'why is so much politically-focused genre fiction centred on monarchies' many reasons, but one which I think deserves attention: monarchy is an obvious way of tying together the dysfunctions of the domestic to those of the state
will byers stan first human second
Sweet Seals For You, Always
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

No title available
The Bowery Presents

if i look back, i am lost
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Noah Kahan
sheepfilms
Monterey Bay Aquarium
No title available
ojovivo
macklin celebrini has autism
wallacepolsom

#extradirty
One Nice Bug Per Day

tannertan36
Keni

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
🪼

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Belarus

seen from Germany
seen from Israel
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany

seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from Türkiye
@pedanther
'why is so much politically-focused genre fiction centred on monarchies' many reasons, but one which I think deserves attention: monarchy is an obvious way of tying together the dysfunctions of the domestic to those of the state
really specific trope i like that i feel like can only be explained in a diagram
Accepting identities I don't understand is actually extremely easy because I just go "this isn't about me" and move on with my life unbothered by someone else's identity, it's truly that simple.
i heard someone say once, “you don’t need to speak French to acknowledge that it’s a language that exists”. and i feel like more ppl need to keep that in mind when they come across something they don’t understand.
when brandon sanderson talks about villains in his famous free youtube writing class video lectures he'll say 'what's the difference between gollum and sauron' and of course he means the villain that's present in the narrative and characterized in a way the audience can potentially relate to or sympathize with vs. the looming threatening anonymous far-off force (among other things). but every time he asks that i think 'well one of those guys tracked down frodo and got his ring back'
Brandon Sanderson: What's the difference between Gollum and Sauron?
OP: Skill issue.
please wear sunscreen!!! I've seen "fuck the beauty industrial complex" posts about complicated skincare regimens and am 100% with them except sometimes they mention sunscreen and no. no. absolutely not. sunscreen is a wonderful supportive friend who wants to keep you safe, and you should let her do it. throw out all your other cosmetics and skincare products if you want, but keep your sunscreen. and if you're not wearing sunscreen, start wearing it!!!! this is not about terror of aging, this is not about every tiny imperfection our fucked-up culture has made you feel insecure about, this is about protecting yourself from skin cancer. wear the damn sunscreen.
I'm gonna say it, I do think that even the laziest person imaginable should have a roof over their head, food in their stomach, and access to healthcare
a lot of people are reblogging this saying that most "lazy" people are actually just disabled or that the concept of laziness itself is a product of our society's obsession with productivity. this is all true, but it is not my point.
even if someone WAS just lazy and simply didn't want to do anything but lie on the couch and watch tv, they should still have these things. it's irrelevant whether some people aren't actually lazy because everyone, including hypothetical lazy people, should have their basic needs met.
if we have the resources to do it, there is no defense of letting people die because they don't want to work, and much less because they can't.
I don't want lazy people to have basic necessities because they "actually" deserve them because they ARE working or CAN'T work. I want lazy people to have basic necessities because they are people, and we shouldn't leave them to die when we have the resources not to.
I also, perhaps controversially, am of the opinion that more odyssey adaptations should retain the hanging of the unfaithful maids
The only adaptation I'm aware of to engage w the hanging of the unfaithful maids is Margaret Atwood's Penelopiad and I actually really didn't like the way she handled it
@platonce would love to hear more about your thoughts on the penelopeiad/how you would want to see it done
ok brief context first for any readers not aware: in the Odyssey, the unfaithful maids are a group of enslaved women in the house of Odysseus who are hanged for 'betraying' Odysseus by having sex with Penelope's suitors. In the Penelopiad they are instead Penelope's most faithful and trusted maids who she enlisted to spy on the suitors.
my issue w the Penelopiad on this subject is just that I think making it so the maids weren't actually 'unfaithful' carries the implication that if they had done all the things the Odyssey says they did then in some sense they would have had it coming.
as to how i would want it done, i suppose the main thing i would like to see acknowledged is that given that they were enslaved women the sex they had with the suitors would have been inherently coercive. (nb i think the Penelopiad does acknowledge this but as stated above I have other problems w its handling of the subject matter)
Ah, okay. In that case, an asterisk next to my suggestion of Claire North's version, because that takes a similar approach to the maids' motivations. (I should have checked up on the Penelopiad to find out what it did before making the suggestion.) But it includes that part of the story, which is something.
The Return, the film version from a few years ago with Ralph Fiennes as Odysseus, has the maids as characters, but I don't remember whether it acknowledges the coercive aspect, and I don't remember what happens to them in the end (which I'm pretty sure means no hanging).
Sampler, silk embroidery on linen foundation, c. 17th century, England
image source
These two fire extinguishers at my work
Had to draw them
They share the highs and the lows.
I also, perhaps controversially, am of the opinion that more odyssey adaptations should retain the hanging of the unfaithful maids
The only adaptation I'm aware of to engage w the hanging of the unfaithful maids is Margaret Atwood's Penelopiad and I actually really didn't like the way she handled it
Have you read Claire North's Ithaca trilogy? The third book is a retelling of Odysseus's return from Penelope's point of view, and she has a lot to say about about the hanging of the unfaithful maids
ohhh my god I just fact-checked, Nolan actually DID cut the "Nobody" scene from his Odyssey movie. Mfer that is like cutting the Father reveal from Star Wars. Let me speak in a language you understand this is like not dressing Batman up in his suit. "It was not possible to work it in" the TikTok musical with a budget of $4 and a scratched Hamilton CD managed to work it in in SONG form, step up your FUCKING GAME
