The Dark Lord (Voldemort)

I am Lord Voldemort

[ghostlynocturnalspirit]

cw: mention of sa

i love the idea of rodolphus wanting sirius, not bellatrix. he was so beautiful, could almost be mistaken for a girl in certain lights... but alas, he was clearly a man with that behavior of his, and rodolphus had respect for men. he would watch, leave a comment perhaps, but no more.

and then sirius disappears, no longer considered a black, and rodolphus sets his sight on the younger brother. he on the other hand is feminine in a way his brother never was. all that reading, his quiet complexion, those big sad eyes... regulus, he can touch. he will never be his older brother but he will do, as a substitute.

[shushutup]

Why does everything have to be so male centric? You take the one character whose whole life revolves around his wife (Rodolphus) and even turn him male centric? What's wrong with you? Aren't there enough men in your fandom?

[thelordofdarkness]

Exactly. Like, if you want Sirius/Lestrange, Rabastan is right there.

[maaleaidahar]

Heir of Slytherin

[yellowrotaryphone]

Severus saw the same desperation and fear he felt when he reached out to Dumbledore in Narcissa when she reached out to save her son Draco. He gave her mercy with no conditional terms that he could profit from. Unlike Dumbledore. Severus was of course scared, but he knew his life was over; he worked to serve and save others. Bellatrix was insane, claiming she would gladly sacrifice any son she could have had to Voldemort. She didn’t have the depth to love someone enough to stand up against the terror of Voldemort. Snape knew the pain of loss and wanted to stop the chance of more pain and loss for Narcissa.

[fugamalefica]

Bellatrix was insane, claiming she would gladly sacrifice any son she could have had to Voldemort. She didn’t have the depth to love someone enough to stand up against the terror of Voldemort.

????

Bellatrix wasn't insane, and she had a great deal of depth to love Voldemort himself. She even stood up for the ungrateful Malfoys all the fucking time, like in DLA where she had to briefly be a target for the humiliation herself because she defended those ingrates. She even went to Spinner's End with her ingrate sister!

[the-purple-dragon]

Her ability to love Voldemort unconditionally is such a central part of her character. And I'm sat here reading that she didn't have depth to love? The woman who spent fourteen years in the worst place in the world and didn't break? The woman who would indeed sacrifice anything and anyone for the man she loves? That woman doesn't have depth? Kill me now.

[thelordofdarkness]

Exactly!! How are people this stupid?

[vintage-bentley]

So, I'm a former radfem and I'm still trying to find my way. I am open to being a radfem again if I find the answers to the questions I'm having.

Anyway, I agree trans activism has a lot of issues. My issue with radical feminism is about the basic ideas, where radical feminists treat the only difference between men and women to be genitals. I'm not really being accusatory because of course radfems aren't stupid and they understand that there are other differences too, but I do think there's a lack of focus on that because they might make them understandably uncomfortable. Not mental, I don't believe in that, but the physical differences themselves can have tremendous impacts practically because the whole world is physical in the end. Personality is, when push comes to shove, secondary. That's my main problem with the idea of gender abolition. Biology itself just has so much effects practically that while gender abolition can work individually, whole societies being structured without acknowledging those sex differences just doesn't make any sense to me.

Respectfully, it sounds like you never fully grasped the idea that sex and gender are completely different.

Radfems acknowledge the differences between the sexes, and the importance of recognising these differences. We absolutely don’t treat the only difference as being genitals. For example, we acknowledge that men and women have different physical strengths (men have more brute strength, women have more survival strength). We also acknowledge that the current society is built around men’s strengths to make it look like men are the physically strong ones (sports being catered to the male body). We also obviously acknowledge the way that men use their strength against women to hurt us.

Gender abolition is just that, gender abolition. It has nothing to do with sex being abolished, because that’s impossible. It imagines a world where sex is a neutral trait and doesn’t have any stereotypes or roles or expectations (aka gender) attached to it. Hypothetically, in a society without gender, of course there’d still be sex differences that would need to be acknowledged. But there’d be no value or concepts of superiority/inferiority or roles attached to these differences. They’d just be neutral facts of life, like difference in hair or eye colour.

[raspberrybakewell]

What anon doesn't seem to realise (and what a lot of people including a lot of self identified "radfems" who came off the back of disillusionment with transgender activism) don't seem to realise is that radical feminism is a whole political ideology and activist movement that encompasses several core principles that you have to agree with in order to be radical feminist to begin with otherwise you're not a radical feminist, you're a different subset of feminist.

