Scholar from nowhere

[blocodibujo]

A photo study that ended up becoming something else, as it usually happens

Also, wanted to try drawing one of Tifa's outfits from Ever Crisis (the only one I've managed to unlock because the odds don't like me and I sure as hell am not spend money)

[altocat]

um...guys??

Um....gUyS?

[galileosballs]

Can I ask you a professor question? Why is it that everyone I've ever spoken to in an academic context tells me I just can't, will never be able to do a paper/essay in one day when I keep doing it (I know I know, it's a bad habit that's coming out of ADHD and I'm trying to break it) and especially when I keep getting As on those papers? It's not exclusively easy classes either, it's been several senior level classes on complex topics (I am a sophomore and some classes were modern neopaganism in America, which I wrote a 15 page research paper for in one day and got an a, and a theories of counselling psychology class which I wrote a 24 page literature review for in about 26 hours)

I'm glad you asked this, @scattereda-remade2. You really gave me pause for a second there - because all professors do say this, and yet everything you've written here could have been written by a younger version of myself. Though I never got to take a class on modern neopaganism in America and that sounds pretty sick. Sign me up.

But no, you're right. For a certain proportion of the population, essay writing comes easily enough that a one-day paper can still get an A. One of those little unfair things about the world - it does work for some of us. That doesn't mean it's a good idea. To discuss why that's the case, we need to make a distinction between two kinds of paper: papers that get As, and papers that are the best papers they can be. It is an unfortunate fact about 21st century academia that those are not even remotely the same thing.

To explain why, I'm going to have to get into the weeds a bit.

I'm going to assume for this discussion that you're in the United States. That's the academic context in which I've spent my teaching career, but not the one in which I did my undergraduate career. Coming to the US was a real culture shock for me in this respect. At my university in not-the-US, I mostly got As and A-minuses, but the threshold for getting an A was 85% of the available course points. A- was 80%. So, of course, I walk into my first TA job at my new university in the States and start grading according to that same basic structure. My students riot. This is, I learn, not how grading works in the US. In the US, the typical threshold for an A is 90%, and 80 is a B. So, for all my students who were expecting As, being marked down at all was a threat to the GPA that was, in many cases, needed to maintain their scholarships.

So what you end up with in the typical US grading system is a pinch. Students expect As, and in humanities courses your department will also expect the average to be no lower than a B+, barring unusual circumstances. But that means that about half of your class has to be graded in such a way that they get more than 90% of the available points on your rubric. Think about how constraining that is to an evaluator. You have to grade everyone the same way, of course. And that means building a rubric that won't automatically fail everyone whose grasp of English prose is a bit weak. I have no problem with giving out a lot of As. A lot of my students deserve As! This is not really the place to talk about grade inflation, and honestly, I don't think grade inflation is a huge deal once you're already in university. But rubric crunch is a big deal. How can I possibly motivate a student to improve when I can tell them they've done something wrong a maximum of 10 times per term? How can I actually make them see their mistakes when I can't fairly assign a penalty to them?

Thankfully, my university didn't actually have a rule in any of its books that established the 90%-A correlation, so I was able to just put the 85%-A scale in my syllabus and get on my way as normal. Most universities probably would not let me do this. Yours probably doesn't.

So, that's the problem. Grading in the US is an extremely blunt instrument at the high end of the range. There is almost no room for teachers to indicate to already-good students that they can do better using the numbers of the classroom. If you're getting 95% on a paper, that means you wrote a pretty ok paper. But it does not mean that you wrote the best paper the teacher thinks you can write. They just don't have a way of telling you that numerically. Keep in mind that writing is very difficult for many. As the notes of the plagiarism post indicate with horrifying clarity, many high schools completely fail to teach their students how to write. Helping students get from a C-level to a B-level occupies the majority of the pedagogical space on the rubric. But for students who are already competent academic writers, that means that the grade scale is nearly useless.

So let's now turn to the papers themselves. I believe you when you say you can churn out a pretty ok paper in a day. I know I can. But if you're at the level where you can churn out a pretty ok paper in a day, you can write a great paper in two days. The difference is not the total amount of time, it's that there's a break in the middle. You can put that break anywhere you like - between outlining and drafting, between drafting and proofreading, halfway through the draft, or (my favourite) after the draft but before writing the introduction and conclusion. But it's crucial that you at some point look over your paper with fresh eyes, instead of just riding the focus highway all the way through. Because that's how you catch the mistakes.

