This is how Project Hail Mary went, right?
I hope you enjoy this silly video, and have an AWESOME day!
hello vonnie
AnasAbdin
will byers stan first human second
One Nice Bug Per Day
Cosmic Funnies
Sweet Seals For You, Always
art blog(derogatory)
Sade Olutola

Discoholic đȘ©
No title available
d e v o n
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

Product Placement
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

romaâ

@theartofmadeline
đȘŒ

JBB: An Artblog!
h

ç„æ„ / Permanent Vacation

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia
@steep-your-creativitea
This is how Project Hail Mary went, right?
I hope you enjoy this silly video, and have an AWESOME day!
No, there is no secret ending. Yes, the weird fourth wall breaking and Truman references are still intentional.
The point is, Mike Wheeler the storyteller is unhappy with his ending, and that's why he's a storyteller. He'd rather write fiction than live his reality. He is the narrator of this story, and always has been. He has little to no interiority because he's not supposed to be a character in this story. He's just there. Will and Jane are the main characters.
The show always used recurring door imagery and metaphor, and we are told quite explicitly which doors Jane, Mike, and Will chose in the end. Jane chose the first (death), Mike chose the second (acceptance of fate), and Will chose the third (escape).
Jane represents childhood magic apparently, and although I feel her character was done injustice, I can dig a character being tied to an allegorical concept. So really, that means Jane was an allegory in Mike's story. Perhaps representing childhood wonder, first loves, and innocence? Therefore her death signifies the loss of childhood, and even the death of love itself.
Mike imagines an ending where She (magic, wonder, love) lives on. She's free but she's also isolated. On her own like that, it's not so different to being kept in Mike's basement or Hopper's cabin. Mike must associate something very shameful to these concepts, otherwise he wouldn't constantly hide her away in his story, despite loving her so much.
Still, he wants to believe in this alternative ending where Jane, who is love, and innocence, and magic, lives on in relative peace. He implies that simply believing it can make it true. Will believes too. They share a meaningful look before being interrupted by an opened door, and it's their last ever interaction on-screen.
No, there is no secret ending. There are many endings, and it's just that we've only been shown one of them. The bittersweet one. Mike killed magic, first love, and childhood wonder. Then he gave Will the good ending. Mike thinks the good ending is having Will no longer love him, and sending him far away from him.
Finally, he chose the second door. This means he didn't write the ending he wanted, but the ending he felt he deserved. He will never tell the true story of the mage. As in, he will never clarify what Jane actually represented, and what her death truly meant to him.
something beautiful about how stranger things finale aired not three days ago and the number one trending tag is supernatural. you should all remember who runs this shitshow.
dick, early on in bludhaven: ugh, canât believe BRUCE is coming around to try and show me up in my own city. he thinks Iâm so incompetent but I can handle myself!! He better not make me look like a sidekick in front of my new rogues gallery or I swear to godâ
*superman one-hit KOs dickâs nemesis for him as a treat, instantly solving many of dickâs problems for the day*
dick: hee :)
going goblin mode about it
"nothing is real atoms never touch each other youve never touched anything in your life" ok. well when i pet my dog he is soft and when he licks my hand it is wet and that is far more real to me than whatevers going on at an atomic level
what my atoms are doing is their fucking business man i'm busy trying to stop my dog from eating tissues directly out of the box
nuclei don't touch, but the nucleus is not the core of reality. reality is made of electrons dancing. reality is made of bonds.
you pet your dog and the atoms that are you brush up against the atoms that are him, and the electrons that are you press into the electrons that are him, and both of them change their movement.
electrons of course are not really particles and do not really move.
you pet your dog and the electron-orbitals of your skin overlap with the electron-orbitals of his fur, and both are changed by the contact. you are not made of little motes floating alone in a void. you are a single unfathomable chord formed of a trillion vibrations, and so is he. and the note you play is changing at every moment by what you touch and how you breathe, and so is his. and atoms do not really have edges, and to touch is to interact, and when you put your hand on your dog the universe does not know that you are separate. the song expands to hold you both.
and when you put your hand on your dog the universe does not know that you are separate. the song expands to hold you both.
World Heritage Post
Even more MadMaid
So does this mean Nifty was/is an overlord!?!?
i'm personally a big fan of alastor, who frequently puts his hands all over people whenever he feels like it regardless of their opinion, loudly professing that he hates it when vox does the same. they are so hypocrite4hypocrite
So I noticed something very interesting about Vox and his victims.
Before killing:
1st victim:
After killing 1st victim:
2nd victim:
After killing 2nd victim:
Final victim:
Everytime Vox killed in his past he completly copied his victims behaviour, talent and even their style. And while he sabotaged some of them, he also manipulated the others to trust him. He pretended to admire them or help them out only to betray and murder them.
