striae the people want to know 🎤 your hope and enjoyment is so high. how do u do it
are you the same microphone anon that sent me an ask a few months ago? i think you're very cute and sweet, and also sincere, so i have a very sincere response for you!!! i took your question very seriously and i've been thinking about it kind of non-stop since you sent it in a few days ago, bc leading up to, during, and then after, the australian gp, i've actually been rage-baited sooo easily and you've given me a way to flip that around and make it positive.
at first i drafted a mini-essay breaking down the new regulations on a technical level, explaining my feelings about the different systems, but then i thought that probably wasn't what you meant. i've seen truly egregious misinformation spread on here but a bitchy "you're all wrong this is what the car is really doing" screed isn't the way to counter that. truly it was so bad my gdoc draft was literally titled "STRIAE SCREED".
then, second attempt: me trying to articulate how i've been actively watching formula one seasons starting in 2016, and on the offseasons went back on f1tv and watched every season lewis' raced in + have gone down every list of 'historically important' seasons and watched the ones available on the archive, and how i only joined the fandom/rpf side of f1 six months ago. i tried to contrast these experiences and means of engagement by inventing the concepts 'fandom brain' vs 'sporting brain' and compared them... this went so badly the gdoc got renamed "CONDESCENDING STRIAE SCREED".
my third try at answering the very basic question "how are you hopeful and excited for race weekends" i sort of mixed these concepts and asked my battle-hardened 'bad faith high sensitivity k-pop twitter poster' friend to do like? an rpf sensitivity read for me, like, if i say this do you think people will like it or would it go over poorly?, and my friend told me absolutely not to post 💀🥀
so, i'm probably overthinking it. in the probable spirit of your question, here's me just writing what i think in a casual way. you're apparently very good at asking me things that trigger long answers!
don't hit "read more" on the dash; this is a couple thousands of words 🌻💛
WHAT RPF TRAINS YOUR BRAIN TO DO
part of what bogged me down before were granular observations about what mindset rpf instills, and how incompatible the resulting 'rpf framework' is for making meaning out of, not just sports in general but, formula one racing specifically.
everyone already knows real life isn't fiction but it's easy not to notice that engaging with real life if it were fiction, that intentional double-think we all do ("this didn't happen, but if it did happen, i think it would be interesting if it went like this"), guides how we interpret a LOT of the driver's actions, not just literal fanfic. and that way, this perspective becomes not intentional double-think, but a narrative that is so community-reinforced that it is treated like fact.
it's easy to forget that widely-accepted fandom interpretations, like those of max's reasons behind engaging with the rookies and charles' opinion about ferrari, are also fandom speculation. oftentimes it's really blurry between invention and fact but the distinction is important! other drivers from the era and max himself have talked about how the grid didn't embrace max with open arms &largely gave him the cold shoulder when he first joined. the infamous 'max had to carry his own sim case' story is credibly true. the additional step to say that specifically because of his bad experience max 'adopted the rookies' is speculation. 'adopted the rookies' is a very specific story with a lot of underlying ideas you have to accept to make it work, but because that sim case story is true, the rookie adoption idea built over it also feels true.
when these stories are told back and forth to each other and treated as commonly-held foundational assumptions that we all have, it's really really easy to ground your enjoyment in these narratives instead of the original scenarios that generated those narratives.
do you follow me on the difference here? one is interpreting a primary source in an intentionally fictitious way, and one is taking a secondary source absolutely at face value.
i really mean this playfully hahaaha but my biggest gripe with my dashboard these last two months has been basically this tweet:
blowjob brothers = preexisting narrative that i personally like/story-based framework of interpretation that keeps my worldview in tact despite the presence of challenging new information.
i don't think anybody is thinking this way consciously. i think this kind of mindset really creeps up on you over time. the two sides of rpf's coin are "we all know this is made up and we're agreeing to pretend otherwise" and "our made up thing is exciting because look at these real things that support the made up one". because most of the time we're putting rpf goggles on and off consciously, widely-accepted fandom speculation that seems to be true can really pass by unchallenged. and those widely-accepted speculations are obviously based on observable reality, too, so the line gets thin and it's easy to conflate!
okay, so, why is my enjoyment so high? i'm not doing this! i think most of the people who i've seen getting really really worked up and upset are, and it's become kind of a baseline expectation in terms of fan mindset.
