Monsterfucking is so normalized on Tumblr I kinda forgot it even counted as a kink. I thought it was like liking boobs on girls. The basic normal stuff most people like.
Phantogram Three

#extradirty
Today's Document

@theartofmadeline
No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
noise dept.
Fieri Frames

Product Placement

blake kathryn
Keni
Claire Keane

Kiana Khansmith

izzy's playlists!
$LAYYYTER
No title available
tumblr dot com
Show & Tell
seen from Germany

seen from France

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Italy

seen from Venezuela

seen from Germany
seen from France
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Portugal

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Bangladesh
@slashersweetheart
Monsterfucking is so normalized on Tumblr I kinda forgot it even counted as a kink. I thought it was like liking boobs on girls. The basic normal stuff most people like.
reblog if your followers can flood your inbox with NSFW asks
i may be a slut but you still have to impress me & show me why you deserve to fuck me
dissociative amnesia haver: wow i wish i remembered shit
dissociative amnesia havers when they remember:
dissociative amnesia havers when the memories then get taken from them:
interact with this if I can get off to your posts
Let’s get something straight: “Woke” isn’t the insult you think it is.
It means being informed, aware, and paying attention to how systems harm people — people who don’t look like you, vote like you, or worship like you. That’s not weakness. That’s humanity.
You say you're about “freedom,” “truth,” and “Christian values.” But when someone speaks out against racism or inequality, you lose your fucking minds and call it “woke.” Since when did caring about others become a bad thing?
You claim to follow Jesus, you know, the guy who healed the sick, fed the poor, and flipped tables in temples when the powerful exploited the weak. He wasn't waving a flag and screaming about "traditional values." He was standing with the oppressed. Sound familiar?
Times are changing. That’s how history works. Every generation confronts the failures of the last one. You call that an attack on tradition. We call it progress.
Now let’s talk about the part that seems to send some of you over the edge: trans people.
No one is asking you to become transgender. No one is forcing anything on you. Talking about gender identity — or acknowledging that some people live differently than you — isn’t “shoving it down your throat.” It’s called understanding the world you live in.
You don’t have to like it. You don’t have to agree with it. But learning about trans people — because times change and people evolve — is no different than what every generation before you had to do:
The Greatest Generation had to adjust to women entering the workforce, civil rights marches, and the collapse of segregation.
The Silent Generation had to accept rock & roll, television, and interracial marriage.
Baby Boomers had to learn about the Vietnam War, birth control, hippie culture, and the AIDS crisis.
Generation X watched the world go digital — from rotary phones to the internet, from traditional family roles to open conversations about mental health.
Millennials grew up through 9/11, the rise of LGBTQ+ rights, the collapse of the housing market, and the shift from church pews to social media.
Generation Z is growing up with global movements around climate change, gender identity, school shootings, and mental health awareness.
And Generation Alpha? They’re already being raised to understand a world of diversity, technology, and rapid change — whether you like it or not.
Every generation has faced something “new” that challenged what they thought was “normal.” And every time, society grew because of it.
You don’t have to embrace it all. But you do have to acknowledge that other people exist — and they deserve to live without fear, shame, or hate.
Being kind doesn't mean changing your beliefs. It just means being decent enough to agree to disagree — and move on without cruelty.
Here’s the truth:
Wokeness isn’t the enemy.
Diversity isn’t the enemy.
Accountability isn’t the enemy. Your fear is.
If your values fall apart the moment people ask for equal rights, maybe they weren’t values — maybe they were privileges.
And using “woke” like a slur? That doesn’t make you clever. It makes you look scared of a world that’s finally holding itself accountable. You’re not defending truth — you’re running from it.
Mocking empathy isn’t brave. It’s cowardly.
So if you think “woke” is an insult, guess what? You’re just mad that people finally see through the bullshit. And deep down, you know it.
shoutout to all my fellow lesbians who are told theyre not ""really"" a lesbian, i see you and stand alongside you and love you. youre wholly and completely a lesbian, your lesbianess is not dictated by anyone but you 💖
you aren’t doing the lgbtq+ community a favor by “kicking” out fellow members, btw.