I grade a lot of papers that are written all in one go, and it's usually pretty obvious. They're competently written, reasonably well-researched papers that have something to say... but the points don't connect. In that rush of words pouring out onto the page, some key step in the argument was omitted. Something so obvious to you that you didn't even notice it was missing. This happens all the time. I notice it in my own work, too! I'm a fast writer, and I often do write a full draft in a day or two of deep focus. But those drafts aren't finished. They need me to step away, reflect on the points I'm making, and then re-evaluate whether or not the text I put on the page actually says the thing I mean.

Students who write like this typically get As. After all, what is an A but a stamp of approval? I do approve of these students. But it's a real shame that the way grades work means that I can't use them to show these students that they could do more. If you can write like this, you're ready for the next level. But I can't tell you that with a number.

I hope you found that peek behind the graders' curtain helpful! This is the sort of thing your professors are probably not in a position to tell you, since, well, it does deflate the value of an A a bit. But you can already see through the smokescreen, so there's no point in hiding it. I hope the effect is to help you take that next step, not to encourage you to rest on your laurels. But you can do what you want! I'm not your boss. I'm not even your professor! Just have fun with it.

[wormofmouth]

hey also. writing a paper in a day does not scale. you will hit your wall at some point. the human body can only endure so much sleep deprivation and panic, and even if you get through your undergrad skating along this way (i mostly did), you might hit your wall on the master's or the phd qualifying papers. or, like a LOT of undergrads i have advised, you hit that wall in your senior year. and that's a really bad time to discover that there is only one tool in your toolkit, and zero coping mechanisms for when it breaks.

every time to do this to yourself, you deprive yourself the opportunity to learn work/life boundaries and project management skills for projects that are bigger than 48 hours. you are putting a really hard ceiling on what you will be able to accomplish in the future.

one of the joys of being in my thirties is that i did hit my wall in grad school in my late twenties, and had to learn new ways to do projects that didn't demand 24 hours of raw panic from my body. and it means i now have the ability to take on projects that will be years long, doing bigger and cooler shit than i ever could have done when i was 22, even though i had so much energy then. i learned ways to work that age with me.

anyway please investigate pomodoros or something

[roach-works]

here's another thing ill tell you with the benefit of 15 years outside of academic institutions: bosses LOVE when a guy has a 'shift into overdrive' mode. if you respond to pressure by slamming back a redbull and pulling an all nighter, you'll get a great big pat on the ass.

and then your boss will expect you to do it again next week.

and the week after that.

and twice the week after that.

eventually your kidneys give up. you start pissing blood. you black out in traffic and crush your bumper. you make a mistake on a project and rip a finger off, or just total some expensive equipment, and your boss isn't the guy who soaks up that whoopsie, you are. you pay for it.

bosses love a guy who doesn't know how to take his time and give a project the time it needs to be done safely and well. they blow through those guys like kleenex.

respect yourself more, work to the clock, and take some fucking naps.

[sloshi]

Swamp Star | Baldurs Gate 3

[blessedarethebinarybreakers]

Jesus wasn't Palestinian you dumb heretic. Palestine didn't exist yet. The Palestinian people didn't exist yet. Read the fucking bible. Dumbass

(what anon's responding to)

This is going to sound sarcastic but i mean it genuinely: i love getting called a heretic by randos online. helps me know i'm doing some things right!

In honor of Jesus the Palestinian Jew, here's an excerpt from a sermon (which you can read / listen to in full over here) I wrote back in June on how Jesus's direct identification with those the world calls "least" in Matthew 25 empowers (and challenges) us to envision him as literally one with all who are denigrated, disenfranchised, executed by Empire — as Palestinians are today.

...In proclaiming himself not only kin with the world’s outcasts, but literally one with each and every one of them, Jesus empowers us to imagine him in ever newer, ever more expansive ways. He empowered Black theologian James Cone to declare that Christ is Black, and that every time a Black person is lynched, Christ is re-crucified with them. He empowered disability theologian Nancy Eiesland to declare that God is disabled – to envision the throne of God as a wheelchair, and to point out how the wounds with which Christ rose would have impaired his movement. He empowered gay artist Maxwell Lawton to paint Christ with AIDS lesions, and photographer Elisabeth Ohlson Wallin to depict Christ’s resurrection wounds as transgender top surgery scars. Though some have decried all these images of Christ as blasphemous, it was Jesus himself who told us that he is one with those whom the world denies food, safety, medical care, freedom, and love...

btw if anyone has other examples of theologians declaring Christ a member of a marginalized group it's my fave thing so please add on. Another great one is S. Yesu Suresh' declaration that Christ is Dalit (the "untouchable" class in India).

