This is the money Marge. Reblog for good fortune
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
No title available
DEAR READER

izzy's playlists!
will byers stan first human second

Andulka
One Nice Bug Per Day
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

tannertan36
d e v o n
taylor price
wallacepolsom
art blog(derogatory)
YOU ARE THE REASON

shark vs the universe

romaâ
todays bird
AnasAbdin
$LAYYYTER

seen from Egypt

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Russia

seen from Chile

seen from Germany

seen from United States
@judacriss
This is the money Marge. Reblog for good fortune
Piracy is theft, and it has nothing to do with Disney specifically. It has to do with art requiring artists' labour and you devaluing when you steal it. I could care less about Disney as a company but piracy harms the industry, not them.
To be loved is to be changed.
This is all i could think about walking out of the theater, i was LITERALLY sobbing my eyes out /pos
The ending of this movie was GARBAGE.
okay so i did start that WIP i was talking about and now it's, uh, finished? or okay the first draft is finished. i need to go the fuck to sleep but godDAMN i really like this fic and maybe i hope other people will like it.
Is It a fic where Garnet tries to HELP Pearl and Rose with some of the struggles they have? Cause if so I'd love to read It.
Imagine being an alien war criminal who's in gay love with your partner in crime, only for them to friendzone you in favor of a het relationship, makes a baby then dips, and now you're left to care for their child in their absence.
Say it with me "PEARL IS NOT FRIEND ZONED. ROSE LOVES HER"
AI defenders will make it seem as if art is this gatekept pastime that only the most elite can partake in and theyâre making it possible for the ânormiesâ to create meanwhile one of the most memorable pieces of recent art Iâve ever seen is âMy sonâs drawing of safeâ
Well, I don't want to create anything like that. I want to create something that looks neat and clean and symmetrical. What then?
then you use the tools for that job, naturally.
What if I have no time or energy because of a job or my education?
Well, if using Ai in place of talent or skill is your favorite option, your education is obviously failing you
Tell me how I may acquire that talent or skill
There's this funny little thing called practicing and not piggy backing off robots to do a piss poor job :)
See above. This is how class differences actually come out most of the time.
I was actually taught by my mother and lived in poverty for a long time, though im not sure how class plays into being against AI "art" because its soulless, lazy, and frequently steals from real artists, me and her practiced on napkins and used broken pencils, its not the Quality that makes art, art, its the fact that art is the one universal understanding, and AI can't replicate it, no matter how hard you argue it. It will never be art, effort makes art, no matter how much effort, if you can type in a prompt to Bing, you can look up a free drawing tutorial and create your own art, no job worth doing comes quickly or easy, art takes practice, i was incredibly lucky these past few years, my parents bought a new house and were able to take me to art lessons before I started middle school, please, AI is horrible, compare real human made art, to fake, stolen AI art, AI looks soulless, effortless isn't always good, when I was younger I spent my recesses with a bunch of kids who wanted to draw like me, and I did my best to teach them, look for any artistic person in your life and just ask, ask them to explain color theory or body ratios, hell, I'd explain it to you, I apologize if anything I said offended you, but I hope you realize the effect an increased usage of AI does to creatives
So what you're saying is you just found the time because you wanted it so much, and now you're just fine because you got a break. And of course you, who had people who loved and supported you all the way, are representative of all people who lived in poverty. If you can do it, can't they? How original. Can we make a new kind of bourgeois propaganda or are we just stuck with this general story frame forever?
Lol @cadmium64 your replies are beyond pathetic. Grow up and work at the skills you wanna have. AI is not a skill. It is art theft.
Don't you guys have butter to churn or something? Ink to refill? Why don't you just hop in your carriage and go to the market and get yourself some nice filling bread and cheese?
I'm just dishing out low grade insults at this point. I promised myself I wouldn't argue on the internet because it made me feel bad, but this feels fine really.
Look at @cadmium64 and their pathetic attempt to hide their lack of drive and talent XD
"I don't get why AI bros⢠say artists are elitist gatekeepers, look at this drawing a kid made."
"But what if I want to make something that doesn't look like a child's drawing?"
"Then you'd better be able to buy the right tools and spend a lot of time practicing, you lazy thief. Hey everyone, get a load of this person's pathetic lack of drive and talent!"
It is truly a mystery why anyone would think such friendly and non-judgmental people were a bunch of elitist gatekeeping assholes.