FAN MINDSET
when i first started to watch formula one in 2016 i was fifteen years old (age reveal btw). and it's infamous how old max was... i liked being close in age. also infamously, and usefully to me, it was his first year in the sport--i immediately latched onto him because i'm the kind of person that likes to know every detail of the topics i'm interested in, and max was great because i didn't need to immediately know a ton of history and ex-teammates and lore and whatever. i was new and he was new too. day one!
the reason i'm saying this is to shamelessly farm verstappie credibility 😀 guyssss take me seriouslyyyyy you have to take me seriously and you can't say i'm not a real fannnn 😀
but, according to every standard of what 'a real fan' does, i am fake as fuck. i've noticed a sort of unspoken set of expectations for what supporting a driver as an rpf-fan means, and they're very different from what i personally believe drives my interest in max. the divergence is very steep and again i think definitely a huge cause of why i am happy and most people are not.
as i said before, our wonderful f1 rpf communities analyze various race happenings, results and track-action and gpda action or lack of action, and driver travel updates/instagram interactions/team-mandated marketing material--f1 media 'content' as well as irl interactions--all from the perspective of narrative. very importantly then, the community's ways of collectively making meaning is organized on concepts that are narratively satisfying.
some of these concepts are:
continuity ('omg XYZ is just like ABC from years ago'; 'driver one mentions driver three over and over and over again')
predictability (on thursday thinking 'oh i'm certain max is going to make a 69 joke after he wins' and then the enjoyment on sunday after he does; having a theory two drivers will talk with each other during the parade and then it being exciting when they do)
storyline payoff ('all season mclaren hasn't been willing to name a number-one driver and there's all these papaya rules incidents, when will they resolve that definitively? how will it end?').
so, pause right there, people who have unconsciously primed their brains to highly value these concepts (that they obviously didn't get to see in australia and that the current state of the new regulations are by their nature preventing)--these people are frustrated and upset.
really though: f1 is even more subject to unpredictable outside force than other, non-automotive, sports. a long-jumper just has to deal with herself and the sandpit (i presume!??!), f1 drivers can't turn around without tripping over some new obstacle between them and self-determination.
did your team make you a fast car? do you know how to drive that car? are all the components on the car working today? some guy you've never met collected the sim data your mechanics are relying on to make the setups, are the mechanics doing it right and was the sim guy reliable? was your teammate honest when you swapped information earlier? what's the weather like, what track is this, what compound of tyre did pirelli make available? the strategy your team came up with, is it good? should you listen to it? should you listen to your race engineer?
and you can always be crashed out of the first corner by somebody else. fourty-second pit stops can never be ruled out. your engine can randomly fail. lightning can strike in the same place over and over and over.
in response to this i've seen a high percentage of fans decide that it is therefore the job of fans to be the unchanging bulwark. like, unconditional support. if your driver flops and you agree that it was his fault, you're disloyal and not a real fan. if another driver overtakes your driver and you admired anything about that manoeuvre, you're not a real fan. if you feel that someone who also supports your driver is going a little Blowjob Brothers you cannot express that because not only are you not a fan but you also don't even 'know the basics' of your driver. dropping the coyness here, if you disagree with max about the regulations, you're definitelyyyy not a real max fan.
and if you're so devoted to a driver that nothing can shake your faith and your perception of them is built on stories instead of based on the real life that generates those stories... you don't really need to watch races. you can be so locked-in on the fandom element of things that the racing side becomes sort of irrelevant, because if your driver does well it's because he's a good person and amazing but if he loses it's because the other teams have illegal cars driven by evil men and nobody could be expected to have done better.
i really have to disclaim that i personally hate this attitude so much and i can't be objective about it hahaahah. all last year i saw people stuck in the cycle of "max qualified badly, that fucking mclaren needs to be investigated, i'm not even going to watch tomorrow, we're dead, it's over" and then after the race "i knew he could pull off a recovery drive, i never doubted, he really is the greatest". it shows a lack of long-term memory and most of all it shows a lack of belief in max. max is the greatest in the world beyond every doubt but there's no way he can win against this other guy who we all agree is terrible, the worst? it's ego-protecting. if he wins it's because he's amazing and if he loses it's because he's unlucky and the other guy cheated. i don't understand how you can go through that high-low-high-low hamster wheel week after week and still be having a good time. &i think people stuck there are not having a good time! lol
relatedly, fans are expected to accept negative narratives about other drivers, because formula one is a competition and so pushing another driver down is a way to pull your driver up. i want to be absolutely clear that i'm talking about rpf-fandom space and not sporting space right now, okay, because as a sport obviously you love your guy more than any other guy and your team more than any other team, and fuck the rest, because that's the damn point of competition and that antagonistic mindset is built-in to the idea of sport. rpf is not sporting space though!
