Link to the original tweet
sheepfilms
Misplaced Lens Cap

Kaledo Art
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Cosimo Galluzzi

⁂

#extradirty
No title available

Love Begins

izzy's playlists!

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
official daine visual archive

No title available

roma★
Peter Solarz
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

shark vs the universe
Claire Keane
Sweet Seals For You, Always

seen from T1

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Singapore

seen from Sri Lanka
seen from Netherlands

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@mijabo
Link to the original tweet
Cellulite is a female secondary sex characteristic and should be celebrated as a rite of womanhood, not despised or eradicated.
it’s really a secondary sex characteristic?!
It is. It has to do with the way our bodies network fat. Female bodies create sort of a mesh network to support fat (female bodies are MUCH more hardy in times of stress) and it can present as delightfully lumpy. More than 90% of women have visible cellulite, but all women store fat in this manner.
why did no one tell me this?!
You know why :/
Spread this. I only just started to see mine and I started to freak out a bit. More people should/need to know about this
Here’s an illustration of the aforementioned difference in fat storage.
Men’s lattice pattern collagen threads holds subcutaneous fat in a way that, when the skin expands because of the fat storage, it expands evenly. Women’s “pockets” expand unevenly when we accumulate fat, creating that orange peel effect. Our storage pattern means we can healthily store more fat than men. Like a woman with 25% body fat is average, a man with 25% body fat is chubby. Because of that, like OP said, women are hardier in times of stress or famine. It’s also one of the reasons why our bodies can survive pregnancy, which is a massive energy demand on our system.
And there’s absolutely NO “treatment” for cellulite that will work. They are all bullshit designed to separate you from your hard-earned cash. It’s a secondary sex characteristic, it’s perfectly normal and it’s not going away no matter what you do. Like I’m very lean myself and I work out 5~6 times a week, and I still have cellulite. Someone giving a woman shit for having cellulite is akin to giving her shit for having skin. It’s just a mixture of misogyny and corporate greed.
Love your lumpy skin, ladies. It means you are a badass surviving machine shaped by millenia of evolution.
Like conflict resolution, gardening, organizing, or any other skill, self-defense is a tool. It is not the most useful tool, but it has a place. Power has more tools of oppression than we can shake a stick at. In certain situations we have the moral obligation to resist violence with something other than protests and passive resistance.
scott crow, Black Flags and Windmills: Hope, Anarchy, and the Common Ground Collective (via probablyasocialecologist)
The mental health system and the education system in their contemporary forms are both products of industrial capitalism. Briefly, compulsory schooling developed across western societies in the nineteenth century due to the needs of capital for higher skilled workers as well as to socially control working-class youth (through, for example, socializing them into the norms and values of capitalism as the only ‘correct’ way to think and understand the world). As I discuss in my book, the mental health system develops during the same period as another institution of social control: the asylums separate the able from the non-able bodied, and pathologises and confines problematic populations (primarily working-class groups).
Marxism, Psychiatry, and Capitalism: An Interview with Dr. Bruce M. Z. Cohen | Hampton Institute (via fullpraxisnow)
It’s not consent unless there is a choice. A ‘yes’ doesn’t mean anything unless saying ‘no’ is a safe and comfortable option available.
“He kidnaps, she screams”: words associated with gender in Wikipedia plot descriptions
by variance_explained
In linguistics we call this “social gender”, which is basically whether a word has a feminine or masculine connotation. This kind of thing can be hard to intuit, since there are no hard and fast rules. Obvious examples include words like “nurse”, which may be technically gender neutral, but it’s got such a strong feminine connotation that many people will clarify “male nurse”. Less obvious examples are words like “muscles”, which all humans have, but the default interpretation is like, a manly guy with bulging biceps.
Many many words have social gender that’s difficult to notice, either because of the natural struggle to see gender, or because it’s just that subtle. So a corpus analysis like this is exciting because it gives concrete data on words we might not have thought twice about!!
In 1819 new legislation to regulate child labour, the Cotton Factories Regulation Act, was tabled in the British Parliament. The proposed regulation was incredibly ‘light touch’ by modern standards. It would ban the employment of young children – that is, those under the age of nine. Older children (aged between ten and sixteen) would still be allowed to work, but with their working hours restricted to twelve per day (yes, they were really going soft on those kids). The new rules applied only to cotton factories, which were recognized to be exceptionally hazardous to workers’ health. The proposal caused huge controversy. Opponents saw it as undermining the sanctity of freedom of contract and thus destroying the very foundation of the free market.
Ha-Joon Chang, reminding us what the free market actually means. (via cocainesocialist)
BUT HOW THE HELL DID THEY DO IT ?????????????
Lion Dance. The dance of martial artists.