I got a free ticket to this movie and i have Thoughts (below the cut in case anyone??? Is worried about spoilers??)
#i went in with a very low bar and it pulled out a shovel via @cannot-kill-the-sun
Skip Letterboxd this is the only review I need
"What" needs more letters so I can camelcase it adequately for the amount of wtf
WwHhAaTt
Theeeeeeeeeee
FFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
Previously, I vaguely had the impression that I wasn't keen about seeing this movie. Now, I very concretely have the impression that I don't want to see this movie. This is into "did you, like, read the book you're adapting?" territory.
"You should create for yourself" and "it's okay to feel discouraged when creating your own original projects if no one interacts with them" are two sentences that should be able to co-exist with each other
On the one hand, you should kill that capitalist in your head that tells you to make art only for the enjoyment of other people. On the other hand, it's totally fine to be disappointed that you spent hours or even days on something that only got 4 notes. You can feel both ways.
Humans are expressive, social creatures. Art allows us to express ourselves and is best done for the joy of it, and one of the most natural ways for humans to enjoy things is to share them with others.
reblog this and tell me your favorite album written and performed by a woman?
the more i think about gandalf the more i like him. like yes he’s a very wise and powerful wizard but he’s also very cheeky and sometimes you can tell he’s using his reputation to mask the fact that he doesn’t know what the fuck is going on, which is very endearing. it’s good character building. i think a lot of the time characters who are written to be super wise and powerful end up feeling kind of flat because they’re lacking that bit of nuance that signals to the reader that ok, despite how awe inspiring this character is they’re still a person with some parsable degree of interiority
also it makes your world feel a lot bigger and scarier when the narratively confirmed most wise and powerful guy out there is sometimes a little scared too
Oh thanks but what the fuck does any of that mean
I’ve seen quite a few of these in my time, but this one takes the cake.
This is fucking killing me
Golp: a roundel purpure.
Repeat this to yourself until it begins to have meaning
Okay then since some of you need to be reminded of this:
Roundels are circles in heraldry. They are named according to their color, which also has its own lingo. Let’s meet them!
Bezant: roundel or (gold) 🟡
Plate: roundel argent (silver) ⚪️
Torteau: roundel gules (red) 🔴
Pomme: roundel vert (green) 🟢
Hurt: roundel azure (blue) 🔵
Golp: roundel purpure (purple) 🟣
Pellet: roundel sable (black) ⚫️
If your field is strewn with roundels, you can describe it appropriately as being bezanty, hurty, golpy, and so on.
*squints* why in the fuck is a pomme green and a torteau red, specifically?
The answer appears to be Tradition, i.e. nobody remembers. "Torteau" is said to be from the French word for a tart, so maybe some influential herald liked cherry tarts or something. In French heraldry, Wikipedia notes, a roundel of any colour can be called a "torteau".
(Incidentally, I don't understand the original premise of this thread. In that situation, especially if you're reading an online dictionary with hyperlinks as depicted in the image, all you have to do is click on the link and now you not only have a definition for your original word, you've learned a bonus second new word.)
(The fact that I already knew what furze and gorse are is neither here nor there.)
Most oddly named town in each US state.
i love small towns in America.
🎶Volcano, Hawaii! Ding Dong, Texas!🎵
look somebody remind me to go on about sanfa claus indiana when i’m not trying to catch a bus
There's this thing I never realized I did when I was doing it that I like to think of as "Ownership of Space"
And it's that thing where you mentally place yourself as the second, auxiliary party to someone else that you consider to be "In Charge" of whatever space or occupation or responsibility you are assigned to
And when you are IN that mindset, it *feels* like you're being responsible. It *feels* like you're being respectful, and helpful, and contributing to the load.
But what you don't SEE- because it *feels* like deference- is that the other person who you're seeing as The Authority you report to- by being assigned that role, has also been assigned the invisible load of BEING YOUR MANAGER.
This is by FAR most commonly seen in husband-and-wife relationships, where the man says, "just tell me what I can do to HELP- you don't have to do it all by yourself, but it's like you won't even tell me when you NEED help. You just do everything and then get mad at me for not doing it first. I can help clean. I can help with the kids. I can help"
But I also see it- and am guilty myself of doing it- at work, at school, in public- that mental, "this is THEIR space, and i will be respectful and helpful to THEM"- without realizing that subservience in this manner isn't actually a good thing. That it actually shifts the burden of responsibility to the other person. That aspect was totally invisible to me.
I didn't understand that when I was told, "if you see something that needs to be done, just DO it", or, "take the initiative", what they ACTUALLY meant was, "I am not above you", or "you have equal say in what kind of environment you want to live or work in", or "I do not want full control over what happens here, I do not want to order you around, I do not want to be in charge, what I WANT is to co-command WITH you"
Being in The Assigned Authority position NOW, that is all so much clearer.
I am the senior member of my team at work, and now, every time I train a newbie, every time I finish catching them up to speed and giving them a list of everything that needs to be done, my next big hurdle seems to always be, "now take pride in the space when I'm not around". "Now don't assume I'll tell you when something is due or what orders to plan things in".
Now, having been on both sides of the struggle, I can appreciate the sticking points here
TO THE PERSON "IN CHARGE": The person deferring to you doesn't understand the invisible labor you're doing. They genuinely believe you know more, you WANT more, you see things they don't, and that they are being respectful and good by staying out of your way and waiting on your orders. THAT is the bit that's not clicking.
TO THE PERSON "WANTING TO HELP": "Help" implies that you are providing assistance to a problem that belongs to somebody else. Stop thinking like that. Understand that the problem belongs to BOTH of you equally, and consider what kind of shared space you BOTH want. What is your SHARED GOAL? Not THEIR goal, but a goal that belongs to you too. Own your space.
This is not a Commander-Lieutenant problem. This is a Partnership problem.
You Are Co-Commanders On This Ship
Sharing my own tags actually