Wow @marvelsbitch123 - Tumblr Blog

eijiroukiriot

this is the funniest tweet i’ve seen in months bye

bigratbastard

fxr-yxur-amusement

chaos-storm

aaawunder

nomuru2d

these are all the geek equivalents of Lovecraft’s Cat’s Name

official-lucifers-child

his cats name couldn’t be that bad!!!! it’s a cat, what’s the worst name?

official-lucifers-child

i am wrong, what the fuck

ruriginzuishou

Me every time this post comes back

babyanimalgifs

Smiling pitbulls, reblog if u agree

ilovetomotoes3000

The wedding is about to begin!!

acecrack-mack

I ship it

ilovetomotoes3000

The bridesmaids and groomsmen are coming down the aisle!

ilovetomotoes3000

The ring bearer!!!

acecrack-mack

This is beautiful

ilovetomotoes3000

Flower girl with the bride and her father in tow!

ilovetomotoes3000

And everyone is in places!!!!!

ilovetomotoes3000

“if anyone can show just cause why this couple cannot lawfully be joined together in matrimony, let them speak now or forever hold their peace”

theladyoffangorn

THIS IS MY MOMENT

MY FUCKING TIME TO SHINE

ilovetomotoes3000

“I OBJECT”

ilovetomotoes3000

{disapproving gasps}

ilovetomotoes3000

“Bethany!” The bride says. “You-you know this woman?” The groom says. He is baffled.

dogwithpants

I physically need to know what happens next

ilovetomotoes3000

“Why yes!” The bride says, “She is the only person I’ve ever really loved!”

fallingofechoes-deactivated2022

omg what a plot twist

ilovetomotoes3000

“Bethany, will you marry me?” The bride says.

ilovetomotoes3000

“Yes!” Bethany says and they both kiss.

ilovetomotoes3000

“Well then!” Says the groom, “I suppose if you’re marrying Bethany, I’ll marry Thomas!”

ilovetomotoes3000

Double wedding!

ilovetomotoes3000

Honeymoon photos!

becausewhyknotme-deactivated202

BRINGING THIS BACK FROM THE DEPTHS OF HELL

elegybeatty

WHAT!?!?!??!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

AHABSHVSHSVSHSIVSHSVSHSVAIBSBWHEYSVQVWVHSJBSYUSHVSGHSYS

stripedsweater

asleepontheceiling

For those wondering,

double triple - six patties bossy - all beef deluxe - with everything (lettuce, onions, tomato, etc) on a raft - on toast 4x4 - 4 patty by 4 cheese, so (6x4) 24 patties and 24 slices of cheese animal-style - cooked in mustard extra shingles - extra toast with a shimmy - jelly on the toast and a squeeze - orange juice on the side light axle grease - with butter make it cry - extra onions burn it - well done let it swim - extra sauce

merkonan

thewifeofichimatsu

You forgot the orange juice on the side

rubegoldbergsexmachine

katsually-deactivated20190930

the only valid addition to this post

viostormcaller

IM CRYING

frosslasss

WHY DOES THE BOX SAY ASS

atheseus-owl

Dead

whitepeopletwitter

cheeseanonioncrisps

God, I remember when I started sixth form (last two years of high school in the UK, seen as a more university style learning environment) and the teachers kept complaining about how quiet we were during lessons.

We wouldn’t talk. They’d tell us to do something and we’d just sit there quietly and do it, until eventually they just said “hey, guys, it’s okay to chat while you work!” and then everybody would start talking.

One teacher described it as creepy.

And I just remember thinking, what the fuck did they expect to happen? We’d all been taught from the age of four or five onwards that talking in class was bad. That if we did it, we’d be told off, or punished, or in some instances maybe the entire class would be punished along with us, just to make sure we really got the idea. It was a whole thing.

But now, because we were sixth-formers and therefore ‘grown ups’, we were suddenly expected to flip a switch and be able to talk as much as we liked? The whole reason we were in sixth-form was because we had worked hard, done well at school, and generally followed the rules— but still the teachers couldn’t understand why we didn’t just talk to each other.

Now I’m at uni, and seminar tutors are having a similar problem. People will talk in seminars, but a lot of them will insist on raising their hands and waiting to be called upon first. “Don’t put your hands up, just shout at me!” the guy keeps saying. But they keep doing it anyway.

Like, I really don’t know how to tell these people that you can’t train somebody to act in one way for over half their lives, and then suddenly expect them to start acting differently just because the expectations have changed.

biofomission

This is why you gotta treat kids like actual people

antisisyphus

✨🍂🎃october won't be a shit storm🎃🍂✨

like to charge, reblog to cast

antisisyphus

I FUCKING KNEW THIS POST WAS A GOOD IDEA

vesface

the-gayest-dovah

Better see y'all reblogging this

i-hate-chick-fil-a

abnormoinfo

new ebbits! new site!

poison-liker

this is probably my favourite comic of all time jsyk

sonic-gems-collection

can someone explain this to me?

shadeddaxion

Sure thing! For convenience I’ll refer to the guy with his arms in his pockets as SG (shorter guy) and the one on the computer as TG (taller guy).

In the first panel, SG sees TG playing on the computer and is disappointed. SG puts a lot of value in the idea of “making things,” specifically “art,” and thinks TG is just wasting their time

So he asks them if they wouldn’t rather be “making something” instead of just playing games and listening to music, implying that TG isn’t doing anything worthwhile or creative with their time

But TG replies that “interpreting is generative,” meaning that even if they spend their time just doing fun stuff, the mere act of enjoying something is creating an experience and an interpretation. Talking about something, dancing to music or sharing a piece of art with your friends IS “making something,” and each of those can be worthwhile and artistic.

SG leaves, complaining he “can’t be an auteur of [interpretation].” Auteur is a movie term that refers to a filmmaker with artistic control and vision enough to be considered essentially the singular creator of the resulting work of art. Turns out, SG doesn’t just want to “make things,” he wants to make things he and others see as “important.” He wants to make art not for the sake of art, but for the sake of being recognized and praised for his art.

This comic really speaks to elitism within the artistic community, the idea that art needs to meet certain standards to be considered art. SG’s viewpoint is really traditionalist, that art need to be “approved” and validated in order to be considered “really art;” while TG recognizes that art can be as little as just talking about what you love.

TLDR: Art is for everyone, not just some sort of social “artistic elite.”

abnormoinfo

ooh i love the explanation