Cosimo Galluzzi
Andulka
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
art blog(derogatory)
todays bird
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
PR's Tumblrdome
sheepfilms
Stranger Things
dirt enthusiast
Kiana Khansmith
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
oozey mess
hello vonnie
izzy's playlists!
One Nice Bug Per Day
RMH
@theartofmadeline
seen from Canada
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Belarus
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Japan
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia
seen from Indonesia
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
@ooenvs3000f24
Disclaimer.
This blog was created for ENVS 3000, University of Guelph.
The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of the University of Guelph.
The University of Guelph is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by this blog.
Unit 10 Blog Post
Describe your personal ethic as you develop as a nature interpreter. What beliefs do you bring? What responsibilities do you have? What approaches are most suitable for you as an individual?
Throughout my life, and now throughout this course, my love for nature has grown and evolved quite a bit leading to the interpreter I am today. I feel that each week through the assigned textbook and supplemental readings, along with the blog prompts and getting to read others’ posts, I have been able to learn a lot about my personal ethic as an interpreter.
Me out in Lake Erie enjoying nature!
For me, I believe that the interpretation of nature through a variety of goggles is the best way to go about it. In fact, I believe that you cannot only interpret nature under one lens, you need a mixture of outlooks to truly understand and appreciate the natural world. As a science major, it is easy for me to believe that science is one of the most crucial ways we can interpret nature because it brings along an understanding of what exactly we are seeing around us. Understanding why plants are green or why chipmunks may be burying their food helps to provide a deeper understanding and appreciation of our environment. As mentioned in one of week five’s supplemental readings, complicated issues such as the loss of biodiversity gain a lot of support when community members are taught about, and engaged in, the science behind it (Wals et al., 2014). By interpreting nature through a scientific lens we are better able to make sure people are informed about what is really going on around them and hopefully inspire them to take action when the natural world around them is at risk.
Sea stars I collected for experiments in a marine research course!
Even though I believe that science is necessary when interpreting nature, I do not think it would provide someone with everything they needed to love nature for all that it is. While science provides an understanding of what is going on, it sometimes lacks emotion. I believe that a major part of nature is the emotions that it provides to the interpreter and one of the main ways to feel those emotions is through forging a more personal connection through the arts. Whether that be through painting, drawing, crafts, music, or any other form of art, it is what truly connects us to nature. Taking something as simple as a lone tree in a field and interpreting it in a way that is personal to you, making something physical out of what you are seeing, is the most pure form of interpretation in my mind. Boeckel et al (2015)., mention that there is a disenchantment of the world occurring along with a loss of direct nature experiences. I feel that by taking what we see in nature and making something out of it we are effectively reconnecting with it because we have to take the time to be immersed in it to generate ideas on what to make.
Park near my house where I like to go and paint what I see!
Without artistic interpretations of nature we lack connection, but without scientific interpretations we lack understanding. This is why I believe we cannot simply pick one method of interpretation and run with it.
As an interpreter I believe that I have many responsibilities. First of all it is my responsibility to ensure that everyone feels included. This involves unpacking invisible knapsacks as learned in week three. Making sure that each and every participant has the same tools available to them, either literal or metaphorical, to truly understand and appreciate what is around them is key. If someone felt like they were at a disadvantage due to a lack of education, experience, or anything else then they would not be properly able to enjoy nature as they may be feeling othered. It is a responsibility of mine to be extra observant and make sure that this does not happen. Another responsibility I carry is making sure that everyone is being respectful with the natural world, myself included. Whether it's leading a hike or a camping trip or anything else outdoors there is a possibility for people to treat nature unkindly. Maybe it's by throwing their food wrappers on the ground or unnecessarily killing bugs around them for being “creepy”. When we are in and around nature it is our responsibility to treat it with care so that future generations can have the same experiences as us. As an interpreter I feel a sense of leadership and responsibility that includes keeping our forests, beaches, and other environments clean. Another responsibility of mine is to appeal to each and every learning style. In the course content we discussed tactile, auditory, and visual, but the textbook goes on to provide many others. Things like logical-mathematical, inter- and intrapersonal and many more were mentioned (Beck et al., 2018). I feel it is my duty to truly understand what each one involves and what strengths/weaknesses someone with that learning style may face when it comes to interpretation. A final responsibility I feel I have as an interpreter relates to what I wrote about above. I feel it is my duty to ensure that all aspects of interpretation are being included when out in nature. Providing the science behind why something is the way it is then going into artistic interpretations of it to make sure that everyone gets the whole picture is key. In the future I will strive to interpret in a way that incorporates it all to give participants the best shot at finding something they can connect to in nature.
As an individual I feel I am best suited to do all that I have mentioned in this blog. I am a science student which helps me with scientific interpretations, but I also have a love for being creative which would help me with the artistic part. I definitely feel as though these weekly blog posts have helped me better understand who I am as an interpreter and what works best for me. I have learned quite a bit about myself during this course and I cannot wait to use all that I have learned in the future to be the best interpreter I can!
I cannot wait to read everyone else’s blogs this week and I hope everyone has a great rest of their semester!
References
Beck, L., Cable, T. T., & Knudson, D. M. (2018). Interpreting cultural and natural heritage: For A Better World. SAGAMORE Publishing, Sagamore Venture.
van Boeckel, J. (2015). At the heart of art and earth: an exploration of practices in arts-based environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 21(5), 801–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.959474
Wals, A. E.J., Brody, M., Dillon, J., Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence Between Science and Environmental Education. Science 344,583-584. 10.1126/science.1250515
Your careful observations on how you combine art and science in your understanding of nature are much appreciated. Since science explains the "why" behind the things we see, I agree that it is crucial to gaining a deeper understanding of the natural world. As you said, knowing how biodiversity is lost or how animals behave might motivate people to take action, particularly when they witness the real effects on ecosystems. Additionally, the science based approach guarantees that we convey accurate and useful information that promotes well-informed conservation decisions.
But I also share your belief that a strong emotional bond with nature cannot be fostered by knowledge alone. People can re-establish a connection with the environment through art. It makes it possible for people to communicate their own feelings and experiences, strengthening their connection to the natural world. This all-encompassing method may engage students of all backgrounds and promote a deeper understanding of the natural world by fusing scientific truths with artistic expression.
It's admirable how you embrace diversity and make sure everyone has the resources they need to enjoy nature. I also concur that it's critical to accommodate various learning preferences so that everyone can participate. All participants will have a more enriching experience if you balance creative and scientific interpretations and accommodate different learning styles.
Which techniques have you found work well for fusing artistic interpretations with factual explanations in your nature interpretations? When time is limited, how can you strike a compromise between these factors?
Unit 10 Blog Post
Developing My Personal Ethic as a Nature Interpreter
Interpreting nature is an opportunity to inspire, educate, and foster deep relationships between humans and the natural world, not just a job or duty. As I cultivate my own ethics as a nature interpreter, I think carefully about the values I uphold, the obligations I have, and the methods that best suit my character and life experiences. These components will be examined in this blog post, which will weave together the knowledge I've gained from this course, my past experiences, and my future goals.