What did I just watch?!?!
Lion dancers are crazy, and here I thought all that Wong Fei Hung stuff was exaggerated. NOPE
Lion dancing is so cool. This is what it looks like in full costume btw:
Whenever I see amazing stuff like this, I think, “Someone actually had this idea. Someone looked at their friend and went, ‘you know what we should try?’”
y’all don’t even get me started.. listen lion dancers are on something else ok cus the wong fei hung stuff is no joke:
Keep reading
I am yelling I landed on a Christian article about Florence & The Machine
this is honestly probably the best review florence welch has ever received
Thesis: the narrow focus on public performance over substantive action in certain activist circles has less to do with cynical schemes to game the system for progressive brownie points, and more to do with the fact that many folks basically think social activism is a form of ritual magic. Popular histories give us images of Great Men making speeches and leading marches and circulating petitions, and completely erase all the ground-level infrastructure that made all that stuff work; the end result is that a lot of folks seem honestly to believe that bringing about social change is a matter of performing the appropriate symbolic actions and waiting for reality to reconfigure itself accordingly.
This is, IME, exactly how a lot of people think reality works, whether or not they realize it. It’s not just Tumblr, or movement orgs – it’s the prototype narrative we’re presented with in both fiction and education. It’s how successful movements get portrayed after the fact.
An action is revolutionary or not depending on the meaning it acquires from contact with the world. Throwing a rock is never just “rock-throwing.” It can freeze a situation or set off an intifada. The idea that a struggle can be “radicalized” by injecting a whole passel of allegedly radical practices and discourses into it is the politics of an extraterrestrial. A movement lives only through a series of shifts that it effects over time. So at every moment there is a certain distance between its present state and its potential. If it stops developing, if it leaves its potential unrealized, it dies. A decisive act is one that is a notch ahead of the movement’s state, and which, breaking with the status quo, gives it access to its own potential. This act can be that of occupying, smashing, attacking, or simply speaking truthfully. The state of the movement is what decides.
To Our Friends (via autonomisery)
Feather River Bulletin, Quincy, California, March 20, 1924
lesbianism
»an oak tree« by michael craig-martin
Like I’ve been legitimately thinking about why exactly is it that people in the supposed position of being (white) allies have the most moralistic and harsh views on cultural appropriation and I think this is the answer. Like for awhile I figured the reason they so frequently seemed to be going really far with the rhetoric was because they were just more detached from the culture in question and while that might explain general ignorance it doesn’t explain why they are so harsh and absolutist. But now that I think about it it really looks very similar to Nietzsches analysis of guilt and how there’s basically this passion of wanting to be wrong and wanting to be morally judged. Like when they ask something that is so massively obvious like “is it ok for me to wear this if I’m offered to wear it” it’s because there’s really a covert desire for the answer to be “no” because they want to not just feel guilty (for even entertaining the idea of sin) but also because the feeling of guilt gives them the ability to pass moral judgement on others.
my sociology prof went into this a bit and one piece really stuck with me
the more you learn about how privilege works, the more self-conscious you become of your place in the dynamic, and your complicity in it. this tension is often felt as white guilt. now guilt can motivate you, but ultimately the goal is forgiveness - for your own peace of mind. it’s a selfish motivation at best. in this context it’s also totally futile because there’s no one voice that can speak for all the victims of white supremacy - no-one to absolve you
so these guilt-driven “allies” go out into the public fora desperate for validation that they’re one of the “good whites”. they pick up social justice ideas and language, but since they act selfishly they wield them recklessly. the guilt makes them obsess over personal responsibility despite most SJ issues being systemic. the nuance that comes with a compassion driven ideology is totally lost when it’s driven by negative emotion. “don’t monetize native american culture” turns into “white people shouldn’t wear feathers” turns into “white people should only do white people things”
A biology teacher posted a status pointing out the wide variety of genders in the human and animal kingdoms.
This is AMAZING. The teacher’s rebuttal:
I just commented this on a transphobic post that was all like, “In a sexual species, females have two X chromosomes and males have an X and a Y, I’m not a bigot it’s just science.” I’m a science teacher so I responded with this.
