Doctor who showrunners be like “writing a good story to secure the show’s continued existence? That pales in comparison to my strategy. Stuntcasting Billie piper” and then not even secure the show’s continued existence.
trying on a metaphor
we're not kids anymore.
h
DEAR READER
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
RMH
Jules of Nature
d e v o n
Three Goblin Art

⁂
hello vonnie

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

if i look back, i am lost
YOU ARE THE REASON
No title available
Game of Thrones Daily
art blog(derogatory)
Monterey Bay Aquarium
cherry valley forever
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Portugal

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
@mattandsaraproductions
Doctor who showrunners be like “writing a good story to secure the show’s continued existence? That pales in comparison to my strategy. Stuntcasting Billie piper” and then not even secure the show’s continued existence.
My latest cartoon for New Scientist
Four options for how to read this “the Christmas special is canceled” news (genuinely not sure which of these is more likely):
1. There never was a Christmas special. From the top down, everyone was lying.
2. The BBC commissioned a Christmas special, they went “Russell you’re writing this, yeah?” RTD goes “sure thing boss!” and never puts pen to paper. Christmas is canceled, RTD exits.
3. The Christmas special is commissioned with an eye towards getting a new production team and actor going, and probably securing a new funding partner. There are discussions about the episode to set up the future of the show, but in failing to get anyone signing on to create or produce the show, everyone involved agrees that they can’t just produce a one-off special with no future, because that wouldn’t leave the show better off than it is. RTD and Bad Wolf exit, the special is canceled. His “I never wrote anything, suckers!” Instagram post is mostly a lie.
4. The same as (3), except RTD as producer says he’ll sign a new showrunner, maybe also promises a new financial partner too, with Bad Wolf Productions continuing to produce the show. On failing to secure these halfway through the year, RTD and Bad Wolf are fired by the BBC, and the commissioned episode is canceled.
Starting a gofundme for my friend Bunbury who's a terrible invalid,
Well, I'm starting a gofundme for the funeral of my brother Ernest, who died in Paris of a severe chill,
thing thats pissing me off the most is that in rtd’s post, he’s acting like the christmas special being written and the casting of the next doctor are some crazy fandom conspiracies and not. things that we were fucking told were happening. the fuck do you mean, “sit in that chair and wait to be proved right?” YOU WERE THE ONE WHO SAID THOSE THINGS WERE COMING.
this is not a secret fourth sherlock episode situation, sir, you said multiple fucking times that things were in the works for a christmas special. you commented on the doctor’s casting and whether piper was the next doctor or not. no one made this up. you did that. what the hell are we being mocked for, believing what we were told by the guy who was supposed to be in charge of making it happen???
Cosplaying as Russel t Davies where I just leave shit on a cliffhanger then quit my job
my feeling with regards to the billie piper cliffhanger was like 'well it's stupid but i suppose if this is what it takes to secure the show's ongoing existence it will be worth it'. consequently i now feel comfortable saying: that was simply fucking stupid wasn't it
how does this man continue to get even more disappointing 😭
Oh, this definitely belongs on Tumblr.
From the Nib, by Mattie Lubchansky
In 2026, the chicest thing a gay actor can do is never explicitly come out as gay but also make it abundantly clear that he is. Coming out is too modern. Staying closeted is too old fashioned. But this method merges contemporary freedom with Old Hollywood glamour and allure, and it weeds out the dumbest people who truly don’t get it. I call it the Pascal Method.
Taylor Swift does this
no she doesn’t
You clearly don't go here or to queer history and signaling, or both, enough to have this conversation and I'm not going to explain it to you. You could have asked questions, you could have done even a modicum of research. You didn't and you made yourself look ignorant. Goodbye.
#I'm fucking crying#this is an instant classic#this is the next meme#i can't believe I'm here to see a baby copypasta nary two hours old#I can't#lol#i laughed way too hard#iconic
i went to queer history and signaling and i didnt see taylor swift
Sorry to take the joke post seriously or whatever, but I’m not sure how this Taylor Swift fan’s comment doesn’t undermine OP’s thesis. If any celebrity can be considered to be secretly gay, where fans will claim it’s “abundantly clear” that so-and-so is gay and will produce what they consider to be evidence - then what about this is different than being closeted? (I’m also not sure how we’re supposed to read “coming out is too modern”). The comments are talking about the actors from Heated Rivalry. And obviously they don’t owe anyone coming out, but no one here is stopping to think that maybe we should consider why even actors from a gay drama feel like they can’t come out without hurting their careers. The comments are full of people mentioning whatever actor they like and arguments over whether they’re really gay. Again, there’s no particular code here, just whatever getting interpreted as evidence towards a pre-determined conclusion. This isn’t some special code you’re talking about; it’s fans projecting queerness onto their faves.
twelveclara + reductress headlines [2/?]
Five seconds into The Residence and I’m just like “please stop copying Knives Out, even Rian Johnson doesn’t copy Knives Out.” So the jury is out on whether this will be a good whodunnit or derivative. Al Franken still being a senator is not giving me hope (who made this, the “blue no matter how sex pest” contingent?)
