IntraScholar

Your Trusted Resource for Personality Typing (MBTI, Enneagram, etc.)

[intrascholar]

“Flow” and Cognitive Functions

Flow from a psychological perspective, is understood as a “mental state of operation in which a person performing an activity is fully immersed in a feeling of energized focus, full involvement, and enjoyment in the process of the activity”, otherwise known as “being in the zone”. Many regard flow as a key to achieving happiness in work and life. If you aren’t immersed in the activities of your life, it can be hard to feel “alive”. Yet we find that most people are disengaged from their work throughout the world. It is not very uncommon to find that people rarely achieve “flow” in their work.

Consequentially, if you were able to achieve flow in your daily activities, it would very likely lead to greater productivity, results and feelings of well-being. Because flow would be desirable to achieve within our work (where most of our time goes), the next question would be, how can we achieve it?

From a cognitive functions perspective, we can theoretically argue that achieving flow will be a matter of exercising your top cognitive functions. Because our top cognitive functions are where our highest latent talent lies, we have an easier time using and developing those functions. Inversely, excessive use of our inferior functions can cause energy to drain faster, increase stress and lead to feelings of dissatisfaction.

As an example, it can be easy to see why ESTPs are reputed to dislike and perform poorly in school, on average, even if they tend to be bright. An ESTPs top cognitive functions are Extroverted Sensing (Se) and Introverted Thinking (Ti). The combination of Se-Ti is a ‘learn by doing’ loop. Through exposure to information from the physical world, Ti gathers internal principals of how things work. However, in a typical school environment, information is thrown at the student through lecture format. Not much is done to stimulate the Se as much.

(As a side note, you will find that this theory of cognitive functions also demonstrates weaknesses within learning curriculums. It could be argued that each student should have completely different curriculums based on type. A generic lecture-style form of teaching, while efficient for scalability purposes, is clearly not optimized for each individual student.)

On the opposite end, when an ESTP is exposed to learn-as-you-go environment such as start-ups or playing sports, they can shine brilliantly. The same principal of Se-Ti loops works in their favor to help them succeed in these environments. It’s not surprising to see that many ESTPs (along with ISTPs) frequently report sports activities as one of their main interests because it exercises their top functions.

Accordingly, within people’s work lives, many people are prone to reporting dissatisfaction. Potential solutions include identifying which lines of work will allow you to exercise and improve your top functions while providing you with a sense of purpose and autonomy (this also falls under the theory of how to make work meaningful. The advantage of understanding cognitive functions is that we now have a framework for selecting which types of work would engage us most effectively.

Thanks for reading and please share any thoughts!

[intrascholar]

Settling the Beef Between Extroverted Feeling and Introverted Feeling

Between Extroverted Feeling (Fe) and Introverted Feeling (Fi) types, oftentimes there arises conflict very similar to that between Extroverted Thinking (Te) and Introverted Thinking (Ti) types. Fi types tend to see Fe as fake and manipulative, while Fe types often see Fi as selfish, burdensome, and insensitive towards others. In underdeveloped Fi and Fe types, these judgements can be fairly accurate, but it is important for both types to recognize the importance of the other function.

Similar to Te, Extroverted Feeling is targeted towards quick decision-making. In large groups, Fi can be inefficient, because the analysis of each person's feelings to such a degree can take a while. Fe however, focuses on emotional cues from each person to quickly estimate how they are feeling, and how they will feel if certain things happen. The rapidity in which this function is used, can easily save a group of people, or most social interactions, from total catastrophe.

There is, of course, a downside to Fe. Although it is great at preventing bad situations from arising, oftentimes its lack of intimacy can actually cause bad things to happen. There are plenty of situations where a quick analysis of one's emotions will not help a person. When someone is feeling particularly bad, Fe can seem downright offensive. In situations like these, it's actually Fe that is perceived as selfish, burdensome, and insensitive towards others.

Much like Ti with its analysis of ideas, Introverted Feeling likes to process each emotion in detail before making a decision. Introverted Feeling may seem slow and selfish to an outsider, but really it's because they have to process all the complexities there are to emotion that Fe users may ignore. In one-to-one conversation, this allows for more intimate dialogue. If given the chance to process itself, Introverted Feeling can be more effective than Fe at communicating, understanding, and acting upon emotional needs. Fi can be very effective at building strong bonds between people.

Fi has its problems too. Because of its need to feel and understand every emotion without being incomplete, or false to oneself, Fi can result in poor decisions. Because it focuses on internal feelings rather than picking up cues from other people, it is often the case that a person has to fully explain how they are feeling, in order for an Fi user to understand and make a good decision that works to the benefit of everybody's feelings. This can be compared to how a Ti user must understand the logic behind everyone's arguments in order to make a good conclusion that agrees with the logic of all the arguments given. In many instances there isn't enough time to do this, or perhaps the other person is unaware of the need to express their emotions thoroughly to the Fi user. When this happens, the Fi type will up making a decision that agrees with their own emotions while ignoring the feelings of others, similarly to how a Ti type in this situation would make a decision that follows their own thought processes. Additionally, Fi types are equally capable of being manipulative and fake as Fe types can be, since they possess the advantage of being able to empathize with people to such a high degree. It is important for both types not to abuse their powers.

The best way to solve this seemingly endless dispute between Fe and Fi types, is for both types to recognize the benefits of the other type, and to work on their own feeling function to the level that it can replace the other. Extroverted Feeling types should realize that it is impossible to fully understand how someone is feeling so quickly, and that affecting the emotions of others is not always the best approach to solving a problem. In many cases it is important to slow down and feel the emotions of the other person in a more detailed, intimate manner, a practice known commonly as empathy. Introverted Feeling types should recognize that before making a decision that strictly serves their own emotional needs, it is important to gather the feelings of those around you, and likely you'll find out that there's some common ground between all of your emotions. Developing these processes may take longer, but can lead to an enriching effect on an individual's life.

This post was written by an INTP Guest Contributor. Read their theory on INTP Personality Biases.

Read more like this at intrascholar.com 

[intrascholar]

Transactional Analysis within Relationships, from MBTI Perspective

Transactional Analysis Theory is a modern psychological theory attesting that within any interaction between two or more people, there are multiple “games” being played.

