*bass boosted "FAKE OFF" by RONDO x Merm4id intensifies*

fandom trash enthusiast // chaotic tired Not a spoiler-free zone.

[gokusclit]

HELP like immediately when i hear “it’s for the girls and the gays” i know whatever it is is gonna be dogshit

[jurassicworldtieindrpepper]

[389]

lolita111000

[nevver]

Where is everybody? José Manuel Ballester

[mezeinyul2000]

what if women

[icehaus]

it’s 2026 i think it’s high time we left mind-body dualism behind us as a species. let’s go into 2027 with the full understanding that we are our bodies and that our consciousness cannot be separated from them thank you

[icehaus]

[simena]

Füsun Ürkün - Uğur Böceği

[themusicdanceexperience]

Queer theory is so funny to me as African because I'll see all these people in the western countries trying to assign meanings to clothes and to pronouns and to parts of their personalities, they'll believe that changing their clothes or their pronouns or their language or their behavior will exempt them from misogyny. And while I understand that it is a condition of the System to keep us all separated, I can't help but bristle at the racism behind this all.

If any of these liberals had bothered to read, they would know that there exists many many communities indigenous to Africa whose languages don't have gendered pronouns, where clothing rules are different. Where men and women dressed the same, where the rules of nudity are different. Where men are effeminate. And in most, if not all of these communities, misogyny will still be rampant.

My community used to allow female to female marriages but all those women were still circumcised. My language does not have "she" or "he" but that did not save any of us from misogyny. My friend's community doesn't even have gendered slurs and she still had to run away when she was 11 so that she wouldn't be circumcised. There is no solution other than uprooting the whole system. Creating more categories does nothing.

[ashstfu]

i do not ghost purposely i just have no idea what to say ever

[ashstfu]

and i have no concept of passage of time

[cookieekun]

[idlelizard]

more sketchbook beasts

[kiefbowl]

queer theory people will be like "fetishes are good" until a feminist is critical of something and then they'll be accusatory like "you say that because you fetishize it" okay if that's true then what's the problem 🎤

[brdrlnds-4realtho]

| Borderlands 2 warning signs

[sacred-portal]

[medusadyke]

tumblr discourse after 13 years on this fucking website

[princessnijireiki]

[dumbpuppyfag]

UNGRATEFUL tech companies are saying things like "turn off your ad blocker" and "we need your photo id" instead of "thank you so much for not just pirating our shit, youre so handsome"

[seagullgal]

so hard to be sex positive in a "women and even men should be able to healthily masturbate and enjoy physical pleasure" kinda way while also being very very anti sex industry is hard sometimes.

Ahh but porn has always existed!! Look at cave paintings! Okay. Masturbate to cave paintings. I really want you to masturbate to cave paintings. If it's the same thing, you should have no issues masturbating to cave paintings. I'm dead serious when I say I have no issues with anybody masturbating to cave paintings, or even written smut or anything that doesn't rely on the rape of real people and profiting off of it. I'd be fine with hentai if so much of it didn't try to up the shock factor as much as possible to get people hooked on various fetishes.

People have masturbated forever, and they didn't need HD violent videos to do so. You can do it with your mind, or a nice lil story, I promise. Make your own horny cave painting, idgaf

[the-pink-economy-crit]

This is exactly the distinction that gets lost in the "discourse." Being anti-industry isn't about being anti-pleasure or anti-human nature; it’s about being anti-commodity.

​The "it’s always existed" argument is such a lazy reach. There is a massive structural chasm between a cave painting and a multi-billion dollar tech industry that uses predatory algorithms to keep people scrolling through increasingly extreme content. One is a human expression; the other is a profit-driven machine that relies on the financial desperation of real people.

​You can be 100% in favor of people having healthy, liberated sex lives while still recognizing that a massive, unregulated industry built on the extraction of labor from vulnerable populations is a net negative for society.

Promoting imagination or ethical, non-human-based media isn't "puritanical" it's just asking for a world where someone's survival isn't tied to being recorded for a stranger's subscription fee.

[antiporn-activist]

If porn was required for masturbation, that means everyone used have to visit those five specific caves to do it.

[papertrailprints-blog]

Carrie Lingscheit, “Falling Cat”, Monoprint, 15" x 5.5", Available here.