Product Placement
No title available
Mike Driver
Jimmy Eat World
Show & Tell
sheepfilms
hello vonnie
Cosimo Galluzzi
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Sweet Seals For You, Always
h
No title available
Aqua Utopia｜海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
NASA
if i look back, i am lost
YOU ARE THE REASON
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
𓃗
ojovivo
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Lithuania
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Ukraine
seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Uruguay
@peridot-against-otayuri
Anyway “you must disclose your sexual orientation/mental illnesses/survivor status so I know you’re Allowed™ to disagree with me on matters regarding those things” is one of the most heinous and hateful things I’ve ever seen asked of people or had asked of me on this site
discussing fandom homophobia isn’t fandom “turning toxic” the toxic thing is having homophobia in the fandom
discussing fandom racism isn’t fandom “turning toxic” the toxic thing is having racism in the fandom
discussing fandom transphobia isn’t fandom “turning toxic” the toxic thing is having transphobia in the fandom
discussing fandom pedofilia isn’t fandom “turning toxic” the toxic thing is having pedofilia in the fandom
discussing fandom abuse apologism isn’t fandom “turning toxic” the toxic thing is having abuse apologism in the fandom
something to remember for those Critically Thinking Adults™
*Inhales* You must have spent so much worthless time searching the frickin' law of the USA that talks about Child (Yurio is not a child) pornography...You mustn't have that many friends or a lovely and wonderful life.
Okay, a: Yurio is under the age of 18 so yes he is a child; b: trust me, I have plenty of friends and a fucking incredible life, in part because I’m not disgusting; and c: why the actual hell are you still on my blog? Go away????
It drives me up the wall when I make a comment about fujoshis being straight cis girls/women and then some fujoshi is all like “I’M NOT!”
like that’s fine, Janet, but most of you are, the ones who are most vocal and cause the most damage are, the ones who get the least shit for your nonsense are, and the fact that you refuse to recognize that makes you even more annoying than you were before I posted.
noah fence™ but if you’re over the age of 18 and you found welcome to the madness “hot,” then i have news for you, buddy: you’re a fucking pedophile.
noah fence™ but if you’re over the age of 18 and you found welcome to the madness “hot,” then i have news for you, buddy: you’re a fucking pedophile.
So with welcome to the madness out.. you might as well just delete your account now. Thanks.
on the contrary, anon, I think people (especially minors) need a safe® space now more than ever
i just turned 18 is it ok to follow"?
yeah sure go for it
~mod peri
Your rebuttal is bullshit
That's all you have to say to me? Kayla, honey, if you're gonna argue with me you have to at least try.
Child Pornography Laws: Legality of drawn child porn
18 U.S. Code § 1466A, this states that a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting that depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex shall be subject to the penalties
Yes, you can identify cartoons as children. Saying that cartoons are “indistinguishable” from real children is using the definition incorrectly as well as ignoring the fact that the above states that drawn images of children in porn is still illegal
“ the term “indistinguishable” used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults. “
https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-obscenity
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A
the above link is the United States website of law
the below link is basically the same info just shorter and easier to read.
Drawing porn of child characters from comics or cartoons is ILLEGAL in the United States
18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children
(a)In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B) is obscene; or
(2)
(A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value; or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
(b)Additional Offenses.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly possesses a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B) is obscene; or
(2)
(A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value; or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(2), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
©Nonrequired Element of Offense. It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist. Source
Here are some recent cases and convictions.
Most recent conviction seems to be May 2016. That’s this month.
When abusive adults in fandoms prey on the children in them, try to spread that it’s okay to draw child porn of the child characters, to sexualize the child characters, they are breaking the law and encouraging minors to break the law. The law doesn’t care if you use it as a “coping mechanism” (even forgetting that abused people can become abusers themselves). This is illegal and it can get you imprisoned.
Please boost this. Not enough people know the law exists and big-name artists routinely bully people, survivors, minors into believing that spreading child porn in their fandoms is okay and to do it themselves. It’s not, and it can get rebloggers arrested for possessing and spreading obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children.
this is the best news i’ve heard all day arrest all of them
I can’t believe people have had the law clearly laid out in front of them and are still trying to defend child porn with “it’s just fictional!!!”