Within this theory, there are three observable ego states called “the parent”, “the child” and “the adult”. Each interaction between 2+ individuals has an intended transactional purpose to feed one of these ego states, regardless of whether the participants realize it or not. These ego states are a step-up from the Freudian ideas of the id (child), ego (adult) and superego (parent).

The child (id) is pure internal reactions and feelings. It is a very primal in its way of being.

The parent (superego) consists of learned behavior from growing up. It represents our family values, societal values and other types of conditioning from when we are young.

The adult (ego) is thought-based, representing our ability to think and make decisions, independent of the child or parent.

Effective transactions (or communications) are often complimentary to each other. The child ego state may manifest in ‘Player 1’ with them seeking emotional support. ‘Player 2’ may then respond with a parent ego state, fulfilling the role of a comforter, allowing them to receive internal gratification by taking on this role. Both players complete a successful transaction in this scenario. Other successful scenarios could be with two matching ‘adult’ ego states that come to an agreement or two matching ‘id’ ego states that have a mutual sensory appreciation of an experience.

Given that we understand the basics of transactional analysis, how would this translate between the relationship choices between certain MBTI personality types? The question being, is there a consistent theme of transactional needs being fulfilled between two specific personality types, thus explaining why certain personality types are more likely to mesh well with each other than others? If we understood the ‘games’ that each personality type is more prone to playing, then that could strongly influence our approach and help us recognize what each personality type may be looking for within the interaction.

My theory is that the specific MBTI types that get along most commonly have many ‘matching’ ego states. I also am seeing a common trend of certain MBTI types to have a preference for a ‘dominant ego’ state over the other two. While an ideal match would have all three ego states naturally match, many serious relationships will start with the matching of at least two ‘primary’ ego states. When it comes to less serious relationship/friendships, we may find that they suffice with one matching ego state. It is also very likely that certain relationships end quickly because the two players may have one very strong ego state interactions but because the other ego interactions are weak/lacking, the connection weakens.

Based on my observations, these MBTI types seem to have the following preferences for these ego states WITHIN SERIOUS RELATIONSHIPS (if it wasn’t serious, they are likely to be more lax in this area with the ‘child’ taking precedence):

Dominant/Auxiliary Si types (ESFJ/ISFJ/ISTJ/ESTJ) tend to have a focus on the parent (superego). This makes sense as Si is normally about representing the cultural values of their family and/or society. As for their second ego state preference, it will depend on whether they identify more with their adult (ego) or child (id).

Dominant/Auxiliary Ne types (ENFP/INFP/INTP/ENTP) present a child side primarily. This makes sense as extroverted intuition is an experiencing function. Depending on whether they identify more with their parent or child, they will seek someone with a similar child + a matching counterpart to their adult (ego) or parent (superego). Generally, Ne types will place a higher emphasis on the adult rather than the parent.

Dominant/Auxiliary Ni types (INTJ/INFJ/ENFJ/ENTJ) identify more with the adult (ego) state. This makes sense as these types tend to strongly identify with being ‘independent thinkers’, regardless of the influence society has on their thinking direction. Depending on whether they identify more with their child (id) or parent (superego), they will seek someone with a similar ‘adult’ + a matching counterpart to their adult (ego) or child (id).

Dominant/Auxiliary Se types (ESFP/ESTP/ISTP/ISFP) identify with the child, similar to Ne types. Extroverted sensing is an experiencing function just like extroverted intuition. Depending on whether they identify more with their ego or superego, Se types will often seek someone with a similar child (id) + a matching counterpart to their parent (superego) or adult (ego). Generally, Se types will place a higher emphasis on the parent rather than the adult.

You may be wondering why I haven’t included the Feeling & Thinking functions as primary factors when it comes to Transactional Analysis. My view point is that the thinking and feeling functions will have some influence in relationship matching but will mainly manifest by influencing the real-time interactions. The thinking/feeling functions won’t necessarily have a foundational effect on the successful completion of transactions. Thinking & feeling are the ‘rational’ functions as Jung would coin it while sensing & intuition are the ‘irrational’ functions, which makes sense within this context.

So this all begs the question, what games are you playing?

[intrascholar]

True Growth of Extroverted & Introverted Feeling

Over 900 followers now, thank you!! Here is the latest post on my theory for how to improve growth of our cognitive feeling functions:

Extroverted Feeling (Fe) and Introverted (Fi) exists within everyone. One of these two will be dominant within a person as one of the first four in their cognitive function line, while the other will be in the recess of their unconscious. As we grow older, every person will likely develop and exercise Fe and Fi in more mature ways. However, as we come to identify with those specific emotions, it influences our perception of the world more than we realize. To reach true growth of our individual selves, we must be able to see past the bias of our primary cognitive function line. This means being consciously aware of how we are prone to think and pushing our thinking boundaries beyond what our impulse feelings would tell us. This will be explained further.

The natural state of Introverted Feeling (Fi) is experiencing a depth of emotion. This way of processing in the world directly relates to how the Fi user feels about something. This level of depth is usually reserved for few people. A more dominant Fi user often has a concern with the genuine expression of their emotions and are more selective of it’s use.

The natural state of Extroverted Feeling (Fe) channels actions and words for influencing others as a wave of outward emotion. It is an ‘expansive’ function extending it’s attention to many people. An Fe user usually finds it easier to “fake” emotions and influence others with their show of it. A more dominant Fe user tends to use their skills more freely.

Fe users will care for a breadth of people, often showing a great concern with society and it’s core values. This can lead them to be caring of many people in general but it can potentially lead to superficial valuations of people and also with the Fe users own interpretation of the world. The Fe user is more prone to becoming lost in the values of society without giving internal thought to the user’s own values and interpretations. The crowd’s opinion is usually given more weight over the individual.

On the other end, because Fi “cares” more in-depth, they tend to be selective. However, this comes at the cost of a rigid “us vs other” mentality. The Fi user becomes too identified with their interpretations of their “in-group” and may be relatively heartless to those on the outside that they don’t deem important. They may get attached to the values of their in-group without consideration into the implications of overall society, potentially leading to extremist tendencies.

