cherry valley forever
Keni
Show & Tell
Monterey Bay Aquarium
occasionally subtle
Acquired Stardust
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Andulka
Peter Solarz

No title available
Stranger Things
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Claire Keane
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
AnasAbdin
taylor price
trying on a metaphor

Janaina Medeiros

shark vs the universe
hello vonnie

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from South Africa

seen from Lithuania

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Dominican Republic

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from South Korea
seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
@sasusc
i don’t think ravi the perpetual buddie thirdwheeler should end now that he’s no longer single, in fact it should evolve and now he’s somehow bringing may to doubledates where mayravi are the only two aware that it’s a double date
"He's perfect." 911 | 4x04 | 6x18 | 9x17 | 9x18
LUCY CHEN & TIM BRADFORD 🧡
↳ THE ROOKIE | 8.18 “The Bandit”
Ryan Guzman as Eddie Díaz 9-1-1, S09E18 - Hearts and Flowers
I wanted to come back to this post now that donor baby’s (fondly referred to as Unethically Sourced White Baby, or USWB, by the server I’m in) return has occurred, but haven’t be certain on how to formulate my response. I tried. So, in a (long) defence of USWB:
I think, as a donor conceived person, that the discourse regarding the TheoandBuck of it all so far is just missing some context? People may just not know what it’s like to be donor conceived and/or adopted, have forgotten how Hen’s family is constructed, and/or be ignorant to the vast amount of ethical issues surrounding sperm- and egg-donation. That’s fine. I’ve just been seeing a lot of accusations of bio-essentialism and found family dismissal (which the show doesn’t do), and personality retconning (the behaviour is consistent with the plot’s introduction in season 6) all to give Buck a baby, and I’m not sure I agree.
I viewed a lot of Connor and Kameron’s behaviour during the dinner, in addition to their reasoning for seeking out Buck for help in season 6, as pointing to Theo being an attempt at a designer baby. Sperm- and egg-donation exists in a precarious position that can shift into eugenics rather easily: though people with genetically hereditary diseases are often barred from donating for health reasons, more and more people are pointing out that refusing donations based on mental disorders may be related to the eugenics (and thus, creation of ‘designer babies’) driving the industry, and I’m inclined to agree. Connor and Kameron largely didn’t seem to be asking for help in handling Theo (other than the “Could we speak to your mother?” comment), and instead sought out someone to blame. It didn’t come from my side of the gene pool, you better not be a criminal, he’s absolutely your kid, we’ve visited a number of professionals and none of their suggestions have helped and he might be [said ominously] Diagnosed with Something so we must ask if you are too and withheld it from us.
It’s no secret at this point that disorders like ADHD and ASD may be hereditary. It’s also no secret that it doesn’t have to be: realistically, Theo could’ve exhibited the same behaviours and symptoms if Connor had been his biological father. There’s fine line between ‘it’s okay if you’d rather your child didn’t have this’ and ‘it’s okay to pick and choose genetics to have The Best Child’: you cannot truly remove ‘a person with autism/ADHD shouldn’t donate sperm or eggs’ from eugenics, and you especially cannot disregard the optics of Connor and Kameron specifically choosing a white man to donate when Connor isn’t white.
Prospective parents should, of course, be able to make an informed decision, but as my mum put it: Buck’s behaviour, to Buck, does not include symptoms of ADHD. It’s just his behaviour. He helped them make an informed decision with the information he himself could provide, based on the questions he was asked. To go to his house and essentially blame his DNA for Theo’s behaviour (great parts of which are not solely caused by undiagnosed ADHD, because there is such thing as permissive parenting, especially if none of the four experts they consulted could come up with even slightly helpful solutions and methods) is very plainly weird. Any parent worth their salt of a donor conceived person wouldn’t blame all their child’s ‘bad’ behaviour on genetics. They’d be removing their own hand in raising the child. That, specifically, would be bio-essentialist.
The show doesn’t have a habit of using that line of thinking. Mara and Denny are not biologically related to Hen and Karen, but there’s no doubt they’re not their kids. The fandom keeps comparing Chris’ behaviour to Buck’s, Buck’s to Bobby’s, May and Harry’s to Bobby’s, and nothing is written accidentally. The show itself even has suggested Buck’s impulsive streak comes from his parents’ emotional neglect: the flashbacks of Buck Begins are steeped in the idea that he was desperate to receive their attention, and getting hurt was the only way he could.
I could go on like this. Had Bobby’s father not been an alcoholic, Bobby likely would not have drunk the whiskey after his death to connect with him. Had Ramon Diaz not had a job that had him away from home for such long stretches of time, Eddie likely wouldn’t have been so insistent on what a father’s role is in a family, and might not have joined the army after Shannon got pregnant. You’re coloured by your environment and the way you grew up, not just by your genetics. My own behaviour is most similar to that of my legal father’s: nurture, not nature.