Also, it will never stop being funny how "AI art looks soulless" if and only if the person making that judgment already knows that it was made by AI:
Gatekeeping is not even always bad thing moron. Yes art SHOULD be gatekept from AI garbage.
Toxic Yuri Bracket Round 27
Which ship is more toxic?
Pearl/Rose Quartz (Steven Universe)
Cassandra/Rapunzel (Tangled: The Series)
What the heck? Listen I like cassunzel but.... Cassandra LITERALLY tried to kill Rapunzel and Eugene a couple times?
Pearlrose isn't even exactly toxic they are just shit at communicating
You know what? I give up. Fandoms are hopeless
Like, imagine the logic needed to claim "X character once intentionally tried to kill the other and a person they love but they are less toxic than pearlrose"
Like, I am the last person to dunk on Cassunzel it is one of my fave ships but the way people see Pearlrose in a twisted way is too much lol.
Yeah this poll and post is absolute nonsense lol
Lol
This has to be the worst poll ever made
Toxic Yuri Bracket Round 27
Which ship is more toxic?
Pearl/Rose Quartz (Steven Universe)
Cassandra/Rapunzel (Tangled: The Series)
Im going with Pearl and Rose. While i have mixed feelings on both, iâd argue Cass and Rapunzel are less toxic. By the time the series started it was already known Eugene and Rapunzel were together and Cass never really made an attempt to ruin that. Sure she didnât like him but sheâd never try to like, break em up (like pearl with greg. Though i wouldnât say Pearl is worse than Rose in this ship, absolutely not. Pearl was created for her, she was meant to be at her side)
Its also important to note that even though Cass was clearly having inadequacy issues before her betrayal, Zhan tiri definitely made things more toxic though her manipulation during the seashell house arc. In fact most of the moments in s3 where Cass is being toxic is because of Zhan tiri, and when sheâs not around (like in âOne a handmaidenâ before sheâs discovered) she actually is pretty good at understanding and communicating with Rapunzel until sheâs made to believe sheâs wrong again.
Cassandra was manipulated, Rose acted of her own accord. Nobody manipulated her once the other diamonds thought she was shattered.
Call me biased since i stole my nickname from Cassandra, but one is definitely far worse than the other here.
Cassunzel is obviously worse than the other here. I don't remember Rose trying to kill Pearl or even hurt her in any way.
(manipulation or not Cassandra did make the choice to try to KILL Rapunzel more than once)
PearlRose I would argue isn't one-sided at all. Rose is just shit terrible at communicating and assumes everyone is cool with her being polyarmorous. Her and Pearl are still very much involved when she's falling head over heels for Greg and getting serious with him. We've seen how Pearl is without Rose, I'm pretty sure Pearl would've been an even bigger wreck if Rose had actually broken up with her.
no i know however the sheer level of devotion pearl had for rose wasn't reciprocated at least the way pearl felt it (important) so thats why i said not completely
ok im starting to see how people think they were in a relationship now but honestly i always thought that rose just though her and pearl were best friends đđ and that if she did like her romantically she didnt understand those romantic feelings (as in thought they were some kind of weird platonic feelings), like how she didnt understand a lot of her romantic feelings for greg, but either way i def agree the sheer level of devotion and tbh obsession that pearl had with rose wasnt reciprocated
people always say this and it bugs me? Because what does "the level of devotion wasn't reciprocated" even mean here?
Especially since you called Pearl's love for Rose "obsession"? I disagree, but if so how was Rose supposed to reciprocate that?
hello !!!!!!! sorry i didnt explain much i didnt realise pearl having a love obsession (??? i dont remember what its called exactly) wasnt a common interpretation, im saying this as someone who has personally experienced this and personally saw her as having some behaviours i displayed when i was going through this, it basically means that you have some kind of trauma and as a reaction to that you develop an obsession with someone your in love with, like you become absolutely fixated on them to an unhealthy agree, pearl was completely devoted to rose, which can be sweet and healthy but to me it seemed like the sheer level of devotion pearl had to rose was due to trauma of being objectified and constantly talked down to on homeworld. she started falling in love when pink diamond/rose was the first person to treat with respect and as a real, valuable person, which can be a cute and healthy love story !!! just due to the obsessive ways pearl behaves after this i feel like because of the way shes been mistreated in the past it seems like she really latched onto rose, partly due to genuine love and partly as a trauma response.
also i assumed she was probably 'programmed' in some way when being made to be completely devoted to the diamond she was serving, like she was literally designed that way or something, kind of like the way that children are instinctually attached to their parents to some extent. i dont think this is the whole reason shes in love with her, but its what i assumed was the reason that she was SO devoted and attached to her. I know this isnt every persons interpretation, but its just how i saw it as someone whos experienced that. its not that i think shes in love with rose soley because of how she was made and her past of being objectified, but i do think it changed the way that she loved her, growing so much devotion that she develops obsessive tendancies and even becomes self sacrificial.
