Yes!
DEAR READER
will byers stan first human second
No title available

Discoholic đȘ©
sheepfilms
todays bird

titsay
Xuebing Du
Keni
Stranger Things
Acquired Stardust
h

â
Not today Justin

No title available

tannertan36
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Origami Around
tumblr dot com
Three Goblin Art

seen from Singapore

seen from Ireland

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Ireland
seen from United States

seen from Spain

seen from Taiwan

seen from France
seen from Ukraine

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Ireland
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Spain
@saberwriter
Yes!
Past commissions of my OCâs as GuardiansâŠ
âBeneath The Waking Ruinsâ, By Adam Withers, Colors by Philip Moyer.
âVoidwalkerâ, By Xuunies, Colors by Philip Moyer.
âSunbreakerâ, By Adam Withers, Colors by Philip Moyer.
âThundercrash Titanâ, by Xuunies.
âHunter Outside the Cosmodromeâ, By Adam Withers, Colors by Philip Moyer.
âVoid Warlockâ, By BlazeSharpCat.
leech and her boss
Another chance to get the award-winning game, now with new adventure... START!
We're entering the second week of our new kickstarter! Don't miss your chance to grab our first supplement, GM Screen, and copy of the core rules (or new special edition)!
PĆhutukaryl Cosplay as Haruhi Suzumiya The Disappearance of Haruhi Suzumiya
photoshoot with Linda Quach Photography WaitematÄ Station, TÄmaki Makaurau April 27 2025
buy me a Ko-Fi?
âïžZINE RELEASEâïž
You can download Connect: A Madoka Magica Franchise Fanzine RIGHT NOW!
The full PDF is available on our Itch page!
Alternatively, you may read it as a flipbook on Heyzine, no download required!
Thank you so much for following us on this journey, and we hope you enjoy the zine!
Tumblr Advisor Board
I think it could be cool to put together a board of the top Tumblristas in the world, that could see previews of what's coming up and advise on strategic direction. Who should be on it?
Okay, look. We're gonna do it like this, Matt. I used to work in market research. This one is free, next time I expect a month of free premium and if there's a third time I expect a job.
TO EVERYONE ELSE:
A series of ten reblogs is about to follow, since you can only have one poll per reblog. Please answer all ten polls. If you don't see them all, check the notes (this shouldn't take me long so if it's more than like, fifteen minutes since I posted this one they should all be there.)
1) What is the PRIMARY thing you do on Tumblr?
I mostly reblog others' posts
I write original posts
I make/post memes
I make/post images or gifs
I make/post videos
I run a poll blog
I run a gimmick blog
2) how long have you been here?
Under twelve months
1-2 years
3-4 years
5-6 years
7-8 years
9-10 years
More than ten years
I don't remember
3) how old are you?
Under 18
19-28
29-38
39-48
49-58
59-68
I'm one of the Tumblr grandparents
4) thinking about the recent Tumblr feature release/rollback, what did you find most frustrating?
There was no communication before the fact
I felt like the feature didn't take Tumblr users' wants and needs into account
I felt like the feature showed a lack of understanding of Tumblr culture
I felt the feature would hurt Tumblr culture
I felt the feature would hurt Tumblr artists and small makers specifically
I wasn't bothered by the change
It happened so fast I didn't even know until it was all over
5) thinking about the recent Tumblr feature release/rollback, what satisfied you most about the response?
Tumblr staff responded quickly
I felt like we were heard and listened to
It was nice to see our concerns were understood
I wasn't bothered by the change
It happened so fast I didn't even know until it was all over
Other
6) thinking about features you use on Tumblr, what would you like to see improved?
The recent UI changes to reblogging are too confusing
I'd like tagging to be easier
I'd like to see the tagging system overhauled
I'd like to see the reporting/adult tagging system improved
I'd like a separate page for my communities
I'd like to be able to mark posts as for my followers only
I'd like to see the blocking system improved
I'm happy with Tumblr as it is
Other
7) with the understanding that Tumblr needs to attract new users or convert more current free users to paying users in order to stay online, what do you think of Matt's "top tumblrista" idea?
Absolutely not--this is very famously the influencer-hating site
Absolutely not--this site is too diverse for that to work
Absolutely not, for other reasons
I'm actually liking this poll method
The poll method is clunky but something similar would be great
I think the panel of "top users" would be great
I have no opinion on this
8) if you don't currently pay for use of a Tumblr feature, why not?
I have paid Tumblr features
The price point is too high for my wallet
The price point is too high for what's offered
There's nothing offered that I want
