- On my mark

@theartofmadeline
Misplaced Lens Cap

pixel skylines
$LAYYYTER

Andulka
Sweet Seals For You, Always
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Monterey Bay Aquarium

No title available

No title available
d e v o n
todays bird

No title available
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
AnasAbdin
🪼

Origami Around

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

Kiana Khansmith

tannertan36
seen from China
seen from Malaysia

seen from Belgium

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from Netherlands

seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@thebatteredroses
- On my mark
elden ringi have: dog
elden ring have: wind
elden ring… have wimbdy dog?
Sometimes I wish I understood tumblr rp because I miss it and sometimes miss the complex relationships of Trinity Blood and exploring them through the ideas of breaking away from canon. Alas.
The purpose of the Democratic Party is to normalize and expand the crimes of the previous Republican president.
The mass deportation machine, drone warfare, the forever wars, illegal detention and torture, suppression of whistleblowers, the full hearted support of the police and the expansion of the prison state, all things Republicans began that Democrats expanded.
The Democratic Party also has another function - subsumption of all radical challenges to the status quo back into support of that same status quo. It’s why every election they appeal to progressives and the left and why after every electoral success they immediately abandon the platform that got them elected even when holding a majority in both houses of congress.
The Democratic Party, representing the “progressive” wing of the imperialist bourgeoisie wants to maintain the daily reproduction of capital accumulation into the hands of a few wealthy warmongers as do the Republicans. But unlike the Republican Party, which represents the openly reactionary racist wing of the imperialist bourgeoisie, the Democrats are willing to provide minor concessions and reforms to the working class and oppressed nationalities to maintain their position of power and wealth. So while representing the same wealthy racist warmongers as the Republicans and pursuing the same domestic security and foreign policy stances, the Democrats through limited domestic social policies constantly at risk of reversal can manufacture consent for the American global police state.
This is why their politics are ever shifting to match popular sentiment, sound incomprehensible in their use of both neoliberal techspeak about “market incentives” to deny expanding welfare and social justice language to promote themselves contradictorily as the party of welfare and rights expansion, and why they adopt so much of the policies of the right while rhetorically appealing to the politics of the left, it is because their role as the imperialist bourgeois party of “compromise” is itself a contradiction. To find a compromise between the interests of wealthy openly racist warmongers, the so-called progressive wing of the warmongering wealthy, and the poor and the oppressed is impossible. Two of these groups have overlapping national and international interests despite conflicts in domestic policy and the last of these groups have no overlapping interests with the former other than living in the same country. Logically, you can’t meet everyone in this situation’s needs especially when the poor and oppressed have no wealth to buy the favors of particular industries and politicians that these two wings of the bourgeoisie do. The contradictions within the bourgeoisie, between the progressive and the reactionary, are usually not antagonistic meaning the conflict between them supports rather than upends the political structures driving their conflict. The contradiction between rich and poor however is always antagonistic, as the bourgeoisie’s political rule depends on the suppression of the working class as an independent self-organized political entity. Practically, compromising these reconcilable conflicts within the rich with the irreconcilable conflict between the rich and the poor means emiseration, poverty, war, state violence, slow defunding of welfare aid programs, and an increasingly fascist United States.
You will never find a compromise between people’s survival, profit maximization and violent racists that will not result in sacrificing people’s survival for the benefit of the other two.
The CDC has always been shit, actually
For anyone shocked and horrified at the CDC relaxing COVID guidance for capitalism, let me share with you a little story from the world of public water:
Many people are familiar with the story of Flint, Michigan, but what was unique about Flint was mostly that it got as much attention as it did. Almost 15 years before Flint, there was a similar leaded water crisis in Washington DC which is less remembered these days. Like Flint, the DC crisis was caused by accident, though this one was motivated by good intentions, not budget.
In 1997, DC decided to switch their water disinfectant from chlorine, which had been used to treat public water in the US since 1908, to chloramine, which had been shown to be safer and more effective. What they didn’t know at that time was that chlorine has anti-corrosive properties, which had been preventing old lead-coated pipes from breaking down. After the switch, with no anti-corrosive present, the pipes began to shed their coatings into the drinking water, causing spikes in lead in public drinking water at levels six to eighteen times the federal action level of 15µg/L.
Let’s be clear: There is no safe level of lead in drinking water. Every bit of lead a child consumes is known to decrease cognitive development and increase behavioral disorders. The action level is the level at which regulators are required to act to reduce a contaminant.
The DC lead issue was discovered and first reported in 2001, but it didn’t start really making headlines until 2004. In those years between 1997 and 2004, elevated lead levels in drinking water are estimated to have directly caused to more than 200 stillbirths and more than 2000 miscarriages. We cannot accurately quantify the impact on children who drank DC water during those years.
To understand what happened next, you need to understand how public water is regulated in the US. A municipal water system is monitored and regulated by a state EPA, which in turn is regulated by the federal EPA. For example, the Michigan EPA was found responsible for failing to adequately monitor and regulate the water in Flint.
