#jeff winter

[truth-is-relative]

Jeff being completely oblivious to Abed's level of autism in the pilot is so- like you texted that kid from an unknown number a weird message like that and you thought "he will completely understand the nuance of this situation". YOU FOOL. YOU ABSOLUTE IMBECILE.

[dearemma]

Jeff and Annie kisses in the perfect timeline

[thetwiceexceptional]

Chidi: What's wrong?

Eleanor: I have this weird pain right above my eyebrow.

Chidi: It's called a stress headache. I got my first one when I was four.

Eleanor: I hate it!

Chidi: Well get used to it! You're knee-deep in it now. This is philosophy!

[run-middle-aged-dude-run]

Referee selection process to weed out personalities

Referee selection process to weed out personalities #referee #premleague

Owen Gibson, The Guardian:

But a more professional process involving sports psychologists, in-depth interviews and appreciation of the extent to which referees are considered to be “team players” will form an increasingly important part of the process.

I…

View Post

[thesubstitution-blog]

I wrote to Jeff Winter

You can do that, you know. The same Jeff Winter who has told anyone who can be bothered to listen that Mark Clattenburg won't referee a Premier League match again if he is found guilty of having racially abused a player at Stamford Bridge last Sunday. The same Jeff Winter who wrote the following on his blog in 2011: 'Celtic are top of the league! Now the football implications are obvious, but what does it mean for the altar boys? Do they get abused in celebration? Would it gave [sic] been worse in the anger of defeat? Or would they just get abused anyway?'

Yes, I wrote to him to ask him what he thought of the Clattenburg allegations, just because I could. The response was almost immediate, and as similar to everything else you've been reading as you might expect.

There seems to be a common denominator with Chelsea and referees. Supporters have long memories and can be vicious in their condemnation of individuals. Referees are always remembered for specific incidents: Poll, Alcock, D'Urso, Wiley are a few that spring to mind.

Some will always say "No smoke without fire"; conversely many people are suggesting this is a stitch up and sour grapes following the defeat. I am amazed that if words were used on the field of play that there wasn't a reaction there and then. I just hope that the matter can be resolved quickly with no doubt left then perhaps there is a chance that Mark can get back to refereeing. I have my doubts, though, that this will be resolved in that manner.

I am certain that the referee won't be treated like Suarez or Terry should he be found guilty – no second chances for him!!!

Best wishes,

Jeff.

"Thanks Jeff," I didn't reply. You can call this an exclusive if you want, but it's really just the same few sentences you've read before written differently. So an exclusive, then.

I wrote to Jeff again to ask him what he thinks makes him qualified to offer his views on the matter given his questionable decency. He replied, almost instantly: 'Others think I am.'

– Max Grieve. Write to Jeff Winter by clicking here. 

[temporarylee]

"Winging It"

Mom: What's that talk show with Jeff Winger called?