#callback

[theknucklehead]

Here's a callback I bet non of us expected to see in the new episode.

From the first teaser trailer for the Amazing Digital Circus.

[mndvx]

MICHAEL HSU ROSEN and JUSTIN H. MIN in CALLBACK (2026) — now streaming via the Sundance Shorts Pass written and directed by Matthew Puccini

[wolfnanaki]

Puss vs. Death, first vs. final fights.

[opbackgrounds]

Yup, this is definitely the chapter where Ace's parentage is revealed

[thereisnothingwrongwithlove]

“you always steal my stuff”

[overthetopdramalover]

ED, that was not a funny callback! please, stop poisoning my man, Robert Jacob Sugden, with carbon dioxide. One time was enough! Plus, he already had a hangover! Hasn’t the man been through enough? 😢😩🥺🙍🏼‍♂️

[sky--phantom]

Solas and regret

[vhen-harel]

What Post-Trespasser Stories Reveal About the Inquisitor

I recently finished reading Tevinter Nights and it struck me that these stories created a consistent portrayal of the Inquisitor - as if the writers were shaping a canonical vision of who the Inquisitor is.

In stories like The Dread Wolf Take You, Callback, Genitivi Dies in the End, and Murder by Death, and a bit of other extra media, there’s a consistent throughline in how the Inquisitor is described.

1. Still Leading, Still Impactful

In The Dread Wolf Take You, when Solas reveals himself to Charter, he doesn’t speak of the Inquisition as a disbanded or faceless group. He says: “When you report back to the Inquisitor… Say that I am sorry.” The wording is direct, and his voice falters as he says it. That moment reveals two things: the Inquisitor remains the point of contact and authority within the organization - and Solas still feels something personal toward them, suggesting the Inquisitor is someone who can still shake a 'god'.

In Genitivi Dies in the End, Charter continues to lead missions under the Inquisition’s banner. The story’s most sensitive discoveries - truths about the Evanuris and the Veil - are deemed too dangerous to publish. Instead, the information is sent “for the generals”, implying a still-functioning command structure with the Inquisitor at the top - suggesting continuity and trust in the Inquisitor’s judgment.

That trust extends to temporary alliances too. In Dark Fortress, Fenris joins a team of Inquisition agents in a mission to stop a red lyrium ritual that threatens Thedas. The Inquisition is a force where it can even bring in allies like Fenris, who historically has strong anti-mage and anti-authoritarian views, but still sees value in this cause.

In Murder by Death, Cassandra speaks on the Inquisitor’s behalf when ordering an agent to stop an assassination plot in Nevarra. She makes clear: “The Inquisitor does not wish to see that happen.” implying that the Inquisitor remains involved in major political decisions and is still regarded as a central authority by senior figures.

2. A Leader Worth Following

When Charter confronts Solas in The Dread Wolf Take You, she speaks as someone still acting on the Inquisitor’s moral example: “You told the Inquisitor that you were going to destroy this world. Did you expect us not to try to stop you?” Her conviction reflects loyalty to the Inquisitor’s judgment. That influence lingers and it extends beyond Charter. In Dragon Age: Absolution, we see agents still working in the Inquisition’s name - gathering allies, retrieving dangerous magical artifacts, and confronting threats linked to Solas’ broader network. In The Missing, Varric and Harding are personally tasked by the Inquisitor to pursue Solas through the Deep Roads and beyond. Their mission is about carrying forward a purpose they still believe in, even when the odds are against them. The fact that these field operatives continue to coordinate, recruit, and act with shared direction suggests they still recognize a leader worth following. This isn’t a scattered resistance - it’s the legacy of someone whose influence still holds them together. Varric's letters in Veilguard support this as well.

All of this - agents acting in the field, dangerous intelligence routed back to them, and political directives issued in their name - builds a consistent picture. The Inquisitor isn’t just a symbol of a bygone era. They are still trusted, still informed, and still pursuing Solas. And what they know - about the elven gods, the Veil, and Solas’ - goes far deeper than Veilguard alone suggests.

3. The Inquisition Was a Reflection of The People

In Callback, Sutherland and his companions return to a silent, corrupted Skyhold. The story pauses to reflect on the reach of the Inquisition that once called it home. The nobility feared the Inquisition’s size - “ten thousand” soldiers, assassins, diplomats, and freeblades loyal not to crowns, but to a cause. That kind of devotion is implied to be unsettling to a world built on lineage and borders. More horrifying to them still was the idea that all of it could be wielded by one person: the Inquisitor. They were called a “charismatic monster,” because the nobility feared them for how compelling, powerful, and persuasive they were.

But the same passage affirms that this 'feared' leader didn’t misuse their power. Instead, they unified Thedas to oppose a false god - and in doing so, gave people a purpose beyond politics. The memory of that moment, when the Inquisitor stood and with Thedas shouted “No!” as one against evil, remains so potent that Skyhold itself becomes a problem: too symbolic to destroy, too dangerous to leave untended.

And Sutherland’s company, are called in because they understand what Skyhold meant. They are described as “small enough to disappear” if things go wrong. And yet, they still go because they believed in what the Inquisition stood for, and in what the Inquisitor once gave them: purpose

4. They Were Good

This is perhaps the quietest consensus. These stories - by tone, memory, structure - don't seem to allow for an Inquisitor who was cruel or careless. No one speaks of them with bitterness or fear. The people who knew them speak with conviction, reverence, or quiet belief. Therefore the stories assume a certain kind of Inquisitor: decisive, compassionate, charismatic, inspiring and influential. They are the kind of leader whose agents are still willing to risk everything to stop Solas' destruction of the world.

Why would people continue to willingly follow a tyrant once the organization has been disbanded and their authority formally revoked? In Veilguard, Elgar’nan commands loyalty through fear, manipulation, and 'promises'. His followers are bound by illusion and threat. But the Inquisitor’s allies are different. They follow because they believe.

That kind of enduring loyalty reveals a leader character who is rooted in shared purpose, moral clarity, and integrity. The Inquisitor leads by example, not decree and their strength is revealed through these stories in that others are still following them, even when they’re no longer in power. It’s a quieter, steadier kind of authority, one that is still consistent in Veilguard - especially one that shines through in the atonement ending.

At least, that's my interpretation.