Imagine you're the head of the center for treating Boneitis in your country. There are many observational studies that show Bone Unhurting Juice helps with Boneitis, but you only hand out Bone Unhurting Juice after a screening process where you deprive the patients of calcium.
You then publish research.
Your research, performed exclusively within your jurisdiction, claims that patients receiving Bone Unhurting Juice still suffer from osteoporosis, have many different health issues associated with calcium deprivation, and your conclusion is that you've revealed a flaw in Bone Unhurting Juice research.
Except… You're the one giving the patients osteoporosis.
You are accepted as a leading voice of reason by the Association for Concerned Parents of Boneitis Fakers. Countries condemned for their treatment of Boneitis patients flock to your research.
The research where you admit that your approach to Boneitis treatment is giving patients osteoporosis.
There continues to be no evidence to suggest that calcium deprivation does ANYTHING to benefit Boneitis patients. You make the calcium deprivation more intense because of your publications.
Mengele comparisons are not just appropriate at this point, they are necessary. You should not be in the position of authority that you have, because you are actively harming your patients.
Actual Boneitis experts in your country who offer Boneitis treatment without calcium deprivation get shut down because you say they're being irresponsible.
You keep shitting out more and more self-incriminating research.
Opinion piece writers call your critics "extreme" and "lacking nuance."
Your critics are rightly pointing out that you are a hack elevated to the position of an unaccountable petty tyrant held to no standards, allowed to scrutinize others from a position of unearned authority.
Most of your critics are your patients.
You should resign. You do not.
This makes you evil.
This post is about the gatekeeping model of trans healthcare.





















