You are
Indecisive like Ralph
Impulsive like Jack
Fat like Piggy
Weak like Simon
Sadistic like Roger
And lacking autonomy like Maurice
You are not my Lord of The Flies đđĽ
almost home
art blog(derogatory)

blake kathryn
taylor price
noise dept.

Kiana Khansmith
dirt enthusiast
No title available
Jules of Nature
Acquired Stardust
đŞź
Peter Solarz

oozey mess

tannertan36
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

No title available
hello vonnie

JBB: An Artblog!

ellievsbear
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from Romania

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Japan

seen from Switzerland

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from United States
@snooze-mp4
You are
Indecisive like Ralph
Impulsive like Jack
Fat like Piggy
Weak like Simon
Sadistic like Roger
And lacking autonomy like Maurice
You are not my Lord of The Flies đđĽ
WIP of an animation Iâve been working on for a long while now, on and off yk T-T (ignore the ending đĽ°)
bro wtf the quality đđđđťđđť
FUCKIN AMAZING!!!!
@socialflairity it wouldn't let me reblog w rhe video attached what the freak..... anyway grand visions great minds here you guys
hey lotf fandom i know we had this conversation months ago and some of us decided to make fun of the person who said it, so here goes again!
the word "savages" in lotf is racist. it is used in a racist way, by a racist man. it was used only to describe people who did not abide by white, british stereotypes and hunted for survival and painted their bodies and acted unlike the white definition of "civilized." this is an occuring issue throughout white history, especially in the united states. during westward expansion, white people went outside of the united states to establish "order" (white rule) in "uncilivized" (indigenous peoples) areas. and golding was referring to those people as the villians of the story and what made them so evil was their "savagery."
THAT is why the word is racist. if you want to argue with me, go right ahead but know that you are ignoring the history behind the word being used in that way AND you are arguing to keep using a racist term because you think it isn't racist.
oh and on this post let's use our brains! it obviously isn't referring to the word used lyrically/in reference to songs or any other way outside of the obvious!
anyone else get really upset about ralph at random points in the day like itâs 8:35 pm im doing homework and i feel genuinely sick over the Guy Who Represents Democracy from the required english reading in tenth grade
I'm so sorry I love Basil but his death was so comical like imagine dying because your twink muse got the ick
Omfg 7 notes I'm falling off so hard
Someoneâs car has been claimed
(via)
hii uh lotf doodles
yeah
I'm so sorry I love Basil but his death was so comical like imagine dying because your twink muse got the ick
music & a bite to eat is life
playing my game
ok idk what to caption this
im not a fan of doing digital art so this is on paper teehee
jalph
I'm still alive I promise!!!
can I get a job as an editor but the only thing I do is correct when someone uses the word "prone" when they mean "supine"
thank you wikipedia for this really good image
a helpful mnemonic for everyone
too good for tags
More lotf horror au
Rivalry More Like Sexual Tension, or The Jalph Essay
I wrote this mess for my English class and turned it in enjoy
The concept of human relationships has existed for thousands of years, yet still continues to fascinate people in real life and in literature. There are several types of relationships but all vary in form and habitually appear in unexpected places. In William Goldingâs 1954 novel, Lord of the Flies, a group of boys crash land on a remote island and are forced to form their own society while waiting for rescue. Throughout the book, two of the main characters, Jack and Ralph, share an unusual connection constantly ranging from more than friendly liking to sexual tension to unrequited feelings. Their relationship culminates in a bitter power struggle ultimately causing the downfall of an attachment which could have evolved far beyond its final destination. Jack and Ralph are an ill-fated young couple who illustrate the effects of a certain aspect of human nature- the survival instinct- on interpersonal relationships.
Jack and Ralph originally have an amount of chemistry going beyond what is considered âfriendly.â When they first meet, they look at each other with âa shy likingâ (23). Both boys, specifically Ralph, prove themselves completely comfortable around others, yet once they interact with each other, they suddenly become shy. Although most of their association bases on emotional rather than physical attraction, Ralph briefly demonstrates how impressed he is by Jack during their first meeting; â[Jackâs] grey shorts were sticking to him with sweat. Ralph glanced at them admiringly,â (23). Jack and Ralph have outgoing, commanding personalities, and from the beginning they seem evenly matched, with plenty of potential for evolution. For the first few weeks, they tend to fumble, blush, and stutter their way through conversations with each other. Eventually, they establish a cooperative bond which consists of Jack leading the hunters and serving as a confidence booster for Ralph, while Ralph leads the government and keeps Jack in check to the best of his ability. The connection between the boys continues to develop as they spend more time together. Although their ideologies differ, the situation has not yet become dire. They mostly have the same goal of keeping the rules intact, and Jack still respects Ralph, as stated by Piggy. âYouâre all right- he respects youâ (93). For his part, Ralph holds Jack in high esteem, even thinking Jack Merridew the person is equal to the high status of chief (93). Part of Ralphâs character includes valuing people over power, which leaves him confused and shattered after Jack, motivated by a thirst for power, finally breaks off to start his own tribe.
