perCIStant

I'm kind of a flake. They call me Joey. I'm right and my takes are better than yours.

[percistent]

I've decided to speed run getting banned.

Follow me on X -

[fr3nstimu1ator]

[percistent]

[percistent]

[bloody-monstrous-wolf]

[percistent]

This is progressivism in action and it is actually, fully and totally evil.

[percistent]

Gang-rape victim, 25, whose suicide attempt left her paralyzed, will die by euthanasia after yearslong court battle

A 25-year-old gang rape victim who was left paralyzed after a suicide attempt is scheduled to die by euthanasia after court officials overru

It's nearly impossible to comprehend the level of outright evil modern progressivism has brought to the west.

[percistent]

And then the knight sold her organs.

[percistent]

Gang-rape victim, 25, whose suicide attempt left her paralyzed, will die by euthanasia after yearslong court battle

A 25-year-old gang rape victim who was left paralyzed after a suicide attempt is scheduled to die by euthanasia after court officials overru

It's nearly impossible to comprehend the level of outright evil modern progressivism has brought to the west.

[percistent]

No resources for mass deportations, but 200 billion to fight a war for Israel is fine.

Fuck Trump. Fuck this administration. The Republicans deserve to lose forever.

[percistent]

[percistent]

Hottest new booktok novel.

[percistent]

People like Nick Fuentes are becoming more mainstream because people are sick of watching the West be destroyed through some forced sense of collective shame and racial double standards. We're allowed to have our own cultures. We're allowed to prefer those cultures. We're allowed to exclude people that don't fit within the framework of that culture.

[ypeorescosasvendran]

You have to be an special kind of retard to believe Nick Fuentes represents anything positive ever at all

[percistent]

I didn't say anything about his existence or popularity being positive. It's the inevitable result of shitting on western men, especially young western men, for the last 30 years.

[ypeorescosasvendran]

The inevitable outcome of western men shitting on themselves is that a chicano twink with ties to the feds is going to represent them? That doesn't follow.

[percistent]

He's advocating for a collective identity for white western men. He's doing that because literally every other demographic has been doing it and has been celebrated for it for decades. It's collective identity, rights and privileges for everybody else, but when it comes to the people who built the Western world it's "universal principles". That's not going to last forever especially as more and more young men have nothing to lose.

[generallemarc]

He's advocating for a collective identity for white western men.

Ok, so you know he's a retard. You are aware of this already, because nobody could write that out without thinking "oh wow, that's retarded" while doing so. Artificially-engineered "collective identities" are dumb enough already, to say nothing of ones based on immutable traits. And you might say "well what about black people?", but it was a response to a problem that caused it. Blacks were being denied their fundamental rights, so the tactic was to organize en masse to do something about it. It could be argued that those who want that collective identity to persist in a nation with full legal equality are naive at best and wanting to exploit said identity at worst, so why is the fix for this to just do more of it? Why the fuck do I need a collective identity with others based on something none of us chose and have no inherent ties to? Skin color ain't culture, I've got more in common culturally with the black lady I work afternoon shifts with than all the white people in Denmark(and every other European country), because my co-worker and I are both Texans who grew up here while those guys with my same skin color are thousands of miles away in a culture I know nothing about.

Tl;dr-If collectivism is a problem, which it absolutely is, then deciding to do more of it is deciding to make the problem worse, and anyone advocating that is delusional.

[percistent]

The reason white people are starting to see their own collectivism as necessary is because they're the only ones not allowed to do it. Saying all collectivism is bad is nice and everything, but the only racial group actually being held to that standard are white people. Every other demographic acts in collectivist ways, working towards their own self-interests. I'm not saying every individual person, I'm saying that every other demographic has personal advocacy groups with strong in group preferences. We've had 30+ years of "collectivism is bad but only for white people" and the younger generation isn't buying it anymore, especially as they're watching their society crumble around them.

[udon-poodles]

as a zoomer - becoming a mom has made me into an unapologetic ethnic nationalist

an America that disadvantages my white children because they are white and doesn't put Americans first, is an America i want dismantled

same with every other nation on the planet - anything less then Britain for the British, Ireland for the Irish, France for the French, Japan for the Japanese, etc etc is unacceptable

having in-group preference was normal until a couple of decades ago, and that normalcy is what we will return to as the post WW2 liberal order dies off with the boomers

[wtfhascanadabecome]

I was pretty radicalized before my twins were born.

