Janaina Medeiros
Xuebing Du
cherry valley forever
★
#extradirty
Sade Olutola
Cosmic Funnies
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
AnasAbdin
⁂
YOU ARE THE REASON
Sweet Seals For You, Always
NASA
Today's Document
Origami Around
Show & Tell
PR's Tumblrdome
Stranger Things
Kaledo Art
blake kathryn
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Taiwan
seen from Bulgaria
seen from Romania
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
@the-young-scribe
Some basic statements from the curator of this blog,
Trans Rights masc/fem/enby, Transandrophobia is real, Black Lives Matter, Free Palestine, Fuck ICE, Fuck radfems, Fuck zionists, Fuck tankies, Fuck nazis.
I will block if you seem to be in the circles/circling people in any fucked ideology/philosophy, if you really need to view my posts, you can do it logged out.
transcribed:
Michaela Joffe (joffeorama.bsky.social):
I know that fascist attacks on "obscenity" and "pornography" are a very dangerous threat to queer people and art, but the idea that all expressions of all kinks must be treated as default value neutral, or even good, as a result is absurd. porn is art, and so it is open to criticism.
you cannot have it both ways. if porn, kink and obscenity is worth protecting, and I believe they are, that means you can't whine and cry foul when it is criticized and analyzed. your desires, like everything else, exist in larger contexts, and sometimes they are homophobic, misogynist and racist.
the idea that all expressions of human desire are equivalent, and exist free from any larger historical, cultural, artistic or interpersonal contexts… that is absurd. why would desire alone be unique in that way? why would kink be different from every other human expression? ridiculous.
I am not swayed by accusations of "puritanism" made in defense of straight men's corrective rape fantasies or white peoples' racist roleplay. I do not believe such accusations come from a sincere desire to protect filth, a noble pursuit, but from a childish fear of judgement. from discomfort.
"if you accuse a trans woman of anything I will simply not believe you. by accusing a trans woman of literally anything you will get her harassed by transphobes and that is your fault. and also even if she did the thing by talking about it you're not doing anything about it so it's useless and I hate you."
"what if she's racist? I am a black trans woman and many white trans women are racist."
"you see oversensitive darkie this is exactly why I posted this. she probably has a very human and normal and understandable reason to actively be racist, which is normal for racist people. you can't help if she's racist. unless you are willing to personally put in the work to deprogram her racism why would you want to talk about her being racist? who gave you the authority to do that? what's that? this is actively harmful to you and other people she is being racist to? too bad. by talking about it to warn people or anything kiwifarms will kill her."
they are so obsessed with invoking the specter of the kiwifarmer to dismiss actual problems within their community
PFFFGHKFK
"fiction doesn't affect reality. anyway..."
"...i consume this sort of media to better cope with my trauma" ok so it affects the reality of your mental state
"...just because it turns me on, that doesn't mean i'd actually DO those things except for roleplay" ok so it affects the reality of your sexuality
"...i just find this stuff thought-provoking" ok so it affects the reality of your understanding of the world
"...we have our own community, and it's harmless!" ok so it affects the reality of your interactions with others
"...it helps me explore my identity" ok so it affects the reality of your self-awareness
"... but-" OK SO IT REFLECTS THE REALITY OF YOUR POSTING AND TALKING AND THINKING
whether or not the influence is positive or negative, i'm not going to debate that right now. i'm not arguing that consuming XYZ makes you do XYZ, it's more complex than that. my main point is that this is the stupidest, most easily disproven, thought-terminating quip i regularly read on here.
The victim who made the Patricia Taxxon video retracted her allegations.
https://ibb.co/mrnNfYX4 https://ibb.co/DZD36B4
okay.
she can grow and change from sexually harassing a teenager all she wants, but that's not the only thing patricia has ever done and while i can respect rebecca's wishes and not discuss what happened to her i cannot in good conscience allow patricia to still operate on the internet presenting herself as safe or trustworthy, let alone as an active intellectual or someone to give credibility to. has patricia ever addressed the spamnet used to get people to stop discussing the allegations. has patricia ever addressed her fetishization of maus. has patricia ever addressed her antiblackness.
has patricia ever addressed targeting those affected by the holocaust? has she addressed invoking the nazis to them?
no?
has she ever addressed her racism against asians or black people?
the constant fetishization of children? the fetishization of other people's trauma? the defense of bestiality?
of literally anything?
then genuinely and actually fuck off that was last year not six years ago
anons from her fans threatened to rape me kill me rape kill and eat my cat they threatened to skin my cat and call the police and say i did it so id go to a ward or jail they threatened to fake screenshots of me grooming kids they made entire bot networks to make my blog unusable for months
ive posted the insane shit i got for two years
there is no realm or reason i would ever stop talking about patricia
yeah u freaks up north look and sound exactly like this when u pretend that us southern queers are perfectly complicit in our own eradication - for the heinous crime of not living in a liberal population center.