This was an issue for DC in particular, because it is not a state and therefore does not have a state EPA to oversee water quality. Its water is directly regulated by the USEPA, which investigated itself and found no wrongdoing (go figure). After the Washington Post started to raise the alarm about the issue in 2004, the CDC was called in to investigate the USEPA.
What followed was perhaps one of the most damaging medical reports ever written. The CDC went to homes in the worst contamination levels, tested the lead levels, and then tested the blood of children in those homes. They found, miraculously, that elevated lead in drinking water did not significantly contribute to elevated blood lead levels. This conclusion was, of course, absurd, and didn’t take into account the fact that these peoples had known about the lead for 3 years and hadn’t been drinking the water for 3 years.
But the CDC report stood: leaded water didn’t cause lead poisoning. This report was used to absolve the USEPA of wrongdoing and was afterward used by several governmental agencies to defend not acting upon leaded drinking water, thereby expanding the damage caused by the DC lead crisis exponentially.
The CDC has never been about controlling disease or protecting public health. The CDC’s primary goal is to protect the interests of the federal government.
(Source: “CDC Misled Residents…” by Carol Leonnig, May 2010: https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/19/AR2010051902599.html and more in references at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Edwards_(professor) )
First, I think it’s safe to say that it’s a bad writing decision when you have to explain on twitter why you did it. Second, why are they attempting to rewrite fundamentals of the story? Why would Geralt already know how to be an emotionally connected father? That’s not what I got from Season 1 or the first episode of Season 2 at all. Episode 2 is the first time we meet Vesemir and the other witchers, and I don’t automatically get that Geralt has been loved super well by them. Why would he have been? He literally talks about being starved and beaten at Kaer Morhen? And we know the trials are awful. Plus, Geralt hardly mentions the other witchers in Season 1. So why should viewers assume that an outcasted, alienated group of monster hunters knows how to love (in a healthy, emotionally in-tune way)? It would make so much more sense of we saw the show’s stoic, stunted Geralt struggling the handle his fatherly emotion for Ciri. Why shouldn’t Netflix Geralt struggle with that? It’s infuriating how much the writers lean into the audience’s foreknowledge of the story and characters only to butcher and rewrite it to their whims.
Azem: Alright, what’s something good you did today?
Emet Selch: I prevented a murder.
Azem: Well, how did you do that?
Emet Selch: Self control.
Hythlodaeus: It was beautifully done, if I say so myself.
Honestly, as an eastern european the casting discourse around Netflix!Witcher is so tiresome. On one hand there are blatantly racist people who hate the fact that POC were cast at all, on the other people who push for diversity but will come for your throat the moment you suggest they should have cast slavic/eastern european actors because all they hear is “they should have only cast white actors”. I think most americans don’t realize how big and culturally diverse Eastern Europe is-
pt2- there are many ethnic minorities and mixed people, especially in countries bordering Anatolia/Asia. And sure, most of us are white but eastern european/slavic does not necessarily equal white. They could have cast POC who are also slavic/eastern european, they just didn’t because the process of hiring american/british actors was clearly easier. And then there’s people who try to shut this discussion down entirely, because us eastern europeans are still light skinned and are thusly-
p3- in “no need of representation” as if it’s every day they get to see our culture, a story that originated from it or us in a role other than mobsters, weapon dealers, traffickers or spies with funny accents in american media. It’s disheartening because the people who do this are very often the same who call for diversity in media. It’s just that the way that we talk about diversity online is- ironically- very americanized and does not take into account the experiences of people abroad.
I’m just gonna let you soundboard off of me for this one, anon. I got nothing to add. 👏👏👏
The Vatican family being...a family???
ʏᴏᴜ ᴛᴜʀɴɪɴɢ ᴍᴇ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴀ ꜰɪᴇɴᴅ
i love how caim is an absolutely irredeemable protagonist and person. he’s such a piece of shit. he loves mass murder so much. his sole redeeming trait is that he loves his literal dragon wife and just for that i forgive literally everything he’s ever done. all respect to him being a LITERAL dragonfucker.
World of Warcraft waifus
What's bad about getting vaccinated? I get the mask aversion, since the masks are basically useless, especially with people constantly touching them, and moving them around like idiots, and never changing them. But vaccinated? You're kinda following the footsteps of all the anti-vaxx people who claim it causes (insert random reason) and computer chips. : |
I'm 100% not against vaccines period, I'm against this specific vaccine that has so much weird shady shit surrounding its creation
Anti-vaxxers: “Vaccines cause autism and it’s all a global conspiracy. Putting toxins in your body is only going to make you sick and vaccines are toxins.” -insert a bunch of other crazy as fuck things here-
COVID ‘vaccine’ Skeptics: “This vaccine wasn’t clinically tested for long enough as all over vaccines were given proper clinical trials before release and it’s also not FDA-approved like other vaccines are. On top of that, they’re not real vaccines and are a different type of treatment. Then there’s a bunch of shadiness surrounding this whole thing so I’m just not comfortable getting it.”
Pro-mask/Pro-jab cult members: “There is no difference between these things. Clearly both groups of these people hate all vaccines and think they cause autism, despite the fact that the skeptics clearly have no problem with other vaccines. But the news and our politician masters call them anti-vaxxers so they are!”
Come wailing wind chill my heart Come the rain fall on me as I depart
ah Sif, there you are