OH-MY-GANDALF!

Phoebe // 22 // New Zealand

[thoodleoo]

very important question for all of my greek myth buffs out there: who has fatter tits, aphrodite or dionysus? asking for a friend

[thoodleoo]

[lady-redhaired]

Me in 2022 when the pandemic hasn’t ended yet because people don’t know how to act right and I’ve been holed up in my house for three years acquiring a new flavor of crazy, going to open the door for the guy in the hazmat suit that’s come to deliver my groceries

[dianas-shortgalpal]

[hunter-rodrigez]

[supermariomamafucker]

what is that thing

[supermariomamafucker]

what is that thing

[radiofreederry]

[welpnotagain]

[kate-likes-this]

Pedro as Prince Oberyn (2014) Game of Thrones, Season 4

[aletheyass]

i literally wasn’t made to work sorry to the freaks who enjoy this grindset shit but you literally have psychological problems. i just want to sit and think and maybe talk and eat and drink

[elderly-scrolls]

there should be a secret 8th day of the week just for playing dnd

[pluckywallflower]

This is the legality that always gets me: A deceased person cannot be forced to use their organs to save someone's life. It's sacred body autonomy. The federal government now says a woman must use her organs to support potential life. Women have fewer rights than dead bodies.

[homunculus-argument]

If you go on the internet and google how to dry out a drenched book, you'll find a forum where someone else asked the same question and was told to go fuck themselves and just google it.

If you go on the internet and confidently announce that the best way to dry out a drenched book is to dip it in alcohol and light it on fire, and nobody else has ever figured out a better way to dry out a book without damaging it. Argue about it with absolute confidence for long enough, and somebody will write you out a peer-reviewed 30 page tutorial with an essay section with 15 cited sources that offers you three different, separate, far superior methods on how to dry out a drenched book.

While the human desire to help one-another may wane or falter, you can always count on the righteous anger of someone witnessing a stranger being Wrong On The Internet.

[sic-semper-hominibus]

[gandalfs-mommy-milkers]

number one priority is being comfy

[gandalfs-mommy-milkers]

literally this is at the top of my list of priorities at all times

[dailyhistoryposts]

The Original Rainbow Pride Flag (1978) by Gilbert Baker.

[unrealunearths]

jot that down

[important-animal-images]

[important-animal-images]

[important-animal-images]

[tonysopranobignaturals-deactiva]

[tonysopranobignaturals-deactiva]

also

[fungalfaggot]

oh you're touch starved? here eat up *fucking punches you*

[invisible-goats]

finally, a knuckle sandwich

[elbiotipo]

When one thinks about "ancient" Native American civilizations and ruins... the thing is that... most of them, they weren't ancient. The Inca were not fully conquered by the Spanish until 1572... for reference, the Mona Lisa was painted in 1502 and Martin Luther made the 95 Theses in 1517.. the "ancient" Aztec Empire was younger than the university of Oxford founded in the 11th century, Montezuma lived at the same time than Leonardo Da Vinci... There are castles that are younger than Machu Picchu, those cities were inhabited by millions just a few centuries ago, and some (Cuzco, México), many actually, are still inhabited today. People speak about the Ancient Maya as if it was some mysterious civilization that was lost, and while it was past its prime at the time of European conquest, the Maya still had city-states and were living in the same areas they live today.

There are still millions of people, right now, who speak Quechua, Nahuatl, and Maya in all their dialects, and I'm just talking about the three most well-known civilizations here... there are millions of Native Americans who still speak their languages and practice their culture and beliefs alive, both thriving and struggling today.

Talking about the "Ancient Inca" or "Ancient Aztecs" makes as much sense as talking about the "Ancient Dutch" or the "Ancient Swedes", and it's another way of erasing them, saying that they just aren't around anymore just like say the Sumerians, or that they just weren't relevant to world history. They were contemporaries to modernity and they're still alive today.

You can talk about the Ancient Olmecs or Ancient Chavín though. Because the Inca and the Aztecs are relatively "modern" but their cultures were just the latest from a cycle of civilizations stretching millenia before Christ.