in rpf communities, instead of your guy being a 'driver that i support in competition' it's generally understood that we're all engaging on the level of your guy being 'the reality-bent blorbified driver i like thinking about most'. agreeing 'lando got a lot of points last year because his car was good' is a totally fair opinion to have and one that's plausibly grounded in real racing. but, 'car merchant lando inherently sucks and can't drive' is a negative narrative max fans are expected to embrace or else they're betraying max. and, sorry, but it's not grounded in reality; aside from zillionaire paid drivers with political connections like mazepin, drivers who make it to the f1 grid are actually good at their jobs. the team principals are too ruthless and flush with other options to accept mediocrity; there's too much money involved to sign a contract with a driver that is Inherently Bad Really Stupid Only Wins Because Of Luck.
likeeee me posting a gifset of lando after winning the wdc resulted in a furious anon asking me how it was possible to be so tone deaf hadn't i been cheering for max &i actually wasted time feeling apologetic and bad and wrote/deleted many variations on this:
tldr--watching sports as sports embraces the competitive mindset of 'us or them, fuck em all, put the boot on their neck' and i love this and partake in it enthusiastically. posting about rpf guys who play sports using an 'us or them, fuck em all, put the book on their neck' mindset, and doing under the false perception everyone around you has the same underlying beliefs, causes friction. of course we should all feel free to do this because it's fun as fuck but can't we at least tag it...
pulling the ideas of this section together, i'm happy and excited because i do actually like watching max verstappen drive racecars and i trust him to do it well 💀💀💀💀 because i have that 'long term' view on the season, grounded in the years of results i've watched him achieve, it doesn't feel threatening to me when he has a bad quali. it doesn't cost me anything to notice and enjoy when non-max drivers are having interesting races. merc looks quick this week? i genuinely think max is a better driver than george, so i'm anticipatory, not afraid.
this all means i didn't have that hatred of the blorbo version of lando most verstappies seemed to adopt last year &which, also, caused a lot of upset and cynicism, so when real-life-actual lando won the wdc it fucking pissed me off and broke my heart obviously but i was dealing with that grief using sportsfan tools--it didn't feel like my favourite character from my favourite fictional television show was fucked over by the writers and might be killed off soon. my enjoyment in the sport is grounded in the sport, not in the narrative of 'i want to watch my driver win everything all the time'. i do, obviously, want max to win everything all the time, but i watched it play out in 2023 with tremendous enjoyment and now i'm ready to see different sides of his driving.
WAIT WHAT DO YOU MEAN MIGHT BE KILLED OFF SOON
i think there's a subconscious fear among my fellow verstappies that if max doesn't like the new regulations he will retire. therefore every complaint he makes and every time he references his displeasure, it feels like an extremely high-stakes threat.
personally i think he's going to retire when he's ready, no matter what the regulations are (my bet is when his current contract runs out) and taking on the high-level fear of max's f1 career ending, having that in mind whenever max complains (which is constantly, and has been constantly for years), changes nothing. but it will make you feel extremely bad on a regular basis.
COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE NEW REGULATIONS
when the drivers get on mic and say that the new cars feel awful to drive, they're confusing and unintuitive, being forced to go slower than they're used to is frustrating, and they hate the new direction, my response is: totally fair.
when i see posts from fans written after (&many before!) literally one gp saying they hate the new regs and they hate this style of racing, i am dismissive and i don't have sympathy for it. i'm sorry. i know this is controversial. but i don't. i've seen so much misinformation and accounts passing on descriptions of things that were phased out before the cars even hit track, using old terminology, equating new systems to old systems when they don't really map--this is the bitchiest thing i have to say in this already bitchy post, but i'm sorry, i do not think the average f1-rpf tumblr user understands how the cars work and it's been driving me crazy to read how confidently wrong some posts are, and how smug the resulting conclusions they're drawing out of thin air are.
formula one engineering is so fucking insane complicated. i don't think the average f1-rpf tumblr user NEEDS to understand how the cars work, and i think it would be deeply deeply unreasonable of me to expect them to. legit, you don't have to know how the damn engine works to enjoy the racing.
buttttt i suspect that because talking about the technicalities of the regs and getting into the systems and talking about the battery charge and the energy starvation issues--i think that using that framework of critique makes people feel 'more legitimate' than saying, i don't like that max's engine broke because i would've preferred it if he won the race. and why? that second sentence isn't embarrassing! it's actually more informed than the other option, because one race in is absolutely too early to make any sweeping judgments about "this style of racing", there literally isn't enough information.
i've seen people get shouted down and called stupid for defending the new regs and for saying they're optimistic, because being cynical is always seen as a 'more powerful' position. hope is naive, right? but disbelief makes you look cool and then if it goes bad you can say i told you so. the only possible reason for not doom-posting is that you're stupid and you don't know wheel. well lol i strongly disagree.