I wouldn't pay even if something I wanted was offered
Other
In the following question, "pre-social media" refers to platforms like LiveJournal, forums, alt.net boards, early MySpace, and similar spaces.
9) thinking about the given definition of "pre-social media," how much do you agree with the statement "I think most tumblr users I know would prefer pre-social media to modern platforms like Facebook and X"?
"Strongly agree" is not strong enough
Strongly agree
Agree
Kind of maybe agree?
Neutral/I don't know enough about pre-social media to say
Kind of maybe disagree?
Disagree
Strongly disagree
"Strongly disagree" is not strong enough
10) do you think Matt should just hire me to do this so I don't have to squeeze it around my break at work?
Yes, this was awesome
Sure, you're not perfect but this was way better than what they've done til now
No, but someone should do this
Honestly I'm just sad you didn't give us nuance/bald/vanilla extract/tickybox
Reblog to give prev the power to write their fanfiction
Reblog to give prev the TIME to write their fanfiction
Reblog to give prev the hocus focus to write their fanfiction.
Reblog to give prev the energy to write their fanfiction
Reblog to give prev the executive function to write their fanfiction
I love trans women
The world would be unbearable without trans women
Stay alive with me
Throwback to all these Jesus comics I drew in 2012âŠ
Good post OP
Good post, OP, and if you ever decide to do another may I please suggest âNOT IN HEBREW IT DOESNâTâ as a punchline? So much of the Old Testament is HORRIFICALLY translated from the Tanakh, it drives me batty.
WAIT WAIT WHAT DOES IT SAY?????? I NEED TO LIKE,, DESTROY MI MUM FOR BEING REALLY HOMOPHOBIC
Okay, so, strictly speaking, the infamous Leviticus 18:22 does say âforbidden.â Hereâs the thing:
1) The word translated as âforbiddenâ is âtoevah.â While that translation isnât ⊠wrong, itâs sort of like saying âMcMansionâ means âreally big house.â There are a lot of connotations in that word. The specific issue with toevah is that we ⊠sort of ⊠donât know anymore exactly what it meant. Based on context, it seems likely that the word referred to something ritually forbidden. This part of Torah was written not only as a guide for future generations, but also to say âso, look around, see your neighbors? DONâT DO THAT.â Thus, if we interpret âtoevahâ to mean something thatâs forbidden to do as a ritual before G-d, then the verse says nothing whatsoever about Adam and Steve and their two kids and their dogâitâs saying you shouldnât have sex with another man in the Temple as a sacrifice.
2) Following the same âthis is ritually forbiddenâ logic of toevah, this verse may also be interpreted as âdonât do sex magic,â which was a thing in. Like. A lot of fucking cultures at the time.
3) Hebrew is a highly gendered language, and the grammatical gender in this verse is really really weird. One of the âmenâ in this verse is given female grammar. Why? Who fucking knows, man, this isnât the only grammatical oddity in Torah. (There are also places where G-d is referred to as plural, and also as female.) One suggestion is that this is a way of creating a diminutiveâthat is, that the verse should be read as âa man should not lie with a boy.â Now, itâs worth noting that modern secular scholarship has concluded the written Torah was written down around the 6th century BCE, and most non-Orthodox Jewish scholars are like âyeah, all things considered, that sounds pretty legit.â
Do you know what else was happening around the 6th century BCE? What laypeople tend to mean when they say âancient Greeceâ was happening.
Do you know what happened a lot in that time period in Greece? Dudes forming relationships with younger boys, like ages 10-15, and using them for sex in exchange for financial gifts, mentorship, etc. While we donât know just how young some of these younger boys may have been, we do know some were prepubescent. In light of this, and also something I mentioned under the first pointââsee your neighbors? DONâT DO THAT,â if this verse is interpreted to say âa man should not lie with a boy,â then itâs pretty clearly âmy dudes, my fellows, my lads, donât be fucking pedophiles.â
4) Because of the grammar I mentioned in #3, itâs also possible that âshould not lie with a man as with a womanâ is actually referring to a place, not an abstract personhood: a man shouldnât have sex with another man in a womanâs bed. In the time period, a womanâs bed was sort of likeâthat was her place, her safe sanctuary. It was also a ritually holy place where babies were made. By having sex in her bed, youâre violating her safe space (and also introducing a man who may not be a male relative, thus forcing her into breaking the laws of modesty). If this verse is read this way, then it should be taken to mean âdonât sexually violate a womanâs safety and modesty.â 5) And as an offshoot of #4, this may be a second verse relating to infidelity. Which womanâs bed is any random dude in 600 BCE most likely to have access to? His wifeâs. But laws were administered differently based on whether the person they pertained to was slave or free, male or female, and so onâthus, a man committing adultery with a woman would be treated differently than man committing adultery with a man (especially because the latter would carry no chance of an illegitimate pregnancy).