The biggest problem with making identity central to activism, especially in social media (doubly so on blogging platforms like tumblr), is that it's lead a lot of people both inside and outside of radical feminism to attach the identity of "radfem" to themselves or others who simply don't align with it based on only one (if even understood correctly to begin with) of several principles. People have forgotten that feminism is, first and foremost, an activist movement. It's not something you inherently are, it's something you actively engage with. It involves learning and action.

So when people write things like this insinuating they can be convinced to become a radical feminist, as though it's a club they're waiting to be sold on and put in their bio, especially when it always comes down to the issue of gender abolition and nothing else, it already exposes a fundamental misunderstanding of what radical feminism is at it's core. Which is being an activist in the fight for the liberation of women from under, and the dismantling of, patriarchy.

Anon, what are your opinions on the nuclear family? Have you thought much about women as the primary victims in war? Have you thought about how socioeconomic disadvantage impacts women uniquely? Do you maybe support the sex industry? Or the beauty industry still? Do you know why radical feminists want to dismantle these industries? If I were to ask you if you were PIV sex critical, would you have opinion on it? Do you know the fundamental differences between radical feminism and other branches of feminism? Are you a part of any feminist groups in your local area? Do you centre women in your daily life?

If you are struggling with the concept of gender abolition, then have you considered doing any feminist reading outside of tumblr to get a full grasp of these ideas and what they mean in the wider context of female liberation?

Some things to consider.

[thelordofdarkness]

Hi! So I am the anon and I thought it would be just better and cleaner to use a sideblog rather than to stay anon. You're not wrong that a lot of women have adopted the radfem label without really engaging with it as a full political framework. Fair enough and honestly it's quite an important observation and I don't blame you for the pattern recognition there because it's a real problem and it does dilute the conversation, but personally, I always engaged seriously with the theory. I left not because I found it too radical or too uncomfortable, but because I found specific foundational arguments unconvincing on their own terms.

As for the questions you've raised, I do have opinions on all of those and they're not simple ones, but the conversation I'm actually trying to have is about mechanism and whether this framework actually solve the problem it identifies. My issue isn't with gender abolition as an aspiration in the abstract but that the physical power differences between the sexes (which predates human culture entirely) cannot be neutralised by dismantling social constructs and a framework that cannot account for that gap between theory and mechanism isn't something I can fully commit to, regardless of how much of the rest I agree with.

I already sent an ask to @vintage-bentley , who's very intelligent and I'd love to hear her thoughts on it, but I'll just copy and paste it here for you as well:

Gender abolition sounds doable and great in theory, but in practice, what about if men were to use their physical strength against women, for example? How can that be stopped in the first place? Because for sex to be a neutral trait at all, the power differences biology unfortunately grants should be neutralised. Eye colour doesn't grant one group a significant physical advantage over another that can be weaponised. I mean blue-eyed people cannot, because of their eye colour, overpower brown-eyed people, nor can brunettes overpower blondes because of their hair colour. I suppose theoretically you could castrate men before puberty or use puberty blockers, but in practice, how would even that work? Unfortunately, misogyny existed long before humans were even able to think in ideas, so ideas of gender can be one part of oppression, but they're not the only source. Sexual coercion, male violence against females, and sex-based dominance hierarchies are documented across other primate species too, and monkeys don't think in ideas. Of course humans have more advanced brains than monkeys, but looking at the average man, there's honestly not a huge difference. Nature is unfortunately extremely unfair and cruel and it's very painful to think about, but men being on average physically stronger than women have huge implications in the real world that go way beyond superiority or inferiority concepts and even the family structure that creates gender roles. This is not to even mention other sex differences. I like the idea of radical feminism, in theory, but when practicality is considered, it feels so idealistic. That's not to say women are doomed to oppression of course, because there are ways to manage male violence, like weapons for women, training, support and safety nets, laws ensuring no sexist behaviour and heavy punishments for sexist behaviour, especially violent behaviour. Slowly, society's structure would start to change. If men are too afraid to hurt women because of actual, extremely harsh legal consequences, even the dumbest and most primitive man would understand in his primal, self-preservation concerned brain that he can't hurt women without being punished tenfold for it. It won't be eliminated completely because perfection isn't really possible, but it would show huge improvements. That's actually liberal feminism though. The current state of liberal feminism is absolutely dog shit. I'm not denying that. It's completely useless and cares more about males (trans women) than actual women. It's not advocating for women's rights at all and is more concerned with maintaining the status quo. It's become in many ways extremely illiberal, but is radical feminism really the solution? Why not fix liberal feminism and bring it back to its roots? That's not to say radfem theory is completely useless because it can and should work to fix liberal feminism, but only the practical and achievable parts. Not in some distant utopian future but right now. Historically, liberal feminism has the far stronger track record of actual, lasting, material wins for women. Women's suffrage, property rights, equal pay legislation, access to education, workplace anti-discrimination law, Title IX in the US, the Equal Pay Act in the UK, were almost entirely delivered by liberal feminists working within existing institutions. They lobbied parliaments, built coalitions, used courts, wrote legislation, and treated the political and legal system as a vehicle. I was reading about women like Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, Millicent Fawcett, Betty Friedan, etc, and they operated squarely in this tradition. They wanted equal access to the same world men occupied and they got it, while radfems only ever had theory.

