#syscourse asks

[oceanic-discourse]

You can't be pro-endo but anti-radqueer btw, hope this helps!

I would like to see a source for this, anonymous.

[the-fox-collective]

how would you define system stability in fronters outside of having a host?

Oh this is fun!

Okay okay so first I think that this applies even to systems with a host, so bear that in mind. Also our system is very reliant on our host so I don't have the experience of not having a host, or not needing a host. However, I'm going to answer to the best of my ability anyway.

I think stability is something that changes from system to system, and there's no singular correct definition.

1. Having the ability too choose whether you (singular alter) want to be fronting.

Being able to step out of front when needed. The reasons for needing to step away from front can vary but some common ones, in our experience, are trauma, stress, front exhaustion (fronting too long), and not being the right alter for the situation.

Making innerworld more pleasant, if you have one. With visualisation we have made a lot of nastier places in innerworld into sanctuaries for the alters living there, which greatly improved our stability as alters weren't constantly fighting for front to get away from innerworld.

2. Emotional stability

We have episodes of intense, explosive anger and working on that has improved our relationships with others and our relationship with ourself. We aren't short tempered anymore, we have a larger stress tolerance. This means the whole system is able to cope better with anger and frustration.

Dealing with (finding coping mechanisms or medication for) depression, anxiety, anger, sleep problems etc can greatly improve stability.

I also think stability involves not being impulsive to the point of destruction. Everyone acts on impulse, but it becomes problematic when it starts to harm you or the people around you (for example suddenly running away or making drastic life decisions based on little information).

I don't think you need a host to be a stable system, at all. I believe that stability involves getting each part to compromise and communicate so that they aren't causing harm to the system.

[oopsallsyscourse]

I am once again asking for syscourse questions.

I'm looking for some questions on our recent fusion since I want to talk about it more, but I have no clue what area to talk about. Feel free to be as invasive as you want.

[pro-willo-miku]

If you think all endo systems are created you aren’t pro endo. Sorry I don’t make the rules.

not all endogenic systems are created systems, but created systems fall under the endogenic label, so being pro endo means being pro created systems! hope this helps!

[chaos-in-one]

Syscourse ask:

Every syscourser is now a fox. Present a fox image (online or drawn, I know you're an artist) that represents the major stances.

Oooo I like this idea! I'm just going to do ones for 3 of them, I know that there many more but I don't want to overcomplicate things for myself

Anti Endo

Syscourse Unaligned/Neutral

Pro Endo

Decided to pick from drawings I've done of foxes to give myself a little challenge

[oceanic-discourse]

as someone who is mostly anti rq (more rq critical than neutral thats for sure. heavily anti-xenosatanist/anti-harmful contact tho because kids cannot consent to adults and i only support harmless transid transition such as transplurals doing willomancy) and an endosys of course you can be anti-rq and pro-endo lmaooooo what tf was that anon thinking

That anon's thought process will be one of life's greatest mysteries, that's for sure.

[oceanic-discourse]

To go along with the last ask, whats the difference between willomancy and tulpamancy?

From what we know, tulpamancy seems to be rooted in spiritual and religious beliefs, while willomancy is not.

(Disclaimer: We are not experts on tulpamancy, and we are still educating ourselves on it, please feel free to add additional information in the comments or reblogs of this post.)