What we can see here is a difference in objectives between the natural state of these two cognitive functions. Both the users of Fe and Fi are severely lacking in the LESSONS that the other function can teach.

Fi users would benefit from broadening it’s range of acceptance for all. Fe users growth goal would be to find individual depth within it’s acceptance of society’s norms and people.

This must be done consciously, as our natural inclinations will be to follow the bias of our naturally dominant cognitive functions. By opening ourselves up in this way, we surpass our internal limitations towards something potentially greater than we would have otherwise achieved.

[intrascholar]

Rick from Rick & Morty is an INTP

I recently learned about Rick & Morty (pretty late, I know) and found out some people thought Rick was an ENTP, INTJ or even ENTJ. Rick is straight up an INTP! So I wrote a post on why he is an INTP, and not an INTJ, ENTP or ENTJ:

Reasons why Rick Is Not An INTJ

Rick is often seen using deductive reasoning throughout the show. This is completely different from the way xNTJ work.

xNTJ use inductive reasoning, drawing big-picture conclusions from the analysis of a few details. Rick’s method of thinking often follows steps, typical of deductive reasoning. If Rick sees a detail like people looking dazed and sick, he will reason that it’s because they are infected with a virus. If Rick notices that Morty is acting funky and more happy-going then usual, then he will venture into the next step and assume that Morty isn’t real. This is very different from the way an INTJ works. An INTJ has inferior extroverted sensing, meaning their attention to detail are prone to being off when they’re conceptualizing conclusions. INTJs will typically focus on bigger picture meaning behind what their attention is put towards, which usually does not pertain to visual characteristics of other people.

Popular INTPs from other TV shows (who are also typically mistyped by the public) use deductive reasoning, including Dr. House from House and Sherlock Holmes.

Typical of unhealthy INTP, Rick despite being intelligent, resorts to drug abuse to get by with the reality of of life. This constant drug usage is not evident of inferior extroverted sensing because it doesn’t present itself in times of stress (which is what happens for inferior Se) but at all times, whether it’s good or bad.

INTJs also typically have a huge anti-social streak, which is completely different from the way Rick’s personality will manifest. Rick is interested in sociability at times (more discussed on this below), resulting in him hosting parties, which is something INTJs typically abhor. INTJs are typically more slow-paced and usually lack witty responses to people, which is something that ENTJ/ENTP/INTP are more capable of.

Reasons why Rick is not an ENTJ

Rick may be seen as an extrovert due to his outgoingness or ability to maneuver through the world with relative ease but he is far from it.

Specifically, for why he is not an ENTJ, it encompasses some of the same reasons as for why he is not an INTJ. Rick uses deductive reasoning, not inductive reasoning.

Rick also sometimes does things for no purpose, sometimes for the pure comedy of it, like turning himself into a pickle. This is extremely the opposite of ENTJ, who are usually goal-driven and take actions with purpose in sight of some big-picture goal they have set for themselves. At times, we can see Rick engaging in random banter with his despised son-in-law, or engaging in a quest to destroy an intergalactic government out of some principle. Rick is not an ENTJ by any means.

Read the rest of the article and find out why Rick is not an ENTP: http://intrascholar.com/rick-rick-morty-intp/

[intrascholar]

MBTI types of How I Met Your Mother Characters

Lily - ISFJ. Marshall - ENFP. Ted - INFJ. Barney - ENTP. Robin - ISTP. What do you think?

[intrascholar]

Hunter-Gatherer Tribe Theory

Hey everyone, sorry for not posting in a while (I've been working on my new financial planning firm). This Tumblr now has over 730 followers. Thank you everyone for your support! I never would have thought IntraScholar would get this big.

Here's the new post:

Hunter-Gatherer Tribe Theory

Why do MBTI types even exist in the first place? Why did it become necessary in our genetic evolution for our bodies and minds to become shaped in a certain cognitive function line? What benefits are there for an INTJ to have dominant introverted intuition with auxiliary extraverted thinking while an ESTP has extraverted sensing and introverted thinking. Why don't we have all the functions easily available to us? Here is my theory, which I’m calling Hunter Tribe Theory.

1) Being strong in one area and weak in another forces collaboration among humans. For us to be able to take over and get more done with the synergy of our combined forces, we need to be able to work together. While an INTJ may have a knack for foresight, their common inattention to the physical world can be compensated for by the ESTP with a just do-it style, and can help each other. Imagine living in a hunter-gatherer tribe, where the INTJ plots how to catch the next prey and assists while the ESTP leads the expedition. It is important that each member of the tribe has diversified skills and cognitive functions, to help ensure a greater likelihood of survival. Being deficient in certain cognitive functions can lead to weaker communities.

2) Unique cognitive functions and environmental growth gives a niche to each person, making them indispensable. If we were good at all our functions from the onset, it doesn't make for much variability in our gene potential. It would make us weak if everyone was similar. Encouraging gene variation among humans with different cognitive functions is healthier for us as a race overall since it makes us less susceptible to sickness, bad habits/choices, etc.

3) Assuming Hunter Tribe Theory was true, what is the optimal percentages to have of each cognitive function among people? What are the implications of having more or less of a certain type in society? Studies have shown that ISxJ and extroverted sensing types are the most common in society. But is this the result of an efficiently functioning society or a social system that has allowed certain MBTI types to thrive? Perhaps the optimal level is dependent on the societal structure itself.

This post has spurred more questions than answers, and that’s because there is not a lot of information out there. Hopefully, we’ll figure the answers out soon enough. What are your thoughts? Do you agree or disagree?

