My buddy opened commissions!!!
@flamflamflamingo
Here's her website too
SHE DRAWS LOVELY STUFF GO BUY FROM HER 🫵🫵🫵

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
KIROKAZE
untitled

Product Placement
★
todays bird

Kiana Khansmith
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
No title available
Show & Tell
hello vonnie

Love Begins
No title available
Xuebing Du
art blog(derogatory)
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
taylor price
Jules of Nature
Claire Keane
EXPECTATIONS
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from Thailand

seen from United Kingdom
seen from South Korea
seen from China
seen from Mexico
seen from Tunisia

seen from Tunisia

seen from United States

seen from Ecuador
seen from Canada

seen from Venezuela
seen from T1
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from France
@majomeowjo
My buddy opened commissions!!!
@flamflamflamingo
Here's her website too
SHE DRAWS LOVELY STUFF GO BUY FROM HER 🫵🫵🫵
legalize copyright infringement
to be clear this is a fully sincere political belief that I have. I am pro copyright infringement and in fact anti "asking for permission to make derivative art"
a few people in the notes seem to be under the impression that this is a stance that requires caveats. so just so we're all on the same page: no exceptions. "stealing art" (copying existing works for personal gain) is a good thing.
some of you seem to have bought into the capitalist lie that copyright infringement causes artists to "lose money", which fundamentally assumes that everyone (or even like a notable portion) who obtains a would-be-illegal copy would have otherwise paid full price to obtain the original. and like we all know that's not true right
So without copyright, what would prevent capitalists from taking a book and selling copies of it at a much lower price than the author? (thereby preventing the author from making money on their creative work)
this is already how copyright law works. working creatives (the majority of people in the industries) already sign away their work to "capitalists" (problematic wording - petit bourgeois artists are typically already capitalists, but i do understand the intent) and then are not permitted to make money off of or sell their work, have no claim to it, and will be legally decimated if they try to outside of whatever very narrow avenues may be granted to them
drew this silly doodle of my lovely🫶
I’m always saying this
ink commissions i did during ropecon 2026! :^D
image that's existed in my minds eye for weeks; don't forget
rare pairs and chars post
mirror of me (a piece on identity)
goddamn I'm proud of this piece
i love this guy
it implies a "postcum"
the postcum movement encompasses a variety of artistic, cultural and philosophical movements. it emerged in the mid 20th century as a skeptical response to cum,
I have never felt more seen
All stories are real
FICTION = REALITY
used artfight being down to finish up these bum ass furry refs finally
do you believe in "central europe"
yes it's a real thing
no
The ancient world was full of textile masterpieces we can only imagine… but most of them have rotted away. So few of them have come down to us in these days that we think of metal and stone as the primary mediums for the oldest artworks. But there were tapestries and fabric work that would have rivaled the finest wrought gold and iron and the first cave paintings.
legalize copyright infringement
to be clear this is a fully sincere political belief that I have. I am pro copyright infringement and in fact anti "asking for permission to make derivative art"
a few people in the notes seem to be under the impression that this is a stance that requires caveats. so just so we're all on the same page: no exceptions. "stealing art" (copying existing works for personal gain) is a good thing.
is it unprofessional to sting customers painfully
yes
no
( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡° )
Bitter rivals