seen from Kuwait

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Ireland
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from Uruguay
seen from China

seen from France

seen from Israel
seen from Israel
seen from Australia
seen from Germany
seen from Israel
seen from United States

seen from Switzerland
seen from Italy
Moving toward a less deceptive interface...
So how do we tell whether our mental model is closer to reality rather than just rhetorically convincing? The answer that has slowly emerged in philosophy and science is not a single test but a set of structural constraints that good models must satisfy. These constraints allow us to detect improvement without requiring direct access to reality. By setting these limits, we can check whether we are mentally moving closer to reality or moving away from it.
The third constraint is explanatory compression. Better models explain more phenomena with fewer assumptions. When a single framework unifies previously unrelated observations, it suggests that the model has captured deeper structure in the world. This kind of compression appears throughout the history of science. For example, one set of physical laws can explain planetary motion, falling objects, and ocean tides. Persuasive stories usually accumulate extra assumptions rather than simplifying them.
Wondering how long it’s going to take to sink in that the home I’m in now is mine, i.e., not an Airbnb. It’s been unsettling the past three months but also a good reset on what I “need” vs want. We reduced our belongings at least by half and still have too much I wonder why I’m holding on. I have too much cargo!!!
@lissongallery
Download (SFS).
Download ( Dropbox ).
Enjoy!!! Please let me know if you encounter any problems with my cc.
Portrait “Study” Attempt #1