In a recent post I mentioned how eclecticism can easily lead to unrestrained personalization. This causes things to get added to a practice but get stripped down, misunderstood, out of context, or culturally appropriated because "my intentions" and "its incredibly personal."
We have to avoid grabbing onto The Thing because its shiny and cool and we want it. Instead we should think deeply about them before adding it into our practices.
But it's not just self identified "eclectic pagans" and "eclectic polytheists", everyone can be prone to those mishaps. As someone with a mixed practice of 2 pantheons and an entirely separate practice I'm eclectic in some sense of the word.
But I was thinking how do we avoid that stripping down effect? What is "thinking deeply"? Because thats rather vague.
The W questions. The W questions are so ridiculously helpful. And they can seem like really simple one sentence answers, but that doesn't have to be the case. Here is an example.
Well attested 800BCE onwards. Archaic Greece, Classical Greece, Hellenistic, Roman Empire
Potentially origins "respectively, match Apollo’s association with the bow and arrow and with plagues in the Iliad. Regardless of his particular ancestry, it is likely that there was a widespread cult in the Bronze Age Eastern Mediterranean of a god known to the Greeks by the Luwian-derived epithet “Apollo.” link
In this question each of the time lines can then be looked into further.
Greece, eventually spread into Ancient Near East during Hellenistic era, and throughout Roman Empire (at some point). Each of these can be looked into more.
List major cult centers ex Delphi. You can draw up a long list of cult centers and work on studying each of them.
Deity, Theoi, God, Divine
Apollo. Twin of Artemis. Son of Leto and Zeus. Father of (lots of people). Can explore his various connections to all the other beings in Greek cosmologies.
This can also include a lot of his mythology since that is who he is as a 'character'
Or look up his possible "equivalents" and syncretisms
Apaliunas in Hittite Wilusa (possibly). Nabû in Mesopotamia, Apulu in Etruscan Religion. Apollo-Helios, Apollo-Hermes, .... apparently "Apollo-Mithras-Helios-Hermes" in the ancient Greco-Iranian Kingdom Commagene in Anatolia Link
Music, Art, Healing, Plague, Oracle, Divination, Archery, Hunting, and so on
Could also add epithets and look into each of those (although that could also be under who).
What were his cults like? what offerings were given? and then those answers could be different for all the different cults or time periods we mentioned in previous questions.
And this is where things get intense.
Why did the ancient people of the time periods researched above worship him? Why did the ancient people of all the locations researched above worship him? Why did they pray, what were they seeking?
and then the scariest question of all
Why do I want to worship him, pray to him, give offerings?
Each of these questions could be multiple essays individually, and then the area of knowledge only gets larger as you add all the info from all of those essays together and look at it as a complete picture. This can be for gods or spirits, but also concepts and practices. Not all 5 questions will make sense to answer but chuck the questions at it anyways and see what happens. I'm not saying you have to legitimately write the essays, just that this is the way you can think things through.
Make what you add to your practice a bit of a quiz or a puzzle to be figured out, so you can learn its nooks and crannies, it can even help avoid overlooking things because you simply "didn't think about it" because all these questions can be domino effect in research exploration and lead to things you didn't expect.
(Anyways this was a random thought)