Heavily Anti – Non-Traumagenic ,⠀Endo ,⠀Adjacent Labels Also Anti – Radqueer ,⠀TransID ,⠀Profic ,⠀and Other Harmful Identities. ⠀DNI to all of the above. Interlopers will not be given the time of our day and instead will be voided.
⠀⠀⠀ We are 18 yrs old and have Bipolar and are Neurodivergent.
⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀ This blog is SCP 2521-based!
Alright, so, heads-up, this isn't the part that was previously running this blog. I'm taking over to format this post more coherently.
I'm using the syscourse tag to spread awareness. Yes, I'm still including the stance and DNI tags ( for nontraumagenics ) in case someone still wants to filter them out. Don't commence the next fucking world war in our comments, please. If you guys do, it's getting removed.
To start, we've already blocked Sophie's main, so she shouldn't be able to see this post to begin with.
If she does manage to come across this post, take that as confirmation that she is using separate accounts — not just side-blogs — to conduct her harassment and cyberstalking towards anyone who actively has her blocked.
But anyway, this is going to be a long post, so strap in.
We refuse to give any individual or collective names on this blog for two separate reasons.
Reason A:
We are actively being stalked by our ex-partner, who has our full name, our full address, and other personal information regarding us, our triggers, and our traumas. This person has threatened to harm us, and they have led us to relapse.
We do not want them, or their friends, finding this blog or any of our others.
Reason B:
A large majority of us individually use cultural names that belong to us, including our collective name as well. We're sick and tired of people anglicizing our culturally significant names, and we aren't going to allow another privileged white person to disrespect that significance.
And we know exactly who would.
None of these means to automatically refer to us as "Charlie Kirk," especially when Sophie had already admitted that even if we had a separate name listed anywhere, she wouldn't use it.
Now, one thing that has irked us is how she decided to insinuate that the part behind this blog was a "factive" of Charlie Kirk, which is honestly distasteful by itself.
But, it almost plays like a big and loud 'Fuck You' to people who have introjects of their abusers or oppressors, which is completely out of our control.
Besides that, she also seemed to be genuinely upset that we were not regurgitating ableist, racist, classist, and transphobic under the guise of "satire" and "humor", which is probably why she created the counterpart to this blog.
Which...is not surprising. She's a white American, so it's no surprise that she would find the oppression of POC, disabled people, poor people, and trans people humorous.
I wonder why we won't give her any of our names? Hm.
The part behind this blog made the claim that you were enacting a microaggression against us because you refused to listen to him when he said that it made us uncomfortable.
You know what you're supposed to do when you don't know someone's name? Use their pronouns!
Who cares if the URL is the only thing you see that you can use as a name? If we had to use a URL or a display name that used a slur that you couldn't say, would you still use it? Of course not! You'd use the pronouns like everyone else!
But you know what, instead of denying the microaggression claims, she doubled down! She proudly said that she was enacting a macroaggression against us. She's admitting to being overtly and systemically discriminatory.
Now, for those who don't know:
Microaggression:
An everyday, subtle, intentional ( sometimes unintentional ) interaction, remark, or behavior that communicates hostile and derogatory messages towards historically marginalized groups.
Macroaggression:
A large‐scale systematic oppression of a target group by society's institutions, such as government, education, and culture, which can all contribute or reinforce the oppression of marginalized social groups while elevating dominant social groups.
So, not only is she misusing a term and watering down the weight behind it, but she's also just...making a joke out of the oppression of marginalized groups?
Like, yeah, we all knew she was a racist piece-of-shit, but she seems to genuinely not care about how much harm she's doing to people she views lower than her. Yikes!
Of course, she resorts to her ableism, per usual, to insult our intelligence.
"I know I accused you of not being a real satire blog before, but I'm starting to rethink that. Like, surely there's nobody genuinely stupid enough to be going "but actually, it's racist to call me by the name I chose, and you have to only refer to my blog vaguely by my pronouns like I'm Voldemort!""
Besides the blatant ableism, you're also maliciously misinterpreting what we said!
Do not call us "Charlie Kirk." That is not our name. That is the name of our dead oppressor. Not us.
You know what you could do that everyone else had sense enough to, even (pro) endos? Use the full URL like a normal person. Even if we don't like that either, it's far more tolerable than being blatantly referred to by the name of our oppressor.
She exceptionally pisses all of us off, especially since we began experiencing racial discrimination at the age of 6 months old in a religious pre-school, and we have continued to experience it to this day.
