successor to âthis bitch empty. Yeet!â
Cosmic Funnies
styofa doing anything

No title available
No title available
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

@theartofmadeline
One Nice Bug Per Day
đȘŒ
AnasAbdin
todays bird

Kiana Khansmith

if i look back, i am lost

ç„æ„ / Permanent Vacation

tannertan36
occasionally subtle
Peter Solarz

Love Begins
Misplaced Lens Cap
tumblr dot com
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Romania

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Sri Lanka
seen from Canada
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Portugal
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Israel

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
@reddiamond002
successor to âthis bitch empty. Yeet!â
Welsh council votes to abolish Prince of Wales title
"This archaic oppressive tradition is a blight on our nation and has been for centuries. It gives the impression that the people of Wales are owned by the system, rather than being free citizens living in our own country... It makes no sense, in my view, that so much public money is used to sustain the royal family, including the Prince of Wales role, given the cost of living crisis that our people are suffering up and down the country." said the councilor behind the motion
Last month King Charles named his son William as the new Prince of Wales in his first public address as monarch. The title has been controversial since the last Welsh Prince of Wales, Dafydd ap Gruffydd, was brutally killed in 1283 on the order of Edward I of England, who later gave his 16-year-old son Edward II the title.
Gwynedd councilors voted by 46 to four in support of Mr ap Elwyn's motion while four abstained, the BBC reports.Â
His jobless ass better get on indeed
Ngl this is kinda hilarious
Makes sense. I mean, a passenger of a cruise line isn't called a sailor, right? Astronaut literally means "star sailor."
OP how could you not include the first paragraph of the article
Huge oversight on my part you're absolutely right
I love that literally you can present two autistic people with the same thing, and one will be, like, "I love this thing because I'm autistic." and the other will be, like, "I hate this thing because I'm autistic." and both of them are correct to attribute their feelings to autism because being autistic is just like that
"surely im faking this," i think, directly experiencing all the symptoms nd not benefiting from it at all
"Surely I am faking this" I tell myself and absolutely no one else because I refuse to even let them know I'm struggling in any way shape or form
charts are happening >:)
happy pride month to my favorite piece of official sonic the hedgehog art
what if we held hands and raised a lizard together and we were both girls đłđł
ok hanging out on reddit is actually a great idea. someone said they didnt like henry cavill as geralt because witchers move "10x faster than a human", but cavill only moves at human speeds, and someone replied they were "fascinated by what actor they would suggest instead" given the limitation that all actors are human.
"maybe OP knows the secret to making witchers in real life but no one's listening" bro đ
"Geralt should be played by a horse" is the hot take of the day.
okay
body positivity has largely failed because people started arguing for attractiveness and romantic prospects instead of respect and dignity
this is truly the best summary of what all of this SHOULD be about
People keep searching for ways to argue that JK Rowling has always been a horrible person deep down as a way of explaining her recent behaviour.
But hereâs the thing: thatâs probably not true at all.
Pretending it is discounts the harsher, scarier truth: that even decent, well-meaning people can be radicalised by dangerous, hateful, predatory groups, and given enough time they can become truly hideous versions of their former selves.
It can happen to me. It can happen to you. It can happen to any of us, given the right mix of circumstances. And over the past few years, weâve seen it happen to one of the most famous childrenâs authors of our age.
Nobody is immune.
So youâre saying that The Clown wasnât always⊠outright evil?
No one is born evil
WellâŠ
Good point, but prejudice is best installed at a young age. Why is why I assumed the said Clown was just evil since some early part of their life.
What Iâm saying is that JKR, like so many average people, very likely started off in a place of well-meaning ignorance. Then she started exploring new and different ideas being shared online. Some ideas resonated deeply with her experiences as an abuse survivor, so she began exploring them deeper. Then, wham, public backlash. Her trauma is triggered - but so is her curiosity. After all, if something she did or said set people off, maybe sheâs onto something. So she starts exploring more. Starts asking more questions. And when she does this in public, there is always backlash. Meanwhile, however, in private, her new friends are telling her âSee? This is proof weâre right. This is proof that the world wants us silenced, because theyâre scared of the truth, and they really hate women that much.â And what do you know, what theyâre telling her starts sounding more and more reasonable, especially since the outside world is becoming more and more hostile.