First of all, in a sexual species, you can have females be XX and males be X (insects), you can have females be ZW and males be ZZ (birds), you can have females be females because they developed in a warm environment and males be males because they developed in a cool environment (reptiles), you can have females be females because they lost a penis sword fighting contest (some flatworms), you can have males be males because they were born female, but changed sexes because the only male in their group died (parrotfish and clownfish), you can have males look and act like females because they are trying to get close enough to actual females to mate with them (cuttlefish, bluegills, others), or you can be one of thousands of sexes (slime mold, some mushrooms.) Oh, did you mean humans? Oh ok then. You can be male because you were born female, but you have 5-alphareductase deficiency and so you grew a penis at age 12. You can be female because you have an X and a Y chromosome but you are insensitive to androgens, and so you have a female body. You can be female because you have an X and a Y chromosome but your Y is missing the SRY gene, and so you have a female body. You can be male because you have two X chromosomes, but one of your X’s HAS an SRY gene, and so you have a male body. You can be male because you have two X chromosomes- but also a Y. You can be female because you have only one X chromosome at all. And you can be male because you have two X chromosomes, but your heart and brain are male. And vice - effing - versa. Don’t use science to justify your bigotry. The world is way too weird for that shit.
Platypie have male XYXYXYXYXY and female XXXXXXXXXX. With some of the X’s and one of the Y’s also containing parts of the bird Z chromosome.
The white throated Sparrow has 4 sexes across two axes. Male & Female, White striped & tan striped. So you can have male white striped, male tan striped, female white striped and female tan striped.
A Male White striped bird can only mate with a female tan striped bird. And so on across the other combinations.
When you get to fungus and microbes the sexes get even more complex with some species having thousands of sexes/mating classes.
And then there’s the Chaos-Law axis to consider.
remember being little and thinking dandelions were fun or a pretty color or something and every adult in an 80 mile radius wouldn’t let you say that without screaming ITS A WEED
also like:
dandelions are edible, easy to grow, and are rich in vitamins a, c, k, beta-carotene, calcium, iron, manganese, and potassium
dandelions can be made into wine, tea, soft drinks, and a coffee substitute
they are used in herbal remedies to treat liver and digestive problems and as a diuretic
they’re good for bees!
they make good companion plants for various herbs and tomatoes; their long taproot helps bring up nutrients in the soil and they release ethylene gas which ripens fruit
dandelions secrete latex which means they can be used to make natural rubber
they make great flower crowns
Why ARE they considered a weed? They’re a good flower? Who decided they were bad? =(
You can also make beautiful jelly from the blossoms!
They’re considered weeds because they were a poor person resource and not having them was a status symbol.
Let’s back up.
In Europe dating back to the 1500’s and even earlier, you could only have immaculate manicured lawns if you had just pots of money and were able to own land. So, rich nobility had swaths of land, and they demonstrated their wealth and power by hiring people to physically cut the grass and keep their gardens and dig weeds out of the turf by hand. It was a demonstration of money and power. It said “I can afford to have eight people employed full time just to dig things that aren’t grass out of my grass. I can afford to have all of this land doing nothing. It’s not producing food. People don’t farm it or live on it. I can afford to just grow grass, and have someone tend to that wholly useless crop.”
Fast forward a few hundred years. Europeans come to America. Many of them are from the poorer classes in Europe. Many have never owned land before, and now all of a sudden they can (because they stole it from the Native Americans but that’s a whole other rant.)
Now, at first you see little cottage gardens like the lower classes in Europe always had around their homes; places where they grew food and herbs and kept chickens or other livestock. Dandelions were welcome here; they were eaten and brewed into wine and used for medicine, just as they’d been for centuries.
But then people start making a little money, and we have the whole phenomenon of people who can demonstrate that they are Moving Up In The World by buying all of their food and medicine, just like the old landed gentry back in the Old Country. So they do. What goes in the place of those cottage gardens? Why, the same thing that went in the place of productive land back in the Earl of Chatsworth’s front lawn; a lawn.
So. Dandelions were a symbol. They were a throwback to the old days. They were a sign that you were somehow less prosperous than your neighbors, or lazier. (A Mortal Sin in America.) But, many Americans work, and can’t afford to hire a gardener just to grub dandelions out of the yard with a trowel all day.
Enter the lawn care industry, which began to market a dizzying array of poisons and fertilizers aimed at making your lawn a sterile moonscape where only grass grew with minimum effort from the homeowner. This continues to this day and is a multibillion dollar industry that has huge negative impacts on the environment and human health, but we can’t seem to shake that old ideal of a manicured lawn.
We pour water on deserts and poison on native wildflowers to attain it. We expose our children to poisons. We poison pollinators and pets. The days where we recognized a well kept lawn as a symbol of aristocratic leisure are gone, but we’ve been successfully fed a lie that some dandelions and chickweed are Bad by the lawn care industry in their ads for decades. They, obviously, want to keep it going because they’re making fat $$$$$$$ off of us.
THAT’S why dandelions are viewed as weeds.
Also yeah dandelions are really good for bees, and beloved by native bees and honeybees alike. So please, leave them blooming!! You can support bees and do your bit to smash capitalistic exploitation of the working class and the environment all in one go!
lawn culture discourse part II