But, I mean, she obviously could give less of a shit about any marginalized group's oppression. All she cares about is herself and her little predatory ring that does nothing but incite harassment and harm on both sides.
If you are curious as to what her blogs are, that we know of, so you can block them for yourself:
@/sophieinwonderland
@/sophies-filter
@/anti-lies
@/anti-willo-charlie-kirk ( suspected )
@/dreamchaserguild ( her main )
@/do-i-archive
@/we-are-harbinger
@/canonicallyplural
@/sophie-killed-my-puppy
Honestly, regardless of what side you are on, you should report her and block her. She's honestly a danger to people, no matter what your stance is.
I hope she realizes that what she's doing can technically lead to her having legal action taken against her. Behaviors/Interactions that are continuous, unwanted, and cause reasonable fear or severe emotional distress legally constitute harassment or cyberstalking!
So, honestly, if you're being harassed by her, no matter how many blogs of hers you've blocked or how many times you've told her to stop, start collecting evidence and report it!
I'm tired now. It's early in the morning, we haven't slept because we're distressed, and we have an appointment later today.
i wanted to make this post on my own blog, but in fear of #those syscord users finding me, i'm sending it here cause it feels safer to share my opinions..
i know you're not very caught up on ramcoa/oea and all that, so don't worry about having to provide a response. i'm perfectly fine with just being heard!
trigger warning for mentions of programming, ramcoa/oea, holocaust, slavery, genocide of the indigenous peoples, and dehumanization. nothing is explicit in detail! it's all mentions.
i, as programmed system, actually hate the whole idea of gatekeeping "number names" from non-programmed systems or non-systems in general.
not everyone wants to, or needs to be open and public about their extensive trauma, and trying to contain the usage of "number names" quite literally forces these people to come out with their trauma and paints a big, red target on their back.
not to mention, not everyone who went through ramcoa/oea or any sort of programming was always referred to as a number. it's a dehumanizing experience, but ramcoa/oea survivors and programmed systems are not the only ones who had that form of dehumanization.
holocaust victims and survivors were listed and referred to by number rather than by name.
enslaved people, past and present, were listed and referred to by number rather than by name.
political prisoners in totalitarian regimes, such as soviet gulags or the khmer rouge, were listed and referred to by number rather than by name.
indigenous children who were forced into assimilation boarding schools were referred to by number rather than by name.
we need to stop with this whole idea that "number names" are exclusive to us and us only. it's not, and treating it as such is dangerous.
it also feels like a way to "gatekeep" traumas.
I don’t have a response but I appreciate you telling me, and I agree with the sentiment even if I’m not 100% educated on ramcoa systems.
apparently pro endos think using plural tags is worse that sexualizing a mental disorder. why am I not fucking surprised that these ableist fucks dont care about sexual harassment aimed towards disordered people.
CW abuse
When I was in a pro-endo alterhuman Discord server I was pushed into identifying as plural/multiple despite me just being there because I was questioning being fictionkin and factkin. Even though it was back in 2024 it still messes with me to this day. I donʻt even have a dissociative disorder.
I couldnʻt take it slowly either, I was pushed into creating a pluralkit profile and learning what "system origin" I was (They pushed everyone in there that was questioning into identifying as endogenic anyways). They even implied systems who wanted final fusion or didnʻt use pluralkit were abusive for it. Some in there even admitted they were afraid of "traumagenic" systems because they could be against endos
You canʻt just be a singlet when dealing with endos either, they either push you into thinking you have a system or pressure you to "create" a system. They see everyone as either a system, someone who isnʻt a system /yet/, or as an enemy to them
Reblog if you are a safe place for people who used to identify as endogenic/tulpas before realizing they were either a) a DID/OSDD system or b) not a system at all
CW: racism, mentions pro endos, rqs and how much they fucked up recovery/spread anti-recovery rhetoric, incredibly brief mentions of abuse (assume all kinds)/RAMCOA , depression
Hi, I’m a member of a system and I’m one of the members who finally turned a new leaf and went from pro endo -> anti endo. I want to share our experience in order to warm endo neutrals who may scroll on any tag, or even pro endo CDDs who scroll here. Because let me tell you something: it is NOT worth it. It’s not worth it at all to stay with these people and support them. When you mix CDDs with people who claim to have non-disordered plurality, you are asking for trouble and will— consciously or not— turn to anti-recovery.