So youâll note, there are a lot of ways to read this verse, and only a one-to-one translation with no cultural awareness produces âbeing gay is wrong, all of the timeâ. (Youâll also notice the word âabominationâ is nowhere to be found. Thatâs like ⊠a straight-up fiction created for who only knows what reason.)
Apparently tumblr mobile doesnât want to show @prismatic-bell âs long and in-depth essay, so hereâs the screenshots, because it still shows up on mobile browsers:
Much appreciated.
I love when scholarship and history debunks bullshit
âŠI sadly have more bullshit to report.
âremoved for violating guidelinesâ, EVERY screenshot.
âŠgoddamnit
Letâs try this again
I am horrified that @prismatic-bell keeps getting censored + this info is gold.
Many thanks, @pulmonary-poultry. This isnât the only Jewish post of mine thatâs mysteriously stopped showing up in searches and/or vanished from my blog entirely, but it is the one I get the most requests to repost, so this saves me from having to rewrite the whole damned essay. @the-invisible-self, thanks for bringing it to my attention that someone was able to preserve the post!
The Leviticus stuff for Jews being ritually distinct is very interesting @prismatic-bell where can we learn more about how scholars learned about the context clues, for those of us who arenât Jewish and/or scholars and donât read Hebrew?
This is the kind of thing that gets discussed in yeshivas and synagogues. I donât know that youâd be able to find anything, or if you could, where it would be. All of this came from study groups at my shul.
copied it into plaintext + my own info below from study groups iâve attended:
Okay, so, strictly speaking, the infamous Leviticus 18:22 does say âforbidden.â Hereâs the thing:
1) The word translated as âforbiddenâ is âtoevah.â While that translation isnât⊠wrong, itâs sort of like saying âMcMansionâ means âreally big house.â There are a lot of connotations in that word. The specific issue with toevah is that we ⊠sort of âŠ.. donât know anymore exactly what it meant. Based on context, it seems likely that the word referred to something ritually forbidden. This part of Torah was written not only as a guide for future generations, but also to say âso, look around, see your neighbors? DONâT DO THAT.â Thus, if we interpret âtoevahâ to mean something thatâs forbidden to do as a ritual before G-d, then the verse says nothing whatsoever about Adam and Steve and their two kids and their dog-itâs saying you shouldnât have sex with another man in the Temple as a sacrifice.
2) Following the same âthis is ritually forbiddenâ logic of toevah, this verse may also be interpreted as âdonât do sex magic,â which was a thing in. Like. A lot of fucking cultures at the time.
3) Hebrew is a highly gendered language, and the grammatical gender in this verse is really really weird. One of the âmenâ in this verse is given female grammar. Why? Who fucking knows, man, this isnât the only grammatical oddity in Torah. (There are also places where G-d is referred to as plural, and also as female.) One suggestion is that this is a way of creating a diminutive-that is, that the verse should be read as âa man should not lie with a boy.â Now, itâs worth noting that modern secular scholarship has concluded the written Torah was written down around the 6th century BCE, and most non-Orthodox Jewish scholars are like âyeah, all things considered, that sounds pretty legit.â
Do you know what else was happening around the 6th century BCE? What laypeople tend to mean when they say âancient Greeceâ was happening.
Do you know what happened a lot in that time period in Greece? Dudes forming relationships with younger boys, like ages 10-15, and using them for sex in exchange for financial gifts, mentorship, etc. While we donât know just how young some of these younger boys may have been, we do know some were prepubescent. In light of this, and also something I mentioned under the first point-âsee your neighbors? DONâT DO THAT,â if this verse is interpreted to say âa man should not lie with a boy,â then itâs pretty clearly âmy dudes, my fellows, my lads, donât be fucking pedophiles.â
4) Because of the grammar I mentioned in #3, itâs also possible that âshould not lie with a man as with a womanâ is actually referring to a place, not an abstract personhood: a man shouldnât have sex with another man in a womanâs bed. In the time period, a womanâs bed was sort of like-that was her place, her safe sanctuary. It was also a ritually holy place where babies were made. By having sex in her bed, youâre violating her safe space (and also introducing a man who may not be a male relative, thus forcing her into breaking the laws of modesty). If this verse is read this way, then it should be taken to mean âdonât sexually violate a womanâs safety and modesty.â