I keep this image on hand for whenever I see similar sentiments.
a lot of transfems' posting about gendered socialisation makes it clear that they think it's something that they opt into/choose to participate in/have to enjoy to be affected by rather than something that happens to people from the time they are born. people start saying shit like "wow what a little flirt!" about baby boys before they've even developed object permanence. people have gendered expectations for babies based on their cries. mothers overestimate their infant sons' ability to crawl and underestimate their daughters' ability. these attitudes affect how people raise their children. these attitudes affect how children develop their attitudes towards themselves and others.
peers bullying you for your sensitivity, parents blowing up at you for liking Girl Things, boys saying you aren't really a boy because you're a pussy are things that happen to boys because they were born and raised male. being the world's sweetest most gentle and sensitive effeminate little child who never hurt a fly or did a misogyny doesn't make the male socialisation not exist. the socialisation one receives isn't an "I consent!" thing it's the way people treat you differently based on your gender. transitioning later in life doesn't magically stop wider society from being homophobic, transphobic & misogynistic and enforcing rigid expectations based upon this on anyone in society.
I don't think people realize it's social conditioning.
Patricia Taxxon and Hbomberguy
Patricia Taxxon was previously friends with and collaborated with HBomberguy, a popular Youtuber known for his extensive video essays. Some of his most well known videos include ROBLOX_OOF.mp3 and Plagiarism and You(Tube). Patricia composed the music for his videos covering Ctrl+Alt+Del and RWBY.
They eventually stopped speaking to each other, which in itself is not unusual.
However, before being banned from Tumblr, Patricia made a number of posts speaking negatively about HBomb, stating that he was a bad friend and underpaid her.
She also publicly defended James Somerton, the primary subject of the plagiarism video. Somerton was a video essayist who focused on queer media and plagiarized the work of numerous queer authors while making tens of thousands of dollars through Youtube ad revenue, Patreon, and IndieGoGo scams.
On May 14, 2026, HBomberguy made a post on Bluesky that he deleted shortly afterward. He did not mention Patricia by name in the post.
context of Patricia's post:
Patricia's response:
A reddit thread was created, and in the comments Patricia received a considerable amount of pushback.
Hbomb's producer commented on the Reddit thread and asked the mods to take it down.
The thread gained quite a bit of traction.
Patrica then posted the screenshot of what Hbomb had said and continued to talk about the situation on Bluesky.
She received even more pushback.
She then said that she was planning to make a post on her 2nd youtube channel. She deleted the post and then called Hbomb an abuser.
As of May 22nd 2026, Patricia has deactivated her Bluesky.
It needs to be emphasized, while Hbomb was irresponsible in making the initial vague post, he did not mention her by name and quickly deleted it. Patricia, however, continued bringing up the situation herself, which drew further negative attention toward her.
Despite this, some people claim HBomb pedojacketed her.
When it comes to HBomberguy allegedly underpaying Patricia when she was 18 and unsure how to price her commissions, that was definitely wrong. At the same time, I feel the issue would have been better handled privately once Patricia had a better understanding of the value of her work, rather than being discussed publicly after their friendship had ended.
One bit of context as well: PTaxx previously pulled the "I was exploited and underpaid" card on a pair of college students SHE approached to collaborate with who were clear from the start that they had nothing to offer her but future royalties, so she has a habit of agreeing to projects, getting buyer's remorse and then claiming to have been exploited or otherwise mistreated.
publicly talking about what they post is harassment, talking about people they've victimized is harassment, talking about what they've done to you personally is harassment, looking at what they post is stalking, thinking what they post reflects on them is believing in thoughtcrime, sharing what they write verbatim is pedojacketing, and any level of public perception of what these people share is a social murdering mass campaign. it's DARVO all the way down and when it's just their general behaviour being discussed it's Deny & Attack anyway. Open Your Eyes!!!
I like how all of y’all keep sharing the Hbomb post but leave out the context of what he was referencing.
He wasn’t pedo-jacketing shit, that was literally what she said.
It’s not transphobia to not want to associate with someone who posts weird shit like this DAILY.
