noise dept.
One Nice Bug Per Day
art blog(derogatory)
sheepfilms
YOU ARE THE REASON
occasionally subtle
Doug Jones

pixel skylines

#extradirty
Cosimo Galluzzi

Jimmy Eat World
Monterey Bay Aquarium
No title available

Kiana Khansmith
Keni

Origami Around
ojovivo
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Show & Tell
tumblr dot com

seen from Türkiye

seen from Singapore

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Jamaica
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from Colombia

seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from Costa Rica

seen from Saudi Arabia
@kennyomegasweave
Not bad, they got into character quickly. Cut!
hate when i get a password wrong and the browser goes "heyyyy :) do you want me to save those credentials you entered :)" like i am already humiliated why must you rub salt into that wound firefox
unconvinced i'll ever find "the vitamin" that makes me all better so i can get real work done but i do expect they'll elucidate whatever my deal was post-mortem, after which what i did manage to accomplish with my life will be regarded on the level of Beethoven composing despite being deaf or Gordon Ramsay cooking despite being british
TIANYUAN. Weibo Update (2026).
"I think that the place that they end, walking hand in hand — frankly, there's an introduction of a physical intimacy in the finale that does feel new to me. I think when Ava meets Deborah at the airport, and she puts her head on her shoulder, they've hugged, and they've, you know, pushed each other a little in jest… I think there was a real, genuinely new physical intimacy that was established throughout, they're really holding each other in this way that is new throughout, whether that's in the airport or in the Louvre, or in that last shot walking arm in arm. I do think something new happens in the finale." - Hannah Einbinder
leviticus (2026)
Angel Reese making history as the first pro athlete to walk the runway at the 2025 Victoria's Secret Fashion Show.
padme haunting the narrative of return of the jedi
haunting the narrative refers to a character who is absent but whose actions have major consequences to the story and help to build the theme of the work
(For @butchvaderkin's 'Where is Padmé' celebration)
Hacks— “Montecito” (5.07)
ryan teasing naim
JONGHO - DAZED KOREA BEHIND - logbook#224
so many negative reviews for leviticus saying it was bad because it didn't explore the entity deeper really grate on me bc it's such a fundamental misunderstanding of the story adrian was trying to tell. we dont get the origins of the entity because it doesn't matter, it's clear from the beginning what function it serves the narrative—a physical manifestion of homophobia. leviticus is not a supernatural monster film, it's a coming of age; a teenage boy reckoning with his queer identity and the reality that because of who he is, he will always be at risk from homophobia
although i can understand some of the dissatisfaction given how leviticus was heavily marketed as a horror film (and typical horror conventions dictate the supernatural being is a focal point), negative reviews lose me when they demonstrate a complete disinterest in engaging what the film actually is, rather than what they wanted it to be. leviticus won't satisfy you if you're marking it against a rubric it wasn't designed for. the deliverence healer and the entity aren't fleshed out further because they are not the focus, and adrian is not a bad writer for choosing not to spend his incredibly tight run time on something that wasn't important to the story he was actually trying to tell: queer kids harmed by the dangers of religiously charged homophobia.
i can't help but feel like these comments that leviticus was "underdeveloped" and "poorly written" come from the fact adrian refused to hold the audience's hand. he left things out because he wanted the viewers to fill in the gaps with their own experiences, making the film more personal and grounded. if you weren't shown something, it's because adrian gave you enough to figure out the rest yourself or because it wasn't relevant. every time i rewatch leviticus im blown away by how restrained it is. its not common (especially nowadays) we get a writer/director so willing to hand a film over to its audience and let them independently join the dots. adrian did not poorly execute leviticus' message, he just makes you work for it.
art is obviously subjective and everyone is free to post their review, but if you go on abt how leviticus is bad because it didn't dig deeper into the deliverence healer/entity and wasn't clear abt its message, don't be surprised when people tell you you didn't understand the film.
if somebody is like, ‘excessively’ picky about food (and it’s not a deliberate dietary restriction like being vegan or paleo) then it’s almost certainly related to a disability or health condition. in fact I’d go as far as to say it’s 100% down to a disability or a health condition, even if they don’t know it themselves!
Nobody is going to choose to be extra picky about what they eat just like, for shits & giggles bcos it’s 1) extraordinarily inconvenient and 2) very anxiety-inducing
self reblog to add: the reason some picky eaters gravitate towards processed food as their ‘safe’ foods isn’t because they just want to eat junk food all the time. it’s because processed foods are predictable - you go into a mcdonalds and order chicken nuggets, they will be the same as every other mcdonalds chicken nuggets you’ve ever had.
if you have sensory processing disorder or ARFID (or both!) even tiny variations in what you’re eating can be a Big Deal. the natural variety you get with homecooked and fresh foods that most people enjoy is stressful and unpleasant. even eating a different brand of processed food than you usually would is :S when it’s not a given they’ll be truly identical.
I see people act like someone who’s ‘safe’ food is e.g. bread and butter must have a legitimate issue whereas someone who’ll only eat mcdonalds chicken nuggets is clearly being obnoxious but that’s just… not true? what makes it a legitimate problem is how restricted the person’s diet is, not what foods they eat.
sorry for the deep fried nature of this pic, i had a hard time finding a good copy (or a source). but this has stuck with me since i first saw it
Higher resolution image in case the other one is two small.