Of course I’m not ignorant to the show’s potential implication that Buck may be better at handling Theo because they’re related—or at least, because he understands his own mind and behaviours, and as such would understand Theo’s. But then he wasn’t shown to be better at handling Theo. He was shown to be somewhat capable handling him whilst babysitting, which is different from parenting: when he can’t give Theo all of his attention, Theo almost sets his kitchen on fire.
Disliking this storyline doesn’t mean it’s inherently an amoral depiction of something, much like enjoying a storyline doesn’t mean it’s inherently a good portrayal. It ultimately exists in a grey area in a reasonably progressive show that, from time to time, proves itself as one of the more democrat-aligned shows of American procedurals. But as someone donor conceived, I simply don’t see this storyline as particularly problematic, as Buck doesn’t even want to be Theo’s parent—he’ll (perhaps only initially) be a foster parent at most, underlined by the show (and Buck himself) differentiating between ‘Buck’ and ‘next of kin’. And if anyone could encourage Buck to foster, it would be Eddie, as Eddie’s been concerned with people falling through the cracks of the safety net the entirety of season 9. That would be the found family you’re looking for: choosing to help and to love.
So before you write this storyline off as fridging, bio-essentialist, or out of character, please remember that the show has a habit of relating a child’s behaviour to how they’ve been parented. Remember that Buck doesn’t consider himself to be Theo’s dad. And remember that in season 6, Connor and Kameron were pushy, stepped over boundaries, and chose Buck because he was Connor’s tall, handsome, heroic, (white), friend without a criminal background. Their behaviour hasn’t been retconned since; it’s just been built upon. If that means some viewers therefore see Buck of all characters as the better option, then so be it.
Death and the Girl, painting by Frans Van Kuyck (1852 - 1915)
@gaydadeddie asked: The first time Buck held Theo & The next time he held him 9-1-1, S06E18 & S09E17
After this
@super-powerful-queen-slayyna 🫶
Mini Buck 🥹 pt.1
Oh, does he
buck’s backyard + a buckling <3
theo's perfect 6.18: Pay It Forward 9.17: I Got You Babe
Got sick and tired of losing my scissors, needle, and stitch markers. So VOILA! I present: the modern-day chaterlaine necklace.
Made with a clover circular cutting pendant, claw clasps, o-rings, and some waxed cord. Try hiding from me now, you little bastards!!
Ohhhhh this is sooo fuckin cooool
I didn't even know a cutting pendant was even a Thing
I have to make one
Oh, for those who don't know, this is a typical chaterlaine:
It was like a decorative and often very elaborate chain of useful knicknacks, because women have always wanted to carry sharp tools with them without tearing up their pockets or stabbing up their thighs. It's sort of like a foot-long charm bracelet, but the charms are useable notebooks and tweezers and stuff.
I'd never heard of a pendant chatelaine, let along a circular cutting pendant. I LOVE
I HIGHLY recommend making one! One of my friends asked me if I would sell them. My answer was a resounding NO! They're way too easy to make, and making things is more fun.
You can get everything from local craft shops apart from possibly the pendant. I got mine from Clover as I like the brand, but there are so many other places that make them. Just search online for 'circular cutting pendant' or 'yarn cutting pendant' and there will be tons of options!
The clasps are basic lobster jewellery clasps. Two are attached to a jump ring. One clips to the cord, the other to whatever you want to attach. Minimum of two clasps on the ring is important. This means you can remove the whole section from the necklace, or just take off the item itself off one clasp, leaving the other clasp on the cord. I only needed two sections, but you can make as many as you like!
2mm waxed cord fit the clover pendant perfectly, but you could use any cord, nylon, leather, whatever you like. The closure is a simple sliding knot to allow it to be worn higher up the neckline when not in use.
Hope you have fun making one!!
wait wait wait hold on... i knew all these things individually, but suddenly the pieces came together
st. christopher, patron saint of travellers — st. theodore, patron saint of soldiers
the traveller and the soldier
This is the seasons of parallels. And Kameron and Connor naming Buck as the person to take care of Theo in case something happened to both of them would be an interesting parallel to the Eddie & Chris of it all. And maybe finally force the Will conversation.
But I really don't like the idea.
I wish there are actual next of kin for Theo but none of them are able or willing to take him in.
So Buck steps in. Because he can't imagine Theo going into the system. And maybe falling through the cracks. When he already loves him.
It would finally give Buck the opportunity to make choices about his life. Instead of it just happening to him. And would be so much more meaningful, IMHO.
Sleepy boys 💤