The departure of Jack from the main tribe and the formation of a new dictatorship drastically alters the bond between Jack and Ralph and stretches their relationship past the breaking point. Immediately following Jackâs split from the group, Ralph is devastated. He sits in the same spot the rest of the day, ignores people when they talk to him, and repeats âHeâll come back. When the sun goes down, heâll come,â (128). Ralph, always the optimistic one on the topic of rescue, says to Piggy, âThereâs no help, Piggy. Nothing to be doneâ (128). Only when offered food and comforted by his friends does he perk up, and eventually Ralph becomes more reliant on Piggy the way he was on Jack. Although the closer friendship with Piggy helps Ralph, the dynamic has shifted. Piggy never becomes a true replacement for Jack, and Ralphâs feelings for Piggy remain platonic. More interesting still is Ralphâs excusing of Simonâs murder and Piggyâs stolen glasses.When the four boys go to Castle Rock in an attempt to recover the glasses, Ralphâs priority is on possibly talking it out rather than going by force. While fighting, he holds back for a time, and after Samnericâs capture, he still tries to appeal to Jackâs âbetter side,â despite its uselessness. âRalph cried out hopelessly against the black and green mask, âJack!ââ (179) It takes Piggyâs death and Jack stabbing Ralph with a spear for Ralph to finally realize there is no hope of bringing Jack back to the rational side. Though a logical person, Ralph is not immune to the effects of emotion blindsiding him, and his continued feelings toward Jack allow him to hold on to the idea Jack might be above killing him, even after the events of Castle Rock. Ralph never quite abandons his side of the âindefinable connection between himself and Jackâ (184). Like before, Ralph mostly appears confused over what he did to agitate Jack so greatly. He says to Samneric: âWhat have I done? I liked him-and I wanted us to be rescuedâ (188) after they tell him of Jackâs plan to hunt and kill. Jack and Ralph had a connection deeper than a mere power struggle or usual friendship, but their relationship follows the same downwards path as human nature throughout the novel.
Despite their potential, Jack and Ralphâs relationship falls apart due to a key part of human nature and the survival instinct. The factors composing the instinct include brutal selfishness which allows the person to eliminate any obstacle to survival. These obstacles include, but not limited to, pain, moral values, or even people and objects the survivor once considered valuable. The survival instinct served a critical role in destroying Jack and Ralphâs conceivable relationship. As displayed through his behavior and attitude, Jackâs instinct kicked in much earlier than Ralphâs. While Ralph manages to stay rational and calm for the majority of the time on the island, Jack falls prey to inner brutality and greed. Their ideas of what defines survival differ as well. Jackâs definition is being chief, ruling with complete power, and staying on the island. As a result of his power desire, Jack stops seeing Ralph as a person; instead, he views him as an opponent on his course to survival. From the point on, the survival instinct takes control and negates most attraction he has toward Ralph in favor of overthrowing the latterâs chiefship. Not all feeling vanishes immediately, as Jack doesnât try to eliminate Ralph despite given opportunities, such as the late night raid on Ralphâs camp and the fight at Castle Rock. But once Ralphâs resources are completely nullified, Jack sees his chance and goes in for the final kill, effectively ending any remaining sentiment he had for Ralph. Â Ralphâs definition of survival, on the other hand, is a cooperative relationship and rescue. His more rational outlook keep the more primal part of the survival instinct from factoring into his decision making, therefore harboring affection toward Jack for longer. He continues to see Jack as a reasonable person for the majority of the novel; however, the instinct finally takes effect in the last chapter and shreds most feelings to ribbons. After Ralph, on the run from the tribe, has lost everything, he stops seeing âthe savages,â as he calls his former tribe mates, as humans and does not hesitate to hurt them as they become his greatest survival obstacles (195). Interestingly enough, he continues to refer to Jack by name, and does not address him as âthe chiefâ as everyone else does, as if making one last effort to convince himself Jack is somehow still human. Only once the arrival of the naval ship guarantees Ralph safety does he stop calling him by name, instead identifying him as âa little boyâ (201). While it could be argued the rescue officially ends whatever last shreds of connection remain between Jack and Ralph, âboyâ is a distinctly human classification, signifying Ralph still sees Jack as human to some extent; therefore, the bond may not have completely died. Even so, distancing himself from Jack and never seeing him again once they return home would be the rational choice. Ralph has proved a logical thinker, and human and good are not synonymous. However, an experience such as the one they have both gone through leaves lasting scars, and it proves nearly impossible to imagine Ralph ever fully leaving behind Jack Merridew.
While the survival instinct is not inherently dark or light, it can tear apart or neutralize any potential compatibility, as previously discussed. From their initial meeting, Jack and Ralph created a connection plausibly crossing from friendship into a romantic relationship. Yet, once the survival instinct takes hold, the relationship swiftly deteriorates to a one-sided attachment and ends with next to nothing. The descending spiral between Jack and Ralph depicts the ramifications of a part of human nature and the disastrous result on personal relationships.
Ralmon but as shrucy because they reminded me of them idk