I feel like we need to bring back, once more, the definitions of the different bits about sex/romance for some people.
Sexual/romantic orientation: Who you are/aren't attracted to (in general, usually based on gender).
Sexual/romantic attraction: Who you are/aren't attracted to, whether you are attracted to someone or not (individually). <- Not experiencing this, or only a little, is what makes you ace/aro/aroace.
Sex drive: How much you want/need sex physically (simplified definition).
Libido: How much you want/need sex psychologically (simplified definition). <- Either of these (sex drive/libido) can be high or low, regardless of orientation or individual attraction. They're also often used interchangeably.
Sex positivity: Moral/ideological stance on sex (Sex positive: Sex is a good thing, do what you want. Sex neutral: No stance. Sex negative: Sex is a bad thing and to be avoided - closely associated with purity culture). <- Note that this has nothing to do with one's own, personal relationship to sex.
I assume romance positivity/negativity exists too, but I've never seen anyone talk about it.
Sex/romance favourability: One's own relationship to/physical stance on sex (Sex/romance favourable: Likes it, may have it. Sex/romance indifferent: Doesn't really care either way; may engage with it though, for example for partner's sake. Sex/romance averse: Does not like it, will likely not engage with it. Sex/romance repulsed: Finds it gross, will avoid it.) <- These may apply differently to any one person, depending on context (look up aegosexual/-romantic, for example).
Positivity and favourability are unrelated to and independent from orientation and attraction.
All of these are normal and healthy (with the arguable exception of sex negativity, which can cause real life harm through purity culture, and sex positivity when it goes into the extreme of making sex into a mandatory thing that everyone should want) and not to be pathologised.
In fact, I personally would argue that not being able to accept that people feel differently about it than you do is something you should talk about with a therapist, but what do I know...
Just, you know... "You're equating being aro/ace to being romance/sex repulsed. Being aro/ace is normal, being romance/sex repulsed is not. Go to therapy."
That sure is a thing you can say on the internet, huh.
Sorry you had to deal with that.
Thank you very much for this. Yep. That's pretty much it.
Heck, never considered the idea that sex positivity COULD become its own bigotry if pushed to such such an extreme before this post (and I doubt most sex-positive person WOULD turn it into that, but it's something to think about, for sure).
Thanks for the kind words as well.