Let’s start from the beginning: late November 2025. This is when we discovered we were a system. Scared of being fake claimed and judged because the anti-endo servers we joined were openly fake claiming someone’s friend because they had a fictive from a show they watched recently (which is incredibly dumb as they have no clue what circumstances could allot that and that is no reason to fake claim anybody), we retreated to pro-endo spaces because they have less of a fake claiming tolerance, and we were just becoming aware of being a system then and wanted acceptance.
It started off okay the first few months. We learned about our system and about specific community roles, roles used in the field, etc and were slowly uncovering things at a normal pace. But by March, everything changed. Endos would show off multiple strictly anti-recovery -genic terms, like ‘Addgenic’ and even ridiculous xenogenic terms like Angelblessgenic or something. They like to think that alters are like… completely separate. Like it’s understandable to treat your alters with respect as if they were separate people, but the community celebrated and encouraged new alters formation and romanticized it as ‘new friends in the headspace!’ and ‘omg more alters added to my list!!! :D’ and this caused our symptoms to worsen significantly.
During school we got pretty depressed, and struggled to even get by this semester while maintaining scholarships. A lot of loopholes had to be done with final grades to do that. We dissociated so much that we couldn’t even concentrate without rapid switching, multiple alters forming, etc from fragmented parts.
Worst of all they also encouraged us, who explicitly stated we thought we might be RAMCOA/OEA survivors on top of being non-organized abuse survivors, TO DIG IN AND RESEARCH THE SUBJECT? They genuinely wanted us to research and figure out what’s happening. And less explicitly the pro-endo culture is that discovering alters is like buried treasure. Nobody talks about anything ugly in pro-endo spaces. When you do, you’re gaslit into thinking systems are always a positive experience ALL THE TIME and you can’t be mad EVER! I am not saying systems have to be miserable 24/7, obviously, but the opposite is just as harmful.
To add this in the middle: the pro-endo community is also overlapping with pro-radqueer and profic spaces too. There was a space I was in that said it’s ok to have certain Radqueer trans IDs (like trans race, and they said this to a black system!!! because ‘they could possibly have a good reason for it’ when there’s never a good reason to be racist and be trans race EVER. The server also advocated for white people having dreadlocks because their black alters in the headspace did and I can’t even stress enough how racist this is. They also tone policed us constantly but only after we explained we’re black… interesting!!!
And because we were stupid and researched, that caused an entire system reset and now we’re a smaller system. I’m incredibly pissed off by pro-endos. They’re anti recovery without even realizing it and some of them even encourage you explicitly research trauma you suspect to have that is infamously known for being incredibly dangerous to the survivors if it’s not done with a therapist.
This is your beware all neu-pro endos with CDDs watching.
Some people like hate asks because it gives them narcissistic supply (or anything else you’d want to call that, as I know some pwNPD don’t like the term).
Some people like hate asks because the sheer stupidity of them is wildly entertaining.
Some people just like arguing.
Receiving hate asks gives me NPD supply, and when I’m in a manic episode it gives me a nice outlet for my energy.
Now, this post is *especially* disgusting because a lot of systems have sexual trauma, and you implying they’re doing this for sexual gratification can trigger these people’s trauma. It’s wild that you think this is even remotely okay to say.
Basically: i saw some pro endo confessions page post a confession that admits "we should normalise harassment and hate towards traumgenics for oppresing us” (the blog owner only tagged "disclaimer: we do not condone harassment" as if they didint posted confession and hide this disclaimer under tags in just case semoene conforts them💀)
"anti endos piss me off so bad that i want to run harassment campaigns against them. i think more people should be aggressive and hateful to them. like if you say you're anti endo you wake up to an inbox full of people telling you to die. i recognize these are bad thoughts but like, it feels justified because that's what they do to us. we're powerless to stop the hate since the entire world hates us so why not be violent and evil."
Those people did not used to be a hate groub. They STILL ARE. "Evil" and "violent" as if they didin't ripped off our places, as if they didin't stole medical terms, as if they didin't spread misinformation about our condition and normalised roleplaying it. As if they didin't already caused so many forced syscovery on people that didin't even had CDD. As if they don't promote their disorder as "make everyone plural!" which means "give everyone childhood traumas".
Fuck you, anon. Whoever you are. You will never be valid.