[intrascholar]

ENxPs Growth

All MBTI personality types will become more balanced as they develop their cognitive functions. On the other hand, if the MBTI type does not develop their top cognitive functions well, their inferior functions tend to overrule them. There are fewer tragedies in terms of lost potential of MBTI types than when an ENTP or ENFP does not properly grow their dominant extroverted intuition (Ne) and auxiliary introverted feeling/thinking (Fi/Te). As a result of their top functions weak development and society’s pushing of Introverted Sensing (Si) onto the ENxP, that individual’s growth can become highly inhibited. To explain further, we will look at this from the context of ENxPs growth in their youth. As teens, ENxPs are dominant extroverted intuitor (Ne) types, where their natural interest is in the possibilities of outcomes. Although this wondrous imagination can be great, it can tend to make them stand out poorly, especially in a population with high percentages of dominant and auxiliary introverted sensors (Si users). The wide range of the Ne can get overwhelming for a majority of self-conscious teens that are looking to fit in by being “normal”, or otherwise adopt to Si standards. For more mature ENxPs, they will be able to successfully navigate the differences between their Ne and Si. However, for most ENxPs, they may find that they will receive intense negative feedback from their peers. This negative feedback can actually end up resulting in an overly aware Si within the ENxP that is still immature and comes out poorly. The Si will cause the ENxP to restrict their extroverted intuition in situations where that sort of thinking capacity may in fact be appreciated greatly, and cause them to miss out on a number of opportunities as well. The ENxPs that weren’t allowed to be “gushy” ends up conforming to the Si standards, and may enforce those standards onto others, because they themselves have been treated poorly for their dominant Ne use. However, for those who have been allowed to use their Ne in a productive fashion, they tend to be more open-minded to new ideas and vibrant in all aspects of their life to the joy of many around them. While the lack of inferior functions development can lead to poor results in all MBTI types, not being able to grow properly can be a tragedy with the ENxP. The ENxPs growth depends on the development of their dominant Ni and inferior Si, more so than other types. Thus, it is important to recognize when you may be dealing with an ENxP in their younger years and encourage their natural abilities. Discouraging a young toddler that asks many questions such as “why” over and over can be barring to their potential as well as demeaning a young teen for what may appear to be outlandish ideas. Because of how the ENFP and ENTP types can have differences within their environments in terms of support, the ENxPs growth leads to the largest differences in what their types can look like. They may come off as an overly strict authoritarian that adheres to societal expectations in unnatural ways (unlike an ESFJ/ESTJ with tertiary extroverted intuition which will ease them up from time to time) or an open-minded, vibrant force of good that spreads joy and cheer to the rest of the world with their enthusiasm for life.

[intrascholar]

INTJ Misconceptions

INTJ misconceptions are all over the internet with online descriptions giving fantastical descriptions of INTJs without the full story. Here are some misconceptions. INTJ Misconceptions: Misconception #1: We are not that smart, you’re just not that bright. INTJs are not the mythical beasts that they would prefer you to think they are. In fact, they can feel that the way they are is normal and it’s everyone else who seems to be deficient. INTJs can feel like they are the only sane ones in a world full of crazies. Misconception #2: We don’t realize we are offensive, sometimes. INTJs don’t usually realize when they have said something that others would consider offensive. When INTJs say something, it is something that they would be willing to accept if someone else said the same thing to them. Or at least they like to think they would. Misconception #3: We have feelings, we just don’t show it. Behind that cold-seeming intense gaze is a turbulence of contained thoughts and emotions. When INTJs speak, they calm down the storms of their minds to clear a passage for the sailboat of their thoughts. And then they make sure to speak in the most dull way possible so you have no idea what’s going on nor care to figure it out. Misconception #4: We are the ultimate strategists. It’s not that INTJs are particularly good strategists but it’s more likely that they do it so often and for such a long time without tire that they inevitably become good at it. This doesn’t mean they are natural planners but they are people who can relentlessly persist at meticulously thinking out each variable. Misconception #5: We don’t want friends. INTJs do want friends and to be social. Just probably not with you. No offense, but you’re probably crazy (see misconception #1) and you won’t like us anyway (see misconception #2). They like really smart people, and can find it painful to spend time with someone dumb. Also, it helps if the friends are not too much smarter than the INTJ, lest it hurt their esteem of being the smartest in the room. Misconception #6: We’re arrogant. This is half and half. Yes, INTJs are arrogant but at the same time , they aren’t. INTJs know what they are good at and won’t be the type to act as if they knew something when they really don’t. INTJs usually know their place and will say what they are good or bad at openly. This is true as long as the INTJ hasn’t spent their entire life surrounded by dimwits, who failed to teach the INTJ humility. Misconception #7: We’re clever. Clever is a word reserved for smooth-talkers who can come up with great remarks quickly. That quality is more reminiscent of an ENTJ, ENFJ, or ENTP type. INTJs would still be in their head before they realize someone has said something and a nearby ENTJ type has already made a response. Where would an INTJ be in a drama show? Doing their work while avoiding all the crazies who keep having petty fights. Misconception #8: We really hate you if we seem stern and we really like you if we’re nice. If an INTJ is looking at you with their signature stern look, then they don’t really have an issue with you. Most likely. INTJs do show all sorts of emotions from time to time, but they are still very reserved. But if an INTJ is going out of their way to seem friendly to you, then beware because they likely see you as a threat that needs to be neutralized and handled. These are some basic INTJ misconceptions, let us know if this resonates with you or any INTJs you know.

[intrascholar]

Was Hitler an INFJ or INFP MBTI Type?

