This is something I’ve wondered for a long time. Does anyone have any idea exactly why William doesn’t like Michael and doesn’t want to accept him as his son? Especially because he decided to have two more kids. What was it about Michael that was different? Does his similar appearance have something to do with it? As interesting as I find William I’ve always found it a bit hard to get inside his mind. But also we weren’t given an overwhelming amount of information about this relationship which I hate because it’s one of the most important relationships in the story lmao. Their similar appearance is emphasized over and over and over to a point where Michael ended up *literally* purple because Scott wanted to get that point across extra hard. But at the same time, the idea that William dislikes Michael came from The Immortal and the Restless (I think)? I was actually talking to someone about how Michael being so uniquely hated by him is unanimously agreed upon but was wondering where exactly that came from. Is there anything other than the Immortal and the Restless? I would love to know if there is.
Like most, I’m of the belief that William hated him enough to not even want to be associated with him (The Immortal and the Restless does make a good case for that) and considering William’s treatment of his other children throughout the franchise I think it’s basically canon that he’s an abuse victim. But I was thinking about it and I was just like, why? It’s not like William is a great father to Elizabeth and crying child but why is Michael singled out? Why does William wish Michael WASN’T his son? Williamheads I would love to hear your thoughts.
Even their voices are similar and P.J. Heywood (William and Michael’s voice actor is the same person which I’m sure was a deliberate decision) had this to say about that, and I have not been able to get this off of my mind:
“And in terms of playing the two, it does allow you to explore two sides of… what would otherwise be very similar people if it wasn’t for their characters. You know, William’s dead and shambling around. Michael’s dead and shambling around.”
I just want to know more about this relationship. I mean I’ve inferred based on what we know plus some logic how Michael was treated by William and how he feels about William, but I still haven’t quite figured out the reasons behind the way William feels about Michael. If there even is one.
P.J. Heywood also said that it sounds to him like Michael is trying to win William’s approval which I thought was worth putting here too since it counts as one of those crumbs of information.
I kind of understand what he means like, I feel like Michael might still want that deep down even if he hates William. But you know when I listen to the beginning of that speech it always reads to me as “I did what you asked me to and I succeeded, are you happy?” coming from someone who has never been able to do anything right for the person he’s speaking to. But I think there’s a tone shift, several actually, but specifically right at “There’s only one thing left for me to do. I’m going to come find you” that is threatening. It always sounded that way to me especially with the implication that Michael is the one who started the FNAF 3 fire (I think the “I’m going to come find you” is the warning and the scene we’re viewing is a flash forward to the aftermath) but I’ve seen other people say they don’t read it as threatening and I just. I like that we’ve all listened to that and tried to interpret emotions. My favorite one is after he says “they thought I was you” he makes this quiet noise and I still cannot decide if it’s a laugh at how ridiculous and unfortunate the situation is, or if it’s some sort of scoff from frustration at that fact.
Last thing I’ll put here, I’m not really a big fan of the new FNAF stuff but I did at least watch a playthrough of the new one. It didn’t resonate with me so I didn’t look very far into that Moon thing but this.
And in my mind, I’m immediately thinking of that toy phone in FNAF 4 and the question in the survival logbook asking Michael if his favorite toy was the phone. Maybe there’s another meaning for this line or something else it’s meant to represent that I don’t know due to not looking into it but it’s a question I’d been meaning to ask so it’s worth putting here.
My guess would be two things:
1) Michael is A LOT like him
2) Michael has a mind of his own and he WILL stand his ground.
There might be a deeper story even before that, but it would be too much of a speculation: but these two points seem to be actually implied.
Their manner of speech, the "theatrics", are quite similar (look at William's voice lines in DBD and Mike's speech + constantly making jokes in survival book, for example) - they even look so alike.
And Mike is very proactive - he WILL take action and be bold with it, when sitiation calls for it.
What does it all make him? A rival.
He's so much like William, AND he goes against him, AND he's not going to just stay low - he's a threat to William. He could always become one, and with his actions William made him exactly that. If William wasn't so proud and stubborn - he could mold Michael into a second version of himself, but instead he chose to try and break him. And failed.