And round and round it goes, until you have a radical.
This is absolutely how radicalization works. I started out âI could never be a feminist, they hate kinkstersâ (yes, this was a massive oversimplification) and within, oh, i think two years? i was saying âwell, i donât like the overtones of âradical feministâ but whatâs so wrong with saying youâre a radical AND a feminist? we need to make sure thereâs space for traumatized women who really do legitimately hate and fear men.â When you become an extremist, you become UNRECOGNIZABLE even to YOURSELF.
#also JKR is just the most famous and most heinous case#there are MANY MANY young people being indoctrinated with the same ideals within the circles they found safety and community in#i do not care that JKR has been radicalised; i am far more worried about people not recognising the radicalising process#and how it invades queer and womenâs communties to deliberately and actively create harmful environments#as disappointing and gross as JKR is; itâs#itâs important to recognise that radical ideologies (be they alt-right racism or TERFdom) are spread (via @wondersmith-and-sonsâ)
There is also thisâŠ.revisionist tendency to say that JKR has always been a closet bigot and conservative and right-wing since she got famous, but thatâs not even entirely true. One of her first major political stirrups was criticising Tory austerity measures and David Cameron, (she also once said âpeople who send their children to boarding schools seem to feel that Iâm on their side. Iâm not.â), donating to Labour and being openly supportive of the British welfare state. She has, in at least one interview (from 2000) self-proclaimed to be left-wing. As early as 2003, she claimed that one of her biggest writing influences was a Jessica Mitford, who Rowling described as a âself-taught socialistâ.Â
This isnât to apologise for her behaviour or rehabilitate her into some former activist who is still worthy of saving; itâs to contextualise her recent descent into TERFdom compared to her previous political stances sheâs openly held. She was probably never going to be a staunch ally for equality and diversity, and yes, a lot of the HP series were very problematic in retrospect, but she could very easily have gone the other way and at the very least turned out to be less of a bigoted shitbag she is now. The fact that her politics in late 2000âČs/early 2010âČs were similar to so many people who are now activists and organisers for queer, BIPOC and vulnerable communities should tell us to be all the more careful about radfem ideology and transphobia in progressive spaces.Â
Itâs comforting to say âwe should have known in hindsight that she was always going to become a TERF, the early signs were all there!â but thatâs also not true. We have to recognise that the toxic ideology, the active harm she chooses to participate in, was a deliberate choice; this was a path she chose to go down, not one that was pre-determined for her. Itâs also an easy way to separate ourselves from being critical of radfem influence; âJKR was always a right-wing bigot and thatâs why she became indoctrinated with radfem bullshit. Iâm not a right-wing bigot, therefore unlike her, I will never fall for radfem bullshit.âÂ
People who become radicalised, including those to become radfems, were not always irredeemable right-winger proto-Conservatives doomed for extremism and hatred, and thatâs the point. The revisionist idea that she was always beyond salvaging erases how TERFs recruit people (especially vulnerable, impressionable people) in queer, progressive and liberal circles and how easily their dogwhistles can go undetected. The idea that JKR was already a closet right-winger from the get-go and therefore could never have been a good person is ultimately unhelpful because all it does it separate from the reality of how radfem doctrine spreads. TERFs sell their own toxic, harmful views packaged as progressive ideas as part of their strategy and thatâs why their ideology is dangerous and requires constant vigilance to drive out.Â
You cannot comment on the absurdity of a name when yours is fucking Fresh Cut Grass
Hi, I am losing my mind over this.
My doctor here in Sweden asked if I was feeling stressed or anxious, and I said, âI follow the news back home in Americaâ and she just sighed with disapproval as if I had said I smoked two packs a day.
gonna download the extremely bad 3rd party dnd sex book so I can laugh at it
this book's handling of gay characters is surprisingly progressive in an extremely late 90s sort of way
oh this is going to be good
there's an std chart
vampirism is on the std chart