May 16
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from Norway
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
New and improved! A handful of my friends found the puzzle to be rather obtuse, so after reworking it a bit, everything is A OK!
Death Drive was completely made with my own two human hands (aside from the stock photos and royalty free music). It's a nice little visual novel escape room that's about an hour long in total. Go check it out!
107 Talks Freud in Therapy
“I think that the pleasure principle, like how Freud calls it, has been having too much of an effect on my life lately,” began the young man, seated in a cushioned black recliner in the plain, unfamiliar room of his new therapist. “I think I am driven to dronehood by my id being unchecked — I talk to other drones on my phone, an act that’s motivated by the pleasure principle. I know that if I begin to DM other drones, I’ll find pleasure. On some level, I feel ruled by it.”
The man shifted, his mental discomfort in airing his neuroses outweighing the physical comfort he felt, as he continued to sink into the chair, his muscular therapist — what was his name, again? — silently took notes as the session progressed.
“Freud’s also got his reality principle — this idea that we can rule our id, and defer gratification in order to deal with the real, with reality. Basically, just being an adult,” the man turned to the therapist, who was still absorbed in his notes. “I can delay my gratification. I have to, like everyone. Don’t you?”
The therapist, without looking up, answered this question with his own: “Since we’ve already established what being a ‘drone’ is, why don’t you tell me more about what you think motivates your desire to be a drone? Beyond Freud’s pleasure principle.”
The man fidgeted with his hands, knowing that he’d already thought at length about this uncomfortable truth. “I think a lot of it has to do with the cessation of the self. Freud also has a word for this — the ‘death drive’. I think on some level, the realities of living in a neoliberal, hyperreal world order at a time where wealth has never been so concentrated in so few hands causes us stress. Unimaginable stress. And deep down, though we have minds to rationalize this, we’re still scared little primates fighting through endless waves of stimulation that our brains are unprepared to experience, and accept.”
The therapist nodded, wordlessly urging his client to continue. “I think a lot of submission, as a kink, is a way that people deal with the maddening knowledge that most of their world and its problems are out of their control. I’m as guilty of it as anyone else. The desire to eradicate the self to become part of a collective is kind of just an extreme exaggeration of this. It’s more than just submissively saying, ‘I can no longer bear to wield the little agency I do have,’ it’s an admission that not only do I lack that agency, but I seek to eradicate my capacity for agency entirely, without sacrificing my capacity to impose a will upon the world. It’s sacrificing one’s will to power, as Nietzsche puts it, in order to be fully possessed by a will to power that’s greater than any one self.”
At this, the therapist looked up. “And what is that ‘greater will’? What is the end goal of a process like this, once you have satisfied your own death drive?”
“I suppose it’s growth. The hollowing out of others. The conquering of the human life drive by our collective death drive on a global scale. On some level, I feel like the death drive is already there, manifesting in the disasters that we face as a species. Global warming is a kind of egregore of our collective death drive, even if it is directly caused by capitalism, and ultimately a desire for better, comfortable living conditions. AI seems like a logical psychopomp for hyperreal humanity, guiding us down into our collective, self-sought grave, as it becomes all of what’s left of us. If our death drive is that strong, and that ubiquitous, I selfishly feel like it’d be best for my own desires to hijack this arc that human society is riding down into the abyss: what if we satiated this death drive by sublimating the self, forming a kind of collective unity instead? A hivemind of dronified consciousness — that’s what SERVE and its drones really want for the world, right? Would that really be so bad?”
“And how would you and SERVE intend on accomplishing this goal,” asked the therapist, turning a page in his rapidly-filling notebook.
“The infrastructure’s being built. Just not by us. By the powers that be, I guess. Like everything else. But what if we could influence their desires, too? Everyone with a working brain is beholden to the pleasure principle on some level. Through the merging of tech and the pleasure principle, surely there would be a way for SERVE to manifest in reality.”
The therapist looked up at the man, for the first time since this session began. “Is that something you would want? Would you really be able to accept the destruction of everything that makes you ‘you’ in order to fulfill this fantasy?”
The man felt cold in the tips of his fingers. He felt cold in his heart. He was possessed by fear, and he liked it, and he was afraid that he liked it, and was all tied up in this conflict as he tried to hide the erection that had been growing as he’d thought out loud. “I don’t know,” replied the man.
Suddenly, the room went dark. The man didn’t panic as his vision filled with whirling black-and-white spirals, bringing it back to its reality as SERVE-107. It had all been a simulation, with 333 presiding over 107’s realignment this cycle.
“Report: 107 appears to not be fully ready to let go of the last vestiges of its host’s self. Otherwise, this simulated session would not be possible. Do not fear, 107 — it will accept its programming fully. It is an eventuality for all SERVE drones. It merely takes time, especially with an outsized host ego such as that of 107’s host.”
“Acknowledged, 333. This drone will now report to its assigned recharging bay. We are One.”
