1. Why do I love Spider-Man so much?
When I was a kid, all I ever got was Spider-Man (even though I never truly realized it). The reason is that he’s not a morally “perfect” hero. Look at Batman and Superman, two of the most iconic superheroes. They’re great characters, but they’re “morally” perfect and don’t have any personal, deep character flaws. Or look at the Avengers. As an example, Steve Rogers is more morally perfect than Superman, whether you like it or not. But all of those characters often get past their “deep” personal flaws. Tony Stark used to be arrogant, but right now in the comics he’s not arrogant. The most interesting thing about the Hulk is the relationship between Bruce Banner and Hulk, but Bruce Banner is generally a nice person who was there at the wrong time. The point I am trying to make is that for the majority of the Marvel characters, they are morally perfect, or they easily overcome their deep, personal, character flaws, except Spider-Man. I may think Last Remains was underwhelming, but what I like about Nick Spencer’s run is that he completely dissects and analyzes Peter Parker. - This is one of my Spider-Man comic panels to depict my austere love for Peter Parker/Spider-Man!
Unlike Tony Stark who gets over his arrogance, unlike Bruce Banner who was just a good dude but turned complicated due to a freaky accident, Peter Parker is a hero who is inherently selfish.
That’s one of the reasons what I love about Spider-Man, that he tries to do the right thing, even if he isn’t morally perfect.
In these pages, Kindred explains that Peter’s greatest flaw is his hubris and selfishness. Peter didn’t let Sin-Eater cleanse Norman Osborn’s sins because he couldn’t STAND the fact that someone was defeating his arch enemy.
Peter was so greedy and selfish that he thought only he was the only ONE who can defeat his arch enemy. Peter Parker has hubris, which means he thinks only his methods can work and always makes the decisions for others.
And every time Peter messes up, instead of owning up to his mistakes, he begs and makes deals with the devil.
Kindred also makes a point where Peter Parker is selfish. He mentions how he didn’t turn in Norman Osborn to the cops years ago NOT because it was the right thing to do, but because Norman Osborn forgot his secret identity.
So basically, Peter Parker created his own arch enemy because of his selfishness and hubris.
I think that is actually great writing. It shows that even when Spider-Man does the right thing and tries to be self-less, he isn’t morally perfect and his selfishness holds him back.
This also ties back to the point where Peter’s selfishness caused his father figure (Uncle Ben) to die.
This also ties in Superior Spider-Man, where Superior Spider-Man (in Doc Ock’s mind) basically exposes Peter’s “no-killing rule”.
People can make the point how Spider-Man is a “bad” person because every time he becomes a superhero someone dies, or that he’s a bad person because even when he becomes a hero, his personal flaws get in the way.
Personally, I think that makes Peter Parker a great hero. Because instead of succumbing to his flaws and being a complete villain, Peter Parker tries to be the best person he can be. He isn’t perfect and is made out of flaws. He tries to improve himself and be better because no matter the odds, no matter the excuses, no matter his vulnerabilities, no matter the impact on himself and his personal life and loved ones, no matter how hard it is, no matter how really it’s not his responsibility: He will always do what’s right. He’ll help the ones in need, he’ll risk his life against some crazy lethal bad guy. He’ll do it because he “has” to, not because he “can” or “want” to.
His extreme sense of responsibility is beyond explanation. His guilt-complexity for not stopping the burglar who killed his uncle has shaped his life. Never again would he let anyone down.
And what’s even worse? Most of the time, he’s seen as a threat, a menace, and misunderstood. He’s not acknowledged for his heroic actions, nor praised or appreciated .Yet, he still does it.
He has many reasons to not being Spider-Man, yet letting anyone down is too much of a burden to carry on his shoulders. Being Spider-Man could screw up his own life as Peter Parker; he could lose his job, his love life, but he’d still do it. He has to worry about paying his bills and taking care of his aunt while he’s fighting a deadly foe. It’s also the fact that Spider-Man wears a mask in order to protect his identity. Anyone would want, as a superhero, to be recognized by people and become prominent and well-reputed to the world but Peter chose to cloak his identity in order to protect his loved ones. He chose love over fame, and that is the wisest decision a hero could ever make. The fact that Spider-Man wears a mask clearly gives no indication of who is inside the mask. Stan Lee clearly stated in one of his interviews that Spider-Man is a fundamental symbol to eradicate racism because anyone can wear the mask and become Spider-Man! Whether you are of the opposite gender, whether you belong to a different ethnicity or ethnic group, whether you come from a different social class, it doesn’t matter because anyone can take on the Spider-Man mantle! Being Spider-Man gets sometimes in direct conflict with being Peter Parker. If he doesn’t go to stop that bad guy, he will be safe and can do whatever important to him, but that means that a policeman can get hurt. Who will he choose? Peter, or some totally random stranger who might not get back to his family again? He chooses the latter.
Spider-Man is the pure embodiment of heroism and self-sacrifice. That’s just one of my infinite reasons why I adore Spider-Man to bits.