the reason i made a distinction between drivers complaints and fans complaints is because the drivers are the ones in the cars doing the inputs. the experience of driving the car has changed utterly, some pundits saying (not baselessly!) it's been the biggest regulation change in the history of the sport. the philosophy of what makes a good lap is totally different, the places that seem like good overtaking zones are different, how you need to defend your position has changed--it's so so so much.
here's a really really brief overview of what i think is the single most essential 'new regulations' change. i'm ripping the next two paragraphs nearly word-for-word from chainbear's video on youtube that i truly recommend everyone confused about the regs watch.
in 2025 the electrical/battery powered part of the engine (mguk) delivered 14% of the car's energy. in 2026, electric provides 47%. if you're going at full power, the battery is completely depleted in 24 seconds. plainly, in less than half a minute you can lose half of the energy available to your car.
this means that the new cars are energy-starved all the time. they're lifting and coasting all the time. they're very miserly with when they use various systems that are meant to aid overtakes, because those systems require energy that the cars just don't have. this is why they're not fun to drive and why they're considered against the spirit of formula one. last reg cycle, not as big a deal to run out of battery because you've still got 86% of your max power, 630kW. you're still able to go flat out. this year, battery empty, major impact on your race. the car only has 400kW and you're slow as fuck now, and if someone comes to overtake, it's way harder to defend.
@landonorissian transcribed a super great interview lando gave to espn just today that explains from the driver's perspective why this is hard to get used to, and why it sucks so bad (i preserved landonorissian's bolding for emphasis).
"It's gone from just seeing how you can optimise every single millisecond out of the car itself and purely from a driver, car — forget about the engine because that was always pretty good for everyone, let's say. It was just who can get the most out of the car on that given day. That was it [...] I think for the first time in our lives basically it's forget everything you've learned in F4, F3, F2 and drive it in a completely different way. The thing is the driver can still make a big impact and can certainly have a big impact on driving the power unit in the correct way."
to really really really simplify max's core complaints with the new regulations, it's that he's missing having access to that 'uncomplicated' energy that used to be provided by the internal combustion engine (the 86% i mentioned above), and he finds the power starvation beyond annoying, the resultant recharge demands fiddly and unfun and against the spirit of formula one.
i believe him! i think that makes a lot of sense! appeals to 'the spirit of formula one' i do find sympathetic because they're thoughts i have too! f1 has been previously characterized entirely by topspeed. the purity of going as fast as you can = what i think people mean when they say 'pinnacle of motorsport'. everything you did in the car was ultimately in service of reaching topspeed as fast as possible in the most controlled way and then maintaining that over the lap. this was part of the engineering challenge!! designing the fastest car.
here's a real crashout i texted to dear friend of the show @devantesmithpelly that i'll just copy/paste because i can't say it better than this even though i have really really really tried to over the last few days:
i got so annoyed &in trying to explain i ended up defending the new regulations a lot and like, im not super positive on them actually!!! part of why im sympathetic to the argument on the regulations not being 'in the spirit of f1' are because i kinda feel the same; if formula one isnt about going as fast as possible but instead becomes about systems management and consistency, there isn't a different motorsport series to take over that niche. but if you like systems management and consistency.... watch formula e, like not being sarcastic, actually do, thats what its built around!!! and f2, right below, bc there's not the engineering part: like again its just theres nothing like f1 and id be upset if it went away bc i watch it, bc i like it. howeverrr every single time the regs change the season immediately starting the new era has taken a hit to speed, the engines have blown up, the 'character of the sport' has changed. like people fucking hated drs bc it was seen as a "press to immediately easily overtake while the guy in front cant defend" cheater button!!!!
so, that last paragraph is my transition into saying "i believe the new regs aren't fun to drive, and i understand totally why the grid is united in hating them AND why the drivers feel like the direction of the sport is changing. but i am not a driver!! lowkey the fuck i care what's fun to pilot??" I care what's fun to watch and a lot of the changes are invisible from the outside!!
this thought is the culmination of the other sections: i think people are really reluctant to disagree with things other fans say about the technical stuff because they don't want to be called stupid, i think people are very primed to agree with max largely uncritically because they feel aligned with his interests as an rpf figure instead of considering their own best interests as fans of a sport, i think there's a weird unacknowledged lack of trust in max's ability to adapt and succeed (when him learning and hunting people down over the course of the season is something i'm personally so excited to see!!), and i think all of this is subconscious blogging culture stuff that people are not engaging with on purpose, so the lack of grounding they have isn't obvious to them and therefore the stakes seem both dismal and overwhelming.