According to Carl Jung, Hitler was hinted to have INxJ qualities, with a “deep intuition”. This leads some to think that Hitler was an INFJ. However, Hitler may actually be an INFP. Here is the reasoning: An INFP predominantly uses the Introverted Feeling (Fi) function, which will give them very strong stances on ideals even if they are not rational. Introverted feeling is heavily associated with stances that are based on emotional foundations. When an INFP speaks with pure introverted feeling, their emotions can move entire crowds. However, this can become dangerous if the INFP believes his/her values are more important than the well-being of individual people because he/she will do what it takes to fulfill that vision. This becomes problematic since the INFP with introverted feeling (Fi) at their disposal will naturally be able to understand the feelings of people but will not care about others over their own values. This is especially evident when you hear Hitler’s speeches, where you can see how Hitler tugs at the soul in the moment with his ideals, even if they were extremely flawed in implementation. This is profoundly different from extroverted feeling (Fe) which an INFJ would possess as their auxiliary function. An auxiliary extroverted feeler is more focused on how others feel over their own values being expressed. You could say that the INFJs dominant introverted intuition’s vision of the world should surpass his extroverted feeling, but at the same time, it wouldn’t explain both his irrational hatred for certain groups of individuals and his adoration for the “aryan race”. The emotional categorizations of preference for different groups is an introverted feeling function process whereas extroverted feeling is focused on impacting as a whole. Paradoxically, when an introverted feeler is expressing their values in a very controlled way, they can actually seem more honest and convincing than an extroverted feeler who uses voice inflections to convey emotions in their words. This is not to say that an INFJ is not going to be convincing (Martin Luther King Jr. was certainly a moving public speaker) but an INFP can be a serious force to be reckoned with well developed introverted feeling. If you also take into consideration the INFPs inferior function of extroverted thinking, this function tends to arise in two different ways for the ISFP and INFP types. The IxFP tends to either be completely lazy with their extroverted thinking or they become stressed out to the point of over-planning and overthinking as a result of their inferior extroverted thinking. When you take into consideration that Hitler was known to be overly paranoid and a good strategist, it may be because of this inferior extroverted thinking function being out of contro . This ability to strategize and plan contingencies is not to be confused with introverted intuition + extroverted feeling functions working in pairs. While introverted intuition is a forward-thinking function, it has a strategic component when it is paired with extroverted thinking. However, with introverted intuition + extroverted feeling, the vision for the future is more intuitive and broadly based than strategic choices that are made from a logical standpoint arising from extroverted thinking. This would also add onto the rational that Hitler had an inferior extroverted thinking. Combining these different factors for Hitler’s type analysis, the conclusion would be that Hitler was in fact, an INFP over an INFJ.

[intrascholar]

Instincts Theory - Secure, Social, Sexual Types

According to Project Evolove’s Instincts Theory, there is a very interesting theory relating to the idea of “instincts”. According to them, there are 3 types of “instincts”, secure, social and sexual. These three instincts can create dual combinations that manifest with qualities of the two instincts such as social-secure and sexual-social, creating up to six different combinations. The Instincts According to the summaries of each instinct, this is the information listed: Secure Those with the Secure Primary Instinct are concerned with “nesting and nurturing.” They are focused on protecting the self, ensuring that its physical needs, comfort, health, and self-sufficiency are met. They are keenly aware of their environment, such as its temperature, safety, and cleanliness. They are inclined to make their surroundings healthy and comfortable. They need personal space and privacy, even with their loved ones. Sexual Those with the Sexual Primary Instinct are devoted to transmitting something meaningful to future generations, whether it is their genes or their ideas. It also means they wish to become “one” with another entity, which they achieve by seeking intense, original experiences that fully engage them. This tendency manifests as their intense desire to form intimate, one-on-one connections with people and as their passionate pursuit of hobbies and interests. Without satisfying these desires, they feel incomplete. Social Those with the Social Primary Instinct seek to adapt themselves to meet the needs of their groups or communities. They are very generous with their time and often sacrifice their own needs to advance the group’s priorities. They wish to increase their inclusion and status within a group, for they see their social status as a marker of their level of contribution. They enjoy being involved in other people’s lives. Quick to see people’s positions and relationships, they can navigate the social circle to obtain protection and influence. Now how can we apply this new information in the context of what we already know? In the context of MBTI, being secure-sexual or social-secure or any of those other combination would explain the huge differences between personality types that are the same, excluding factors such as age, development and environment. The sexual-social INTJ would be heavily invested in imprinting their passions onto the world in a way that will offer them social recognition while the sexual-secure INTJ would look deep within themselves to find inspirational value that others can’t help but be attracted too. In the context of a person being “hot” or “cool”, this may also be a way to describe how these differences are manifested. A “hot” person may in fact have a sexual instinct variant vs a “cold” person who has a secure instinct variant. Also, this may explain why some people with a certain MBTI type can seem amazing to us while another person with the same MBTI type can be unbearable to us. It could very well be possible that the social-secure ESFP annoys the sexual-secure INTP because of how inauthentic they may seem vs a sexual-social ESFP who the INTP feels is “being more true to themselves”. Project Evolove implies that these instincts develop from our innate sexual natures. This would also imply that our sexual natures are separate from that of our personality types that would be measured by MBTI and enneagram, but is somewhat influenced by our MBTI type. This could also bring up the question on whether our sexual instinct types influence our MBTI or enneagram personality types, or whether it is the other way around. If you’d like to read more about this idea, check it out here at this website: http://www.projectevolove.com/education/1/general-concepts#.WHgCM7GZP-Y , which also happens to be a dating site too revolving around MBTI and similar ideas.

[intrascholar]

5th Dimension of MBTI: Calm vs Limbic

Well, you’ve figured out your MBTI type. You may have figured out other people’s MBTI type as well. But there is more. There’s a 5th dimension that isn’t factored in by traditional MBTI type tests, and it involves the concept of emotional stability. The two binary ranges that define emotional stability are calm vs limbic (or labeled assertive vs. turbulent according to some sources). This idea of 5 dimensions is the main theme within the SLOAN Multidimensional Typing System, also known as the Global 5, which is basically the MBTI with this 5th dimension of emotional stability (psychologists tend to like this format more). With this addition of calm vs limbic, this means that there are technically 32 MBTI types. A calm INFP can look very different from a limbic INFP and the differences will be explained. Keep in mind that being “calm” isn’t necessarily the best and neither is being “limbic”. Calm means that the person is more likely to be less reactive to external stimuli. They have a better ability to control their emotions in times of stress, making them naturally great at handling high pressure situations. Calm people are more likely to have a “perceiving” edge to them, as they are more likely to take things as they come rather than prepare as much. They are more likely to be relaxed and take things easy. This can be negative however, as it may make the calm person too relaxed for their own good, when they should really be preparing instead. This can also mean that it’s harder for calm types to feel motivated to do things because it’s harder for their emotions to get riled up. As for the limbic person, they may also find its hard to do things, not for lack of emotional motivation but because their emotions are in such a flurry that they can’t escape their self-induced stress. Limbic people are likely to react more greatly to external stimuli and emotions. Their body stresses out more, which in a prehistoric sense, would have enabled them to create the energy needed to enact fight-or-flight response. In a modern day context, this means limbic people are more likely to prepare for things like presentations compared to confident types who will feel they can “wing it”. However, this depends on how well the limbic person’s development has come. A limbic person can seem like a “Type-A” personality that is achieving many of their goals or they can seem like a mess if they have not learned to channel their stress response well. For both calm and limbic types, there is work to be done by learning from the other side. Calm types should learn to let emotions and stimuli affect them more compared to limbic types who should learn how to respond to those things better and learn to take it easy. The way confident vs limbic manifests for each MBTI type can also be very different. Calm INFPs are likely to be more outgoing, opinionated and social vs limbic INFPs who tend to be quieter, easygoing and less social. A calm ESTP is likely to be very non-chalant, easy-going and loud vs a limbic ESTP who is likely to have lower self-esteem, be more conforming and a better team-player. As you can see, the way calm vs limbic manifests is different for each type. Although people can manipulate the level to which they are limbic or calm, they will be either a set limbic or calm for their entire lives. If you’d like to read more about your type from the context of Big 5 and learn more about the 5th dimension of emotional stability, check it out here. Be warned that the site does not give flattering descriptors for most types.