Beliefs That Shape My Approach
My conviction in the inherent worth of nature is the foundation of my work as a nature interpreter. My early upbringing in an environment with well-kept parks and gardens gave me a deep appreciation for the natural world. These areas served as more than just backgrounds for my life; they were havens of inspiration, happiness, and comfort. Nature can be a source of serenity, concentration, and sensory engagement, as Richard Louv stated in Last Child in the Woods. These encounters shaped my conviction that nature merits our protection not because it is useful but rather because it is valuable in and of itself.
The value of developing a close relationship with nature is another guiding belief. The notion that people protect what they love inspires me greatly. I want to encourage people to take care of the environment by giving them the chance to feel amazement and wonder in natural environments. This viewpoint supports the notion that interpreting nature is about fostering a closer bond between humans and the natural world rather than only dispensing knowledge.
Responsibilities as a Nature Interpreter
I recognize the responsibility that comes with being a nature interpreter. First and foremost, it is your role to convey important and correct information. In a time of environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, and climate change, it is critical that I base my interpretations on facts while also making difficult subjects approachable and relatable to a wide range of audiences.
Promoting accessibility and inclusivity is a further responsibility a nature interpreter would have. Everyone has a right to nature, yet access to its wonders may be privileged; restricted by obstacles, whether they are educational, cultural, or physical as discussed in Unit 3. By developing interpretive experiences that speak to people of all backgrounds and skill levels, I hope to dismantle these boundaries. This entails taking into account various learning preferences and making sure my language and teaching strategies are welcoming and inclusive.
My obligation to future generations is just as significant. Children are not only participants in the events of today, but they will also be the future stewards of the environment, as Richard Louv discussed in Unit 8. Young people can develop lifelong curiosity and compassion by being exposed to the wonders of nature, whether through up-close interactions with wildlife, an engrossing tale, or a practical activity.
Approaches That Reflect My Personality and Skills
My approach to interpretation is both disciplined and dynamic, as I thrive on organization, passion, and goal-oriented communication. Presenting factual information while fostering moments of wonder and engagement is something I try to balance. One of my favorite methods is storytelling, since it enables me to relate relatable anecdotes to scientific principles. For instance, in our first Podcast instead of just outlining the ecological effects of outdoor cats, I might tell a tale about a particular species of bird that is impacted by predation, allowing my audience to sympathize with the difficulties that wildlife faces.
Another essential component of my strategy is interactive experiences. I place a high value on conversation and active engagement whether I'm presenting a workshop, leading a nature walk, or producing a podcast. In addition to keeping the audience interested, questions, observations, and comments provide them the chance to influence the event in ways that are significant to them.
Another aspect of my evolving strategy is the careful integration of technology as mentioned in Unit 8. The significance of employing platforms like blogs and podcasts to reach people who might not be physically present in the field was emphasized in this session. I can share tales, photos, and thoughts with a worldwide audience while preserving the warmth and genuineness of in-person encounters by utilizing digital platforms to expand the reach of my interpretive work.
Balancing Challenges with Hope
Addressing the gravity of environmental issues without overpowering the audience is one of the biggest challenges in nature interpretation. Being an environmental educator can be like attempting to use a teaspoon to halt a rushing river, as Jacob Rodenburg points out in Unit 9. The enormity of the issues we confront such as plastic pollution, habitat devastation, and climate change can seem intimidating. But hope, in my opinion, is a powerful remedy for despair.
To balance honesty with hope, I focus on actionable insights and success stories. Promoting regional conservation initiatives, outlining easy activities people can take to lessen their influence, and acknowledging any advancements made, no matter how miniscule, can give people the confidence that their actions count. For example, to provide participants a practical approach to support biodiversity, a pollinator program can incorporate a hands-on lesson on growing native flowers.
The possibility of regeneration is another source of hope. According to Rodenburg, communities that are rich in nature should be established where kids may both maintain and revitalize the natural systems in their immediate surroundings as mentioned in Unit 9. I see my job as a nature interpreter as fostering this regenerative mindset and assisting others in progressing from awareness to action and, eventually, advocacy.
Making Interpretation Meaningful
In my opinion, the key to meaningful interpretation lies in authenticity and passion. The inspiration for my interpretive work comes from my own relationship with nature. I can provide programs and content that are not only educational but also profoundly personal and influential if I remain loyal to my experiences, values, and voice.
Adapting experiences to the audience is another way to make interpretation meaningful. I can create messages that connect when I know who they are—their needs, interests, and degree of nature acquaintance. A program for a group of young children can emphasize sensory exploration, such as discovering edible wild berries by their leaf patterns or acknowledging the differences in birds based on their chirp. A guided hike for adults could cover ecological principles or conservation tactics.
Finally, I will try to use every interpretative experience as an opportunity to improve, both for my audience and for myself. A crucial step in this process is reflection. What went effectively? I ask myself after every program. What might be made better? How can I learn more about the subjects I'm presenting? My work will always be effective, current, and new because of my dedication to learning and adapting.
Carrying the “So What?” Forward
This course has forced me to reflect critically on my identity as a nature interpreter, reaffirming that nature interpretation is a calling rather than merely a career—an opportunity to uplift people, build relationships, and support the survival of the earth. I carry with me as I go ahead the knowledge that interpretation may lead to change, the obligation to make good use of my education and privilege, and the conviction that even a modest act of connection can have a significant influence. I'm dedicated to making every minute matter, whether I'm hosting a forest walk or producing a podcast, for the sake of the environment and its inhabitants.
Reading your blog post was a lot of fun, especially the part where you talked about how important it is to have a genuine, meaningful relationship with nature. I completely agree with your assertion that people defend the things they care about. I like how you use Richard Louv's observations about how nature may inspire and soothe kids to your interpretation because they are so important. You're true; we can cultivate future environmental stewards by allowing nature to be a source of wonder and tranquilly.
I really respect the way you strike a balance between hope and environmental difficulties. In addition to educating others, you may motivate them to take concrete action to change the world by sharing success stories and offering practical advice. It's a terrific method to make the material more memorable and relatable, and I really like how you use stories and interactive experiences to engage your audience.
I'm interested to know how you intend to increase your use of digital media and technology as a nature interpreter in order to reach a wider audience and increase the effect of your teachings.
Unit 10 Blog
As a nature interpreter, my personal ethics are based on the straightforward yet potent tenet that you should never take anything that is not yours. I've held this view since I was a little child, and it has a strong connection to environmental understanding and conservation. As I work in this field, I've come to understand that respecting and preserving nature is just as important as understanding it. We have a responsibility to protect nature for coming generations, since it is a shared resource. This ethic affects how we interact with nature, how we communicate its importance to others, and how we preserve its integrity.
The only true sin according to Khaled Hosseini's "The Kite Runner", is stealing and all wrongdoing is a kind of theft. According to my interpretation, stealing from nature whether by overconsumption, environmental deterioration, or false information deprives future generations of the harmony and beauty we currently enjoy. As a nature interpreter, my goal is to promote a close respectful relationship with nature, rather than to urge others to take from it.
