Domino's Pizza vs US president visits

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from China
seen from China

seen from France

seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from France
seen from Malaysia
seen from Italy
seen from Italy
Domino's Pizza vs US president visits
Maybe still being on tumblr is why Im not progressing
Nick Fuentes is like Morrissey:
-Big hair
-Irish heritage
-Connection to Italy
-Claims to be asexual, possibly more to the story
-Deeply impacted by a falling out with an eariler associate
-Racist
-Catty
-Loved by Mexicans
Finishing my wonderful food... Related to the last post đ€đ
âSomething Blueâ is like âTabula Rasaâ on a leash. In both cases Willow never intended to cause harm to her friends but in âSomething Blueâ the spell was meant to be for herself. In âTabula Rasaâ itâs meant for Buffy and Tara. Both are destructive spells that have dire consequences but one of them genuinely is a mistake in effort to quickly heal her heart, the other is a purposeful attempt to sweep issues under the rug.
However, what both episodes have in common is that both are a way of Willow avoiding addressing and dealing with her emotions. Both are using magic as a means to escape feeling her emotions. Both are a crutch to make up for what she feels she lacks in herself. And in that way - they are directly connected and show that Willowâs arc was always in character despite it not being made clear itâs true foundation. Where the addiction actually stems from and what kind of addiction it actually is. Itâs an emotional one.
Every time someone says that Willowâs magic addiction just came out of nowhere and was just a way to create drama between Willow and Tara and the Scoobies, I mention âSomething Blueâ. Because in both cases magic is used as drug to self-medicate and that self-medicating had second-hand smoke effects on everyone else. It was harmful for everyone. Whether it was intended to be or not doesnât matter. The fact is that Willowâs use of magic leaned more towards destructiveness than beneficialness and she excused it as âhelpingâ or âhealingâ when it was actually harming and hurting both herself and others.
Quick fixes and bandaids never help or heal anything. What they do is they make problems more difficult to solve or take longer to find solution. Willow needed to be told that her abuse of magic was dangerous for everyone involved - whether purposeful or accidental. And she is all throughout the show but the conversation always avoids the main point. Which is that using it to offset something internal - emotions/insecurities/anxieties - will only lead to both internal and external destruction because it is not addressing and dealing with them honestly, intimately and head on. It is avoiding and escaping them instead - thus making things much worse âinsideâ and âoutsideâ.
So if âSomething Blueâ is the start of Willowâs spiral into emotional addiction, then âTabula Rasaâ is the inevitable conclusion of it. Ignore the âmagicâ part. Thatâs not as relevant as the necessity to use itâs power to counteract Willowâs insecurities of being powerless or useless or valueless or worthless. She knew it was her best chance because itâs what sheâs best at. They could have done the same with her preference for hacking and technology engineering but they never do - instead they give Warren that arc. And itâs not lost on me the similarities between them as far as the need for accumulation of power goes. All they do is make it clear Warrenâs intentions are evil - he intends to control, he intends dominate, he intends to rape, he intends to murder. Willow never intends any of this - but it is exactly what she does anyway.
âTheyâre the bad guys - Iâm not the bad guy.â
Translation: âIt is justified for me to do it because I do not intend to do evil with it. They do.â
But Willow - you become like them anyway because you avoid the truth behind the actions. And the truth is that youâre the one in pain. Youâre the one thatâs sad. Youâre the one thatâs confused. Youâre the one that HAS THE PROBLEM. Not Buffy and Tara. And you know this is the truth, you just refuse to face it.
I will keep saying it: the only thing thatâs wrong with this character is that this character thinks and believes that thereâs something wrong with them. Itâs entirely an insecurity issue right from the beginning. And they mislead you into thinking that that is improved or fixed - when itâs only just covered up. This is the meaning of Willowâs nightmare in âRestlessâ. The hiding and disguising. The âcostumeâ she wears. The âcharacterâ she plays. The âpartâ she performs. Itâs all Willow. Thereâs no doubt about that. But at the same time - itâs a perception severely filtered by lies and an identity veiled in ego. Itâs not so much that sheâs pretending to be someone sheâs not because you canât pretend to be something youâre not aware of being. But it is an act. A performance. An obliviously and obsessively chronic and compulsive behaviour.
That is why Willow is such a profound character.
BIG 5 POST #2: HOW THE BIG 5 CORRELATES TO THE 4 GREEK TEMPERAMENTS
Here's some correlations I found a few months ago between the Big 5 and the 4 Greek Temperaments:
I then went through using the formula mentioned in the paragraph that says: Global 5 notation=temperament blend, and used it to create a quick correlation chart for all the 5 uppercase letter combinations. Here's what I came up with:
SLOAN-Choleric/Sanguine
SCOAN-Choleric/Phlegmatic
SLOAI-Sanguine/Choleric
SCOAI-Sanguine/Melancholy
SLUAN-Sanguine/Choleric or Sanguine/Phlegmatic
SCUAN-Sanguine/Phlegmatic
SLUAI-Sanguine Dominant
SCUAI-Sanguine/Phlegmatic
SLOEN-Choleric Dominant
SCOEN-Choleric/Melancholy
SLOEI-Choleric/Melancholy or Choleric/Sanguine
SCOEI-Choleric/Melancholy
SLUEN-Choleric/Sanguine
SCUEN-Choleric/Phlegmatic
SLUEI-Sanguine/Choleric
SCUEI-Sanguine/Melancholy
RLOAN-Phlegmatic/Choleric
RCOAN-Phlegmatic/Melancholy
RLOAI-Melancholy/Sanguine
RCOAI-Melancholy/Phlegmatic
RLUAN-Phlegmatic/Sanguine
RCUAN-Phlegmatic Dominant
RLUAI-Phlegmatic/Sanguine
RCUAI-Phlegmatic/Melancholy or Phlegmatic/Sanguine
RLOEN-Melancholy/Choleric
RCOEN-Melancholy/Choleric or Melancholy/Phlegmatic
RLOEI-Melancholy/Choleric
RCOEI-Melancholy Dominant
RLUEN-Phlegmatic/Choleric
RCUEN-Phlegmatic/Melancholy
RLUEI-Melancholy/Sanguine
RCUEI-Melancholy/Phlegmatic
I hope this is helpful to you