[vibrantnemesisessence]

Headcanon that Aberforth converted to Islam, which is why he fucks goats.

[thelordofdarkness]

She threw her dirty underwear at Scrimgeour. It was soaked with her cow piss and milk.

'Moo,' Moola mooed coquettishly.

@vibrantnemesisessence

[imperatrix-dissoluta]

Voldemort:

[thelordofdarkness]

Ma'am, I do not drool!!

[imperatrix-dissoluta]

Sorry my Lord, I meant “Drooldemort”, one of your most… questionable… impersonators.

[thelordofdarkness]

Ah, I have heard of that impostor. Most distasteful indeed. As if I would ever drool and fuck an underaged cow!

[thelordofdarkness]

She threw her dirty underwear at Scrimgeour. It was soaked with her cow piss and milk.

'Moo,' Moola mooed coquettishly.

@vibrantnemesisessence

[imperatrix-dissoluta]

Voldemort:

[thelordofdarkness]

Ma'am, I do not drool!!

[thelordofdarkness]

She threw her dirty underwear at Scrimgeour. It was soaked with her cow piss and milk.

'Moo,' Moola mooed coquettishly.

@vibrantnemesisessence

[letheyim]

[thelordofdarkness]

Do you like to get pegged?

Only by your mother.

[thelordofdarkness]

Have you and Rodolphus Lestrange ever had sex?

No. I am not attracted to men.

[vibrantnemesisessence]

And yet, you surround yourself with them 😏

[thelordofdarkness]

Hardly. I always command them to keep their distance!

Also, my dear Melissa, have you ever used these as sex toys?

They would serve the purpose, would they not, if they weren't so slimy and didn't smell of meat?

[vibrantnemesisessence]

Is this flirting, my lord?

[thelordofdarkness]

[crucioslut]

My Lord.. who is this.. Melissa? That's a proper muggle name if I've ever heard one. Who is this?! Why are you discussing sex toys with a muggle!?!!?

[thelordofdarkness]

'Melissa is merely an admirer, my dear. She amuses me when Wormtail is away.'

Three steps brought him close to Bellatrix. He fisted his hand in her hair, her dark curls wrapping round his fingers as he yanked her head back and kissed her hard. When he released her she was panting, lips already swollen and wet, her breasts heaving beneath the silk of her robes.

'Speaking of toys...'

He withdrew the dildo from his robes and held it up between them, watching Bella's heavily-lidded eyes widen as she recognised the exact replica of his cock: eight inches of pale silicone that he'd spent hours perfecting with spell work, copying every vein that ran along the shaft, the slight leftward curve, the foreskin, even the texture of skin. He'd reproduced every detail precisely because if she was going to have a substitute when he was occupied elsewhere, it would be perfect.

'I crafted this specifically for you, Bella.'

She she'd her robes immediately. Her undergarments too were unlaced and discarded until she stood naked before him. He looked at her and his cock hardened fully in his robes, because Bellatrix naked was a sight that never failed to please him. Those ample, delectable breasts with their dark nipples, nipples already stiffening in the cool air, the narrow dip of her waist flaring into wide hips, the curve of her arse, the dark thatch of curls between thighs that were already trembling with anticipation, the Dark Mark stark and black on her pale forearm.

She was exquisite, by far the most beautiful woman he'd ever seen and he'd seen plenty of witches throw themselves at him over the decades. None of them compared to this, to her.

'Get on the bed.'

