Maybe Next to Normal @maybenext2normal - Tumblr Blog

chookiemunster

In a scale from Taron Egerton looking at Hugh Jackman

to Ezra Miller being touched by Colling Farrell

how good are you to hide your obviously gay desires?

gayteenhipster

Horrible! I’m a Dylan O’Brien at best

midnite-wet-dreamz

I’m more of a Tom Daley shooting “pls rerrange my colon” sniper glances

homicidalbrunette

I’m more like Zachary Quinto practice rimming Chris Pine

bowie28

I’m no better than Chris Evans not even trying anymore.

twitch8283-deactivated20220130

bonermakers

I love this!

onaodiarioderw-deactivated20200

gaypeopletwitter

fandomsandfeminism

Thought: I do NOT think that 50% of the world’s billionaires should be women. I think there shouldn’t be any billionaires at all.

cranberrybogmummy

So you are saying 0% of the world should be billionaires?

fandomsandfeminism

Yes.

caosdth

Why shouldn’t their be billionaires? That makes no sense.

fandomsandfeminism

Because the existence of billionaires is predicated on the exploitation of human labor and unsustainable environmental harm. That level of wealth hoarding is harmful to economies, as it reduces the amount of money in circulation. No one person, no family, could ever conceivably even SPEND a billion dollars anyway, and it is inherently immoral to accumulate wealth so narrowly while so much of the world lives in abject poverty.

Better then to create a wealth ceiling, a point at which all wealth over a certain point is taxed at or very near 100% to incentivize people to actually spend their money rather than hoard it, stimulating the economy and bettering the lives of far more people. Better even still to create and regulate economic systems that protect workers and the environment in a way that such extreme levels of wealth accumulation aren’t even feasible.

aflawedmind

The problem with this is that it reduces the incentive to actually do fiscally well. What’s the point of starting a business if you can’t become wealthy?

fandomsandfeminism

There is a very real difference between “reasonably wealthy” and A BILLIONAIRE

twodotsknowwhy

No one is saying you shouldn’t have a nice house, we are saying that having multiple really, really ridiculously nice houses while your employees are either homeless or at serious risk of becoming homeless is immoral.

whenandwhereienter

I’ll never understand why this concept is hard for people. I think it’s because they can’t actually fathom how much $1 Billion is.

fandomsandfeminism

Seriously.

Let’s say you have a badass job. A great job. You make $100 AN HOUR. You work 10 hours a day ($1000 A DAY), 5 days a week ($5000 a week!!!), every week ($20,000 A MONTH), thats $240,000 Every Year.

It would take you 4,167 years to make a billion dollars.

demonikolai

God dammit

postilionstruckbylightning

If you were making, for the sake of argument, $25 million a year, you could live a life of extreme luxury. Even then, it would take you forty years of spending none of that money to amass a single billion. There are multi-billionaires out there. No one needs that kind of money.

iamthecutestofborg

Currency came into existence to simplify trade. It was meant to make things easier and better for society. When a single person has more than they need, even more than they would need for an extravagant lifestyle, they’d completely unreasonable. Money isn’t meant to be hoarded for status. I honestly think billionaires are addicted to money.

unproduciblesmackdown

+ no one can “earn” a billion dollars. to accumulate that kind of money requires stealing funds from laborers and communities. and the wealthy can use their resources to get other people to provide the kinds of time, thought, energy, and labor that generate the actual Work a billionaire will never have to do while the billionaire still reaps the profits from this delegated work. the ridiculously wealthy don’t do work and don’t provide anything to the communities around them (charity is positive PR for capitalism) (and tbh billionaires sucking up ridiculous amounts of money harm communities. see: amazon’s new hqs and the resources offered in the bids) and yet anyone poor who is un/underemployed is seen as contemptible and unworthy of life, while the rich are seen as admirable paragons of success. there is no reason for billionaires to exist and no moral way for billionaires to exist

only1600kids

me trying to pull my life together

meanplastic

Bitch even the dog looks the same I cannot

urfavegemini

Reblog if its okay to randomly message you because I want more gay friends 😊

wizd0mz

Talk to me 😛

von-felden

Let’s talk!

ina-gartens-weave

i am absolutely BEGGING yall to watch this scene where catherine ohara laughs without moving her mouth grghsdzuvjsc

montygreen

1.13 | 3.09

mysomethingtoremember-deactivat

coaztal

Ugh I miss tumblr porn

fromqueertoeternity-deactivated

hittings

luc-iddreaming-deactivated20231

@staff Not exactly the “welcome back to the app store” you were expecting huh

xancredible27

THIS is the kind of protest that tumblr will care about sooner or later. Leave bad ratings and reviews on apple or in the google play store. Lower their rating so hard that it damages their userbase.

Logging off for a single day isn’t of interest to tumblr. I’m not saying y’all shouldn’t protest in any way you can or want, but logging off the site for just one day isn’t going to bother tumblr because tumblr doesn’t CARE about your symbolic protest. Tumblr has proven time and again that it doesn’t CARE about its userbase. We’re still using the site and we won’t stop using the site any time soon because there’s no alternative. But that’s what we’d have to do to hopefully force tumblr to change anything. And they still won’t do it because their policy change isn’t about family values or what the userbase allegedly wants. It’s about money.

So, unless you stop using the site and app permanently, or for a long period of time, this isn’t going to matter to tumblr. And when you do, you need to do it in big numbers.

Leaving them bad reviews in the apple app store or on google play (where it’ll be harder because the current average rating is 4.4 stars and you need to edit or leave a LOT of bad reviews to drastically lower that), is going to do more to damage their reputation and thus do more to compromise their profit.