Occam's Razor: A logical law from the 14th century is THE NEW EXODIA against wenclair.
Hello. As your fellow self-proclaimed rank 1 debunker, I am here to present to you Occam's Razor.
But first, a small introduction:
- I have been blocked by over 150 people on twitter in the span of 3 weeks.
- I have been actively debunking Enid's allegations for way longer than that, actually, but I was using other platforms ( such as discord ).
- I read every single post on twitter that contains the word wenclair. I don't miss a single one. Not even those made in languages that aren't mine.
- I discuss with wenclairs for multiple hours per day.
All of this sums up to me basically knowing 99.9% of all takes they can come up to, aswell as how to dismantle them in a moltitute of ways.
Some weapons are more powerful than others.
Today I present to you THE MOST character-efficient, elegant and flawless way to debunk wenclairhood.
Of course it involves the very same weakspot I've mentioned in the past:
For Enid and Wednesday to kiss ( = wenclair ), it means they HAVE to be lesbian or, at the very least, bi.
This sits at the core of the ship, as two straight girls can't kiss.
Therefore, if we can demostrate that the two girls are straight, whatever take they have is debunked. It's like drawing Exodia in yugioh.
Now let's analyze the data:
Heterosexual girls like boys (1).
Bisexual girls like boys (1) and girls (2).
Both Wednesday and Enid have already kissed boys, which means that the requirement to be heterosexual (1) is already satisfied.
They haven't kissed girls (2), therefore they are half way through the requirements of bisexuality.
Then, the argument becomes: What's more LIKELY?
- For them to be {something they have satisfied 100% of the requirements}
OR
- For them to be {something they have satisfied 50% of the requirements}
?
Here comes Occam's Razor: A logical law ideated in 1300.
It states that if you're ought to bet between two hypothetical scenarios, the one that requires LESS assumptions is the most likely to be true.
In other words:
If you have a problem, and two solutions ( X and Y ) for that problem, the most advantageous to take is the simplest, most straightforward solution.
It is also more famously known as two says:
" Don't cross that bridge until you come to it. "
and
" Don't count your chickens before they hatch. "
Occam's Razor ISN'T an internet meme. It sits at the core of human logic and it's constantly used in high-level hypothetical arguments.
In order to defy it, a person should go through defying the very fabric of human logic.
It vastly surpasses some other arguments of mine I already considered high rank, because:
- It doesn't involve Tyler: Therefore you can't be dismissed as a biased Wyler.
- It doesn't involve talking about "how much queer represent the overall world population": Therefore you can't be dismissed as homophobic or heteronormative.
The less lables they can attach to you, the likelier your interaction will be a "one-shot".
A oneshot is when they block you instantly without replying, a sign that you've left them weaponless and speechless.
Thank you for being with me today!
Feel free to use the iconography I've attached to the post, even creditless!
It's meant to be shared!