She scrambled to obey, climbing onto the crimson silk sheets and lying back without needing to be told. Her legs fell open automatically. He activated the toy, watching her hips jerk at the sound alone. Her cunt clenched around nothing, already wet and ready for him even though he hadn't touched her yet..

'You want this?' He pressed the silicone head against her inner thigh, dragging it slowly through the wetness coating her folds, circling her clit just to watch her thighs shake, just to hear the whimper that escaped her.

'Yes, my Lord,' she gasped, e

Her hands were fisting in the silk sheets. He pushed the phallus inside her, her back arching off the bed as he worked it deeper. Her cunt stretches around the shape and size of him, taking it the way she'd taken his actual cock countless times before. He held it there, buried to the base, whilst free hand moved to her breast.

He cupped it, squeezing gently at first, feeling the soft flesh yield beneath his fingers, and then he kneaded it harder, rolling her nipple between his thumb and forefinger. He released one breast to grab the other, giving it the same attention, the same exploration.

'My Lord,' she moaned, and her hips were trying to move so she could fuck herself on the toy, but he held it still inside her.

'Patience,' he said mildly, and he began to move the dildo inlong slow strokes that had her moaning with each thrust. His other hand continued to massage her breasts, alternating between them, squeezing and kneading and pinching her nipples until they were red and swollen.

'Does this please you?' he asked, increasing the speed slightly, watching her face contort.

'Yes — yes, my Lord —'

'this is a gift for you, for when I'm occupied elsewhere,' he said.

He leant down and took one nipple into his mouth, sucking hard whilst the toy continued to fuck her. Her fingers flew up to tangle in his robes and pull him closer. He released her nipple with a wet pop and moved to the other one, laving it with his tongue, grazing it gently with his teeth. All the while the dildo kept fucking her.

'You're quite responsive tonight,' he murmured against her breast. He could feel her heartbeat beneath his lips.

'More,' she begged, and tears were gathering at the corners of her eyes. 'Faster, harder, please —'

He obliged, increasing the speed of his thrusts. His eyes were fixed intently on her lovely, flushed face, watching the way her mouth had fallen open and her eyes had rolled back into her head. Her thighs were trembling now. Her breathing had gone ragged and desperate, little gasps and moans escaping despite his hand on her throat, and he knew she was close. He always knew when she was close because he'd spent years learning every tell, every sign, every minute shift in her expression that signalled her approaching orgasm.

She cried out, her hips bucking off the bed. He had to pin her down with his forearm across her hips to keep her still whilst he worked her towards her peak, fucking her hard with the silicone replica of his cock.

'My Lord — my Lord —'

She was sobbing now, her whole body shaking, and then she shattered, her cunt clenching round the toy as she screamed. Wetness gushed out around the silicone and soaked the sheets beneath her.

He deactivated the toy with a flick of his wand and withdrew it slowly, setting it aside on the bedside table, and then he unfastened his own robes because watching her come had made his cock leak with the need to fuck her himself.

He shrugged out of his robes and climbed onto the bed, positioning himself between her spread thighs.

'Now you'll have the real thing.'

[thelordofdarkness]

Have you and Rodolphus Lestrange ever had sex?

No. I am not attracted to men.

[vibrantnemesisessence]

And yet, you surround yourself with them 😏

[thelordofdarkness]

Hardly. I always command them to keep their distance!

Also, my dear Melissa, have you ever used these as sex toys?

They would serve the purpose, would they not, if they weren't so slimy and didn't smell of meat?

[vibrantnemesisessence]

Is this flirting, my lord?

[thelordofdarkness]

[thelordofdarkness]

Have you and Rodolphus Lestrange ever had sex?

No. I am not attracted to men.

[vibrantnemesisessence]

And yet, you surround yourself with them 😏

[thelordofdarkness]

Hardly. I always command them to keep their distance!

Also, my dear Melissa, have you ever used these as sex toys?

They would serve the purpose, would they not, if they weren't so slimy and didn't smell of meat?

[thelordofdarkness]

Have you and Rodolphus Lestrange ever had sex?

No. I am not attracted to men.

[thelordofdarkness]

🐖🐖🔪

Harry?

[thelordofdarkness]

Lord Voldemort, I have to confess I am taken by you. I want you

I know, Melissa, but I have told you before that I only want Bellatrix!

[thelordofdarkness]

Only book Voldemort has a large penis. Yours is a chode.

Then book Bellatrix must have enjoyed book Voldemort's large penis very much, because book Voldemort and book Bellatrix were definitely fucking like rabbits.