to Finwe in some way for his claim to hold. Got that? Good, because here’s where it gets complicated.
Here’s where we break the fourth wall and consider the Tolkiens - both JRR himself, and his son, Christopher Tolkien, who spent a good portion if not all of his life working with his father’s unpublished materials.
The issue regarding Gil-Galad is that canonically we do not know who his parents are. JRR Tolkien apparently listed Gil-Galad’s father as at least four separate elves in various drafts/unpublished materials, and never came to a definite conclusion about exactly how GG was related to Finwe. We think his final decision might have been that his father was an Elf named Orodreth (who himself had at least two separate fathers listed!) but we’re not sure. When Christopher Tolkien cleaned up and published his father’s drafts in The Silmarillion, he apparently chose a different elf (an elf named Fingon) to be Gil-Galad’s ‘definite’ father, adding some background material to make it work. HOWEVER.
Christopher Tolkien himself said that “ this decision to make Gil-galad a son of Fingon was an editorial mistake on his part, and did not represent his father's conception of the character. He suggested that it would have been better to have left Gil-galad's parentage obscure.”
Christopher Tolkien said that.
This means, of course, that the fandom has been arguing over just who Gil-Galad’s father was - and who the elf-king himself was - pretty much ever since the Silmarillion came out. The fandom has taken every single interpretation you can imagine and run with it - all four of the elves Tolkien considered making his father, plus a number of other options. Was his father Sauron? There’s fic for that. Was his father a background character who shows up in precisely one page of the Silmarillion only to be subsequently killed off? There’s fic for that, and entire online essays defending said options. Was he a time-traveling elf from the future? At least one good fic.
Much more amusing, in my opinion, are the stories where, in-universe, no-one knows exactly how Gil-Galad is related to the line of Finwe.
So. That’s my summary of ‘The Gil-Galad Debate’.
In my humble opinion, whatever option Amazon picks, it’s going to be debated and subsequently disputed by a large number of, if not the entire, fandom.
Potential fathers for Gil-Galad from Tolkien’s drafts include:
1. As Hamelin-born mentioned, Orodreth. Orodreth has the advantage of definitely having had a living wife on the same continent as him at the same time as Gil-Galad first appeared on the scene. This would make him a really appealing candidate except (a) Tolkien fans really enjoy this mystery, (b) while this would put Gil-Galad in line for the throne, it would arguably mean he was not next in line at the time he became king, and (c) Orodreth is . . . probably not the most popular descendant of Finwe. Which is a little unfair to him, considering what some of the others got up to, but there it is.
2. As Hamelin-born also mentioned, Fingon! The pro side to this is that if Gil-Galad is Fingon’s son, he is next in line for the throne when becomes king. The downsides with this from the fandom’s general views are (a) Christopher Tolkien’s comments, and (b) Fingon being married would interfere with one of the more popular Silm ships.
3. Finrod! Two big problems here: Not only does this renew the inheritance issues, it also introduces a new problem. Namely, Finrod is very much engaged to a woman that is very much not on the same continent as him at the time Gil-Galad is born.
4. Son of Feanor, unspecified. There are absolutely no problems with this theory. None whatsoever.
I mean, it creates an entirely new and different wrinkle in the inheritance debate thanks to Maedhros’s abdication, raises several questions about exactly what string of events led to Gil-Galad being king, and was from an earlier almost certainly rejected draft of Tolkien’s writings, but I don’t care because it’s so much fun to play with.
Other theories worth mentioning!
- @cycas’s theory of Lalwen/Cirdan. This has the advantage of actually identifying Gil-Galad’s mother, a feature most theories decidedly lack.
- Dior/Nimloth - the theory here being that Gil-Galad is one of their twin boys who were lost in the woods after their city fell and who were never seen again. This theory has the advantage of making something in the Silm marginally less awful and the additional advantage of Thingol presumably rolling in his grave.
- Orodreth/his wife, except Gil-Galad isn’t an additional child they had, Gil-Galad is their canonical daughter Finduilas. Canonically, Finduilas died horribly, but that’s no reason we can’t theorize that she decided to fake her own death and return to rule the Noldor.
- Some random dude who got hypnotized by a dragon into believing he was the rightful king of the Noldor. The Noldor, being short on kings at the time, ran with this.
I feel an obligation to note that this last theory, unlike the others, does not have a sizable faction behind it in the fandom. I just like it.
- And many, many more. There are so many theories about his parentage. So many.
I kind of want to come up with as many crazy ones as possible before the new series comes out just in case it somehow manages to finally bring an end to the debate.