5) And as an offshoot of #4, this may be a second verse relating to infidelity. Which womanâs bed is any random dude in 600 BCE most likely to have access to? His wifeâs. But laws were administered differently based on whether the person they pertained to was slave or free, male or female, and so on-thus, a man committing adultery with a woman would be treated differently than man committing adultery with a man (especially because the latter would carry no chance of an illegitimate pregnancy).
So youâll note, there are a lot of ways to read this verse, and only a one-to-one translation with no cultural awareness produces âbeing gay is wrong, all of the timeâ.
(Youâll also notice the word âabominationâ is nowhere to be found. Thatâs like⊠a straight-up fiction created for who only knows what reason.)
and my commentary:
the grammar of the sentence is really interesting.
(note: i have not marked grammatical gender bc im really bad at that. someone fluent in Hebrew feel free to swoop in and correct me. additional note: the nikkudot and trope symbols in the sentence below are not in the Torah, so itâs possible the phrase has been corrupted (more on that later).)
ŚŽŚÖ°ŚÖ¶ÖšŚȘÖŸŚÖžŚÖžÖŚš ŚÖčÖ„Ś ŚȘÖŽŚ©ŚÖ°ŚÖŒÖ·ÖŚ ŚÖŽŚ©ŚÖ°ŚÖŒÖ°ŚÖ”ÖŁŚ ŚÖŽŚ©ŚÖŒÖžÖŚ ŚȘÖŒŚÖ茹֔ŚÖžÖŚ ŚÖŽÖœŚŚŚŚŽ
⌌ŚȘÖŸŚŚŚš - and the male
⌌ ŚȘŚ©ŚŚ - do not lie with [him]
⌌©ŚŚŚ - lying (down), from lying down, from the bed of, my bed [typically translated: as (you) lie with; there is ambiguity in the phrase though]
⌌©Ś - woman [usually spelled ŚŚŚ©Ś esp in modern hebrew; the spelling ŚŚ©Ś can also mean a sacrifice/offering (different vowels but those arenât written in the torah so we get to fill it in!)]
âŚȘŚŚąŚŚ ŚŚŚ - it is toevah [literal meaning unknown; typically translated: illegal, forbidden, abomination]
you can see from the ambiguity of the translation where a lot of @prismatic-bellâs interpretation notes are based in. without vowels or punctuation, or clarifying words that would be added in modern hebrew, the intent of the phrase is unclear.
one interesting point is the use of âmaleâ ŚŚŚš rather than âmanâ ŚŚŚ©. an interpretation ive heard is that this is a prohibition against anal sex, in which case the translation would be: you arenât allowed to penetrate a man (as you would penetrate a woman) because that would cause ritual impurity.
this interpretation could come down to a number of related reasons including that itâs easier to get STIs from anal sex (and youâre doing it with someone other than your wife) and thus you need to be considered a health risk. semen and bodily discharge in general are ritually impure, as are infectious diseases, or contact with things that could cause disease (eg dead animals).
or that according to the torah youâre not supposed to masturbate either bc you should only cum in your wife. the latter especially doesnât make it particularly modern-view-of-sexuality-friendly but again it was written a pretty long time ago. our understanding of sex and sexuality has changed since then.
it could be a prohibition against cheating on your spouse, and as @prismatic-bell mentioned treated differently when youâre cheating with a man as compared to a woman.
i personally like #4 the bestâ it takes the interpretation of ŚŚ©ŚŚŚ ŚŚ©Ś to mean âin the bed of a woman/wifeâ and is a prohibition against taking action that would sexually violate another.
and to discuss one more common anti-gay misquoted torah section, the story of sodom and gomorrah (origin of sodomy) is about gang rape.
but above all, judaism allows almost every law to be broken if it protects a personâs dignity and security, and there is precedent for this in the torah. so next time someone tells you âthe bible says being gay is a sinâ you can respond that the bible also tells you to be nice to other people, asshat.
A note: Torah doesnât actually say you shouldnât masturbate. Thatâs from Talmud and itâs extrapolated from the story of Onan. The issue with Onan, however, isnât that he masturbatedâitâs that he was in a levirate marriage but hated his deceased brother, and Torah says that the first child of a levirate marriage belongs to the deceased, so Onan pulled out rather than impregnate his wife/his brotherâs widow.
A good source imo is Wrestling With God and Men: Homosexuality in the Jewish Tradition by Rabbi Steve Greenberg. R. Greenberg is an openly gay Orthodox rabbi and his book details much of what @prismatic-bell talked about.
Ooh! Iâm adding that to my reading list. Thanks for tagging me. â€ïž
Artist graphic by annie_0318
about fucking time
Reblog to give the prev person some dopamine.