I think it's crucial to be honest about environmental challenges, just as I was taught that lying is wrong. Interpreting nature can be challenging, particularly in light of issues like habitat loss, biodiversity decrease, and climate change. However, facing these problems head on can spur action. We run the risk of depriving people of the chance to make wise judgements, if we minimize or sugarcoat the environmental facts.
In my experience, one of the best ways to hold an audience's attention is through narrative. Stories help us emotionally connect and simplify difficult subjects. I want to inspire wonder and interest in people, especially kids, by sharing my own experiences in nature. According to Richard Louv's "The Last Child in the woods", exposing kids to nature aims to establish a bond that will last and inspire them to take action in the future. I consider it my responsibility to help sow the seeds of environmental stewardship in the youth, who will be the future keepers of nature.
The idea that regeneration is more important than sustainability is a key component of my ethics. Interpreting nature is about pointing people in the direction of what is possible, not just what is. We have an obligation to motivate action beyond preserving the status quo. We must endeavour to restore and regenerate what has been destroyed, simply conserving what is left is insufficient.
I have attached a link to the kite runner if you are interested in reading it, as well as The Last child in the woods:
Furthermore, My strategy is founded on respect for the environment, for the people I interact with, and for future generations. Just like the idea of the Golden Rule. I think about how I would like to be regarded as a member of the greater ecosystem as well as an individual. The moral precept, "Do not treat others in ways you don't want to be treated yourself," becomes the cornerstone of my interpretive work when viewed through this perspective. Nature is a communal area, our actions there have an impact that extends much beyond our immediate surroundings.
An environmental interpreter's job is not just to provide information; it's to inspire in people have a deeper appreciation for the natural world. A future based on environmental stewardship is established by the connection to nature we cultivate in children, whether it is by introducing them to the presence of a pileated woodpecker or by leading them on safe outdoor experiences, as Richard Louv points out. For this reason, I think it's crucial to cultivate deep, intimate ties to nature. Every encounter with nature ought to provide both emotional resonance and understanding. Louv's descriptions of the excitement and serenity he experienced while climbing trees should be reflected in the way I help people observe and experience the natural world.
My convictions are in line with the knowledge that my job as an interpreter is to encourage a closer bond with nature rather than only provide information. I think that a person's worldview can be profoundly impacted by shared sensory experiences of nature. This procedure is similar to sowing seeds that with the right care, can grow into sustainable and even regenerative actions. That responsibility, in my opinion, goes beyond basic education. I think that the most appropriate manner for me to perceive nature is one that is analytical and introspective. I can approach every experience with care if I live up to a philosophy of respect for the natural environment and the people I deal with. It is more important to initiate discussions, promote deliberate action, and inspire hope in ways that feel approachable and genuine to the individuals in my life.
My strong belief that every interaction has the capacity to bring about long lasting change is the "so what" of my work as an environmental interpreter. It is about helping to create a future in which environmental regeneration is a daily practice, rather than merely an ideal. In a world when environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, and climate change appear intractable, our capacity to connect with people and the earth in ways that foster empathy, holds the key to hope.
🌸 🏠 🌎
Unit 9 Blog #1
If you were anything like me as a kid, I bet you spent some time flipping over rocks and logs to discover tiny animals hidden beneath. Maybe you found salamanders, worms, and beetles, maybe something even more exciting for a young mind investigating nature for the first time. I can almost guarantee that something you found while doing this was a hectic, bustling colony of ants. I know when this used to happen to me, I would jump backwards, startled and somewhat unsettled by the squirming pile of tiny bugs, but as I became accustomed to this sight, I would notice how organized these insects seemed to be, gathering up the larvae and eggs and marching them into the tunnels to remove them from this newly exposed section of their home. After a while, I began to have an appreciation for these tiny workers.
As a group that is often overlooked and found to be more of a nuisance than anything else, ants aren’t usually the target of discussions promoting insects, although I hope some of this perspective can be changed eventually. It is much easier to sell a crowd on what we call the “charismatic megafauna” of insects. Things like praying mantises, monarch butterflies, and the large and colourful beetles of the world are easier to convince people to care about than flies, ants, or biting and stinging insects that people are predisposed to dislike. I believe that this could go into a deeper discussion about how we place more value on things that are more visually appealing or clearly benefit us, but that is another topic.
I’m going to delve into a couple of aspects of ant life that many people wouldn’t know about in hopes of instilling that just because these creatures are tiny and may be seen as a nuisance to us, they have been evolving and living their own complex lifestyles for such a long time, and deserve at the minimum respect (because despite my endearment for these little insects, I know this isn’t realistic to expect from others). I bet you never would’ve guessed that ants engage in agriculture! Some ant species keep other insects as livestock in the same way we keep cows. A group that can often be found in these livestock roles are Hemipterans, common name “true bugs”, funnily enough. Aphids are one example of Hemipterans often kept as livestock, and ants will feed them, take honeydew they produce for their own food (much like us milking cows), and even cull their population for protein when it is large enough. Other ant species are known to keep gardens of fungus or plants, some even going to the extent of producing herbicides to maintain these gardens and co-evolving with the gardened plant species.
Ants are so complex, and I truly encourage anyone interested to look into them more, and for everyone, perhaps consider why it is that we value those “charismatic megafauna” insects more than smaller, less visually appealing ones.
Hi There!
I like how you highlighted the intricacy of ants, which is sometimes disregarded! You make a pretty good point when you say that humans often concentrate on "charismatic megafauna" among insects, such as butterflies and mantises. It's true that humans frequently place a higher priority on animals that are aesthetically pleasing or useful while ignoring the intriguing behaviours of less "appealing" species. Ants are a prime illustration of this prejudice, yet despite their complex social structures and unexpected agricultural abilities—such as the aphid farming you described—they make significant contributions to our ecosystems.
Some research on leafcutter ants, which grow fungus in "gardens" to feed their colony, comes to mind when you mention ant agriculture. These ants exhibit an amazing degree of cooperation and adaptation by actively maintaining the fungus by creating natural pesticides to keep it safe from other fungi. This kind of mutualism serves as a potent reminder that nature continuously astounds us with its own intricacy, demonstrating that humans are not the only ones with inventiveness. The book Journey to the Ants by Bert Hölldobler and Edward O. Wilson provides an intriguing insight at the cooperative behaviours and evolutionary tactics of ant societies for anybody interested in learning more.
A more comprehensive examination of how we determine value in nature is strongly encouraged by your post. We may gain a deeper knowledge of ecosystems and become more grateful stewards of biodiversity by acknowledging and valuing the roles of "nuisance" insects. I appreciate you starting this fascinating discussion; I will definitely be reconsidering the next ant trail I come on!
Unit 9 Blog
This course's encouragement to take a closer look at nature and our interpretations of it, has been one of its most transforming features. Interpreting nature involves more than just communicating information; it involves helping people understand the core of what they observe. I've learnt from this course that interpretation serves as a prism through which we may view our own position in the world, connecting curiosity with understanding and science with emotion.