Short review of Superman (2025) [long review will come later at some point] -
James Gunn does nothing to revise my rule against cishet white men from a culturally Christian background writing Superman
Finally catching up on Strange New Worlds, like two years late. Couple thoughts after two episodes:
1. Genetic engineering ban was probably a stupid idea back in the day, but it’s especially a stupid idea if the writers aren’t going to consider the difference between eugenics and turning off the cancer gene
2. We should ignore continuity to make things less stupid. Instead, this show consistently obsesses over its place in “canon” (Christian nonsense) while failing to find its own identity
Also Gilbert & Sullivan wrote operettas, not musicals. Something Spock would know the difference between.
What is with the RTD2 obsession with motherhood? First there's Donna literally being saved through halfing the metacrisis with her daughter. Then there's Carla being spiritually saved through adopting Ruby because she's miserable in the timeline where she didn't have her. And there's Ruby being immune to the god of death because... of her normal human mum? Then there's that wish god baby who got dumped with Carla and whatever the fuck was up with Poppy and Belinda's entire character being reduced to motherhood.
There seems to be a running theme of motherhood, especially to daughters being someone's salvation, someone's reason and purpose. There's no questioning of "do I want this child?" It's just assumed they do. Of course Ruby's bio mum wanted her, she was just a scared teenager but now she's happy to have her in her life. Of course all Carla needed was to adopt a kid for real rather than just fostering. Of course Carla's happy to adopt another child as an older woman without even being asked before the paperwork is signed off. Of course Belinda not only wants a daughter that was forced onto her by a heteropatriarchal dystopia world, but she immediately becomes her entire purpose. And of course none of these mothers, bar Donna, have any men in their support network actually shown helping them raise their child. I guess Belinda has a dad and her mum and dad come over sometimes, but it's probably her mum doing the work given everything else we've seen. It's just women looking after children. Am I tripping or is this weird?
I would argue he’s always had an interest in writing about mothers and daughters, it’s just that sometimes it hits and sometimes it really misses and there do seem to be sexist biases involved. I think as well his problem is that he doesn’t want to stop doing something that was successful, he’s reluctant to tell completely new stories.
Rose and Jackie were really groundbreaking for the show at the time because their story delved into what it’s like for the people who are left behind by the Doctor’s companions. Jackie being a single mum who had raised Rose entirely on her own after her husband died, Rose never knowing her father, them being focal points in each other's lives, the concept that a companion's loved ones might hate the Doctor – this felt fresh and interesting and I think it was largely handled well. Love and Monsters was an awful episode, but I love the Jackie-centric moments in it that show how lonely she is and how much she worries about Rose. I think the fact that it is hard to imagine who Rose would be without Jackie as her mother is a testament to how well the mother-daughter themes meshed with Rose's overall character journey.
Then you got something similar but slightly remixed with Francine Jones, Martha's mum, where instead of being a single mother she was a divorcee with a larger family. The first crack showed here: RTD couldn't stop himself from doing the same thing as he did with Jackie, having Martha's mum slap the Doctor across the face. Martha's dad? Apparently the guy had no strong feelings on the matter, even after he got tortured by the Master for a year.
I don't know if it's entirely fair to point at Sylvia and Donna as another example of only the mother-daughter bond being examined, because the actor who played Donna's father didn't return because he had passed. Donna had her strong bond with Wilf, too. It's worth noting though that although Jackie, Francine, and Sylvia are all markedly different people, they have similar tendencies and habits as mothers. They all nag their daughter, don't always understand their daughter's true potential, are unfairly critical at times (Jackie less and Sylvia much more so), don't approve of the Doctor or their daughter's attachment to him but come around in the end, and operate as a sort of maternal ball-and-chain. They mostly sit in the background of scenes saying disapproving one-liners and being overprotective unless the plot demands otherwise. Sylvia, the only mother who originally didn't slap the Doctor, slaps him in the 60th.
I say all that in Critical mode, as other things about these characters and their relationships with each other make me love them enough to forgive these imperfections, but if we're talking about how RTD handles mothers and motherhood, that should be part of the discussion. And looking back over it, the overwhelming question seems to be, is the focus on mothers and daughters and motherhood because these are female-centric stories, or because RTD cannot separate womanhood from motherhood?
I think the answer is: both. A man does not necessarily have to be in the picture and I think it's cool that Ruby was raised by her foster mother and foster grandmother. I remember being so nervous for Ruby when she met her bio mum and so relieved, moved, and happy that she wanted to bond with Ruby. I kind of love that the big mystery thing that Sutekh was curious about was an ordinary human woman. I have mixed feelings about Donna being saved by becoming a mother, but I land on the fact 1) she chose to become a mother and this was a cool byproduct of that she didn't know about, 2) it makes sense that creating a new lifeform saved her when that's exactly what caused the problem in the first place, 3) wanting kids didn't feel out of character for Donna, 4) Babies Ever After wasn't the only focus of her happy ending, bigger emphasis was put on getting her memories back and having her whole family together including the Doctor.