for example especially in season 1, sometimes when she talks about rose she seems agitated like making anxious expressions and shaking ect, its just the way she talks and behaves around her and when talking about her, like constantly being desperate for her attention and doing anything to impress her, and the way that she puts her on this pedestal and completely idealizes her, the way that she is fulling willing to die for her without hesitation like she teaches connie in sworn to the sword, honestly i think she (at least for a lot of the show) was still in the mindset of being below pink diamond/rose. also, back the fact she is willing to die for rose without even hesitation (at least in that point of the show). i honestly dont know how that could be interpreted as healthy love, it is my personal interpretation that she developed obsessive tendacies about rose, and everyone else is entitled to their own interpretations, but i honestly do not know how anyone could possibly explain the way she acts about rose in sworn to the sword specifically as just healthy love towards someone. maybe some people see it that way but i just genuinlly dont understand how anyone could, honestly id be happy for anyone who does maybe think this to explain why because im genuinly curious.
basically the "level of devotion" i was talking about was referring to my personal interpretation of how pearl acts and feels about rose and why, also im a bit confused by what u said at the end but for clarification yeah rose is absolutely not suppose to reciprocate (what i see as) pearls obsession towards her, this kind of obsession is super unhealthy and is rooted in deeper issues like trauma, not love.
btw, with roses side of this relationship, she did some really bad things to pearl, like forcefully making it so that shes never be able to talk about what happened in a single pale rose, which i am pissed at her for, but generally in the relationship (weather it was platonic, romantic or otherwise) i think rose was just super niave. like she just genuinlly didnt understand that pearl was in love with her, and if she loved her back i dont think she understood that either, her whole arc with greg was about her not understanding love, so i think its kind of unfair for people to expect her to be able to recognise love in other people (like pearl) when she cant even recognise it herself and barely understood what love even is, at least before and at the beginning of her and gregs relationship
anyways its cool if u disagree, a lot of people interpret pearl and roses relationship in a lot of different ways so if you wanna ask anything or explain how u see it pls feel free !!!!! id actually really like to hear other interpretations if u (or anyone else) wanted to share
ok just before i post i just found the names of 2 conditions that r based on obsessive love, limerence and obsessive love disorder if anyone wanted to look into it more :) i didnt know there were multiple so there may also be more that im not aware of
no I get what you mean and I do think Pearl struggled to express her love to Rose as an equal since she never had an equal relationship, but I dislike when people dismiss Pearl's (imo very genuine) love and devotion to Rose as some obsession or programming.
And if it is just that....then how is Rose supposed to reciprocate something so utterly fake and unhealthy anyway?
PearlRose I would argue isn't one-sided at all. Rose is just shit terrible at communicating and assumes everyone is cool with her being polyarmorous. Her and Pearl are still very much involved when she's falling head over heels for Greg and getting serious with him. We've seen how Pearl is without Rose, I'm pretty sure Pearl would've been an even bigger wreck if Rose had actually broken up with her.
no i know however the sheer level of devotion pearl had for rose wasn't reciprocated at least the way pearl felt it (important) so thats why i said not completely
ok im starting to see how people think they were in a relationship now but honestly i always thought that rose just though her and pearl were best friends đđ and that if she did like her romantically she didnt understand those romantic feelings (as in thought they were some kind of weird platonic feelings), like how she didnt understand a lot of her romantic feelings for greg, but either way i def agree the sheer level of devotion and tbh obsession that pearl had with rose wasnt reciprocated
people always say this and it bugs me? Because what does "the level of devotion wasn't reciprocated" even mean here?
Especially since you called Pearl's love for Rose "obsession"? I disagree, but if so how was Rose supposed to reciprocate that?
I saw someone saying that in "Now We're Only Falling Apart", when Steven told Pearl that Rose chose to live on Earth with her forever, it meant that Rose loved Pearl too. I never thought like that before, but if it's true, that's cute as fuck