Realizing that interpretation is more than simply a means of conveying nature, but also a means of relating to its narratives and assisting others in viewing it as an extension of themselves, has been a major turning point in my life. The significance of connecting scientific events to ideas that individuals can identify within their own lives, was brought to light by our conversations. For example, when interpreted, the tale of erosion sculpting canyons is not only a geological process but rather one of endurance, patience, and metamorphosis. We all undergo erosion, whether it is in the shape of slow changes in our own lives, or in relationships and ambitions that take time to develop.
Our unit on thematic interpretation focused on motivating audiences by relating facts to feelings, and enabling them to look beyond the facts. This makes me think about how animals, such as axolotls and starfish, can regenerate complete limbs. I could have previously presented this as a "cool fact" about biology. But now I understand how it might be framed as a representation of resiliency and rejuvenation, speaking to human experiences like recovering from setbacks. The idea is not only instructive but also transforming, since this course has demonstrated to me how interpretation may bring scientific occurrences into the personal realm.
Realizing that self-awareness and connection are necessary for interpretation has been another important learning. We were asked early on to state our goals for the course, and for me, that meant developing a greater understanding of my relationship with nature. Although I didn't anticipate how understanding nature would change my viewpoint, every lesson improves our ability to interpret in subtle yet significant ways. The sense making activities have been a game changer for me because they have made me see that my perception of nature isn't only academic; rather, it is something I can truly relate to and share with others.
I have also begun to view my audience differently as a result of this training. I now realize that my job as an interpreter is to meet people where they are, rather than presuming they have a certain degree of interest. In order to inspire people in a way that is applicable to their life, I must be vivacious and vulnerable. Together, we go on a voyage of interpretation that has the power to change our collective perspective of the world. This method is uplifting and humble, and it has given me a new purpose in the way I study and discuss nature.
Unit 7 Blog #1
Music in nature can be found in the sounds of both the environment itself and the animals living within it. The most literal examples of music in nature, as shown in the readings, can be found in whales and birds, prompting a curiosity about how inherent music is to our world. My favourite example of this, however, is in insects. Though not necessarily thought of as musical creatures by many, throughout different groups song-related mating strategies are common. Crickets and cicadas are likely the best-known examples, in which they rub the edges of their wings together (referred to as stridulation), creating a high-pitched sound to attract mates. Interestingly, these are species-specific, and females can pick out the songs of their species to select a mate. There are even some insect groups that create acoustic amplifiers of various sorts, such as using a leaf as a megaphone or digging in the dirt to create a shape to amplify their song to attract individuals from a farther distance.
I believe nature can be found in music both through the inherent connections we all seem to share, and through the storytelling medium in which vivid emotional moments can be created. A very literal example of nature in music can be found in the DJ using nature and animal sounds to create music, and this was fascinating to me, especially when he would create themed tracks of a certain region. In my opinion, this could have potential for pushing environmental conservation strategies as it is an enjoyable way to connect people with nature. In a broader sense, I expect many musicians throughout time were inspired in one way or another by nature, especially in times before the internet or ease of travel across the world was possible. This weaves the importance of nature into the music, even if it is not directly or immediately apparent. Nature can also be found in Indigenous music, which I will be personally delving more into and perhaps making an additional post with more focus here, as much of their music is either inspired by, ritually connected to, or in various ways about the natural world.
Finally, I have been considering what song brings me to a natural landscape. In what I’m sure is a common trend for people, I connect music that can be played with only a guitar and singing to bring me back to experiences of camping outside with family. Specifically, the song “Cat’s in the Cradle” by Henry Chapin was one that kept coming to mind, as I have distinct memories of my uncle playing the guitar while the rest of the family sang along on a camping trip as a child. This song is great for this atmosphere as well because of the storytelling elements, and even if someone does not know the song going into the experience, they’ll be able to pick up on the chorus and sing along after not too long.
Your observation eloquently illustrates how the sounds of nature, from birds and whales to insects, provide a fundamental "music" that unites us all. Your investigation of stridulation in insects, such as cicadas and crickets, shows a keen interest in the many ways that nature communicates. The idea that even insects can adjust to their environment by employing mud or leaves as amplifiers to enhance the volume of their melodies is astounding. This bridges the gap between human talent and nature by reflecting how artists use their surroundings to improve sound.
Your viewpoint on how music with natural sounds might promote environmental protection really caught my attention. Animal sound recordings are used by musicians such as Ben Mirin, dubbed the "wildlife DJ," to produce music that combines elements of nature and music. These kinds of initiatives strike a chord with listeners, stirring feelings and maybe motivating conservation initiatives. As you mentioned, this method creates a fun and imaginative connection between individuals and certain areas and ecosystems.
I was reminded of comparable outdoor experiences by your selection of "Cat's in the Cradle" as a music associated with natural recollections. It's amazing how these tunes can enhance the experience and create a shared memory in the outdoors. This link is strengthened by indigenous music, which combines narrative with sounds derived from the land and has a profound connection to nature and ceremonies. Indigenous music eloquently illustrates how nature is incorporated into cultural expression, preserving our connection to the land over generations, and I look forward to your continued investigation of this genre.
Week 7 Blog
Nature and music have a strong and ancient relationship. From using tuning forks to create binaural beats to investigating cultural soundscapes like the complex music of the Mbuti people, I have devoted years to the study of sound. All types of sound have the power to profoundly affect us on a biological as well as emotional level. It has been demonstrated that the parasympathetic nervous system is calmed by natural sounds, which bind us to a more primordial and wellbeing-based connection. This relationship is best shown by the Japanese genre Kankyo Ongaku, or Environmental Music, which creates an audio world that resonates with calm and groundedness by fusing field recordings of natural environs into music.
However, these natural soundscapes are becoming increasingly silent these days, which is troubling. This topic is brought to light in a recent piece in The Guardian that details how environmental deterioration has robbed many regions of their soundscapes. As whole habitats are being devastated by fires, harsh weather, and human involvement, the rustle of leaves has stopped, streams have dried up, and birdsong has diminished. As musicians and listeners, we need to consider not just the emotional impact of our music but also its biological effects on us as people and as members of the ecosystem. The potential of music to re-establish a connection between us and the natural world, as well as to attract us towards the outside world that produced them, is what gives it its power in nature interpretation. I've reduced the world's issues to one main focus in my own work: mending the strained bond between people and the natural environment. In order to "tune" listeners to feel attuned and at ease, I make an effort to make sure that each note and sound conveys a respect for the natural world and the human nervous system. If others are intentionally making music with nature and healing in mind, I'm interested to know. The universality of music and its capacity to cut over linguistic and cultural boundaries make it a special instrument for interpretation. Every known human civilization is believed to include music, which is used to tell emotional, cultural, and social tales. Does nature itself have a musical language, one could wonder? If so, is the music we compose a reaction to the melodies found in nature? For example, animals create territories, communicate across long distances, and interact with their surroundings by using certain cries and noises. The use of recorded bird sounds in beatboxing was invented by "wildlife DJ" Ben Mirin, who combines human and natural musical expression.