And we as the fandom lots of time pointed out how similar Vox behaved and dressed as Alastor:
So my guess is knowing how Vox behaved in life that Alastor might have been his perfect victim type. He already started to take on his style but unlike his other victims Alastor didnt fall for his tricks and saw right through him and he couldnt even hurt him.
Because of these he was never able to get over his obsession and switch to a new person.
I am not saying that in a first time ever Vox didnt genuinely wanted to be partners with Alastor or saw him as his equal but I also think his messed up serial killer brain might also has something to do with wanting to be with Alastor.
And if Alastor knows about Vox past and behaviour it is easy to see why he laughed at him and denied their partnership. He thought he will be Vox next victim. Used and discarded as nothing. He probably couldnt believe that Vox would try to manipulate him too.
Vox is REALLY DESPERATE for Alastor's approval
When Alastor insisted on Charlie to say "Vox is the strongest sinner in Hell",
that idiot TV head was just dumbfounded af
FACE OF A PATHETIC LOSER
sometimes i feel like people forget that pepper is just a nickname and her real name is virginia and the only reason tony gave the nickname to her was because she sprayed his security guard with pepper spray
hi i canât sleep
If you cant read any of it donât hesitate to ask for a translation I know my handwriting can be strange sometimes
Peter does the Hamilton trend but instead of Hamilton, he is dressed up as Tony Stark.
The video would start with Peter as Tony trying to get out of the window, andMJ with a red wig, and a business suit, shows up, you could easily tell she dressed up as Pepper potts
"Alexander come back to sleep," MJ dressed as Pepper said.
Peter made a face like he had been caught "I have an early meeting out of town"
"It's still dark outside" MJ said acting fed up.
"I know, i just need to write something dwon" Peter made a writing motion in the air
"Why do you write like you're running out of time"
"Shhhhhhhh" Peter put his index finger in front of his mouth, in shoshing manner.
"Come back to bed that would be enough," MJ said while pointing to the other direction
"I'll be back before you know I'm gone," Peter said putting on an awkward smile
"Come back to-" MJ didn't finish singing with song because Peter fell from the window and she rushed to the window trying to reach him.
The video ended after MJ picked up the phone.
Under the video Tony Stark is mentioned about five times, the video blows up of course, for one reason, because Tony Stark responds to it.
YouKnowWhoI'm: Kid what the fuck.
PbP&mj: sorry not sorry
"homestuck taught me lessons on how to deal with fandom" is maybe one of the most colossal euphemisms i have ever read in my entire life, it's like pointing to chernobyl and saying it gave you a very valuable lesson on the importance of workplace safety
Thinking. John has some incredibly strong characterization as a child, especially regarding his relationship with his father. This especially comes up in the assumptions Egbert tends to make about him. He's still at a point in his life where he doesn't quite understand his father as a human being, so everything about him is inexplicable.
Dad Egbert is just a plain, traditional man. He's a single father trying desperately to raise a child he does not know how to connect to in the slightest, and working an office job to support his two-person suburban family. But in John's head, he's this wild, zany character. Dad's like Superman, except instead of a superhuman alien disguising himself as an unassuming civilian reporter, it's a street performer disguising himself as the world's most White Father ever all the time. Never does John ask himself if that makes literally any sense because he's a Child. Child Brains Don't Make Sense.
I have to point out how much Dad Egbert is a force of Traditional Masculinity, though. There is, as well-meaning as Dad is, still a vague aura of oppression in the Egbert household just due to how intensely Dad embodies the role of a Patriarch. Every single scrap of text we see from or about Dad emphasizes Masculinity as a construct. Particularly, John's "necessary" evolution into Manhood is something that is repeatedly stressed in, like, every note Dad has left for John.
And... There's a lot of things one can say about John's feelings about Dad, particularly regarding the obvious intense frustration John feels about him.
Rose is a terrible source for literally like any information, especially information regarding her friends, but this frustration is tangible in the preceding text. This is a rare Rose Not-Bullshit Moment. The way John rejects his father - for example, for Dad baking John a lot of sweets on his birthday - does speak to some kind of pent-up frustration... As well as general Teenage Moodiness.
Those feelings have been a point of debate over the years, I've seen. A lot of the time, people tend to be asking why John seems to feel so negatively about Dad when he seems to be an alright guy. Usually the answer reached is either "John's just being petulant because he's 13" or "Dad Egbert is secretly super abusive", but like... Honestly, I think the intense gendering is exactly it. It's not necessarily that Dad's doing a terrible job at raising his son, it's that he doesn't recognize he's raising a daughter. And neither does she, but she still isn't happy about it, you know? That feeling of wrongness is still there. The hurt is felt, whether or not she knows why.