The reason why so many of y'all's feminism sucks is because you still believe deep down in your hearts that there are only two kinds of people in the world: precious, ethereal, fragile dollthings called "women", and violent, lustful, rage-fueled apes called "men". Until you throw that idea away, 3rd-grade-tier "girls rule boys drool, girls are princesses and boys are stinky :(" is as feminist as we'll ever get-- and I hope it's obvious that that's lightyears away from the bare minimum of where we need to be.
I don't know how I'm supposed to explain to ostensibly trans-friendly feminists that "women are beautiful soft things made of glass, men are obsessed with violence and sex" is exactly what the patriarchy wants you to believe. Patriarchy wants you to believe that being a woman and/or having a vagina (patriarchy generally believes those two things are synonymous) makes one shatter on impact with reality. It makes you easier to control if you are scared shitless of the other half of the population, and it makes you more compliant with your lot in life if you believe it is in the nature of the other half of the population to rape and kill rather than realise those were choices those individual rapists and murderers made. There is no way to make gender essentialism progressive and feminist, because it is one of patriarchy's tools of subjugation. Stop trying to make it progressive.
And I can scream all of that from the rooftops over and over again, and what I hear in reply is "Trans men really are men because no woman would ever decide to become an inherently evil repugnant rapist ape", and "You're so right. Trans women are women because they too are pretty delicate little objects I can fuck", and "You're non-binary? So are you fucktoy non-binary or sexpest non-binary?", and my patience runs ever thinner.
Hi, I want to talk about this since a lot of people have just responded to this with a very simple "lolicon bad" which i feel like doesn't actually contribute to the conversation from the perspective of trying to convince Patricia and her supporters as wrong but rather as evidence to distance themselves from this crowd.
Here are a few of fairly simple arguments against Lolisho outside of the one being mentioned. I believe there is more, but most of them have already been stated.
Lolisho is the most extreme form of the sexualization of children by the adults around them and encourages them to sexualize the aspects of childhood.
Lolisho does not have a proper definition that removes csem from the label and expects the consumer to do that themselves. Voice actors of fiction children can be real, Designs of the characters can be real. Actors can be real. If it is "just art", it implies photography cannot be fictional. If it can then a photograph of a real child can be called a "lolicon", sexual image or otherwise. If it excludes all connection to children then the inspiration to children cannot exist either.
Lolisho sexualizes a specific minority intended to be for the privileged and fundementally does not allow the minority being sexualized to raise concerns about the medium. Both because they dont have the language or the ability to engage. This is an argument that really cannot be argued with on the other side. As if they do, they are arguing for children to engage with a community of adults sexualizing children. It is impossible for them to engage meaningfully, as they would be groomed or coerced into the conversation.
The purpose of lolisho implies that it is real + accurate enough to be considered an outlet for pedophiles. even when the defence of it is that its not based in reality in any way as the children cannot be real. ie. the defence of lolisho by indulgers that claim they wouldnt be attracted with a "real child" because "real children" "dont act like lolis" (patricia taxxon has not said this argument, I am bringing it up as it is a common one). Which brings the concern of what they would do If they found a child that did.
i genuinely can't fucking deal with the larger internet anymore holy shit what the fuck are you people TALKING about. i am at my limit with this stupid bullshit. who the fuck cares if a man is hired to draw medical diagrams for young girls jesus christ we're pearl clutching about medical illustrations now? next you're gonna tell me male pediatricians shouldn't advise parents on their kids' vulva issues? male surgeons shouldn't be in the room when performing a procedure where a woman's breasts or vulva might be exposed? male researchers shouldn't conduct gynecological medical research? sure. better for men to live in ignorance and NEVER ally themselves with us to expand access to sexual education and reproductive healthcare i fucking guess. Twenty thousand likes. i hate it here KILL ME
THIS is the post that got me my first ever anon hate. i'd like to thank the academy tbh
also not related but can ppl on this post being like "yeah STOP being mean to men!!" pls stop cuz that's not the point of what i was saying 💀 i'm not mad bc someone was mean to a man i'm mad bc feminism is being hijacked by bioessentialist conservative Christian moralist bullshit where the goal seems to be the complete and total segregation of women from men instead of like, the material improvement of women's lives. i don't care if some intsta commenter is mean to men i care that feminism is culturally turning into Nu Conservatism
Genuinely extremely ghoulish to wield the horrific murder of a young trans woman for discourse points against trans men and mascs speaking up on our issues. Go fuck yourself, seriously. And stop misusing the term “social murder” especially when talking about a REAL ACTUAL FUCKING TRANSFEMICIDE. This is not transfeminism this is just disgusting behavior.