once again like... well... i'm not doing that... so i'm having a good time....!
a final button on this section too is, sorry a little gatekeepy but i am talking about only my perspective and my experience here, i've watched the regs change a lot. in real time and as i said, archived seasons too. i think a lot of the super-active super-upset people i've seen are newer fans so they literally don't know what it's always like. i mean this descriptively! not judgementally! but of course your first time with this fundamental instability is scary when you're used to the really stable previous era.
i love it when engines explode on track and there's this randomass "WHO DIES TODAY" russian roulette element of races. the aston martin drama has been fascinating me. i love when there's a huge lack of information and we get to see in real time what teams are smarter and better and therefore faster than the rest. i like seeing this in the drivers and in the teams, like the news a couple days ago about different ways to take advantage of the mercedes' engine and some of the client teams being frustrated. f1 is an engineering competition!! i like the engineering!! the engineering being turbulent doesn't mean i doubt the skill of my driver!!
in the australian gp max couldn't overtake lando--i'm sorry guys but lando was better at battery management AND max's recharge wasn't working correctly. it's objectively an interesting situation if you're not in the mindset that max not being able to overtake lando means that there's a need to suddenly get defensive about max's skill and whatever like somehow his four championships are under investigation. the first twelve laps were sooooo fun and i was genuinely astonished to log onto tumblr and see how mad everyone was.
SPEAKING OF THE FIRST TWELVE LAPS OF 2026'S AUSTRALIAN GP
okay i'm supposed to be talking about how my hope and enjoyment is high but, full transparency, i just fully crashed out and had to delete a lot because guys. what the fuck. do you mean. "fake overtakes". overtakes that didn't stick? failed attempts to pass other cars have been in the sport since literally race one. every way of getting cars close together that's been introduced to a formula one car is in some way "artificial", because the cars need to be able to close on each other for there to be a race. my good-faith interpretation of what's meant by a "fake overtake" is an attempted overtake from driver X while going at the same relative speed with the same power availability as driver Y so the two of them swap the lead a few times and it stays as it was before. it's fake bc of the lack of ultimate change? that's a completely legitimate sequence made in the first five minutes of the first race where the energy distribution worked that way so any failed attempt to 'make it stick' can be easily attributed to neither driver having any experience with how to deploy their systems correctly, AND this is the kind of thing that leads to smarter drivers overtaking in smarter places with better energy management, which is fun to watch them figure out!! four position swaps of the race leader wheel-to-wheel crazy active midfield and it doesn't count because, what. i really really am struggling to steelman the argument of why it doesn't count.
so uhmmmm yet again i'm happy becauseeeee. that's not my perspective.
CONCLUSION
i hope i didn't write ragebait.... i also do apologize microphone anon for the salt that snuck in here despite me trying hard to remove it!! any friends or pals or anons who disagree with any of this obviously i would loveeeee to have good faith yapping sessions with anyone who'd like to engage with this post. but i am also going to say in advance the tone of this discussion i wrote this all up responding to, that tone and general attitude people seem to have is very bad and i'm going to shamelessly ignore anyone who's mean to me hahahahaha <3
the reason i struck out most of my reg explanations is because i'm taking my own advice about not wanting to present myself as an educator or a credible source when that's not true. i have worked very hard to understand these cars but being able to struggle through yourself and being able to explain correctly is different. i'll re-link that chain bear video here at the end and i'd love to direct attention to yelistener, specifically his video from yesterday about battery management, and this other one comparing laps of the australian gp across three different years.
my second attempt at drafting this, the one talking a lot about my personal experience, i didn't like it because it came across as gatekeepy as fuck. like, "your opinion doesn't matter because you only started watching recently". anyone can watch old races. legally, or if money is tight, lol, dm me. i do value watching the races and learning information about the cars from primary sources. but, it's never ever too late to get interested in learning about something and your opinion extremely does matter, no matter how recently you started watching! like i'm sooo new to rpf and i think my opinion matters so why wouldn't i also think the opposite about newer fans to the sport? fuck redditors who make fun of drive to survive fans forever.
the reason i got so snagged on comparing rpf ways of thinking about drivers/other means of analysis, is because i really do think it sneaks up on you, and i really DO think it's way more fun to let those scales fall from your eyes. i'm not saying 'stop disliking a guy you dislike', stop cheering for the guy you're cheering for'. that's sports!!! but i am saying, there's a higher chance than you probably think that you're in an echo chamber, and a chamber is much less fun than an open racetrack.