Soooo. I thought long and hard about this. If Otayuri is "pedophelia", then... What is Levi X Eren? I mean, I'm not hatin' on the ship but... Levi is 30- ish, while Eren is just a teen.
I don't know what you're talking about as I'm not in that fandom, but that is absolutely pedophilia.
A Rebuttal, as promised.
Alright, @anti-anti-survivor, I do apologize for taking so long. Some personal shit went down right around the time you wrote, so I couldn’t respond. But here goes.
I said you antis, meaning the community. This is not an attack on you personally, this is an attack on the community you are a part of. You seem awfully defensive when the statement was not directed as a personal attack at you and in fact the WHOLE POST isn’t directed as a personal attack at you...
I’ll get to this in a second. It’s copied and pasted here for a reason.
If literally everything impacts real people, absolutely everything, I stand by my point that there is MUCH more productive things that you could do combatting something that has an impact on real life. You’ve acknowledged that LITERALLY ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING has an impact on real people, consider this. ANTI SHIPPING CRUSADES HAVE AN IMPACT ON REAL PEOPLE, ESPECIALLY ABUSE SURVIVORS WHO SHIP.
Listen, pal, many antis (not all, and I recognize that), understand that shipping to cope is a valid thing, and technically I have never addressed this on this blog or any of my other anti blogs, so I will do so here. Here is my stance on shipping to cope:
I am fully supportive of any survivors who ship to cope. HOWEVER, I DO NOT support survivors posting their coping ships on a public platform where other survivors who will be triggered or harmed, can see it.
I like to call this “coping courteously.” I can’t stop anyone from doing what they do to cope, but it is NOT appropriate to do that somewhere like Tumblr, where kids and other survivors can see it.
Recreating the circumstances of your abuse is a valid therapeutic method of confronting and eventually coming to terms with your abuse. It’s effective. It’s a technique known as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. I used it to help me get my intense paranoia and phobia of interaction with people outside my family out of control after my years of institutional abuse.
Dude I know what CBT is. I went through its cousin, DBT, multiple times. And I’m aware that it’s effective. But again, coping courteously. Tumblr is not your therapist. It’s a public platform full of children and other survivors.
And on that subject—for ANY therapy to work, it has to be CONSENSUAL. Posting abusive ships on Tumblr and saying “exposure is a valid form of therapy” implies that you are unilaterally giving yourself the right to act as the exposure therapist for people you don’t know, without necessarily having any sort of credential, and those people did not give you their consent to do so, and that is fucking gross.
You know what might make abuse survivor shippers uncomfortable with being able to talk about their abuse? Being compared to ABUSERS by antis. Just because you met a shipper abuse victim who was abusive (not too sure on that either, considering I’m not gonna blindly take your word on things), doesn’t mean they’re all abusers. Before ‘well you know they don’t need to ship to do that!’ here’s another quote from the study.
“In addition, it could help to have the child create their own book with chapters describing the sexual abuse and it’s related events. The book could be drawn or written, poetic or prose. The choice to express the story how they would like gives the child a sense of control of the therapeutic process without allowing them to avoid it all together. Furthermore, the method of communication does not matter so long as the information is relayed in a cohesive and thorough manner.”
This paper examines CBA to treat csa abuse in younger children. You know what drawn or written depictions of their own abuse could look like in older teenagers? maybe FANFICTION AND FANART. SHIPPING. HMMM. Here’s the academic paper for a source and another source from the government about the efficacy of CBA in general, since your response was profoundly lacking in sources.
I do have proof of that person’s abuse, but I’m not going to leak it because I don’t want the victim to be hurt further. And as for the quote and following analysis, once again, YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO PLAY THE CBA THERAPIST. If a teenager or anyone else wants to draw fanfic, fanart, whatever to cope, THAT IS FINE. But y’all do NOT have the right to post it where folks who are going to be hurt further by it, to see it. Keep your therapy to yourselves.
