transparent deer sitting on your blog aw
will byers stan first human second
Sweet Seals For You, Always
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

No title available
The Bowery Presents

if i look back, i am lost
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Noah Kahan
sheepfilms
Monterey Bay Aquarium
No title available
ojovivo
macklin celebrini has autism
wallacepolsom

#extradirty
One Nice Bug Per Day

tannertan36
Keni

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
🪼

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye

seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Russia
@jaxy-boy
transparent deer sitting on your blog aw
UN MINUTO, STO CERCANDO DI FARLE BENEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I apparently reblogged this in 2012 and someone just reblogged it from me this post is so fucki g cool and fu.nny
shout-out to all my friends i like youj
I hate ethics because what the hell is this.
Real slide in my real college level ethics class
I- what the fuck
How is this even a question. This is not troles problem level shit, this is just "will you save a child for 0 consequences or are you an asshole"
Because I see enough people saying this and being confused: that is, in fact, the point.
This slide is meant to be an extreme example to demonstrate where act utilitarianism falls apart. Act utilitarianism is ultimately measuring how much a given single act increases happiness/reduces suffering, and saying that the most ethical choice you can make for that action is the one where that increase/reduction is the highest. It's often used as a "man ethics is easy I got this shit solved, we don't have to talk about this"
So if, to assign an arbitrary number for the sake of example, saving a drowning child is a +100,000 Happiness Units, but giving a bunny a slight feeling of happiness is only +1, then of course you save the child. But if you're giving slight happiness to 100,001 bunnies, that brings more happiness than saving the child, and act utilitarianism says you should let the kid drown. Any evil can be the ethical choice given sufficient numbers of mildly pleased bunnies. This is, obviously, kinda insane. It's an example to show that while this kind of utilitarianism can work in most scenarios (the typical trolley problem, for example), there are times where it doesn't work, so it cannot function as a universal system of ethics.
oh I get it
made a whole au where they got married...
i swear im not insane
they should invent a yourself you can forgive
“our teeth and ambitions are bared” is a zeugma
and it’s a zeugma where one of the words is literal and one is metaphorical which is the BEST KIND
I didn’t know about zeugmas until just now! That is so awesome, everybody:
zeug·ma ˈzo͞oɡmə/
noun
a figure of speech in which a word applies to two others in different senses (e.g.,John and his license expired last week ) or to two others of which it semantically suits only one (e.g., with weeping eyes and hearts ).
ISN’T THAT AWESOME??
#in english class in high school my teacher had us write our own zeugmas in class#and one guy came up with ‘he fell from her favor… and the window’#i am forever looking for opportunities to use that one
She dropped her dress and inhibitions at the door.
What’s this? My favorite rhetorical device showing up on my dashboard?
IT HAS A NAMEEEE!! OH MY GOD!!!
I LOVE THIIIIIS!!!
One I’ve loved was “on their weekend trip they caught three fish and a cold”
I love these they’re like a pun and a metaphor wrapped up into one neat phrase
tumblr is great bc its like a diary where I can take other peoples diary entries and glue them into my own diary
I wanna throw up every time I see the new art with them 🤮 💗💓💞💕 moon cake × sweet tooth
used a slightly self indulgent palette with this one lol
I'm just saying, if you're going to worldbuild magic being a "raw, primal force, akin to and interweaving with nature itself" you gotta explain to me why animals don't use it
I know the normal answer is "they just aren't smart enough for it" but idk I've seen enough media where a character uses a spell in a moment of brain-off panic ilI feel like animals could probably stumble into a spell or two like, accidentally
Also how funny would it be to see a completely normal regular bear cast magic missile outta nowhere
Also there is no way ravens wouldn't figure out spells, tbh
They're smart fuckin birds, I believe in them
Either through observing or just figuring shit out ravens could 100% learn how to cast spells I'm sure of it
Dogs can also cast Magic Missile but every time they do the projectile is shaped like a bone or a stick and they chase after it
group of wizards who ask this in-universe, and after extensive study learn to their surprise that animals are casting spells all the time, just that their magic is so fundamental as to be unrecognizable to humans. turns out the only reason acorns grow on trees is because squirrels keep wishing for them.
It's fun being queer and weird and unconventional until you remember you live in a society
to anyone who missed it:
blorbo - a favourite character
glup shitto - star wars names are fucking nonesense
eeby deeby - youre going to hell
plinko horse - a horse that was stuck in a plinko board
scrimblo bimblo - super smash bro fans can be very angry when characters aren't in a game
Me, so I can view the original meme:
People keep tagging this as educational and I don't know what to do or think about that.
Glossary of Terms
I don’t know if I should be amused or distressed by the realization that someday this post will probably be useful to linguists.
reblog this to remind the person you reblogged it from that theyre loved
“HE TRIED TO FIX HIS BRAIN AND MAKE HIM HAPPY.”