Lenzoli

shimeji? sudoku? bocch? it's yours my friend, as long as you have enough tolerance for me

[lenzoli]

i have been neglecting this place... 💔

heres something i was working on a bit ago. hope i can make more time for it soon

[ros-sauce]

"Cutes" is an autological word

[ros-sauce]

It's literally cutes...

[microsff]

The parking attendant paused by the double-length bay. Intended for mobile homes and cars with trailers, it was currently occupied by a sleeping dragon.

No parts of it extended beyond the lines, and the paper ticket was clearly displayed, impaled on a horn.

The parking attendant moved on.

[lionessfeather]

I was going to just queue it for later but then it stuck in my brain, and I decided to make it everyone's problem

[linqyus]

Love bullet sketches!!

[hi-im-kaybee]

jerma: listen... i just really like strawberries and bananas! (suppressed giggle) it's not- it's not weird to like fruit. to enjoy a yummy strawberry on a summer's day! (looks at chat) "strawberries are weird and gross". what?! huh?!? listen to yourself!! what are you even saying?!?

the game he's playing: [grinding corpses to viscera in an abandoned hospital]

[pisces-comet]

northernlion: Do. Do you ever think about those half-time events where they give away free tuition to whichever college student could sink a basketball into the hoop? How fucked up would it be if you were the person who didn't sink in a basketball and your only thought while an entire stadium is applauding your classmate is "If I'd only sunk one more ball in I wouldn't have had crippling debt"? They got college students out here in the damn hunger games and what? (reads chat) "...hey NL it's just for fun you know what fun is right". you're morally bankrupt. and you will never see the light of heaven. motherfucker. (shouting) AT LEAST IF THEY WERE KILLING EACH OTHER FOR SPORT WE COULD BE HONEST ABOUT WHAT IS ACTUALLY GOING ON THERE!!! (adjust headphones) Anyway...

the game he's playing: [pastel emoji matching game]

[tittled]

grandma ate my fucking pizza

[sivavakkiyar]

make neccessary corrections

[hbmmaster]

for me the thing about pointless internet debates is that I used to like them when I was younger, but it was because I thought everyone was engaging them in the way I was ("here's a question without a meaningful answer! isn't that interesting? let's spend some time discussing why there isn't an answer") before I accepted that no a lot of people really do have a strong opinion on the definition of "sandwich" or how to pronounce "gif". the most common way to engage with them is to develop a strong gut-reaction initial opinion on the topic and then just stick with that until the debate stops trending. it's frustratingly uncommon to actually learn anything about why the ambiguity existed in the first place.

like idk this might just be me but I think learning about differences in perception or how some words are impossible to define is just more fun than getting performatively angry about it

[peppermoths]

does anyone want to see a really good picture of my kitty cat

[peppermoths]

[cheddar-baby]

not a cat, first off

[cheddar-baby]

snale

[doomsday-dj]

There was recently a copyright infringement case in YA and I need everyone to know that the following sentence was in the legal decision:

“Hot, sexy, dangerous boys, central to virtually all young adult romance novels, cannot be copyrighted.”

[kuttithevangu]

“Regarding setting, the court held that both works taking place in Alaska high schools was not protectable because Alaska is a public place and setting a teen novel in a high school is a common genre convention.”

Freeman v. Deebs-Elkenaney | Loeb & Loeb LLP

Freeman v. Deebs-Elkenaney | Loeb & Loeb LLP

[kogiopsis]

I've read the entire decision (skimming over the purely legal precedent/definitions bit) and here are some of my favorite bits:

[eixd-deactivated20150710]

The rest of the space is going to be pretty pissed when they see this. 

[thesassycat]

did you google how to take a screen shot

[speculative]

Taiko no triangleposting by airuei

[johncraft2003]

[aqwult]

[argumate]

I don't see what the-- oh gosh

[certified-door-posts]

certified door post

[tics-deactivated20201202]

POV u are a tasty little cheese

[catbreon-draws]

If you close your eyes right before the rat hits, your brain will think that you have died. some people find calmness in this.

[lustcannibalism]

ok I endured it. now what!!!!!!!!!

[lustcannibalism]

[minttttttttttttttttttttttttttt]

sorry but this video is like a parasitic species to me

[contextfreepatentart]

[patent-art-contextualizer]

Application ID 20260135623

Quantum Transceiver Antenna and Method for Construction

Applicant: Q-Net, LLC

Okay so I spent literal hours doing research on this to figure out if it was viable, only to discover that the two listed inventors, Marianne Veronika Sandor and Edward Michael Porrazzo, had their assets frozen by the SEC and were subsequently fined over $1.2 million for fraud related to a similar claimed invention back in 2018. In short, they claimed their “quantum transducer” would serve as a revolutionary 3D technology for tablets, backing their statements with expired patents and technologies that either didn’t exist or were manufactured by unrelated companies. They then funneled over half of the investor funds raised from these fraudulent claims into their own accounts, spending it in comically lavish ways, as shown below.

Moddha is the name of the company they used for this fraud.

With that in mind, let’s look at the paragraph that gave me the greatest pause when looking at this.

All in all, this paragraph seems to misrepresent basic facts about antennas in an effort to further its own claims. For example, as I’m typing this, I’m getting cell phone signal in a closed-off room, which this implies shouldn’t be possible. In the same vein, basic TV antennas have been usable inside for decades, and the same goes for radios. Yes, the reception indoors is going to be worse than outdoors, but in most buildings you’ll still get decent reception unless you’re underground, near the center of a larger building, or in a Faraday Cage.

While I can’t make a definitive claim of fraud with respect to this application, the history of the inventors and the misrepresentation of fact don’t really look great. And that’s just from the stuff I understand; there may very well be fundamental problems with the quantum mechanics as well.

[balaclava-trismegistus]

ʷʰᵃᵗˢ ᵘᵖ ᶦᵗˢ ᵐᵉ ᵗᶦⁿʸ ʰᵃʷᵏ

ᶦ ᶦⁿᵛᵉⁿᵗᵉᵈ ᵗʰᵉ ᵗᵉᶜʰ ᵈᵉᶜᵏ