I know I get a bit preachy about Shane and Ilya being equals to the point of it being maybe unrealistic, but if you have only watched the show I could see how maybe you wouldn't assume that. I could see how Shane is favored as the best even though Ilya is obviously still a very good hockey player. The book is meticulous about Shane and Ilya being read as equally good players. There is a bunch of them thinking the other is the only one who can keep up, and challenge them and of course there is the famous alone together at the top. And then consider the "facts". Both of them win a gold and silver at the World Junior Championships. Ilya is drafted first, but that could have went either way. Their junior careers are insanely similar. Shane wins Rookie of the Year, but again they are tied for goals and the award could have went to either of them. Shane wins silver at the Olympics and we are told that the Russia team sucked to make it less of Ilya's "failure". Ilya wins the MVP and the cup, only for Shane to turn around an win it twice (and The Long Game implies Ilya would have had a good change at winning the cup again if he had stayed with Boston). Even the wins in Montreal v Boston games are split evenly with the only score fully known being the game in the prologue. The show is lacking in the breadth of their internal acknowledgement of how good the other is. In the show you get Shane leading the scoring race part way through rookie year (which is book canon as well) without the knowledge the Ilya caught up to him by the end of the year and that they were tied. The Montreal v Boston game results are skewed toward Montreal instead of being equal. I've seen people use Shane being captain and Ilya moving to the wing at the All-Star game to prove Shane is the better player (which...ok) and even with that the book made it clear that Shane was voted in by the fans as captain so of course he is not going to move. And of course the two cups loom large for Shane.
If I am allowed back on my soapbox for a second I don't know if it was intentional to have Shane seem like the better player, but Jacob Tierney himself could say he thinks Shane is the better player and I would go rare disagree with you there. Because them being equals is fundamental to their relationship and if you make Ilya not as good of a player as Shane it hurts both of them. Even down to the teasing from Ilya feeling different if it is coming from a lesser player not Shane's equal. Especially when you consider what is coming in The Long Game for Shane. If Ilya isn't as good as Shane it changes Tripgate. The reason why Tripgate makes should no sense to anyone is that they are both as competitive as each other and they are as good as one another. Neither of them has to cheat to win. The best part of them is the fact that they are fully equals and that they will never be able to escape the other in their careers even if they never got together.

















