[shamebats]

[coraled]

when ur a phuckingn babey

[nihonio]

a little creacher

[untitled13945]

show me how far your alchemy abilities go, chief alchemist <3

[zyuqingz]

Windblume with you

[tetherds]

he’s banned from albedo’s lab now.   /   based on this audio.

[tetherds]

30/11

[lostcryptids]

i love asshole fictional men only <3 bc if they were real i’d attack them like a wild animal and tear them to shreds 

[lostcryptids]

some people are like ohh if he was real id kiss him <3 ok well if he was real i would jump on his back like an ape ready to kill 

[catie-does-things]

if you want your female characters to both have agency in the story and be complex human individuals then sometimes bad things have to be their fault

[enrychan]

“The closer rebel characters come to a definable ideology, the more likely they are to be written as villains. At the same time, the emotive aspects of rebellion - the heroism of the underdog, the thrill of fighting the power - are rendered safe for public consumption by taking out any explicit political ideology. … The effect of all this is to suggest that violence is somehow more sympathetic the less its perpetrators believe - that heroism decreases the more detailed your policy proposals get. If Luke Skywalker was fighting for galactic communism, or Daenerys intended to create a series of peasants’ councils to govern Westeros, or Harry Potter wanted to smash the Ministry of Magic and overturn wizard supremacy, we would have to confront serious and difficult questions about when political violence is appropriate, for whose benefit, and for what purposes. I don’t believe those are questions pop culture is incapable of asking. They are questions we do not want to ask.”

— Alister MacQuarrie, Outlaw Kings and Rebellion Chic (via secularbakedgoods)

[queeranarchism]

Related: in almost all these stories, the hero seeks to restore something or stop a villain from creating a big unwanted change. All was well until the villain decided something needed to change. The status quo is okay, change is bad. If the story starts at a bad moment, there was a good status quo before it that needs to be restored. These are counter-revolutionary narratives.

Very rarely do we see fiction where the hero decides to make the world better not by restoring something but by creating something new and the villains are those who resist the change. They couldn’t tell stories like that because that would require for the hero to have an idea of what a better world would look like.

[valtsv]

Megamind was a murderer and a dictator and a catfisher but go off.

i didnt know hal the incel camera guy had a tumblr

[aqua-regia009]

• The Astral Man | Original piece by Sascha Schneider in 1903. • Yvonne | Origina piece by William-Adolphe Bouguereau in 1896. Touched by Clayshaper

[ffxvcaps]

[gavinom123]

smug bastard vibes

[cartethyia-fleurdelys]

[cartethyia-fleurdelys]

[vi14m2lg7m]

Ragnvindr babysitting service

[tetherds]

A few weeks ago someone on Twitter posted about how someone on Facebook said Ren was emotionally abusive. I-I...

ren was told to shut up, and stop talking by the two people who are supposed to care for him most in the world. although ren’s lack of communication and emotional expression is becoming an issue with his personal relationships, if i was genuinely trying to express myself and was told to “screw talking” while in the middle of expressing how difficult it was to communicate one’s feelings, or snapped at with a “that’s enough” mid breakdown, i would be reluctant to express myself again too.

ren’s behaviour isn’t emotionally abusive? i’m not sure where they’re getting that from. ren’s never acted dishonestly in favour of swaying someone else’s intentions. ren finally expressing that he has his own agency, and would like to voice it, and immediately getting labelled as emotionally abusive for having his own thoughts and feelings ... that sounds delusional. a lot of people like to put words into ren’s mouth? and for what? because he doesn’t talk a lot? remember when everyone thought that he was in favour of militia brutality simply because he agreed to help track down a homicidal killer? ( i know they were jokes, but some of you genuinely thought that ren went darkside for no reason. )