Owl's Hollow @necroceine - Tumblr Blog

i wonder if i'll still have a blog tomorrow when i wake up!!!! it looks like posts are getting deleted right off my blog so idkkkkkkkkkkkk

doyoulovethewayzeylily

well that didn't take long, less than an hour. @staff do you wonder why we loathe you?

doyoulovethewayzeylily

please note that none of you would have seen this if I hadn't reblogged it because I believed her. can you please believe me that it happens so much more often than you hear about? the only rare thing here is that it's too obvious to miss.

jurassicpeanut

No bond stronger than a disabled girl and her disabled cat

lilyblisslys

me with the. When she. When her. When the she her me

mollyjames

morallyunequivocal

fuck “someday my prince will come”

“someday my magical animal that gives me magical girl powers will come”

hugintheraven

Hello.

morallyunequivocal

nah. not you.

you go on and get the fuck out of here.

silliestgoose-online

#beat me to it

lesbianeo

mutuals, you can pick me up to put me in your inventory

#bnuuy

rabbitkinglune777

DJ in da house!

(she/her) 🐕🎶🏳️‍⚧️

#art reblog

pocket-deer-belly

me when i listen to victims

pocket-deer-belly

these people's idea of justice involves:

gangstalking an autistic trans woman

divulging her private sexual behaviors constantly

relitigating all her actions forever as "accountibility"

continuing to do so even when an actual victim of said trans woman's behavior speaks out against this constant relitigation

it was already obvious to literally anyone that this wasn't ever about justice for victims but now they have a victim who wants them to stop and they're like "nah". because gangstalking trans women is their hobby

she told you directly that continuing in this behavior, continuing to punish a trans woman and doing so by wielding her experiences as a cudgel against her is retraumatizing and you can't even fucking apologize for this. because gangstalking trans women is just so fucking important

pocket-deer-belly

physically incapable of admitting that their actions have hurt the lives of real people. completely incapable of viewing themselves as anything but like, idk, fucking righteous warriors of justice. britts-galaxy-brain (pizzagate twerf) in particular operates on a necessity to completely downplay the stated traumas of every person involved. their hurt isn't *that* real, or like, not important in the face of making the trans woman suffer forever for what she did, or something. even when the one person who was hurt by her is begging them to stop.

pocket-deer-belly

it was already obvious to everyone who follows me but this has always been about tormenting patricia taxxon no matter what

pocket-deer-belly

continuing with the pattern of calling it "sending hate" when the trans woman has opinions on how people treat her and doesn't stay quiet and convenient

frogthrowaway

@hello-im-dog please delete your extremely popular post relitigating accusations i do not agree with or associate with anymore. thank you!

@britts-galaxy-brain @rambling-crerchur @panicatthecriscodisco please stop spreading the same talking points

i'm tired. let it go. you're just hurting me by doing this. will delete in like. a week. thanks

ot3

i think a new rule of engagement we should have for discourse is that any time someone says "the lesbian community" "the trans community" "the queer community" or something of that ilk you just dead stop the conversation in its tracks until they have successfully explained what group of people they're trying to refer to with this. because there is no such thing as a 'community' that every lesbian, or every trans person, or every queer person automatically belongs to/participates in, and acting like there is, or that we are all otherwise on the same page about which people these 'communities' actually consist of, lets people do a whole lot of lazy generalization that doesn't hold up to the slightest bit of scrutiny.

witnotwitchcraft

...we call the queer community a community because we are choosing to band together for safety and support. it is not woke to say "actually its every man for himself! i have nothing in common with the rest of you freaks!"

ot3

ok. well is "we" in this instance Every Single Queer Person on the planet, or are you perhaps doing a bit of generalization that won't stand up to being scrutinized. dont you think there could be some benefit to attempting to establish which people have made that choice you're referring to, and whose safety they are prioritizing. because if you have to make the choice to do this, then it categorically doesn't include everyone. and if it categorically doesn't include everyone, then conversation only stands to benefit by clarifying who it does include.

witnotwitchcraft

literally no one is able to speak for "every X person on the planet", that gotcha expired three years ago.

"we" refers to anyone who is fighting beside me. self inclusion and self exclusion are copacetic concepts.

i understand the danger of generalizations but if you lean too far in the other direction you get people trying to establish a literal gay card and set of criteria that is Queer Enough.

do you have a specific example of this generalizing language being utilized in a harmful way? it largely seems that language is being used by people being people and speaking in general terms about broad subjects

ot3

when did i say anyone was or wasn't queer enough? this isn't about deciding who does or doesn't actually count as queer this is saying that people are not automatically in community with each other by sharing an orientation label.

here's some examples of how these phrases are used that i don't like:

"the queer community needs to remember our history!" which history? in practice, on tumblr at least, almost always the american lgbt movement. i think its wrong to imply that american queer history Is queer history, and not just the history of queerness in one corner of the world. i think expecting any and everyone to both know and be deferential to the history of the american lgbt movement just because they are queer and speak english, regardless of whether or not thats actually their history, is weird nationalist behavior.

"the trans community has too much infighting" this is a statement that serves to imply that trans people are not allowed to have or capable of having legitimate ideological conflict with each other. it's frequently used to paint trans women specifically as instigators of meaningless internet drama, and completely discredit the critiques they have of the way they're treated by people who are supposedly 'in community' with them

i think pretty much every time "the lesbian community" with no further qualifiers is rhetorically used in a discussion it's been at best meaningless but often actually harmful, because understanding of lesbian identity has long been pretty heavily split between people who are using bioessentialist ideas about who actually Counts as a lesbian and people who aren't. i am not in community with twerfs and never will be, and i think trying to understand or portray lesbianism as a "community" without factoring in these peoples' presence just throws trans women under the bus.

"we refers to anyone who is fighting beside me" is literally a meaningless statement to make to a stranger. i dont know who you are. i don't know what you're fighting for. i dont know what someone has to do to qualify as being beside you. that clarifies nothing. the problem isn't broadness of the category, it is the complete lack of specificity regarding the criteria used to categorize. i'm not trying to gatekeep or police anyone, i'm just saying if you're trying to have a conversation about groups of people, you need to make sure whoever you're addressing can understand who is being rhetorically included in that group.

satanfemme

vitreousglassy

KEEP LIVING! WE'LL OUTLIVE THEM! HAPPY PRIDE!

gazeldhazel

it's pride month, and while I usually spend every other month centering trans women, this month I'm going to center trans women even harder. happy pride to trans women. the world is better with you in it.