Yeah, thereâs actually a lot of signs like that if you look for them. Idk why people are so reluctant to say that Rose loved Pearl
I think it's because at some point Rose stopped loving Pearl, and I bet they didn't have anything romantic because they were terrible at talking about their feelings with each other, so Rose's love just faded, yk? As we were shown Rose kissing someone in the past while Garnet told her story to the Off Colors, her in the end falling in love with Greg and the whole story we already know. Even after all these years and these events, Pearl hasn't stopped loving her, and that's what we are shown during almost the entire show, so it makes we think that Rose never loved her
Why do you think Roses love faded? Rose can love more than one person romantically at once.
Which wlw ship is healthier representation?
Cassunzel (Cassandra and Rapunzel, Tangled)
Lumity (Luz x Amity, Owl House)
This is an incredibly absurd, stupid and nonsensical poll OP. What point are you trying to make here?
No point. Iâm just curious what people think in the fandoms.
I mean, it just feels like a very one sided poll designed for nothing except maybe to ""drag"" cassunzel by comparing it to lumity. Why?
Which wlw ship is healthier representation?
Cassunzel (Cassandra and Rapunzel, Tangled)
Lumity (Luz x Amity, Owl House)
This is an incredibly absurd, stupid and nonsensical poll OP. What point are you trying to make here?
ROUND 1: Eleven | Jane Hopper/Max (Elmax) VS Pearl/Rose Quartz (Pearlrose)
Eleven | Jane Hopper/Max (Elmax)
Pearl/Rose Quartz (Pearlrose)
two best friends who support eachother vs slave x colonizer. make your choice
Are you seriously calling Pearl a slave and Rose a colonizer? Were you asleep when watching their story?
thinking about atla again and itâs not that azula doesnât âdeserveâ a redemption arc or whatever, itâs that sheâs not in a place where one is a possibility for her. yes, azula is a child who deserves compassion and understanding.
but she is also a princess and military commander of an imperial power who has personally conquered cities. like. yes! i do think that someone should help her! but that canât come until either she stops hurting people of her own volition or is taken out of a position where she can keep hurting people.
you canât give the tyrant king therapy until either he stops being a tyrant king or you take him off the throne, detain him, and then force his ass INTO therapy.
Uhhh mate ? Did you watch the entire show?
He wasnât âthereâ, but he definitely knows something he doesnât want to sayâŚ..Â
Oh fuck, is this about the rebellion and stuff?Â
Nah. He just means he cant help cause he wasn't there.
I wish I knew how many of the people complaining about Netflix or Disney cancelling their favorite show ACTUALLY were paying a subscription to watch it legally.
Cause these days, everyone is encouraging piracy because "evil corporations" and then a acting surprised when these corporations cancel their show.
If you steal a product, you cannot be surprised if they discontinue. Disney or Netflix only know the number of people watching their shows legally and that is what counts.
That's a really bad faith and entirely moot point. This would only be relevant in the first place if shows were being pirated unevenly - if squid game gets pirated en mass but then people watch idk riverdale legally then it skews the data. But that's not what's happening, netflix is 'losing' a percentage of views across the board, and it doesn't affect any individual show's success chances.
Second, netflix isn't actually losing any views. By not paying their employees and by pricing out of most people's budget (especially when facing competition now effectively quadrupling the actual cost of streaming) they've lowered their customer base. These are not potential customers they lost, these are people who couldn't afford it.
Third, yes stealing from big, abusive corporations is actually good.
Fourth, netflix was already in the habit of cancelling shows mid production for very little reason at all. They created a culture of cancelling shows so early in production they haven't had time to garner a large audience - especially original ideas which do not have an established fanbase to draw in immediately. By created the expectation in viewer's minds that shows will be cancelled in the first two seasons, they've discouraged people from starting their original shows, which no one expects to last. THIS wildly affects their viewing data and creates this cycle, but the reality is, Netflix execs created the problem. By demanding the same numbers from originals that are poorly advertised as they got from vetted IP's like The Witcher, they've convinced everyone that none of their new shows are even worth starting.
Finally, people know damn well how to support content they like. Spending 10 minutes on tumblr should have made that clear, with how many people jump on patreons for artists, writers, and youtube creators. We have infinite content to support and not infinite money. If you have to choose, pumping money into bezos' pocket is not a good thing. Maybe if netflix, amazon, and hbo want viewers, they should start paying their employees enough to afford their own streaming services.
What you said is entirely moot - all it means is that shows and creators are being hurt by piracy and theft in general. Period.