i am tired of being nice with lesbophobes because maybe they don't know any better or are brainwashed or truly think they are doing the right thing or i don't know what else. i am tired of not saying anything to avoid dramas. if your god said homosexuality is bad well then fuck him and everyone who agrees with this shit. if you like dicks you're not a lesbian. if you have a dick you're not a lesbian. if you ever had a dick you're not a lesbian. "amab nb lesbians" aren't lesbians, they're just straight guys. bi and other mspec lesbians don't exist and are lesbophobic terms. either you are attracted exclusively to biological women while also being a biological woman or you're not and never will be a lesbian. if you decided to be a lesbian because of your political views then you're not a lesbian. if you ever had a crush on a guy you are not a lesbian. if you think lesbianism distances lesbians from womanhood and means we aren't normal women you're a piece of shit. if you think you can become a lesbian or stop being one you are a piece of shit. if you think lesbians just need to find the right man i hope your house will burn with you in it. call lesbians queer and you deserve to be punched. if you think lesbian sex is disgusting go fuck yourself. if you think lesbianism is problematic or sinful in anyway kill yourself. if you think lesbians just need to try dicks kill yourself. if you think lesbians can be attracted to men kill yourself. now you can cry and say i am oppressing you, i don't care. die mad about it
nah , you kill YOURSELF .
Again, this is controversial but being genderfluid isn't real. The brain just doesn't work like that, it can't just switch back and forth between genders. It's literally scientifically impossible, and many doctors and scientists have proved this.
Not sorry for my French, you are retarded. I genuinely don't like you and how you talk like this. You aren't genderfluid so you have absolutely NO say in this shit. I am genderfluid and those people saying it's fake/impossible are lying.
You can't tell me that I'm not genderfluid, I am and you literally can't prove that I'm not. You don't know me, you don't know my body or my mind, you aren't a friend or family. Shut up for once. Just because you are a lesbian doesn't mean you are the shit, you are a lesbian who is lesbianphobic. Lesbians can be wrong.
If living in reality means that I, a lesbian, am somehow “lesbianphobic”, then I am happily a “lesbianphobic” lesbian ♥️
gender ≠ sex and is LITERALLY psychological so it literally IS possible for the brain to be wired differently ?? how uneducated are you
As an exclusionist who's also a lesbian, these are my LGBT opinions:
- you need gender dysphoria to be trans
- if you don't have gender dysphoria, you aren't trans
- gender dysphoria is a mental disorder/condition
- lesbian means WOMEN loving WOMEN
- gay means MEN loving MEN
- pansexuality isn't real
- pansexuality is biphobic
- trans kids/teens shouldn't be allowed to medically transition until they are 18
- the acronym is LGBT, there's no Q, there's no QIA, and there's no +
- he/him lesbians aren't real and they aren't valid
- they/them lesbians aren't real and they aren't valid
- pronouns = gender
- there's only two genders (women and men/female and male)
- aromantic and asexuality aren't spectrums
- aromantic and asexual people are valid but they aren't apart of the LGBT community
- having a preference when it comes to dating doesn't mean that you need to come up with a whole new “LGBT” label to feel special
- being nonbinary isn't real
- xenogenders and xenopronouns aren't real and they aren't valid
- xenogenders, xenopronouns, etc make the LGBT community look like a joke
- gatekeeping in the LGBT community is necessary
- the LGBT community isn't some club that everybody can join just to feel special
- qu33r is a slur and you shouldn't call people qu33r unless they give you permission to call them that
- being genderfluid isn't real
you're a piece of shit <33
back when i was just polyamorous in theory , it was all well and good . but nothing really prepared me for how unreal it is to be surrounded by people who love you . and those people have their own people, and suddenly the world isnt as small as i thought and there is more love than i couldve dreamed of when i first came out three years ago
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Polyamorous culture is liking multiple people at once and just. Never actually getting any relationships because none of them feel the same about you lol
one really frustrating system experience is knowing that you’ve switched but having no idea who’s fronting now.
is it a member we know of, and they’re just acting a little weird?
is it a brand new member?
is it a member that’s been around for a while but we just didn’t know about them?
is it several members co-fronting and blending together?
it’s difficult not being able to pinpoint who’s who, and it’s a problem that’s very uniquely plural.
why do you have "mogai" in your do not interact banner?? you realize that it was always intended to be an umbrella term for the whole community, right?? are the only people allowed to interact with your posts particularly well behaved cishet allies?
mogai, while i’m sure it was coined with good intentions, is a term that isn’t necessary and often is used by people who make up outlandish (and often problematic) orientations
when i say “mogai don’t interact”, i’m talking about the people who self-identify as mogai rather than just lgbt+, as they push ridiculous “every identity is valid! uwu” agendas that tend to do more harm than good