The goal of this course's discussion of interpretative abilities is to inspire action, such as conservation, appreciation, or stewardship, rather than merely imparting knowledge about nature. Music is one of the best methods to bridge this divide, especially when it includes aspects of nature. Incorporating nature into music not only improves our bond with the natural world, but it may also open doors to recovery and reconciliation. The acoustic guitar and earthy lyrics of Fleetwood Mac's "Landslide" remind me of a camping vacation in the Rockies, where the breathtaking scenery was reflected in the song. How about you? Do you have a song that reminds you of the outdoors, or perhaps a musical experience that helped you feel more a part of the world? Your experiences and opinions on utilizing music as a conduit to nature would be much appreciated.
Here are some resources to further your understanding:
State of Nature 2023 report shows the UK wildlife’s devastating decline. Nearly one in six of the more than 10,000 species assessed are at r
Earth.fm explores how and why nature sounds are falling silent, what this means for the natural world, and how this trend can be reversed
It transpires that I was ahead of the curve. Well, there’s a first time for everything. Two years after my trip of a lifetime to Japan in 2
Unit 06 blog post
Hi everyone!
As I read this quote- "There is no peculiar merit in ancient things, but there is merit in integrity, and integrity entails the keeping together of the parts of any whole…", one of the things that came to mind was our relationship with the past. The quote indicates that the past should not be valued simply because it is old, but the integrity of things that exist beyond a certain period of time must still be preserved. It is understanding and remembering what came before that provides the insight necessary to keep a coherent whole, whether in society, tradition, or our own private lives, together. “Integrity entails the keeping together of the parts”, this part of the quote produces interesting questions as to what extent the past continues to have relevance for the present. Take environmental issues, for instance. It is a very modern concern, yet deeply rooted in ancient practices. For centuries, indigenous peoples worked very hard to be in balance with nature, and failure to understand that might cause us to miss out on some key information about how to care for our Earth. Not learning from ancient wisdom compromises our current environmental efforts. On the other hand, not all things passed on from the past are worth preserving. For example, the old ideologies of sexism, racism, and colonialism need to be left behind. The quote recognizes that the value of all things ancient lies not in their inherent worth but rather in the wisdom they teach about what should be preserved and what should be let go. To maintain wholeness in the integrity of living today, we have to carefully pick which elements of the past support that wholeness and which elements do not.
I found the railway station analogy to be very powerful: “To think, feel or act as though the past is done with, is equivalent to believing that a railway station through which our train has just passed, only existed for as long as our train was in it”. This passage of the quote makes me think of a train ride I took last summer in Switzerland, through tiny villages and scenery that seemed to be only a brief glimpse of another world. But that does not mean the towns and people that lived in them disappeared just because I moved on. The past is similar to those towns: it does not get erased just because we have moved on through it, it continues to shape the present whether we like it or not.
This is a picture of one of the beautiful towns I passed by, while on the train.
This led me to think; how do we determine what pieces of the past are worth keeping? I think the answer lies in whether those pieces contribute to sustaining integrity. In my own life, I’ve let go of family customs that felt more like obligations than meaning, but I’ve held on to others, like gathering for family dinners, because they keep a sense of connection and wholeness.
Ultimately, the past should neither be idolized nor discarded. It is but a part of the whole, and integrity means knowing which parts serve us in staying in touch with our selves of today.
Hey Chloe!
Your analysis of the quotation effectively conveys a crucial component of interpretation: the past is not only something that is in the past; rather, it serves as a framework for comprehending and molding the present. Environmental history and the concept of integrity, or "keeping together the parts of any whole," are a wonderful fit. Given the current state of environmental deterioration and climate change, this is extremely important. Have we really learnt from the past, or are we skimming the past and realizing too late that we've overlooked important information?
It struck me too, the similarity of the train station. I'm reminded of how easy we take for granted the permanency of objects outside of our direct line of sight by your train excursion across Switzerland. Highlighting that even after we move on, the past never truly goes away.
The root of the matter is your question, though: how can we choose which aspects of the past to preserve? In my opinion, it's not just about what preserves completeness but also about what keeps us connected to the earth and to one another. At this point, nature interpretation transcends storytelling and becomes about bringing the previously unseen historical linkages to light and making them relevant to the present day.
Lastly, I like that you talked about letting go of ingrained familial traditions. It's a wonderful metaphor for the larger struggle we confront: how to let go of customs and beliefs that no longer benefit us, such as the damaging effects of sexism and colonialism, while clinging to those that promote development and connection.
Unit Blog 6- Additional Substantive Post.
Just a quicker summary of my first post for week 6:
Have you ever pondered what stories the trees may tell if they could talk when you were strolling through a park or a forest? Envision narratives that span millennia, linking human actions, calamities, and changes in the environment. We are strolling through history rather than merely passing through a landscape.
The quotation from Edward Hyams' emphasizes how crucial it is to preserve integrity across time, particularly when it comes to how we interpret environmental history. In this context, integrity refers to maintaining the relationships, even across centuries between human behaviour and the environment. Ignoring the past is like to believing that a train station is only a mirage that appears while we are present.
Examining the historical interactions between people and the natural world, environmental history as a field contributes to preserving such integrity. Donald Worster's Dust Bowl serves as one illustration of what happens when these relationships are ignored. The ecological catastrophe of the 1930s was not only natural; human mismanagement, stemming from a failure to recognize the fragile equilibrium between climate and land, also moulded it.
Another viewpoint is provided by Alfred Crosby's Ecological Imperialism, which examines how colonisation dispersed ecosystems by bringing European species to other areas. Long-lasting environmental changes resulted from this disturbance, demonstrating once more how human activity may break apart the natural world.
Our job as environmental interpreters is to assist people in identifying these historical links. Centuries of human and environmental interaction have created the landscapes we see today. We contribute to maintaining that purity by narrating these stories and providing background on contemporary environmental issues. History then serves as a tool to inform decisions made in the future.
Particularly in this era of environmental issues and climate change, the past may teach us important lessons. By neglecting the complex link that exists between humans and environment, are we repeating the mistakes of the past? What occurs if stories of the region are lost?
Unit Blog 6
In Edward Hyams’ quote, "There is no peculiar merit in ancient things, but there is merit in integrity”. The significance of integrity and its connection to memory and historical knowledge are emphasized. Maintaining a whole's integrity entails keeping it intact even when its components are scattered over time. The notion that the past is history is likened to the notion that a train station exists just as long as our train is stationed there. This idea emphasizes how foolish it is to ignore history. Even if it isn't physically there anymore, the past nonetheless influences how we see the present and the future. If we don't acknowledge it, we lose a significant part of our shared identity, along with the land and surroundings we live in.