They're getting too comfortable as a hate groub. I've never seen an anti endo confessions blogs post about harassment towards endos. Idk how they think they deserve to treat us like this🤷♂️ + there will be also asshole antis, however the most people I've seen have been more chill than most endos I've seen. I used to be neutral—I know what am I talking about.
This post is not up for debate fuck off. Do not violate my DNI you sickos
This will be my one and (potentially) only post on this subject as I'd rather not have a target on my back for even mentioning this, but after briefly glancing over a certain infamous pro-endo's blog, I noticed her bringing up how many AWV blogs have been deleted.
She doesn't realize that she helped caused this. Do none of them realize? The reason so many of us are deactivating and deleting these blogs is because of repeated harassment from pro-endos who don't care about what their actions do to people. They don't care that a living, breathing person is behind the other screen, they only care that someone is calling them out for the ableism we've been dealing with for decades by now.
This proves to me once again that they truly haven't changed from their roots as a hate group. They're harassing us into silence. They're making us believe we're worthless because we won't put up with their bullshit anymore.
To any CDD systems reading this, especially my friends in the AWV, you are loved and you have a place in this world. This is the reaction they want of you, they want you to believe their words. But those words aren't true. You deserve to live here, even if it sucks sometimes.
tw; mentions of child abuse, endorsement for harm against children
honestly, seeing sophie's post, where she fantasized about brutally abusing a fucking 4-year-old, reminded us of our own traumas and upbringing.
i mean, we're fine, but this really just shows how much she does not care about people with CDDs, much less a childhood trauma survivor in general, no matter how much she claims to.
regardless if it was about a literal 4-year-old or someone's little, it's absolutely abhorrent and disgusting to fantasize about and then attempt your hardest to justify it.
if you come across the post, report it for endorsing harm against children.
i don't understand how her followers can see this and still continue to support her. what a bunch of predatory ass people, man.
"That 4-year-old is a manipulative bitch!" that 4-year-old likes to color and draw and watch cartoons.
she sounds like those mothers who claim that their fucking toddler is a manipulative, abusive monster when they're the actual abusers. somebody keep her away from children. knowing her, she might fucking tackle one with the strength of an NFL player.
again, if you come across her account or that specific post, report her and block her.
I actually just went to the ICD-11 website and searched the dissociative identity disorder criteria for you! Nowhere does it say plurality does not require a CDD, or that plurality does not require trauma. I'll put in the relevant screenshots for you that I believe you are referencing.
These are the first two pages that dicuss DID. I'm assuming you are talking about the section, "boundary with normality (threshold)", yes? Let me write it out for you here.
"The presence of two or more distinct personality states does not always indicate the presence of a mental disorder. In certain circumstances (e.g. as experienced by "mediums" or other culturally accepted spiritual practitioners), the presence of multiple personality states is not experienced as aversive, and is not associated with impairment in functioning. A diagnosis of dissociative identity disorder should not be assigned in these cases."
Because you obviously didn't understand any of this (otherwise you wouldn't cite this as your source), I'll break it down for you. "The presence of two or more distinct personality states does not always indicate the presence of a mental disorder" is NOT the end of the paragraph. It goes on to explain that in cases such as spirituality, the presence of personality states is not disordered. Therefore, DID is not a diagnosable disorder.
Absolutely NOWHERE does it say plurality without trauma is a thing. In mediumship, for example, a medium doesn't believe that there are multiple alters in their brain. They believe that there is a spirit or outside source speaking THROUGH their body.
Essentially, if you ARE using this as a source to say plurality exists without trauma, you are comparing the endogenic experience to mediumship. The issue is, endogenics actually don't compare themselves to that. They claim that they have ALTERS without TRAUMA. As you can see, these are two very different circumstances.
And before anyone comes at me about the section "developmental presentations", the ONLY REASON the quote says "Onset of dissociative identity disorder is most commonly associated with traumatic experiences" and not that trauma is THE ONLY WAY is because the testing would be unethical.
1. You can't purposefully traumatize a group of children repeatedly.
2. Even if you could, not all experiences of trauma causes DID.
3. The threshold of trauma is different for every child, and trying to find a specific trauma causing DID would be entirely outrageous.
Before you come into my asks ANONYMOUSLY with some bullshit "proof" that you think makes you look smart, look at your proof first. Read it thoroughly. Because I AM going to read your proof and I AM going to debunk it. Lol.
yousharknotpass
2087
discoholicmusic
dededos
romaincrisis
theartofmadeline