Quite often Tumblr gives me comedic gold with the way posts are arranged.
Sports have always been political â it's just a question of who's speaking out.
We donât know if Vice President JD Vance anticipated that when he attended the opening ceremonies at the Winter Olympics in Italy heâd be booed by the crowd. But if he did, he probably didnât mind.
Vance is used to it by now â he gets booed a lot â but more importantly, like his boss and most of the conservative elite, Vance knows that every major sporting event is an opportunity for the right to stoke the culture war and play the victim. Which is exactly what the Olympics have become.
The Olympics have often featured political controversies, but this yearâs games stand out because of the growing number of athletes â especially, but not solely, Americans â making their beliefs known.
Unsurprisingly, none of it is particularly complimentary to this administration.
The growing anger on the right is mostly performative, but if weâre being generous, we can acknowledge how uncomfortable they must feel at seeing one Olympian after another go public with their distaste for Trump and their chagrin at the administrationâs policies. And it comes so soon after conservatives got themselves all worked up over Bad Bunnyâs Super Bowl halftime show, which they decided was an affront to everything they believe in.
The growing anger on the right is mostly performative, but if weâre being generous, we can acknowledge how uncomfortable they must feel at seeing one Olympian after another go public with their distaste for Trump
Acknowledge it?
I LOVE the thought of the filthy inferior cockroaches that are the oxygen thieving right wing gutter-scum cluttering up this planet being UTTERLY MISERABLE
Their misery and suffering brings me PLEASURE :D
Remember when I told ya'll last month to be ready to start looking for a Discord alternative?
Yeah things aren't looking good for discord.
#what is the alternative anyway
If you want a direct alternative there's Revolt, which is a free, open source discord clone.
Revolt is the chat app that's truly built with you in mind.
Oh...
It's even worse than I thought.
Time to go back to IRC.
I recommend Element; it's very similar to Discord and has basically the same features but it's privacy-focused and both servers and DMs can both be encrypted so only the actual users of those rooms can read the messages.
This means unlike most popular chat apps, including and especially Discord, Element doesn't sell your conversations or tracking data to advertisers, because the company literally doesn't have access to that data in the first place.
I've used it for years and I think it's a natural fit for Discord users.
sighs. saves for later
The problem with this is transferring YEARS of Discord usage to these new alternatives. Until a tool is made that allows full back up if not transfer of All That, then transitioning to these alternatives isn't feasible for the baseline everyday user.
Exports Discord chat logs to a file. Contribute to Tyrrrz/DiscordChatExporter development by creating an account on GitHub.
[Image one: Screencap reading, "Discord co-founder and CEO Jason Citron is stepping down". Image two: Screencap reading, "Industry News: Blizzard Activision's Former CEO/CSO Humam Sakhnini Is Discord's New CEO, Company Announces Plans to Go Public".]
I don't care what you identify as only because I care very much about you having the choice to choose for yourself
hey thanks puky
Holy shit Trans Jesus
James T. Kirk:
-Graduated in the top 4% of his year -was bullied by jocks -Is a history nerd -was so much of a teacherâs pet that he cheated on an exam and was commended for it -Was referred to as âa stack of books with legsâ
Jean-Luc Picard:
-Spent all his free time drinking in pubs and playing billiards -broke more hearts than he can remember -started a bar fight that ended up in him being stabbed in the heart -likes to explore dangerous ruins of ancient civilizations for fun -wouldnât even have become a starship captain if he wasnât this much of a hothead
And yet people still manage to get it backwards???
I think itâs a problem of First Officer, really.
Jim Kirk seems like a wild man because heâs standing next to calm, logical Spock.*Â Â
Meanwhile, Picard seems stately and dignified because heâs standing next to Will âAny alien physiology is bangable if you just put some thought into itâ Riker*. Â
* Of course THEN, we get to the next layer, which is that Spock is the dude who told the Vulcan Science Academy to fuck itself, while Riker plays the trombone.
The Federation is a confusing place.
Meanwhile, Captain Benjamin Sisko is a gourmet chef, art collector, amateur baseball player, and a loving and involved father who commits occasional war crimes and scares Klingons.
His first officer is a terrorist who likes playing space squash.
The nice thing about a post-scarcity society is it allows everyone to be unhinged in their own special way.