I want to lick a frog xD @ladypugga - Tumblr Blog

Oooh! This is actually longtime Popeye character Cylinda Oyl. Olive Oyl's sister in-law. She was always subculture. Used to be a flapper.

In recent comics, when Randy Milholland of Something Positive took over, she very deliberately went goth and also they started to draw her with dark skin.

Also of note is that Popeye was apparently raised in a black family in this run as seen by his foster dad Whaler Joe and Marine Biologist Student sister Petunia here.

Also, the Sea Hag's nonbinary intern is dating Olive's apparently bisexual cousin Sutra.

jaymilepland

Popeye... is woke fr... not just amateurnouns?!

perceived skill

supportive friendgroup

depsidase

jurassicpeanut

No bond stronger than a disabled girl and her disabled cat

bacteriumphage

Thought that post was cute so i drew it

pangur-and-grim

always doing something annoying

pangur-and-grim

can I be honest? I was so pissed off by friends and family criticizing my soap choice that, for half a year, I did an experiment where I washed one hand with Palmolive and one with handsoap, to prove that it didn't make your skin any rougher. and do you know what the result is? it does make your skin rougher. and now I'm even more pissed off.

heavilyglacialvalhalla

I love this. This is the beauty of the honest scientific process. You had an idea, you tested it and you still reported the results even though the results disproved your idea.

It's ok to be mad at it, you're an honest scientist.

moonychka

In the name of the moon I will punish you 😎

wiseguynephile

#the increasing militarization of the moon kingdom has interplanetary relations experts ‘deeply concerned’

sztupy

A German regional court has ruled that Google is directly liable for the content of its AI search overviews. According to the court, previou

ayeforscotland

Let’s fucking go

made-in-manetheren

This is HUGE.

1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.

2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.

3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."

4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.

TL;DR Google reeeeeally stepped in it this time.