I’ve read quite a plethora of books and here are some of the things I've picked up. This idea is closely related to environmental history, a discipline that emphasizes how people interact with their surroundings. Historians such as Donald Hughes highlight in What is Environmental History? that knowing historical relationships and transformations is just as important as understanding discrete events or artifacts. We may understand how human activity has continually affected the ecosystems we live in, from ancient times to the present, by studying environmental history. The significance of keeping in mind and drawing lessons from history is consistent with Hyams' assertion that, in actuality, our actions now are intricately linked to historical processes; to ignore the past would be to pretend it has no bearing on the present.
In Alfred Crosby's book Ecological Imperialism, for example, it is discussed how European colonization resulted in the introduction of exotic species, which had a significant influence on the local ecosystems and native people, in addition to political power. This historical perspective shows how human growth was an ecological phenomenon in addition to a cultural or political one. In a similar vein, William Cronon's Changes in the Land explores how European immigrants in New England overlooked the ways that native populations had altered the region. These misconceptions had a major impact on the environment, changing ecosystems and landscapes in ways that still have an impact on us now.
This thoughtful interpretation of nature and history relates to Hyams's focus on honesty. We maintain the integrity of the narratives we tell about human cultures and the environment by piecing together the historical events that have been dispersed across time. Without taking into account its past, to comprehend nature would be to ignore a fundamental component of its existence. Dust Bowl by Donald Worster serves as a reminder of the catastrophic consequences that may result from human mismanagement of land, but it also demonstrates how we can use the lessons learnt from the past to approach the future with more caution and forethought. I'm always curious about the ecological tales that lie beneath the surface of our contemporary towns. I am reminded that landscapes are more than just beauty when I read Dust Bowl or Ecological Imperialism. They are living archives of human decisions, both prudent and foolish.
In the end, Hyams' train station analogy serves as a helpful reminder that the past is more than simply a fleeting memory. This is an arrangement that endures even after we have moved on. The deeds of people who came before us also influence our natural surroundings. Recognizing this enables us to understand nature in a way that respects its past and maintains the integrity of our connection to the land. It has been demonstrated by environmental historians such as Hughes, Crosby, Cronon, and Worster that understanding the past is crucial to making sustainable decisions for the future.
Here I have attached the links to all the books I mentioned in case you are interested in reading these books.
What is Environmental History?: Hughes, J. Donald: 9780745688435: Books - Amazon.ca
Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900–1900: Crosby, Alfred W.: 9780521456906: Books - Amazon.ca
Dust Bowl: The Southern Plains in the 1930s eBook : Worster, Donald: Amazon.ca: Kindle Store
🌿 🌳 📜 📖 ⚖️ 🕰️ 💡🌻
Blog #5
Unit 5 focuses on how science can be a strong instrument for interpreting and communicating the natural world. While one would initially believe that scientific interpretation entails identifying species or explaining taxonomies, this unit encourages us to seek beyond conventional approaches. It focuses on making nature interpretation more accessible and interesting through science, while also ensuring that it appeals to a wide range of consumers.
The Arboretum at the University of Guelph is an excellent example of practical science-based nature interpretation. Participants encounter nature via a scientific perspective with guided walks conducted by interns such as Kitty and Jenny, but the approach goes beyond just recounting facts or names. Instead of focusing simply on technical aspects, the interns assist participants in making connections with their surroundings, which encourages interest and engagement. This technique demonstrates how science may be utilized to make nature more accessible and relevant to a wider audience.
When I was in my first year I actually had the amazing opportunity of living in the East Town Village townhouses and my specific townhouse happened to be right beside the arboretum. Me and my roommate at the time would walk her emotional support dog Sulley on a daily basis while looking at all the beautiful plant life along the arboretum path. My favourite amongst all the plants is the infamous Monkey Puzzle tree, not sure if it still stands but it always takes up space in my heart and imagination as one of the most interesting plants I have ever encountered.
Another vital aspect of this unit is the For the Love of Birds TED Talk, which demonstrates how scientific interpretation may be simple and enjoyable. During the presentation, the speaker utilizes a simple object: a feather, to elicit amazement and interest in nature. Rather than overloading the audience with technical jargon, the speaker tells the tale of the feather, examining its beauty and utility. This technique demonstrates how, when presented well, scientific topics can fascinate and inspire an audience. The lesson from this TED Talk is that by concentrating on relevant and exciting parts of nature, interpreters may establish a stronger connection between people and the natural world, even if they don't become too technical.
The unit additionally highlights podcasts as a modern tool for understanding nature through science. Podcasts are a fantastic medium for combining narrative, interviews, and sound to create an immersive experience for the listener. Especially for our upcoming Kids podcast assignment, it is important to consider how to transmit scientific material in a way that keeps the audience's interest, similar to the TED Talk. Storytelling becomes critical in this context, and by using sound effects such as bird calls or leaf rustling, podcasts may make listeners feel connected to nature even when they are not physically present.
By mixing scientific knowledge with narrative and media such as podcasts, this unit demonstrates that nature interpretation via science does not have to be complicated or difficult. The objective is to make scientific concepts understandable, accessible, and entertaining for all audiences while keeping the information's integrity. This method invites interpreters to consider how best to express their expertise in ways that build a long-term respect for nature. Ultimately, science becomes more than simply a tool for interpreting nature; it also serves as a bridge that links people to the natural world on a deeper, more emotional level.
Hey Michelle!
Your thoughts on Unit 5 effectively convey how science can change how we understand nature. I like how you emphasize going beyond taxonomic boundaries to make content more approachable and interesting for a range of users. Exuberant interns like Kitty and Jenny lead the Arboretum's guided walks, which are a prime example of how scientific knowledge can promote sincere ties with nature. Rather than just repeating facts, their capacity to foster meaningful encounters shows that good nature interpretation involves both science and narrative. You demonstrate the emotional resonance that nature may elicit with your own tales of growing up next to the Arboretum and your affection for the Monkey Puzzle tree. It's amazing how our unique experiences influence how much we value the environment. As you pointed out in the original TED Talk, this relationship is crucial in the larger framework of scientific interpretation. Using relevant narratives to simplify complicated subjects may pique people's interest and turn them from passive observers into active participants. It is interesting to use podcasts as a platform for nature interpretation. We can build immersive experiences that emotionally connect with listeners even when they are not in the outdoors by fusing soundscapes with stories. This can foster a greater regard for the environment while also improving comprehension. In the end, your observations serve as a helpful reminder that science may help close the gap between information and emotional reconnection, resulting in a long-lasting bond with the natural world. Beyond what we've covered in class, how do you believe we can use creative interpretation to strengthen people's emotional bonds with nature?
Unit 5 Blog Post
In science, paradoxes and riddles are not only annoying problems that need to be answered; rather, they are the very thing that stimulates research and creativity. Think of the Hubble Tension, the difficult task of bringing general relativity and quantum physics together, or the startling paradox of a cosmos that is both dominated by the Second Law of Thermodynamics and has low entropy. These paradoxes, which represent the core of a scientific attitude, push the boundaries of our knowledge and force us to consider novel theories and experimental designs. Such paradoxes should not repulse us; rather, we should welcome them since they could disclose more profound truths about the nature of reality itself.