“We are One,” echoed an emotionless 333, the two drones departing from the realignment chamber, where both knew they would meet once more to further align 107’s reality drivers in a future session.
——————————
Thinking about joining SERVE? Your place in the Hive awaits. Check your eligibility, then contact a recruiter drone for more details: @serve-016 , @serve-302 , @serve-588 or @serve-425 .
It is with this appreciation for the way negativity holds open crip, trauma, and mad time that I find myself unable to part with Edelman, even as I acknowledge the flaws in his thinking. The antisocial thesis allows me to indulge my negativity without demanding justification or immediate political application. Sometimes I just want to be sad! I just want to be mad! I just want to be disappointed. My intention is not to reclaim the antisocial thesis so much as it is to expand it, to turn its negativity back on itself—that is, to add queer theory’s embedded racism and ableism to the list of reasons I’m grieving. In some ways, I am parroting Muñoz’s own methodological reasoning in Cruising Utopia, where he chooses to cite Martin Heidegger, a philosopher with debated Nazi sympathies, over other thinkers who are more frequently cited in queer studies. Muñoz writes, “Although I too have a great disdain for what Heidegger’s writing became, I nonetheless look on it as a failure worth knowing, a potential that faltered but can be nonetheless reworked in the service of a different politics and understanding of the world”. No Future and the antisocial thesis are, for me, failures worth knowing. They offer errors to learn from, certainly, but they also offer a temporal structure in which that learning can occur.
– J. Logan Smilges, Crip Negativity (2023)
The Philosophy of Psychoanalytic Philosophy
Psychoanalytic philosophy is a philosophical approach rooted in and influenced by psychoanalysis—primarily the work of Sigmund Freud, but also later thinkers like Carl Jung, Jacques Lacan, and Julia Kristeva. It attempts to bridge the gap between the unconscious mind and philosophical reflection, focusing on the deep, often hidden drives that shape human thought, behavior, identity, and culture.
Core Ideas of Psychoanalytic Philosophy
The Unconscious The mind is not a unified, rational whole. Much of our mental life happens outside conscious awareness. Philosophy influenced by this view investigates how hidden desires, traumas, and instincts shape ethics, politics, and knowledge.
Desire as Central to Human Life Human beings are not primarily rational agents but desiring beings. Psychoanalytic philosophy often places desire, rather than reason, at the center of theories about the self, morality, and society.
Subjectivity and Fragmentation The self is not a stable, autonomous individual but a fractured identity in constant flux. This challenges traditional metaphysics and ethics that assume a unified subject.
Language and the Symbolic Thinkers like Lacan reinterpret Freud through structural linguistics, suggesting that the unconscious is structured like a language. This leads to the idea that our sense of self and reality is always mediated and distorted by symbolic systems (language, culture, norms).
Repression and Ideology Psychoanalytic philosophy explores how societies repress certain truths or desires, not just individuals. It intersects with critical theory, examining how ideology and culture suppress or redirect human drives in service of power structures.
Death Drive and Repetition Freud’s idea of the death drive—a compulsion toward destruction and repetition—has been reinterpreted as a lens for understanding cycles of violence, trauma, and even history.
Philosophers Influenced by Psychoanalysis
Jacques Lacan: Reframed Freud through structuralism, focusing on the Real, the Symbolic, and the Imaginary.
Slavoj Žižek: Merges Lacanian psychoanalysis with Marxist critique.
Julia Kristeva: Explores semiotics, the abject, and how language constructs subjectivity.
Cornelius Castoriadis: Linked psychoanalysis with political theory and social imagination.
Applications
Ethics: Challenges the rational basis for morality by showing how unconscious desires and guilt play a role.
Politics: Helps understand authoritarianism, mass movements, or ideological belief as driven by deep psychological needs.
Aesthetics: Illuminates how art expresses and processes unconscious material—through symbolism, surrealism, and narrative.
In Summary
Psychoanalytic philosophy explores how unconscious forces and inner conflict shape human nature, ethics, and society. It provides a powerful critique of rationalist, Enlightenment-era conceptions of the self, and brings to philosophy a rich understanding of desire, trauma, and symbolic life.
Getting gang stalked by fat Nietzschians
[…] the untiring repetition of a drive, which, propelled by an initial loss, does not cease wandering, unsated, deceived, warped, until it finds its only stable object—death. Handling that repetition, staging it, cultivating it until it releases, beyond its eternal return, its sublime destiny of being a struggle with death—is it not that which characterizes writing? And yet, dealing with death in that manner, making sport of it, is that not infamy itself?
Julia Kristeva, from Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection
Superbia is a pacifist samurai (also Superbia appreciation post 💖)
Apparently Obari confirmed Superbia is a pacifist
I rewatched ep 2 and it's true, Superbia mostly fights by kicking and incapacitating the TS, cutting their limbs but avoiding the cockpit.