[intrascholar]

What Each MBTI Type Is Like When Single On Valentines Day

Each type reacts differently to Valentines day especially when they’re single. Wondering how your MBTI type of interest might be thinking? INTJ: “I don’t care, holidays are social constructs that are made up and arbitrary. (But secretly, I care a little bit)” ENTJ: “I could probably set up shop at that corner and start selling flowers for huge mark-ups today. Then, use that money to pay for a date. (which I want but won’t really put in the time)” ISTJ: “I don’t care. But I feel like I should, so I care just a little bit too.” ESTJ: “This is just another day to work! No time to think about my love life! (it would be nice if I had someone though)” INFP: *cries out loud* “All by myself!”. And then I’ll buy gifts for myself, because of course, I’m worth it. ENFP: “I’m alone, time to mope and reevaluate my whole love life till I go out later and secretly hope to find someone new.” INTP: “Valentines Day is just a social construct and I obviously don’t care about it at all, so leave me alone! (I want to get involved just a bit).” ENTP: “Meh, I can find someone today probably but if not, whatever.” ESTP: “I’m single, independent and I don’t need no man! Let’s hit the clubs and bars!” ESFP: “I’m single, independent and I don’t need no man! Let’s go out to have fun! Or otherwise, stalk happy couples on Facebook while mourning how single I am.” ISTP: “I want someone but I’m not gonna go out of my way to go get it, even if it is Valentines. They shall present themselves to me.” ISFP: “I might go out with friends if asked, but if not I’ll stalk happy couples on Facebook and make fun of the terrible couples, especially celebrities.” ISFJ: “I’m so single whyyyy. Time to eat ice cream and stay home.” ESFJ: “I’m so single whyyyy. Time to eat ice cream and stay home. Then, maybe go out tonight.” ENFJ: “Doesn’t matter to me, I’m a catch. I’ll go out tonight and have some fun, no secret motives at all.” INFJ: “I love Valentines Day. But if I don’t have anyone, I’m getting myself roses and chocolates, I’m worth it.” Hope you enjoyed and found this relatable!

[intrascholar]

INTP Personality Biases Examined

INTP Personality Biases Examined Given the qualities of the INTPs first two cognitive functions, introverted thinking and extroverted intuition, it may seem like INTPs ought to be open-minded by nature. Many INTPs would likely take pride in this, but they fail to realize what everyone else around them sees: they have very strong biases. The reason for this is that after analyzing information with Ti-Ne, the new information gets stored into their memory. This database of information is also known as the Si memory. It is constructed through Ti-Ne and expressed through inferior Fe. When the realizations they have stored into Si memory is called to the surface in the future, the INTP will not reanalyze anything unless they feel a strong reason to. Doing so would bring them great discomfort providing further incentive to not do so. So when a topic is brought up to an INTP, who believes they have already analyzed sufficiently, they will use Si-Fe to immediately reject any new input. Rather than reanalyzing the old logic and the new logic together, they will argue against the new logic using the old logic as a ‘flawless’ base of comparison. This is why INTPs can seem stubborn in the eyes of many. After the incident, the INTP may reanalyze the new information using Ti-Ne when alone. But this does not mean they will be unbiased in their second Ti-Ne analysis. This is partially because they tend to be insecure about their naturally weak Si-Fe skills. All INTPs have some level of desire for social acceptance but due to their naturally weak Si-Fe, they are unable to achieve it with the kind of natural people skills that an ESFJ type would exemplify. This leads INTPs to take pride within their thought systems, which becomes a part of their identity, an identity that would attract others and bring social recognition. Because they are insecure about their inferior Si-Fe pair, they will see this new information as a threat to their self-image, and they will attempt to justify their initial argument by logically trying to refute the new argument. If they cannot, one of two things will happen. Either they will change their minds (if they have well developed tertiary and inferior functions), or they will get even more emotional about the subject and blind themselves to all counterarguments. Put simply, INTP biases can be reduced to three main weaknesses of the INTP: Laziness In general, most INTPs have an aversion to stepping out of their comfort zone due to tertiary introverted sensing, even if they see value in doing so. Many will deny this however, since they view themselves to be ever-changing and open-minded, but there are certain habits and beliefs that are extremely difficult to alter, even if the INTP sees necessity in changing them. Pride All INTPs live with a construction of an internal system of logic and information. Imagine a pyramid made of building blocks. A slight disturbance in this system may send the whole pyramid crumbling. INTPs take pride in their database of knowledge and wisdom, as it is essentially their life’s work, leading them to defend it at any risk. INTPs are prone to perceiving their database of knowledge as great and flawless, and oftentimes superior to everyone else around them. Low Self-Awareness INTPs have low self-awareness in the sense that they tend to be unaware of how strong their bias is. People who are unaware of the way how they think, are also unaware of the influence that that weakness has on their worldview. INTPs, let alone anyone, will be unable to solve problems with the same consciousness, or database of thought in the INTPs case, that created it. This requires that the INTP detach themselves from initial biases, at least momentarily, and attempt to listen with a “beginners mind” without being closed off from the beginning. The more self-aware any individual is, the more they will understand and the more they will prosper. Understanding these weaknesses for an INTP can help to eliminate biases. This post was written in collaboration with an INTP Guest Contributor.