However. 1) The episode totally failed to convince me that Belinda truly, genuinely chose to become a mother and that her love for Poppy wasn't entirely generated by the Wishworld. 2) Since when did wanting children or being a mother have anything to do with Belinda's story? The only motivation we were ever given for her is "wants to go home". 3) When did Belinda ever show any sign of wanting children or wanting to be a mother? 4) It's bad enough that her "wants to go home" motivation never went any deeper than the basic, literally "yeah I just want to go home", it was actually incoherent that the end to that story was "I am a mother :)".
In Wish World Conrad says:
CONRAD [on screen]: Doctor Who had lots and lots of human friends. They loved him and travelled with him, but sometimes they'd leave him so they could go and fall in love and marry and have babies.
When I first watched Wish World I highlighted this line to my partner as such a great detail, "haha this idiot thinks that the Doctor's companions always leave him to do Inevitable Woman Business because he's so sexist he can't comprehend that most of the time that has nothing to do with it". Today, I had an unpleasant sinking feeling in my gut as I realised that either this line isn't meant to be as intentionally stupid as I thought, and that RTD is so wedded to Babies Ever After being the best happy ending possible that he either forgot all instances where that didn't happen, or assumed that it happened offscreen – OR he is such a hypocrite that he criticised his only villain for exactly the sin he committed in the next episode.
A lot of these things are fine or good on their own, but as OP says above, added up it makes a picture. At best you can call it female-centric, but I would argue that it has hit a point where it's become reductive. At worst it's just returned to "of course all women want to be mothers" and "of course all women will insta-bond with their babies even if their babies were AI generated into existence" and "mothers are more important than fathers" and "women are the ones to childrear" and "motherhood is a mystical magical ineffable untouchable thing which is always good, always involves unconditional love, and can never be twisted, weaponised, or show its ugly side".
Even somewhere in the middle, it's just weird, as OP says. In real life, mothers are not the only and most important parent. In real life, women contain multitudes and sometimes those multitudes include never ever wanting children or being a bad mother. In real life there are other genres of mother than "nags, makes snide comments, is overprotective, doesn't get along well with men in their daughter's life". Yes, this is a sci-fi show, but human nature shouldn't be underrepresented or unrecognisable.
I’m seeing speculation (based on people tracking everything from background extras to Millie Gibson’s eyebrows) that the TARDIS scene was the original ending, with Ruby remembering Poppy and a patented RTD sad Doctor scene because he remembers and Belinda doesn’t.
But that makes the rewrite even worse! It really is “how do I write out this companion? Give her a baby!” And that’s exactly that quote from Conrad. Fuck.
“No you don’t understand she was always a mother”
Ok this is not communicated well in what was clearly a rushed script edit, and it is in no way the obvious reading of the episode, which
“And if you have a problem with Belinda being a mum your criticism is suspect because you don’t think of your own mum as a full person who can have a life outside of being a mother”
Jesus I never thought Tumblr would be the reasonable platform for Doctor Who takes. I suggest avoiding Twitter
But also, at best, Wish World and Reality War are in conflict about what they’re telling the audience about Poppy. In the former, her being recognizable to us as a space baby is part of signaling the Wrongness of the rewritten world. We know they don’t have a child together. We know this specific child is someone the Doctor met before and in fact wished he was parent to.
I don’t know what the original plan was for Poppy, either the presumed original plan Ruby-only version or the pre-reshoots Belinda version. But in the episode as broadcast, there’s a switch to “this child is real” that is unexplained in the particular sense that its narrative logic is not of a piece with the previous episode. That’s what’s jarring about the Doctor rewriting the timeline. If the episode was meant to communicate “Poppy existed prior to the Rani and Conrad messing with reality, and the episodes you’ve seen are the Doctor and Belinda’s false memories created by the reset timeline having slight differences” well sorry, but for many of us that did not come through at all. For one thing, that story doesn’t require Poppy! I mean, that story requires Belinda to have a child, but it does not require her child to be played by the child actor from Space Babies. Why make Belinda’s child into Poppy? Well right, because it’s a way of communicating the false reality of Wish World. But it’s unnecessary and confusing if the idea is that this is her real child. The narrative intent doesn’t track from one episode to the other.
Belinda knowing she’s lost something but she doesn’t know what, having vague memories of a child now erased from the timeline, and the Doctor sacrificing himself to fix it. That works. But that’s not what we got. Because it’s Ruby who remembers (that Amidala meme that’s going around points out the absurdity of this).
(that’s also why I think the original cut of this episode would have been weird in its own right. The Doctor sacrificing himself as above could work as a conclusion to the presumed original Ruby-only idea for the two series. But Ruby remembering while the Doctor and Belinda go clubbing seems off as well. So how much of this was in the first edit and how much is reshoots?)
Anyway, the All Part of the Plan people are wearing rose-colored glasses (sorry. Too soon?) about the structure of these episodes. But good lord to go from “here’s a reading of the episodes that makes them make sense” to “you’re anti-feminist mum-haters for criticizing the ending” what are we even doing here