Hallo, 'especially physically disabled people with mobility aids' anon here
I think I worded that point a little awkwardly.
I wanted to emphasise accessibility for people with mobility aids and/or equipment (as well as non physical disabilities) because too many people/organisations/services/etc think that providing a 'sensory safe' place and stim toys is doing enough to provide accessibility
It's more difficult for them to provide access when it's a case of redesigning and rebuilding doorways, buildings, infrastructure, etc, to allow for wheelchair/mobility aid/etc access.
If they have to actually spend the money and put in the effort, if it's a pain in the ass to do it, they won't do it, but still pat themselves on the back for a sensory room that frequently doesn't accommodate all sensory disabilities anyway (a table of stim toys is nice, but it's not accessibility)
I was also thinking of access to green spaces. For some reason, people think 'of course you can't access a field in a wheelchair, so there's no point in complaining that it's inaccessible', when stiles, gates, bollards, narrow and intended footpaths, etc, are all choices that can be changed to improve accessibility for people with mobility aids.
Apologies, of course! This is important! People who don't design spaces to be inclusive for everyone are ableist!