At least, so I thought.

Seeing them and holding them for the first time pushed me so much further than I thought possible.

[mitchfynde]

This thread is really sad. I guess it just goes to show that white nationalist propaganda has been extremely effective at making people afraid and angry. I wish I could show you guys that your children are really in no danger and that they are not going to be disadvantaged in any way for being white, but I wouldn't even know where to start and I doubt any of you are really open to listening.

Just be aware that liberals such as myself (aka not leftists) are absolutely not trying to disadvantage white people. Most of us are white. I have nieces and nephews. I would never advocate for them to be disadvantaged. We are the majority on the left, even if the online sphere makes that seem different. The Democrats in America and the Liberals in Canada align with what I am saying.

[percistent]

Don't worry everyone, Tumblr user @mitchfynde has informed us that you'll never ever be disadvantaged for being white, at all. Ignore every company and institution with DEI hiring/recruitment practices. Ignore every advocacy group asking for and getting special privileges for their racial demographic at the expense of white people. Ignore the unlimited immigration from 3rd world countries which you'll have to support with your tax dollars while your culture evaporates around you. Ignore the mainstream narratives in education and media that white people are historically uniquely evil and thus owe the world something. This is all just white nationalist propaganda even if you can see it happening in front of you.

[percistent]

So wait, The Notebook is just a story about a woman cheating on her fiancée with a guy she dated for a few months when she was 17? This is the love story evey woman has been obsessed with since I was a teenager?

Honestly, it explains so much about the state of modern women.

[madame-helen]

And she started to date that guy because he threatened to kill himself jumping off a Ferris wheel if she didn't...

[eric-coldfire]

So it's either rape or adultery in women's romance.

[simon-newman]

Or rich, abusive men who take interest in them because "they're not like the others"

[percistent]

NYT Best Seller 4000 weeks in a row

[percistent]

People like Nick Fuentes are becoming more mainstream because people are sick of watching the West be destroyed through some forced sense of collective shame and racial double standards. We're allowed to have our own cultures. We're allowed to prefer those cultures. We're allowed to exclude people that don't fit within the framework of that culture.

[ypeorescosasvendran]

You have to be an special kind of retard to believe Nick Fuentes represents anything positive ever at all

[percistent]

I didn't say anything about his existence or popularity being positive. It's the inevitable result of shitting on western men, especially young western men, for the last 30 years.

[ypeorescosasvendran]

The inevitable outcome of western men shitting on themselves is that a chicano twink with ties to the feds is going to represent them? That doesn't follow.

[percistent]

He's advocating for a collective identity for white western men. He's doing that because literally every other demographic has been doing it and has been celebrated for it for decades. It's collective identity, rights and privileges for everybody else, but when it comes to the people who built the Western world it's "universal principles". That's not going to last forever especially as more and more young men have nothing to lose.

[generallemarc]

He's advocating for a collective identity for white western men.

Ok, so you know he's a retard. You are aware of this already, because nobody could write that out without thinking "oh wow, that's retarded" while doing so. Artificially-engineered "collective identities" are dumb enough already, to say nothing of ones based on immutable traits. And you might say "well what about black people?", but it was a response to a problem that caused it. Blacks were being denied their fundamental rights, so the tactic was to organize en masse to do something about it. It could be argued that those who want that collective identity to persist in a nation with full legal equality are naive at best and wanting to exploit said identity at worst, so why is the fix for this to just do more of it? Why the fuck do I need a collective identity with others based on something none of us chose and have no inherent ties to? Skin color ain't culture, I've got more in common culturally with the black lady I work afternoon shifts with than all the white people in Denmark(and every other European country), because my co-worker and I are both Texans who grew up here while those guys with my same skin color are thousands of miles away in a culture I know nothing about.

Tl;dr-If collectivism is a problem, which it absolutely is, then deciding to do more of it is deciding to make the problem worse, and anyone advocating that is delusional.