[intrascholar]

INTJ Weaknesses Examined

According to 16personalities.com, INTJs display the following weaknesses: Arrogant Judgmental Overly analytical Loathe highly structured environments Clueless in romance As an INTJ myself, I will try to discuss these different weaknesses and expand on it, adding on to other weaknesses INTJs have. Arrogant – INTJs tend to be arrogant, especially at the earlier stages of their life when their exposure to more intelligent groups is limited. Once they find more intelligent peers (if they don’t, they will likely remain arrogant for the rest of their life), the INTJ will respond in one of two ways. The INTJ will humble themselves, and stop treating others as if they are much more superior, and will only consider themselves superior in the regards they know themselves to be (which may be most things still). Or they will deny the discrepancies to keep their ego intact, losing themselves into worlds where they are superior, leading to them developing issues such as workaholism or gaming addictions. INTJs even have books on the link between their type and narcissism too. INTJs will be inwardly arrogant, but they won’t directly tell you how much better they consider themselves to be than you. Unless the INTJ is younger/more immature, they would rather imply it passive-aggressively or not imply anything at all. Why risk having ego damaged? Judgmental – Less developed INTJs tend to assume a lot, because their dominant introverted intuition has subconsciously analyzed many different patterns before, although the problem is that it may be an incomplete analysis. This leads to intuition that is unrefined and prone to being wrong, especially with more complex situations like those involving people matters. It’s akin to learning the mechanisms of a pond before stumbling upon a river and finding out the same principles don’t apply. The problem with this is that INTJs apply their auxiliary extroverted thinking too soon when it comes to matters that they think they already have a firm understanding of, when they would be better off making sure that they know all the details before making a judgement. This could easily apply for many personality types, but can be particularly troublesome with an obstinate INTJ who is convinced that their understanding is correct as it is. Overly Analytical – INTJs tend to over analyze a lot of things which is helpful within the logical realm of theories and ideas but it falls short when applied to the real world, especially with people. Not every human act can be explained easily, and this will annoy the INTJ who wants an explanation for why things happen. This can also lead to quick judgements to relieve themselves of the pressure of finding out the real reason behind an act, or the possibility that there was no big reason. Loathe highly structured environments – Contrary to what most would expect, INTJs tend to actually heavily dislike school. INTJs like learning a lot, but they would rather direct their own education rather than having a separate body telling them what they need to learn. The added factor of socialization within the school environment is also painful as it serves as just another distraction from their learning, forcing them to learn how to navigate the politics of multiple people being involved in a structure. However, just because many INTJs dislike school, this doesn’t mean that they won’t play the “game” and try to win by getting the best scores possible. For INTJs, their future vision of what they can accomplish by winning the “game” fuels their desire to withstand adversity. However, the weaker their vision as a result of completing a task, the less likely they are to invest time within it. This is also applicable for most people, but especially amplified for the INTJ who spends most of their time in their head. Clueless in Romance – For the younger INTJs, this is especially true. They will have no idea when anyone is interested. But after being caught off-guard a few times, they become acutely aware of when people are interested in them. However, after that, the INTJ is practically clueless. Their humor is very different from most other types, their flirting is abysmal, talking can be a chore at times and they aren’t often aware of social cues and people’s feelings. It can be a disaster without an understanding partner that doesn’t judge immediately or without strong personal growth from the INTJ. As INTJs are less than 2% of the population, it may not be a surprise that this type is not in abundance. My additions: Weirdly Emotional – This depends on whether the INTJ has a “hot” or “cool” personality. The INTJs with a cool personality tend to remain more detached and analytical while the hot INTJs will be more in tune with their emotions. This can lead to them feeling emotions more greatly but also arising poorly, leading to an emotional reaction that is often more than it should be. INTJs with hot personalities tend to have more associations with their tertiary introverted feeling. Whether any personality type is hot or cool also seems to be more associated with their enneagram type. Just Weird – INTJs spend a lot of their time in their head or on the computer/phone gathering information. For someone who is generally very detached from the world, this can lead to them developing a very niche personality that will deviate greatly from the norm of the social groups they have access to. Pair that with their natural unwillingness to talk to many people, they can become very closed off from others and hide their real selves as a result. They can fear showing what they really think due to being ridiculed, although it prevents them from finding out who would actually appreciate those thoughts too. Self-Doubting – INTJs are so self-doubting about themselves, they are the most likely out of all the types to try researching their own weaknesses. They have to know what’s wrong with them and how they can get better. This self-doubt can be transparent when they speak because they are willing to show their level of certainty or lack of it, which can come off poorly in the workplace and in relationships because other types would prefer certainty in their explanations. Too Serious – Younger INTJs often don’t know when people are joking, at least immediately. They will generally take many things at face value because of how often they take themselves seriously within their own thoughts. INTJs have high opinions of themselves in relations to others, “armor up” for social interactions and are constantly analyzing what people are saying, all of which leads to their solemn outlook when dealing with the external world. INTJs have a lot of work to do when it comes to their weaknesses, but a well-rounded and mature INTJ will generally become a powerful force to be reckoned with if they are able to master these weaknesses.

[intrascholar]

Which Generation Are You From?