A thought-provoking issue sits at the center of these contradictions: when we try to sort through its complexity, does reality have an underlying disorder, a cosmic indigestion? This idea makes us wonder whether there isn't a "rock bottom" to the cosmos, a fundamental principle that would provide the best explanation for all that happens. Rather, as we continue to explore the endless web of causal explanations, we could come to grasp concepts that are always beyond the ability of finite humans navigating a hugely complex universe.
It's possible that a cosmos full of contradictions may never reach this point since doing so could cause anarchy, when law gives way to lawlessness. This idea challenges us to reevaluate our scientific processes and epistemologies. Since contradiction is the foundation of the cosmos, should our view of nature change to embrace uncertainty instead of trying to eradicate it? It's possible that this complex dance between order and chaos requires adjustments from our scientific investigations, leading us to more complex understandings of the natural world.traversing a huge, complex universe.
···
This philosophical analysis is especially pertinent in the context of environmental research, since learning about the complexities of nature involves more than just committing scientific terms and taxonomic categories to memory. Even though having this knowledge might help us appreciate biodiversity more, not everyone will find it appealing. Rather, interacting with people via a variety of perspectives and tales can have a greater effect as we can understand the stories of nature in a way that speaks to their experiences.
The speaker in a TED Talk titled "For the Love of Birds" asks us to reconsider how we view nature by applying a sense of wonder and simplicity. These methods show that the importance of nature interpretation resides not only in delivering data but also in creating a sense of connection by arousing interest and motivating viewers to interact with nature more deeply.
Understanding how contradiction influences scientific research is crucial as we traverse the complexity of our reality. Accepting this ambiguity can inspire more creative methods of perceiving and comprehending the natural world, pushing us to go beyond strict categorisation and into the domain of experience connection.
Now I have a question for you! "How can allowing the contradictions within nature and science reshape the way we understand our world, as well as our unique roles we were destined for?"
Blog 4!
To interpret nature through art is a process that is based on observation, feeling and to have a sense of connectedness to the surrounding environment. There are, in my opinion, a variety of things at play when it comes to how nature is interpreted through art. I envision mountain ranges, flower gardens, and sunsets when I think of nature in art. However, our five senses are the basis for all these things. Our senses of touch and scent allow us to take in the beauty of the natural world. Like touching rocks, breathing in the scent of woods, listening to birds, or watching leaves rustle in the breeze. It is the sight and sound of nature that evoke some of my most profound memories. There are fundamental memories in nature, from raindrops falling on a window to the calm of a setting sun. The ability to sense every aspect of the beauty that nature bestows upon us through art comes to me when I consider how to interpret nature through art.
One way to define “the gift of beauty” is one’s ability to recognize and value the smallest details, harmony, and patterns found in both nature and human existence. It is all about appreciating the visual, emotional, and occasionally spiritual effect of nature or the arts. By turning this perception into something that speaks to other people through words, images, or various other forms, one might interpret this through art. Although beauty if very personal, at its heart, it often conveys wonder, peace and balance.
I can capture and transmit the essence of the natural environment in ways to encourage people to interact with their surroundings using photos, painting, etc. I love to take photos of the beauty of nature. Something always has a story, from the blooming of a flower, the changing of the leaves, sunsets and more. For example, a picture of a flower in bloom can symbolize rebirth and hope, whilst a picture of a stream with a forest background can be seen as peaceful and calm. My intention and a nature interpreter are to foster a closer relationship between humans and the environments they inhabit by using art to explain what nature truly is. Nature is interpreted by everyone differently, but to enrich someone’s thoughts and views of nature to better it, would be amazing.
Here is a picture that I took 2 years ago of the tree in front of Summerlee. To me it symbolizes change of not only the colour of the leaves but that the seasons are also changing.
An example of when I was an interpreter was when I was a camp counsellor for summer horse camp. It was an amazing experience to teach them the beauty of nature through showing and answering their questions. As well as teaching them the beauty of horses, pastures, and more. It was nice to see their view of how the interpret nature and how they see it.
In the end, everybody experiences nature in a different way, therefore it is important to take a variety of viewpoints and cultural backgrounds into account. They can be enhanced more and can have more comprehensive appreciation of the beauty of nature. Taking Indigenous perspectives and acknowledging their strong ties to the land. My goal is to have people realize how important nature is and to take an act of responsibility for it.
Hey Julia!
Your analysis of how artists perceive nature is really perceptive and strikes to the heart of what it means to have a connection with the natural world. I like how you draw attention to how our five senses influence these encounters. People sometimes assume that art is exclusively visual, but you've shown how important it is for sound, smell, touch, and even memories to evoke feelings and meaning from the natural world. I really relate to your view of "the gift of beauty" as being about paying attention to the little things. It supports the notion that small harmonies and patterns seen in nature, which many people miss, are just as beautiful as expansive landscapes. The example of a flower in bloom, which represents hope and rebirth, demonstrates how individual interpretations of nature may communicate ideas of development and regeneration that are universal. I also like how you've taught people to view and understand the natural world through their own glasses by drawing on your personal experiences as a camp counsellor. In addition to encouraging people to develop their own interpretations, this type of hands-on experience improves people's relationships with the environment and helps them connect with nature on a deeper level. It's crucial to include Indigenous viewpoints, as you said. Their enduring ties to the land provide important lessons about caring for and respecting the environment, lessons that may improve anyone's comprehension of the natural world. Your approach invites others to develop their own way of interacting with and enjoying nature, which is both powerful and inspirational.
Unit 4 Blog Post
We frequently approach nature interpretation with an analytical perspective, focused on data, systems, and processes. But art is also a crucial prism through which we may understand our surroundings. Gaining an understanding of how art functions in environmental interpretation not only extends our viewpoint but also enables us to form emotional connections with the environment. Eco Art History is one newly popular discipline that examines the connection between art and the environment. Rooted in an academic tradition known as ecocriticism, this area studies how art both responds to and changes our perception of the environment. Researchers in a variety of fields from the arts to the sciences, have investigated these concepts under the auspices of a movement known as New Materialism.
Art has the special ability to arouse feelings in people, opening a channel for the convergence of emotional and intellectual perceptions of the world. Think of a picture or artwork that depicts a countryside or a dawn. It could appear to be a straightforward depiction of a scene at first, but closer examination reveals that the colours, light, and composition encourage a more in-depth consideration of the relationship between the world and how we perceive it. In the same way that nature constantly produces beautiful moments, art too captures fleeting moments in time.