[percistent]

The reason white people are starting to see their own collectivism as necessary is because they're the only ones not allowed to do it. Saying all collectivism is bad is nice and everything, but the only racial group actually being held to that standard are white people. Every other demographic acts in collectivist ways, working towards their own self-interests. I'm not saying every individual person, I'm saying that every other demographic has personal advocacy groups with strong in group preferences. We've had 30+ years of "collectivism is bad but only for white people" and the younger generation isn't buying it anymore, especially as they're watching their society crumble around them.

[generallemarc]

That's alot of words to waste on saying that doing the thing that only leads to bad outcomes is something we need to have more of because that way everyone will be acting on an fygm attitude based around a meaningless cosmetic difference. I'd rather try to destroy that attitude and fail than embrace it and succeed.

[percistent]

Okay. How much time do you spend calling out Black, Jewish, Asian or any other racial advocacy groups?

[percistent]

People like Nick Fuentes are becoming more mainstream because people are sick of watching the West be destroyed through some forced sense of collective shame and racial double standards. We're allowed to have our own cultures. We're allowed to prefer those cultures. We're allowed to exclude people that don't fit within the framework of that culture.

[ypeorescosasvendran]

You have to be an special kind of retard to believe Nick Fuentes represents anything positive ever at all

[percistent]

I didn't say anything about his existence or popularity being positive. It's the inevitable result of shitting on western men, especially young western men, for the last 30 years.

[ypeorescosasvendran]

The inevitable outcome of western men shitting on themselves is that a chicano twink with ties to the feds is going to represent them? That doesn't follow.

[percistent]

He's advocating for a collective identity for white western men. He's doing that because literally every other demographic has been doing it and has been celebrated for it for decades. It's collective identity, rights and privileges for everybody else, but when it comes to the people who built the Western world it's "universal principles". That's not going to last forever especially as more and more young men have nothing to lose.

[generallemarc]

He's advocating for a collective identity for white western men.

Ok, so you know he's a retard. You are aware of this already, because nobody could write that out without thinking "oh wow, that's retarded" while doing so. Artificially-engineered "collective identities" are dumb enough already, to say nothing of ones based on immutable traits. And you might say "well what about black people?", but it was a response to a problem that caused it. Blacks were being denied their fundamental rights, so the tactic was to organize en masse to do something about it. It could be argued that those who want that collective identity to persist in a nation with full legal equality are naive at best and wanting to exploit said identity at worst, so why is the fix for this to just do more of it? Why the fuck do I need a collective identity with others based on something none of us chose and have no inherent ties to? Skin color ain't culture, I've got more in common culturally with the black lady I work afternoon shifts with than all the white people in Denmark(and every other European country), because my co-worker and I are both Texans who grew up here while those guys with my same skin color are thousands of miles away in a culture I know nothing about.

Tl;dr-If collectivism is a problem, which it absolutely is, then deciding to do more of it is deciding to make the problem worse, and anyone advocating that is delusional.

[percistent]

The reason white people are starting to see their own collectivism as necessary is because they're the only ones not allowed to do it. Saying all collectivism is bad is nice and everything, but the only racial group actually being held to that standard are white people. Every other demographic acts in collectivist ways, working towards their own self-interests. I'm not saying every individual person, I'm saying that every other demographic has personal advocacy groups with strong in group preferences. We've had 30+ years of "collectivism is bad but only for white people" and the younger generation isn't buying it anymore, especially as they're watching their society crumble around them.

[percistent]

So wait, The Notebook is just a story about a woman cheating on her fiancée with a guy she dated for a few months when she was 17? This is the love story evey woman has been obsessed with since I was a teenager?

Honestly, it explains so much about the state of modern women.

[m00nxtal]

I've never seen it precisely for that reason.

[percistent]

I was legitimately shocked. Could you imagine if it wad the guy who was engaged to a nice, loving woman and he snuck away to bang his ex? Something tells me it wouldn't be the love story of the century anymore.

[percistent]

So wait, The Notebook is just a story about a woman cheating on her fiancée with a guy she dated for a few months when she was 17? This is the love story evey woman has been obsessed with since I was a teenager?

Honestly, it explains so much about the state of modern women.

[percistent]