And as for lacking in sources, I gave you plenty of sources in the original rebuttal, where they were actually needed.
Speaking of sources, if you actually did all of the things you claim to in your post, I commend you heartily. However I would like to see definitive proof before I take you at your word. I have no idea who you are, you could have pulled that out of your ass.
Dude, you are shitting me, right? “Definitive proof” would involve disclosing my full name and location to someone who has publicly stated that they’re an adult, and I’m not going to do that. I don’t really give a shit if you believe me, although it is a little bit creepy that you, a self-declared adult, want me, a minor, to give you personal information....
Pal, that US law is being brought under scrutiny of the Supreme Court just because of the absurdity of equating real children with fictional minors and children. It’s not even proved that representation of fictional minors has any effect on whether or not pedophiles offend. A quote from a goddamn court case about it.
In Free Speech Coalition v. Reno {513 U.S. 64, 78} (later Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition), the court held that “[f]actual studies that establish the link between computer-generated child pornography and the subsequent sexual abuse of children apparently do not yet exist."
Link to the court case. Oh look, another source! And, yanno, actual US Law.
Again, are you shitting me? Pal, just because something goes before SCOTUS doesn’t mean shit. Segregation went before SCOTUS back in Plessy v. Ferguson, and they said separate but equal. The Supreme Court is incredibly important, but it’s inherently imperfect, and at the end of the day is swayed by the fact that each justice is appointed by a President, as well as whatever societal prejudices and biases exist at the time. And right now, there are multiple seats that could/will be controlled by Donald Trump, who’s undoubtedly a sexual predator. Right now, federal law is absolutely irrelevant when it comes to morality, because nobody making the laws has any morals.
DO NOT CALL ME A WHITE CISHET WOMAN. I’m not het, for one thing. I’m bisexual. It says so right there in my blog intro. I’m also intersex, thanks to the one ovoteste I have who thought it was a good idea to be making testosterone and other male hormones as opposed to estrogen and female hormones. It was luck of the fucking draw my external genitalia met that magical medical norm of female, or I might have even worse problems to worry about than just genital dysphoria. I am white, but what does this have to do with being white? Also, ALMOST NONE OF THE ANTI-ANTIS who ship that I count as friends are cishet and some of them aren’t white either. So fuck off with that rhetoric too.
Also, did you know I don’t actually participate in fandom on tumblr? I made this blog when an anti implied that me being a survivor of cs-goddamn-a would have been better because otherwise I’m problematic.Sexual abuse is the only abuse I haven’t suffered. But they’re not a “Real anti” because that behaviour is problematic.
I think this is when we bring back that part from the beginning...
I said you antis, meaning the community. This is not an attack on you personally, this is an attack on the community you are a part of. You seem awfully defensive when the statement was not directed as a personal attack at you and in fact the WHOLE POST isn’t directed as a personal attack at you...
You seem awfully defensive yourself, my pal....
And at this point I’m fucking done, so I’m gonna block you tomorrow. I’ll give you enough time to read this, but don’t bother responding. I’ve had enough.
~Mod Peri
i have absolutely no respect for people who ship yuri with adults
All of you goddamn antis can stop pretending to be protecting minors. Suicide baiting, calling them pedophiles, making them feel like shit and sending them death threats is not protecting minors holy shit
How am I supposed to take you seriously when your URL is literally a fucking incest ship?????
~Mod Peri
@anti-anti-survivor i have xkit and it automatically puts people’s urls in, I accidentally deleted the tag and tried to rewrite it and typed it wrong. I’m salty but I’m not that salty. I’ll respond to you tomorrow, I promise. In the meantime, rest your arms—they must be sore from all that reaching.
@anti-anti-survivor, apologies for a lack of rebuttal. I promise, I will get to it. Please continue to rest your arms.
@anti-anti-survivor i have xkit and it automatically puts people's urls in, I accidentally deleted the tag and tried to rewrite it and typed it wrong. I'm salty but I'm not that salty. I'll respond to you tomorrow, I promise. In the meantime, rest your arms—they must be sore from all that reaching.