[mirra-kan]

HISTORY UNPRAISED: FAITHFUL HARADRIM

«…evil labours with vast power and perpetual success – in vain: preparing always only the soil for unexpected good to sprout in…» - J.R.R. Tolkien.

@lotr20 LOTRWEEK: Day 1: memory | history | home

Although it can also be almost any day ❤ I'm constantly thinking about Faithful people of South and East: What did they have to face? How hard their inner struggles had been? What songs did they sing and who their heroes were? We can only guess but it’s important to remember this part of the story, I believe. I'm trying to speak to others through my art and humbly remind them that: ✔ There were Faithful among peoples of South and East. ✔ There were heroes fighting and dying for the sake of better future for their children. ✔ And their role shouldn’t be lessened. And finally, let me recall a famous Aragorn’s quote:

Deeds will not be less valiant because they are unpraised.

I painted this one thinking of all the things written above. And the image wouldn't leave my mind until I portrayed it. Thus couple of lines become a "living human being", with a gray-eyed gaze. Mixed marriage? Numenorian heritage? I'll leave to your liking. Ifocus on Near Harad for now but am going to gradually make more art about Far Harad, Rhun\Khand, Numenorian expansion and all the things related to the complicated history of Middle-Earth. PS I strongly believe that different tribes of men wore different colors – not sticking to red ’n’ black hues. PPS Pardon my English - I'm not a native speaker ❤

[mirra-kan]

LOTR20: Day 1:  history: The Blue Wizards

They must have had very great influence on the history of the Second Age and Third Age in weakening and disarraying the forces of East ... who would both in the Second Age and Third Age otherwise have ... outnumbered the West.  

Source: Last Writings | The Peoples of Middle-earth ✔All arts are mine and can be found on my blog. Today an awesome #lotrweek starts and I want to celebrate it by recalling my favorite and so underrated heroes - Ithryn Luin - Alatar Morinehtar and Pallando Romestamo. In his last writings Professor Tolkien revised their story and aknowledged the great impact they have had on a history of Middle-Earth. Their heroic deeds and sacrifices left vague but yet we can clearly see Professor's commitment to tell us more about their fate and Faithful Haradrim\Easterlings. What a story it could be... we can only guess now.

Special thanks to @lotr20 for welcoming any works based on LOTR - not movies only ❤

[kamiporterbridges]

henry: -kills 2 of the minibosses- henry: I'll send you back to the hell you came from, over, and over, AND OVER AGAIN! nilufar: oh, it's just like in those novels...

[ren-val]

No context context

[have-you-read-this-short-fiction]

Have you read "The Feather Pillow"* by Horacio Quiroga?

Yes

No

I've never heard of this

Voting ended onDec 11, 2023

*Originally published in Spanish with the title "El almohadón de plumas"

[amarantoo]

Puedes leer el cuento aquí or you can read it here

[paramar]

[lelouch]

btw a lot of harry styles looks hes been praised for being gnc are like. direct copies of juan gabriel's suits

[lelouch]

🧐

[lelouch]

like. Juanga was mocked all his life because he was a fat openly gay¹ man who dressed and acted flamboyantly but now everyone's praising Harry because he's conventionally attractive, white & straight

¹: His identity was an "open secret" most of his career, being that he never denied being gay, and famously said the phrase "Lo que se ve no se pregunta" (Don't ask what you can see) when asked by a journalist.

[squeakitties]

thank you transgender furries

[yarrowdraws]

very late to the meme, it's been done before but. here. turn on the sound pls

[welcome-to-the-holonet]

[kactusnz]

its true. I'm 37 and there's nothing you all can do to stop me.

[rudjedet]

[cheekyposelenets]

GOTH OF THE RINGS

"complete" pack! (idk maybe I'll do other characters but the initial plan is done)

It was fun to draw!

[rotzaprachim]

you can’t follow, know, recognize, react to, and mourn every mass tragedy and mass conflict and mass killing on earth, but you can avoid using language that talks about them being “not that bad” or “not so many children died” or “imagine if this happened in [somewhere This absolutely has happened]” or “nothing like this has ever happened” because it gaslights the experiences and realities of the people for whom it is real, right now

[bran-writes]

Haven't stopped thinking about this since I saw it