Many people like to think that their preferences and choices are their own. But to what extent is that really true? How much autonomy do we really have to make our own decisions? If you know about MBTI and Enneagram, you already know that these two orientations of personality can make a huge impact on the style with which you approach life and the direction you choose. However, one theory, the Strauss-Howe generational theory proposes that even the timing of our birth can cause us to take on the attributes of the our generation’s zeitgeist in cycles of 4. There are 4 different generation archetypes: the prophets, nomads, heroes and artists. The emergence of these archetypes are centered around two distinct periods of heavy activity. The first distinct period of heavy activity is described as the crisis, where “institutional life is destroyed and rebuilt in response to a perceived threat to the nation’s survival. Civic authority revives, cultural expression redirects towards community purpose, and people begin to locate themselves as members of a larger group”. The second distinct period of heavy activity is described as the awakening, when “institutions are attacked in the name of personal and spiritual autonomy. Just when society is reaching its high tide of public progress, people suddenly tire of social discipline and want to recapture a sense of self-awareness, spirituality and personal authenticity.” Prophet generations are born near the end of a Crisis, during a time of rejuvenated community life and consensus around a new societal order. Prophets grow up as the increasingly indulged children of this post-Crisis era, come of age as self-absorbed young crusaders of an Awakening, focus on morals and principles in midlife, and emerge as elders guiding another Crisis. Nomad generations are born during an Awakening, a time of social ideals and spiritual agendas, when young adults are passionately attacking the established institutional order. Nomads grow up as under-protected children during this Awakening, come of age as alienated, post-Awakening adults, become pragmatic midlife leaders during a Crisis, and age into resilient post-Crisis elders. Hero generations are born after an Awakening, a time of individual pragmatism, self-reliance, and let-things-be attitude. Heroes grow up as increasingly protected post-Awakening children, come of age as team-oriented young optimists during a Crisis, emerge as energetic, overly-confident midlifers, and age into politically powerful elders attacked by another Awakening. Artist generations are born during a Crisis, a time when great dangers cut down social and political complexity in favor of public consensus, aggressive institutions, and an ethic of personal sacrifice. Artists grow up overprotected by adults preoccupied with the Crisis, come of age as the socialized and conformist young adults of a post-Crisis world, break out as process-oriented midlife leaders during an Awakening, and age into thoughtful post-Awakening elders. So how does this correspond with our present day? Keeping note that the age ranges of these generations are not set by any one authority, we are still able to see the formation of a plausible model that fits within the generational trends we see today. Baby Boomers, who would be between 52 and 70 in 2016, would be the Prophets. They experienced unprecedented good fortune within their youth having been born in an economy post-world war 2. Generation X, would be between 35 and 51 in 2016, would be the Nomads. Think The Breakfast Club. Generation Y, or millennial, 18 and 34 in 2016, would be the Heroes. The millennials were the last generation to see life without the internet yet on the cusp of new changes with technology. The Hero Generation comes of age during a crisis period, and with the emergence of The Great Recession and issues like ISIS, it makes sense that we are currently in a crisis period. Generation Z, will include those below 18 and those who have yet to be born, featuring as the Artist generation. What we can learn from observing these theories, is that each archetype is formed in response to the previous generations. Generation X incited a spiritual movement from the lack of soul within the strong and cold institutions they saw. The Baby Boomers sought to create unity as embodiments of society’s idealistic visions for the future. These different generations of people were all influenced by their predecessors and their births at specific periods of time. The personalities of these people, despite likely seeing themselves as autonomous individuals with their own goals, created a unique faction that represented an overlying message. It makes you wonder what our personalities could have been like, given the same experiences as our predecessors, what our dreams and goals would be like and whether we would understand people from different generations more. Given these theories of MBTI, Enneagram and Strauss-Howe generational theory, we can almost get a sense that we don’t choose our own destinies, but our destinies choose us. The real battle may be a matter of whether we choose to embrace our roles or fight against the tides.

[intrascholar]

Differences Between INTJs and Psychopaths

INTJs. People that are aware of MBTI personality typing have made quite a legend out of the INTJ personality type. Branded as masterminds, architects and other humbling titles such as the scientist, it can seem quite apparent that there is an appreciation for this personality type within the MBTI community. However, the general demeanor of the INTJ can be off putting to many people in a society full of sensors and feelers. Unlike other personality types, INTJs generally have noticeable scowls visible on their face, not because they are a jerk but because they’re so stuck in their heads that they lose awareness of how they appear to others. This quality does not help them to make extra friends. INTJs often go against the grain of society with their dominant introverted intuition and auxiliary extroverted thinking, breaking apart everything society holds near and dear to their heart because of their respect for traditions (introverted sensing). Their unconventional opinions can be very unpopular, especially at earlier stages of the INTJs life where they are unable to explain their ideas (due to weak extroverted thinking). And due to their tertiary introverted feeling, they are unable to access their emotions as easily as other types. This makes it difficult to be naturally empathetic and understand social queues as easily as other types. INTJs dread small talk as well, making them seem quite unsocial when they don’t engage in the norms of social interactions. When you add up all these various qualities, the INTJ can become a social pariah. And sometimes this can lead to impressions that they are psychopaths or sociopaths. Who would want to trust the guy who always looks angry and seems like he doesn’t give a damn about you when you talk to him? Well it turns out that there are a lot of differences between an INTJ and a sociopath. In fact, you could even say that the INTJ is the anti-sociopath, as they have similar qualities to sociopaths, yet they have other qualities that make them very different. This is not to say that someone can’t be both an INTJ and psychopath but the difference between INTJs and psychopaths of any type are discussed to reduce the misunderstanding of INTJ types. Differences Between INTJs and Psychopaths Both INTJs and psychopaths are capable of analyzing situations from a pragmatist perspective, but the psychopath is limited to that perspective vs the INTJ who can switch their perspectives to take into account human empathy and other factors. Both INTJs and psychopaths are effective at reading personalities, however psychopaths will look to take advantage of weaker ones while the INTJ will try to avoid the weaker and manipulative ones. INTJs naturally sniff out and avoid psychopaths. INTJs are not as good at persuading people naturally although they often should be listened to while psychopaths are very convincing because off their appeal to emotions rather than logic. INTJs often make bad/weak first impressions compared to psychopaths who are great at controlling impressions, however the opinions of people tend to switch considerably after getting to know them. INTJs gives off a stern, intense vibe scaring others into thinking he/she is a dangerous person compared to the sociopath will keep a close eye on how they are perceived and manipulate their image to seem friendly and interesting. Both are usually the opposite of how they come off internally. Psychopaths are very happy to share interesting information about themselves but eventually reveal themselves to be very superficial and fatuous while the INTJ will be very sparing with personal information and has more depth than they’d ever like to reveal except to a few individuals. As a result, you may be surprised to find that the very suave, social person is the real psychopath while the person who doesn’t make good impressions is in fact, hiding the depth of complexity within. Essentially, be wary of the people who work hard to impress and keep a keen eye on those who seem closed-off, you may find there’s more going on than meets the eye. Read more at intrascholar.com