Nipsey Hussle 💯🔥

seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from Switzerland

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Syria
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from France

seen from Switzerland

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Ireland

seen from Germany
seen from China

seen from Mexico

seen from United States
seen from Germany
Nipsey Hussle 💯🔥
Was the Word “God” or “a god” in John 1.1?
By Bible Researcher Eli Kittim 🎓
John 1.1 (SBLGNT):
Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς
τὸν θεόν, καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος.
John 1.1, which is a throwback to Genesis 1.1, aims to define the primordial relationship of “the Word” (i.e. Christ) to God. But certain skeptics have challenged the idea that the fullness of the godhead was in Christ (Col. 2.9), who is said to be “the Word” (i.e. ὁ λόγος). Specifically, Jehovah's Witnesses have raised the argument of “a god” in John 1.1, implying that Christ is a lesser and inferior god that was created. Let’s explore that assertion. John 1.1 is traditionally broken up into three phrases that are separated by commas:
1st phrase: Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος,
2nd phrase: καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς
τὸν θεόν,
3rd phrase: καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος.
First, to suppose that John is talking about many gods, or more than one god, is a theological speculation and a grammatical imposition that is going beyond what is written in the text or what we know about the theology of the Gospel of John.
Second, John *did* mention the definite article τόν in the second phrase, and so he is not obligated to repeat it in the third phrase, as that would be redundant and tautological.
Third, another reason why the third phrase of John 1.1 doesn’t require the definite article (before the term θεός) is because it was already *used* in the second phrase, and therefore it necessarily *carries over.* For example, if I were to write, “I have a pretty good temper, and a very amiable disposition,” I would not be required to repeat the first part of the phrase. In other words, I wouldn’t be required grammatically to write “I have a pretty good temper, and [I have] a very amiable disposition.” The “I have” is *carried over* and doesn’t need to be repeated. It would be considered redundant. Similarly, in addressing τόν Θεόν with a definite article in the second phrase, John doesn’t have to repeat τόν Θεόν in the third phrase, since it is *carried over.* Here’s another example. I could write “God is one being, not two beings.” But that’s redundant. Now, if I were to rewrite the same sentence correctly and say “God is one being, not two,” would anyone argue that the term “two” may not necessarily refer to the concept of being because the word “being” is not mentioned? That’s the same kind of argument that skeptics are raising here in John 1.1.
Since John has already established (as a monotheist) that he’s talking about one (and-only-one) particular God (namely, τόν Θεόν) in the second phrase, then this syntactical construction must necessarily *carry over* into the third phrase. In other words, the term Θεός in the third phrase grammatically refers back to “the God” (τόν Θεόν) mentioned in the second phrase. Therefore, when John writes “τὸν θεόν” (in the second phrase), “καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος” (in the third phrase), the “God” of the third phrase is a direct reference to “the God” of the second phrase. It’s obviously the same “God” in both phrases, not a different one. And given that God is one being, not two, which other god could John be possibly referring to?
In Greek, the third phrase in John 1.1 is actually read in two different ways, not only as “the Word was God,” but also as “God was the Word.” In the third phrase, there’s no ontological distinction between God and the Word——after all, they share one being: “I and the Father are one” (Jn 10.30)——because John already made the distinction (of persons) in the second phrase.
Thus, the “a god” argument of the Jehovah’s Witnesses——which is raised in “The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures (NWT)——is totally bogus and unwarranted both grammatically and theologically!
Wiccan Tips
Pt2. Deities pt2
There is no supreme force of evil in Wicca.
The God is seen as the masculine form of divinity, and the polar opposite, and equal, to the Goddess.
The Goddess is especially connected to the Moon and stars and the sea, while the Horned God is connected to the Sun and the forests.
The Goddess is often seen as having a triple aspect; that of the maiden, mother and crone. The God is traditionally seen as being the Horned God of the woods. A key belief in Wicca is that the gods are able to manifest in personal form, either through dreams, as physical manifestations.
Some Wiccans are polytheists, believing in many different deities taken from various Pagan pantheons, while others would believe that, in the words of Dion Fortune, "all the Goddesses are one Goddess, and all the Gods one God". Some Wiccans are both duotheistic and polytheistic, (and sometimes a combination of duotheism, polytheism, and pantheism), in that they honor diverse pagan deities while reserving their worship for the Wiccan Goddess and Horned God, whom they regard as the supreme deities.
The God
The God is traditionally seen as the Horned God, an archetypal deity with links to the Celtic Cernunnos, English folkloric Herne the Hunter, Greek Pan, Roman Faunus and Indian Pashupati. Horns are traditionally a sacred symbol of male virility, and male gods with horns or antlers were common in pagan religious iconography throughout the ancient world.
Horned God of hunting, death and magic who rules over an after-world paradise often referred to The Summerland
In Wicca, the Green Man is also often associated with the Horned God, though he does not always have horns.
The Goddess
The Goddess is seen as the Triple Goddess, meaning that she is the maiden, the mother and the crone. The mother aspect, the Mother Goddess.
the Great Mother who gives regeneration and rebirth to souls of the dead and love to the living.
The divine couple in Wicca, with the Lady as Hecate, the witchcraft goddess, and the Lord as Pan, the horned god of the wild Earth. The lower figure is Mercury or Hermes, the god or divine force of magic - as shown by his wings and caduceus.
Last bit of Bad God art for the moment. Hope you guys have enjoyed it 😊
Yule Fire 🔥 #witchesofinstagram #witch #fire #thegod #flames #wiccan #yule #yuletideseason #december #winter #wintersolstice #spell #spellwork #light #wicca
@galaxybeginnings
“Wait what? How is that a dare?! I mean like, yeah I do need to take a break once and awhile, but to use a dare to make me do so? You do know a dare is something like ‘I dare you to go up to that random guy and kiss him,’ that kind of thing. I’d rather get he flick to the forehead than scramble up a plan to do that! Or~ You could help me by showing me what a vacation looks like. I do have a free weekend coming up.” Keana smirked at her idea.
Hades, of course, being himself, never truly grasped the concept of truth and dare. Oh well, at least he had tried. “Have you never been on a vacation before?” He asked, wondering why he would have to show someone what a vacation looked like. Or was she doing what humans usually do and saying something other than they mean? Sarcasm, flirting and all things of that sort tend to be lost upon the god. The way she said it though made him think she meant something other than she said. “What sort of place did you have in mind?”
Just looked in the mirror like "Arite, arite, arite..." #tunechi #bbmas #thegod