when i say that ofc i’m not talking about things that are Actually harmless – i’m not a complete douchebag. i’m talking about the shit like androsexual/gynosexual, that one “sexuality” where the person dissociates during intercourse, etc. etc. transphobic, homophobic, ableist, and other straight up harmful bullshit promoted as being diverse and inclusive
EDIT: also, i’m a notably loud cishet-hating, bisexual, trans masc nonbinary person and if you ever insinuate that i’m some cishet boot-licker again i’ll smash your kneecaps with a meat hammer
hi , you being personally offended at people being attracted to fucking masculinity is EMBARRASSING .
An Autism culture blog is spreading misinformation about endogenic systems...
The misinformation:
Naturally, all of this is wrong.
The only true statement here is "you could probably learn a lot more about these things in your own research." Because yeah... Doing your own research is likely to bring you to actually valid sources of information instead of whatever this is.
Real Information:
Endogenic systems are not a "fake form of dissociative disorder."
Endogenic systems ARE plural systems who experience multiple agents, or "headmates," sharing the same body in some way without trauma. Usually, endogenic systems don't even report having any sort of dissociative disorder at all.
And this is a real experience that's been repeatedly acknowledged by the psychiatric community.
So much so that the World Health Organization's diagnostic handbook, the ICD-11, specifically states that you can experience the presence of multiple "distinct identity states" without a mental disorder.
"Distinct identity states" is the same wording the ICD-11 uses to describe alters that characterized DID:
It's also acknowledged in the book Transgender Mental Health by Eric Yarbrough, which was reviewed and published by the American Psychiatric Association, that you can be plural without trauma or a disorder:
...
Additionally, the phrasing that endogenic plurality "mocks and invalidates people who are actually plural" is especially harmful as it erases and rewrites a huge part of plural history. That is, the fact that "plural" is an inclusive term coined and popularized to by non-disordered and endogenic systems.
Back in the 90s, the popular term that was used was "multiple," originating with "multiple personality disorder," the old name for DID.
The shift towards using "plural" was an effort by non-disordered systems to distance themselves from medical and pathologizing language. As you can see from this article from the 90s:
We don't claim that every multiple system/household is a happy loving cooperative one. What we do question is the *identification* of "real multiples" with the characteristics or symptoms of a psychological disorder. We go further: we question by what right or authority doctors and therapists are given sole jurisdiction over the definition of "an individual".
This is one reason our clan encourages use of the word "plural" rather than "multiple". "Multiple", even standing by itself, brings to mind MPD/DID, "multiple personality disorder", "dissociative identity disorder", which are specific diagnoses created by the medical/therapeutic community. "Plural" is a much more neutral word, more commonly heard in the context of grammar than psychiatry. (The other reason, of course, is that plural can be construed to have a broader meaning, applying to anyone(s) anywhere on the continuum who experience themselves as plural in some way. )
The Bottom Line:
An autism culture blog should be lifting up all neurodivergents. Not spreading misinformation about them and encouraging hate!
is 20 and unironically thinks drawing a fictional character from a shitty show makes them a predator. I can't wait until you get a real taste of life, maybe meet a person who has been abused by a real fucking predator and has ptsd, and realise that watering down the meaning of child predator and pedo to include fictional characters does nothing but hurt real people.
It enrages me that people like you can compare real abuse and real grooming to shitty art. How can you act like the man that traumatised me and my family is even remotely comparable to some smut artist? Fuck you and grow up.
If you brush this off as just something from a "proshitter" you missed the point
1. You're justifying child SA depiction, which is wrong, whether you like it or not.
2. I'm a victim, as well as many ppl I interact with. Oh, and they don't approve of such shit.
3. In MY experience, CP enrages most people in general, much less victims who see other victims of abuse attempting to normalize something that is quite literally generally illegal material through fiction as well as something involving characters who legally can't consent to an adult (and I don't wanna hear the age of consent is lower in _____ as an "excuse").
4. If it isn't any worse than that, you're insulting MY age whilst throwing a fucking temper tantrum. Grow up, you predator apologist. If you ACTUALLY gave a damn about "hurting real people," you'd know that the sexualization of minors, fictional or not, is fucking WRONG, and that FICTION AFFECTS REALITY. I will NOT tolerate this behavior.
5. It isn't my fault people canceled you so hard that I was your last straw. Womp womp.
6. Since you wanna talk shit and hide behind an anonymous ask,, the next time, you can expose yourself, considering you enjoy harassing people who aren't okay with depictions of CP. 🫶🏼