I definitely read a fic once where Gil-Galad was a random orc that Maedhros and Fingon adopted
I think my favourite theory was that "Gil-Galad" was just the most comptentent looking noldo at the time for however long. Like playing hot potato with the name & title before they can die
A mood board for seeing the first looks at the Amazon LOTR show.
before: man it sucks how Christopher Tolkien guards his father's legacy so jealousy and doesn't let anyone have fun with it
after: oh god the decline and fall of the Tolkien estate mirrors the decline and fall of Gondor just as this mirrored the decline and fall of Numenor and that mirrored the decline and fall of Beleriand and
between describing elrond as an "ambitious political leader" and describing GoT as a "spiritual successor to lotr movies" I see now how stupid it was to think that the lotr series' intended audience would be you know. lotr fans
POLITICALLY AMBITIOUS ELVEN LEADER??
ELROND??? POLITICALLY AMBITIOUS???
HE WHO REFUSED THE CROWN OVER THE NOLDOR AFTER GIL-GALAD DIED DESPITE BEING HEIR TO ALL THREE HOUSES OF THE SONS OF FINWË BY BIRTH, ADOPTION, AND LATER MARRIAGE????? SPENT AN AGE AS GIL-GALAD’S SECOND WHILE HIS BROTHER’S LINE WERE KINGS??? WHO RAISED A HOMELY HOUSE INSTEAD OF A CITADEL??? WHO CHOSE THE PATH OF HEALING DESPITE GROWING UP IN A SERIES OF WAR CAMPS??? WISE AS A WIZARD?? KIND AS SUMMER????
ALSO WHAT IS THIS
LAST I HEARD GALADRIEL HAD GONE OVER THE MISTY MOUNTAINS TO FOUND LOTHLORIEN BECAUSE OF QUARRELING WITH CELEBRIMBOR OVER EREGION
AND CELEBRIMBOR AND THE DWARVES OF KHAZAD-DÛM HAD AN EXCELLENT RELATIONSHIP (looks pointedly at Narvi and a literally friendly door) WHETHER ELROND WAS A PART OF THAT IS DEBATABLE GIVEN ANNATAR BUT STILL-
It gets worse
*snorts into my fourth glass of dorwinion*
Men should take more lewds.
Not dick pics. There are so many beautiful parts of the human body that aren't genitals. Legs, butts, chest, arms, tummies, hips, shoulders...there's so much to feel sensual about!
Not even to send to anyone, I want men to just take photos for themselves. Just because it's validating. Just because they thought they looked good that day. To let their masculinity be something other than fragile. I want to see more men feeling sexy, striking a pose, and feeling good about their bodies in all the ways they've been robbed of.
Wow this is quickly becoming my biggest post. So many men have been reblogging, messaging, commenting or leaving notes in the tags about how much they needed this or how awful they've felt about their bodies. Or just, didn't realize they're allowed to feel like this.
Kings. My heart breaks for you. It's fucking hard to learn how to love your body, and I'm so, so, so proud of you for trying.
One of these days I'll talk about how Norse Heathenry is mirepresented to promote an extremely colonized and distinctly American interpretation of masculinity.
Actually, I've had sake, so I'll gab about this.
The thing that draws a lot of men to heathenry is the promise that their masculinity (and, in some cases, their whiteness) will be affirmed and celebrated. I'd argue that heathenry, as it stands right now as a co-opted and commercialized phenomenon, does the opposite of this: It actually holds masculinity hostage by creating a standard in which a man must conform to a warrior-like role in order to be a true heathen.
This is just repeating the same dynamic we see in the western world, where a man's masculinity is constantly under threat and revoked the minute he does anything outside of the society's narrow definition of what it means to be "a man."
But the thing about masculinity is that it's like any other fundamental aspect of one's individuality; it's an immutable trait and exists no matter the circumstances that surround it. A man is a man no matter what he does, what he likes, who he loves, what he looks like, or the emotions he expresses.
I find it extremely criminal that Norse heathenry is used as a vehicle for continuing Western society's deeply unbecoming and limiting definition of masculinity, particularly when we have literally no evidence that the Norse people defined masculinity the same way we do.
This is especially true considering Norse heathenry is a spirituality that can support the expansion and fluidity of masculinity. I think it is entirely worth the discussion on how to do that.
I'll also say this: I find it really telling that a lot of Norse heathen men don't regularly identify with Freyr--the god who embodies masculinity--because western society doesn't equate masculinity to Freyr's principles, but instead equates it to being a soldier.
Like...I can get into the entire disconnect men have with Norse heathenry because of Western colonialism.
For my fellow dudes that are following me: Literally no one has the right to define your masculinity for you, and they certainly have no right to use Norse heathenry to do it.
“I forgive people but that doesn’t mean I accept their behavior or trust them again. I forgive them for me, so I can let go and move on with my life.”
— Unknown
Management: Hannibal Lecter, PhD.
Paganism isn't for transphobes.
Tired Kits
📷: Gianluca Facchini