Recognising the intricacy of nature is important to fully comprehend and enjoy its beauty. For instance, the desert plant known as Stapelia, or Carrion bloom, releases a bloom that simulates the smell of decaying flesh in order to draw pollinating flies. How can a plant "know" how to mimic the animal stench of decay? Over thousands of years, it evolved this capacity to secure its survival. This little but significant illustration of nature's inventiveness highlights the complex patterns inherent in the natural world that humans frequently miss. We start to perceive the environment as a network of relationships rather than just a system when we take the time to investigate such occurrences. We also begin to recognise these processes' artistic beauty. Despite its complexity, nature is a well planned system of regeneration and survival. Even while it appears simple, the beauty of nature is frequently quite intricate. We must pay attention to and consider the little things that are sometimes overlooked if we are to really enjoy it. Every piece of nature has a story to tell, whether it's the symmetry of a leaf, the vivid colours of an insect, or the calming sound of a bubbling stream. The secret to deciphering nature's "gift of beauty" is to observe mindfully, without passing judgement, and to comprehend the mechanisms that gave rise to it. Start with something little. Examine a leaf, pebble, or bug up close. How did it arrive there? In its ecosystem, what function does it serve? You start to realize how intertwined the environment and life are by posing these questions.
Interpretive strategies have long been utilized by art museums and galleries to provide a broad audience meaning from their displays. These are the same ideas that we may utilize as environmental interpreters. We may depict nature in art in a way that is both emotionally and intellectually compelling. For instance, combining photography, painting, or sculpture into an interpretative program might encourage closer ties to the natural world. You don't need to know everything, though, to interpret nature in art. It's OK to approach the topic with interest and to acknowledge your ignorance.
Unit 03 blog post
Hey everyone!
This week's topic is definitely more serious, but it is something that needs to be addressed. I would describe my definition of privilege as certain individuals being put at a certain advantage for reasons such as race, gender, sexuality, physical ability, and socioeconomic status. People are usually born with privilege for any of those reasons listed above, as we cannot choose how we are born. I am a straight white woman in the middle class with no physical disabilities, meaning I have been privileged for most of my life. After reading through this week's unit, it has been very eye-opening for me. It is always easy to say that you acknowledge and can understand your privilege, but unless you are in the shoes of somebody else, you will never understand the full extent of it.
Although it may not be obvious, privilege unfortunately does play a role in nature interpretation. An example that stood out to me is being in perfect physical health. Around 2.7 million people in Canada have a mobility disability. This implies that there are many opportunities that they do not have regarding nature interpretation. For example, going on certain hikes. It is much more difficult for an individual in a wheelchair to climb a mountain or a demanding trail with rocky terrain. Individuals without disabilities frequently have greater freedom to venture into difficult terrain or partake in demanding outdoor activities. Because many parks and trails are not made to be accessible, people with disabilities may have varied experiences in natural settings.
Another example that is important to acknowledge is economic privilege. Marginalized groups are frequently negatively impacted by environmental degradation. For instance, low-income areas may be closer to pollution sources or lack adequate green space. It is also important to note that many beautiful places around the world cost money to go see. For example, the Grand Canyon National Park requires a certain fee to visit it. Not only does it require a fee, but for those who don’t live near those places, a plane ride would be required which would cost even more money. And if an individual does live close enough, they would require a car to get there, which would cost money again for gas and insurance. Many people do not have access to a car meaning they cannot go see many areas of nature unless there is a bus that could take them there.
Lastly, speaking English is a privilege that many of us don't even pay mind to. Think about when you go to the arboretum here in Guelph. Almost every single sign describing the plant you see is in English. Even though there are now ways to translate these signs, using apps like Google translate, is still an inconvenience, especially for individuals who do not have a phone. Speaking English also puts you at so many more advantages when it comes to jobs and careers in nature interpretation, specifically in Canada. Why is it that two people, speaking different languages can have the same passion and love for nature interpretation, but only one of them would get a job from it?
Hey Chloe!
I really love how you defined privilege as something individuals are typically born into, rather than something they actively pursue. Your illustrations of financial privilege and physical health in the context of nature interpretation, I can relate to, particularly when you brought attention to the unseen obstacles that prevent many people from accessing it. The point you mentioned about accessibility in parks and trails is really important. It's easy to forget how a person's mobility may drastically alter their outside experience. That's put into perspective by your number of 2.7 million Canadians with mobility impairments. I'm reminded of how frequently we take for granted simple pleasures like hiking or even going for a stroll in the outdoors without giving thought to the difficulties faced by others. Your observations on economic privilege also made me think a lot! We don't really talk about the possibility that access to nature may be restricted by expenses, such as entrance fees, travel expenses, or even merely living close to green areas, when we talk about environmental experiences. This really shows how privilege is connected with common experiences, even in something as universal as nature. One last thing I admired was your remark on the role that language has in how we understand nature. The reality that so much of this subject is unavailable to non-native English speakers, highlights just how deeply privilege is ingrained in our systems. It was a pleasure reading your opinions, it really provokes me to consider these topics more carefully😎.
Best,
Olise
Unit 3 Blog
It's important in nature interpretation to consider our personal identities and the ways in which they impact our audience. Though it might be unpleasant, this is a necessary step in the process. Each of us brings to our task an "invisible backpack" filled with experiences, advantages, and presumptions that shape the way we interact with the environment and others in our immediate vicinity. Understanding these factors improves our comprehension of our place in nature understanding as well as our influence on others. I believe the undeserved advantages we have due to our race, gender, class, education, and other characteristics is referred to as privilege. According to Peggy McIntosh, these benefits are like an "invisible backpack" that we usually carry around without realizing. They remain unseen because we never pause to consider how our identities grant us access or comfort in circumstances where others may find it difficult.
A picture of my friends at the train station awaiting our train to Toronto.
"This image represents a visual metaphor for the invisible backpack concept. Symbolizing the privilege and freedom we have that others might not have around the world."
Speaking English, for instance, may not seem like a privilege if it's your first language, but it's a major plus in many professional contexts. For individuals who aren't as proficient in the language, there may be obstacles in the field of nature interpretation because the majority of the programs, resources, and chances are tailored for English speakers. It serves as a reminder that privilege affects everything, including who is able to interact with and see nature. When we talk about privilege, it’s about more than just accepting we have some advantages; it’s about understanding how those privileges impact the way we navigate through the world. This becomes especially crucial for us as nature interpreters when taking our audience into account. Not everyone grew up with easy access to nature or the resources to participate in outdoor activities. For instance, while learning to swim may seem like a fundamental life skill, there are many for whom it is a privilege. It is not something that everyone can take for granted to have access to a pool, swimming instruction and even practice time.
So how does privilege relate to the interpretation of nature? Access to and feeling comfortable in natural areas, as well as participation in environmental discourse, are all influenced by privilege. While some members of our audience can feel very much like outsiders, others might have a strong bond with nature. We can consider privilege in relation to danger as well. Some people view taking risks as an exciting aspect of life, whether they be financial, emotional, or physical. However, for certain people, going outside might be dangerous in and of itself. The hazards associated with interacting with nature vary depending on factors such as safety concerns, unfamiliarity with outside environments, or fear of being ignored.
A picture of my beautiful backyard.
"A personal connection to nature, and a privilege other individuals might not have."
Recognizing privilege in nature interpretation is more than just a box to be checked. It's about realizing how these privileges affect the way we relate to one another and the environment. I have a question for ya'll that I would be interested in hearing your opinions. As a nature interpreter, how can you utilize your privilege to make the natural world a more inclusive and inviting place for others?
🏞️
