on āthe blond,ā āthe older man,ā and other crimes against third-person limited
You know that thing where a story is written in tight third person limited ā weāre meant to be inside someoneās head, seeing the world through their thoughts ā and then suddenly the narration says āthe blond frownedā or āthe shorter woman sighedā about a person the POV character knows really well?
Thatās called antonomasia ā using a descriptive label instead of a name. And itās fine when weāre talking about strangers: āthe cashier handed her the receipt,ā āthe tall guy blocked the door.ā The POV character doesnāt know their names, and we just need a quick way to tell people apart.
But the moment itās used for someone the POV character already knows, it breaks immersion. Because thatās not how our minds work. We donāt think āthe older man smiled at me.ā We think āMark smiled.ā Or maybe āmy bossā if that relationship matters in the moment.
Third person limited means the narration sits inside someoneās perception. Their inner monologue is the storyās voice. So when you switch from āMark smiledā to āthe blond smiled,ā youāve pulled the camera away from their mind and turned it into an outside shot.
If you want to create distance or irritation, you can do it on purpose ā
āThe idiot from accounting emailed again.ā
Thatās character voice. Thatās judgment. That works.
As soon as your POV character knows someoneās name, use it. While we do tend to worry about repetitions, names rarely register as such to the readers.
If you need variety for rhythm, use relational or emotional identifiers that make sense in their head: her friend, his partner, their teacher, the person they loved.
Because inside someoneās thoughts, there are no āblondsā or ābrunettes.ā
There are only people they know.
